Jan 3, 2014 - solve are cases that will affect the state's ju- risprudence and Illinois' citizens as a whole. The Supreme Court's role is to rule on the constitutionality of issues great and small, to resolve appellate district splits that have con-
supervisory order unless the normal appel- late process will not afford adequate relief and the dispute involves a ... InPhilip Morris, USA, Inc. v. Byron, 226 Ill.2d. 416 (2007), albeit in dissent, Justice Freeman, ... orders in its petition for lea
Name of Case: Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Beach. Jurisdiction: 145 Ill. App. 3d 682 (1st Dist. 1986). Type of Case: estates and trusts. Name of Case: Capsonic Group v. Swick. Jurisdiction: 181 Ill. App. 3d 988 (2nd Dist. 1989). Type of Case: comme
ILLINOIS STATE BAR ASSOCIATION. The Constitution of the State of Illinois broadly declares that â[g]eneral admin- istrative and supervisory authority over all courts is vested in the Supreme Court.â1 Il- linois Supreme Court Rule 383 provides the
VMG Partners, a private equity fund investing exclusively in branded consumer companies, in connection with ... Sale of Sequel to The WhiteWave Foods Company, a leading consumer packaged food and beverage ... Acquisition of Stellar Microelectronics,
manufacturing industries (finalist for 2012 Deal of the Year for Technology, Media & Telecom by The. M&A Advisor) ... Council Tree Communications, a private equity investment firm investing in the communications and energy sectors, in connection with
Acquisition of Solid Gold Pet, a producer of America's first natural dog food and a pioneer of natural, ... chemicals market, in its acquisition of Amber Chemical Company Ltd., a leading global solutions provider for high ... manufacturing industries
STATS ChipPAC Ltd. in connection with the unsolicited tender offer by its largest shareholder Singapore. Semiconductors Technologies Pte Ltd, an affiliate of the Singapore government, to purchase the remaining. 64% stake in the company and all outsta
Acquisition and subsequent sale of Snack Factory, LLC, a company that develops and distributes Pretzel ... Acquisition and subsequent sale of AmerCable Holding Company, LLC and its subsidiaries. - Sale of ... ChipPAC, Inc., a public company in the se
CrispÂ® brand pretzel crackers, to Snyders-Lance, Inc. and S-L Snacks National, LLC. - Acquisition and ... Acquisition and subsequent sale of Speculative Product Design, LLC, maker of the speck (*) brand ... Flextronics International Ltd. and Flextro
protective cases for portable electronic devices such as the iPhone, iPad and MacBook, to Samsonite. LLC. â¢ Industrial Growth Partners, a private equity fund investing exclusively in the manufacturing sector, in connection with the following levera
stock exchange rules. The defendants moved to dismiss, noting that SPG had received an e-mail confirmation from the New York Stock Exchange (âNYSEâ) staff that shareholder approval of the amendment was not required under NYSE rules. The court hel
OFFICe: (866) 558-4465 EXT. 204 ... sent, assuming the duties of chief judge, does American Calcar II break navigation system that was allegedly withheld by the lead inventor ..... Judge Prost and Judge Wallach appear to be operating at the fringes o
Nov 6, 2013 - potential vapor migration or âencroachmentâ impacts. We also discuss EPA's proposed amendments to the all appropriate ... The definition of âmigrationâ has also been revised to include the movement of .... of data or even any ev
âthe purchase or sale of any other security in the. [United States]â20âhas resulted in three potentially inconsistent approaches. The first approach considers whether either the offer or acceptance of the off-exchange transaction occurred withi
Exchange Act.] SECTION 308 OF SOX. Under section 308 of the Sarbanes-Ox- ley Act (SOX), the SEC has the power to add disgorged funds to a disgorgement.
Nov 27, 2013 - Regulatory Enforcement. â¢ FCA imposes worldwide freezing order on suspected boiler room, First Capital Wealth Limited â On 15 November 2013, a suspected boiler room (an outbound call centre selling questionable investments by telep
But it is when Webb is on the brink of trial or in the midst of the ... home, âwinning wayâ with juries and judges that sets him apart from other ..... home. She sat down and cried. It wasn't really good living conditions.â Lonely in a strange
to the .XXX TLD for hosting adult entertainment websites.â Plaintiffs' efforts were stymied by their own complaint when they alleged that Manwin's own YouPorn.com was the most popular free adult video website on the Internet. Thus, since the releva
Mr. Baker as one of the nation's 40 best ERISA attorneys and Chambers. USA (2007â2011) describes him as âan ERISA ... class involving alleged losses to defined contribution plan accounts has become more difficult. In LaRue, the US .... The Spano
Anti-Defamation League First Amendment. Freedom Award. Firm Chairman Dan Webb and Chairman Emeritus. Gov. James Thompson were honored by the Anti-. Defamation League for their commitment to the public interest including their contributions during the
orders and that one of the reasons given for their non-compliance with court orders and CPR provisions was a lack of funds. The ... No reproduction or redistribution is permitted without the written ..... However, it was a different story with regard
must take into account the possibility that Congress will amend. OCLSA, as it did in 2010 to encompass offshore wind farms generally, to include the Jones Act as well. In fact, the US House of Representatives passed a billâH.R. 2360âon December 7
Antitrust Cases Have Routinely Applied Daubert Rules. â¢. FRE 703: Basis of Opinion Testimony by Experts .... his conversation with another expert when expected testimony would have shown there was no divergence of .... the underlying basis for an o
Gordon A. Coffee State of California (In re Lockyer) v. British Columbia Power Exchange Corp. et al. Secured a decision dismissing a $190 million claim against client Allegheny Energy Supply Company, LLC. A FERC administrative law judge found that the California Attorney General had not proved that Allegheny possessed market power when making sales to a California agency during the California energy crisis. The judge further rejected the California AG’s argument that Allegheny should be ordered to make refunds because it allegedly took advantage of a pricing umbrella created by other sellers. In re USGen New England Served as lead counsel in defending USGen New England, Inc., after it elected to reject in bankruptcy a natural gas transportation contract with TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. TransCanada claimed that it was owed more than $50 million in damages for breach of the contract. After a nine-day bench trial and extensive post-trial briefing, the federal bankruptcy court agreed with our position that TransCanada had mitigated all but $3.4 million of its damages. The court accepted our theory on how TransCanada had resold the pipeline capacity originally purchased by USGen to another customer and rejected TransCanada’s argument that its alleged ability to increase pipeline capacity precluded USGen from receiving mitigation credit for resale of the capacity. Midwestern Energy Company Led defense of a Midwestern utility against a claim that it was contractually obligated under a power purchase agreement to provide customers with capacity credits worth more than $30 million. After a hearing and several briefs, an arbitration panel ruled in favor of the utility on all major issues. In re Episcopal Church Litigation Served as lead trial counsel for a multi-firm team representing former Episcopal congregations in Virginia in a battle with the Episcopal Church over property with an estimated worth of more than $40 million. Successfully led the team through two bench trials, with the trial court issuing a series of decisions affirming the right of the congregations to leave the Episcopal Church while retaining their property. The case is presently on remand from appellate court for further proceedings. In re Enron Power Marketing, Inc. Successfully defended a large international consulting firm against allegations that the firm’s employees had withheld evidence during a FERC investigation into Enron’s activities. After an investigation and a series of technical
Attorney advertising materials
conferences and hearings, FERC affirmed a finding by its chief administrative law judge of no wrongdoing by any of the consulting firm’s employees. In re USGen New England Was lead counsel in defending USGen against a $41 million claim brought by Tennessee Gas Pipeline after USGen’s rejection of a long-term gas transportation contract with Tennessee. The case raised novel issues regarding the calculation of future damages and projected mitigation of those damages. After the pipeline alleged that the filed rate doctrine controlled the calculation of damages, we secured a declaratory judgment from FERC stating that state law governed. Ultimately, after extensive discovery and a six-day bench trial, the trial court entered favorable factual findings, reducing the claim to less than $15 million. The case ultimately settled for $9 million. Attala Generating Co, LLC v. Attala Energy Company, LCC Acted as lead counsel in defending a $477 million breach of contract claim arising from termination of a long-term tolling agreement with a power plant owner. The case presented complicated issues regarding the calculation of damages, such as projected future energy prices, the likelihood of carbon taxes, and appropriate discount rates. Managed the case through a one-week arbitration hearing and post-hearing briefs and argument. The case settled favorably before the arbitration panel issued its award. U.S. Ship Management v. Maersk Line Limited Shared duties as lead counsel in an arbitration proceeding involving contract termination rights valued at $25 million. After an evidentiary hearing and extensive briefing, the panel issued an award in favor of our client on all points. Also obtained a preliminary injunction from a federal court in aid of arbitration. National Housing Partnership v. Municipal Capital Appreciation Partners Lead counsel in a dispute arising over foreclosures on low-income housing projects in Maryland and Virginia. Won motion for summary judgment, later affirmed on appeal, extinguishing the claim that our client was liable for partner loans made by NHP to fund improvements to one of the projects. Further led the team through a seven-day bench trial centering on the reasonableness of the foreclosure auction. The case ultimately settled. Sporicidin Int’l v. Baker & Hostetler Co-led a team in defending national law firm against a $70 million legal malpractice claim. At the conclusion of a nine-week trial, a District of Columbia jury found in favor of the law firm on the malpractice claim, finding that none of its lawyers was negligent in representing the former client before various federal agencies. Jennings v. Cedar Cliff After contentious discovery and a four-day jury trial, secured a verdict that the defendant breached a commercial lease claim and that our client had not wrongfully evicted the defendant from the premises. Miller & Miller v. Modesto Broadcast Group Defended a partnership against a fee claim brought by the partnership’s former lawyer. Secured a defense verdict after a four-day jury trial.
Mark Barron, O.D. v. Vision Service Plan Represented an optometrist in his effort to remain on the provider panel of the nation’s largest vision care insurer. Obtained a preliminary injunction from a federal judge preventing VSP from terminating Dr. Barron’s membership. The case ultimately settled. American Lithotripsy Society v. Thompson Managed an effort on behalf of a group of urologists and affiliated professionals to enjoin the Department of Health and Human Services from enforcing Stark II regulations with respect to lithotripsy. Ultimately, obtained a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction against the government, thereby preserving our client’s contractual relationships that were adversely impacted by the regulations. Shuffle Master, Inc. v. VendingData Corp. Defended a company in a patent infringement action over card-shuffling machines. Briefed and argued a Markman hearing that resulted in a favorable patent construction, and wrote the briefs that persuaded the Federal Circuit to first stay and later reverse a preliminary injunction entered by the trial court. Lee Technologies, Inc. v. Virginia Department of Taxation Led an effort to secure refund of sales tax paid on sales to an entity that went bankrupt. The tax authority initially refused to issue a refund to anyone other than the customer, but after several months of litigation, it refunded the sales tax in full, with interest.
The above is a list of the more notable cases. In all, Mr. Coffee has acted as first or second chair in over 30 civil and criminal trials and arbitration and administrative hearings, most of which resulted in positive outcomes. He further has handled numerous other civil and criminal disputes and criminal and regulatory investigations that were favorably resolved short of trial. He has argued more than 80 motions before state and federal courts.
Practice Areas Antitrust
Appellate and Critical Motions
Labor and Employment Relations
Corporate Internal Investigations
Mergers and Acquisitions
e-Discovery and Electronic Information
Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
Product Liability Public Finance
Energy Real Estate Environmental Restructuring and Insolvency Financial Services Securities Government Contracts Securitization Governmental Relations and Regulatory Affairs
Trusts and Estates
White-Collar Criminal Defense
About Winston & Strawn Winston & Strawn LLP is an international law firm with more than 900 attorneys among 14 offices in Beijing, Charlotte, Chicago, Geneva, Hong Kong, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, New York, Newark, Paris, San Francisco, Shanghai, and Washington, D.C. The exceptional depth and geographic reach of our resources enable Winston & Strawn to manage virtually every type of business-related legal issue. We serve the needs of enterprises of all types and sizes, in both the private and the public sector. We understand that clients are looking for value beyond just legal expertise. With this in mind, we work hard to understand the level of involvement our clients want from us. We take time to learn about our clients’ organizations and their business objectives. And, we place significant emphasis on technology and teamwork in an effort to respond quickly and effectively to our clients’ needs. Please visit us at www.winston.com if you would like more information about our legal services, our experience, or the industries we serve.