City of Manassas, Virginia Land Use Committee Meeting AGENDA Land Use Committee 9027 Center Street Manassas, VA 20110 Second Floor Conference Room Thursday, February 23, 2017 Call to Order - 5:30 p.m.
Roll Call 1.
2.
Action Items 1.1
Approve: January 26, 2017 Land Use Committee Minutes Draft Land Use Committee Minutes 1-26-17
1.2
Resolution #R-2017-31: Supporting Route 28 Shared Use Path Agenda Statement - Resolution #R-2017-31 Supporting Route 28 Shared Use Path Resolution #R-2017-31 Supporting Route 28 Shared Use Path
1.3
Proposed Dog Park at Dean Park Agenda Statement - Proposed Dog Park at Dean Park Memo - Proposed Dog Park at Dean Park AKC - Establishing a Dog Park in Your Community Dog Parks - Risk Management
1.4
Tax Abatement for Rehabilitated Real Estate Program – Residential Agenda Statement - Tax Abatement for Rehabilitated Real Estate Program Residential Memo - Tax Abatement for Rehabilitated Real Estate Program – Residential 2017 Local Program Comparison City Code Sec. 110-88 Proposed Changes
Land Use Committee Updates 2.1
La nd Us e Commi ttee La nd Us e Commi ttee Februa ry 23, 2017 Pa ge | 1
Land Use Committee Updates Agenda Statement - Land Use Committee Updates 1
City Council Land Use Committee - Project Status FY17 City Council Land Use Committee - Pending Land Use Cases February 2017 Adjournment
La nd Us e Commi ttee La nd Us e Commi ttee Februa ry 23, 2017 Pa ge | 2
2
City of Manassas
Manassas City Council Economic/Community Development & Land Use Committee Regular Meeting Minutes Thursday, January 26, 2017 City Hall, 2nd Floor Conference Room, 5:30 pm DETERMINATION OF QUORUM MEMBERS PRESENT:
Councilmember Ian Lovejoy, Chair Councilmember Mark Wolfe
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Councilmember Sheryl Bass
STAFF PRESENT:
W. Patrick Pate, City Manager Patrick Small, CEcD, Director of Economic Development Bryan Foster, Deputy City Manager Elizabeth S. Via-Gossman, AICP, Director of Community Development Matthew Arcieri, Manager, Planning and Zoning Kelly Davis, Sr. Planner
GUESTS PRESENT:
Mayor Harry J. Parrish Elaine Trautwein, Planning Commission Matt Marshall, Land Design Consulting Huy Phan, Owner, Manassas Arms Jessica Pfeiffer, WCL&W Jay du Von, WCL&W Bryan Piper, NVR Jonathan Quinones
CALL MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 4:00 pm. A quorum was established. Adoption of Minutes of December 21, 2016 Councilmember Lovejoy moved adoption of the Minutes of December 21, 2016. Councilmember Wolfe seconded. Motion passed. Presentation: REZ #2016-04, Tillett Square Ms. Davis introduced Mr. Jay du Von, attorney for the developer who presented the proposal to redevelop the site with a mix of single family homes and town homes. Two historic structures, including the main home would remain on the site. The property is zoned for multi-family and single family
3
Economic/Community Development & Land Use Committee Regular Meeting Minutes January 26, 2017 Page 2
housing with a potential by-right density of approximately 40 – 45 units. The developer is proposing 73 units which would increase the density by 28 – 33 units. Councilmembers expressed the importance of fully studying the impact of the proposal on roads, schools and other City facilities. Councilmember Wolfe commented on the ratio of town homes to single family homes and Councilmember Lovejoy added that single family homes facing Wesley should be studied. Councilmembers also expressed concern on the amount of parking for the townhomes and the need to consider impacts on the surrounding community if not enough parking was provided onsite. Presentation: Update on Spot Blight Abatement – 9787 Bragg Lane Mr. Arcieri updated the Committee on the status of 9787 Bragg Lane and reported that the ordinance to declare the structure as blighted would be placed on the Council’s agenda for action on February 13, 2017. The Committee concurred. Closed Session Councilmember Lovejoy moved at 6:06 pm that the Land Use Committee of the City Council convene in closed session as permitted by Virginia Code 2.2-3711 Paragraph A (5) concerning a prospective business or industry or the expansion of an existing business or industry, since no previous announcement has been made of the business' or industry's interest in locating or expanding its facilities in the City. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. Included in the Closed Session were the Committee, City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Councilmember Elston, Economic Development Director, and Community Development Director. Roll Call Chairperson Lovejoy Councilmember Wolfe Councilmember Bass
Y Y A
Councilmember Lovejoy moved at 6:34 pm that the Land Use Committee of the City Council did certify that, in the closed session just concluded, nothing was discussed except the matter (1) specifically identified in the motion to convene in closed session and 2) lawfully permitted to be discussed under the provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information act cited in the motion. Seconded by Councilmember Wolfe. Roll Call Chairperson Lovejoy Councilmember Wolfe Councilmember Bass
Y Y A
4
Economic/Community Development & Land Use Committee Regular Meeting Minutes January 26, 2017 Page 3
LAND USE COMMITTEE UPDATES Ms. Via-Gossman reviewed the attachments in the agenda package. Councilmember Wolfe requested that the designation of Annaburg Manor as a historic district/structure be placed on a future agenda. Ms. Via-Gossman reviewed the process for amending the historic district which would be initiated by the City Council requesting that the Architectural Review Board evaluate the proposal. The evaluation is required by City code to include a definition of the boundaries, the architectural significance of the property(ies), and an evaluation of the public interest in the proposal. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Wolfe moved to adjourn. Seconded by Councilmember Lovejoy. Motion carried. The regular meeting of the Land Use Committee adjourned at 6:45 pm.
5
City of Manassas
Manassas City Council Economic/Community Development & Land Use Committee 9027 Center Street Manassas, VA 20110
Meeting Date:
February 23, 2017
Time Estimate:
5 Minutes
Agenda Title:
Resolution #R-2017-31: Supporting Route 28 Shared Use Path
Recommendation:
Approve and Place on City Council Consent Agenda
Motion:
I recommend approval of the draft resolution and that it be placed on the City Council’s February 27, 2017 consent agenda.
Date Last Considered by City Council: Summary and/or Comments:
N/A
Board – Committee – or Commission Reviewed: Fiscal Impact:
N/A
Staff Contact:
Steve Burke, PE, Director of Public Works
[email protected] (703) 257-8476
VDOT requires that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution of Support to accompany a request to the Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) allowing a shared use path as part of the City’s Route 28 widening project. Route 28 is a limited access roadway and VDOT requirements require the CTB to approve any use of bicycles in a limited access right-of-way.
N/A
6
MOTION: SECOND: RE:
February 27, 2017 Regular Meeting Res. No. R-2017-31 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR NOKESVILLE ROAD (ROUTE 28), LIMITED ACCESS BREAK AND CONTROL CHANGES UPC 96721 – State Project # 0028-155-270
WHEREAS, Route 28 is a critical component of the Northern Virginia transportation network and was designated by the predecessor to the Commonwealth Transportation Board as a limited access facility in the 1960’s; and WHEREAS, the City of Manassas and Prince William County have been jointly working to design the widening of Nokesville Road (Route 28) from four lanes to six lanes from approximately 920 feet north of Godwin Drive to approximately 75 feet south of Pennsylvania Avenue with improvement to the connections to the Prince William Parkway (Route 234), Godwin Avenue, and Pennsylvania Avenue; and, WHEREAS, the proposed improvements will include the construction of a shared use path along the length of the project to promote multi-modal traffic conveyance through this corridor; and WHEREAS, 24VAC30-151-760 requires “The installation of pedestrian or bicycle facilities within limited access right-of-way shall be considered a change in limited access control and requires approval of the Commonwealth Transportation Board prior to permit issuance.”; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and Council of the City of Manassas, Virginia hereby endorses and supports consideration by the Commonwealth Transportation Board to approval the installation of a shard use path as part of the proposed improvements to Nokesville Road (Route 28), a limited access facility.
__________________________________ Harry J. Parrish II Mayor On behalf of the City Council of Manassas, Virginia 7
February 27, 2017 Regular Meeting Res. No. R-2017-31 ATTEST:
Andrea P. Madden, City Clerk Votes: Ayes: Nayes: Absent from Vote: Absent from Meeting:
8
City of Manassas
Manassas City Council Economic/Community Development & Land Use Committee 9027 Center Street Manassas, VA 20110
Meeting Date:
February 23, 2017
Time Estimate:
20 Minutes
Agenda Title:
Proposed Dog Park at Dean Park
Recommendation:
Information Only
Motion:
N/A
Date Last Considered by City Council: Summary and/or Comments:
N/A
Board – Committee – or Commission Reviewed: Fiscal Impact:
N/A
Staff Contact:
Elizabeth S. Via-Gossman, Community Development Director
[email protected] (703) 257-8224
Staff will provide a presentation showing the locations available for a dog park at Dean Park based on a request and potential funding and sponsorship by the Wellington Community.
N/A
9
MEMORANDUM CITY OF MANASSAS Department of Community Development Phone: 703-257-8223
Fax: 703-257-5117
DATE:
February 17, 2017
TO:
The Hon. Ian Lovejoy, Chairman, Land Use Committee The Hon. Sheryl Bass, Councilmember The Hon. Mark Wolfe, Councilmember The Hon. Marc Aveni, Vice Mayor (Alternate)
THRU:
W. Patrick Pate, City Manager
FROM:
Elizabeth S. Via-Gossman, AICP, Director, Community Development
COPIES:
The Hon. Harry J. Parrish, Mayor The Hon. Ken Elston, Councilmember The Hon. Pamela Sebesky, Councilmember
RE:
Proposed Dog Park at Dean Park
The following memorandum provides an introduction to the proposal of a dog park at Dean Park based on a request and potential funding and sponsorship by the Wellington Community. Background The City of Manassas conducted a Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Needs Assessment and Facilities Plan in 2016, which identified a need for at least one dog park for the City of Manassas. In addition, the City has had requests from residents located in both the historic downtown area and Wellington community. The Staff is currently considering two dog parks, one to be located in the historic downtown and one at Dean Park. If necessary, a third park could be programmed at Stonewall Park and that location can be reviewed as part of the Stonewall Park master planning process currently underway. A site has not been chosen for a dog park in the downtown; however, the community has suggested Nelson Park and Staff is considering a potential location at Baldwin Park in conjunction with a future museum/library project. 10
February 17, 2017 Page Two Dean Park Sites In the midst of staff’s work researching dog parks, the Wellington Community stepped forward with potential funding and sponsorship of a park at Dean Park. During the master plan process a potential future location for a dog park was noted on the plan where currently the City is storing top soil from the Gateway development. Unfortunately, this site is not available for use until 2020 or beyond. In a shorter timeframe the Staff identified two sites that could be utilized as dog parks that would not be impacted by the future master plan but are impacted by the current Columbia Gas Pipeline project. At the meeting Staff will provide a brief presentation showing the locations available for a dog park at Dean Park based on the community interest currently being shown in supporting the construction of the facility. The timing for construction of a dog park, if the locations are found to be suitable, would be fall 2017 due to the construction of the Columbia Gas Pipeline. If the Wellington Community were to withdraw their support for this project the facility would be added to the Dean Park Master Plan project scheduled in the current CIP for 2020 unless other sponsors were to step forward. Attachments: 1. AKC Establishing a Dog Park in Your Community 2. Risk Management Article re: Dog Parks
11 -2-
Establishing a
Dog Park in Your Community
12
Table of Contents What Is a Dog Park and How Does it Benefit the Community?
1
How to Build a Dog Park in Your Community
4
Dog Park Design
15
Rules and Regulations
16
Success Stories: #1 Monmouth County, New Jersey
6
#2 Sarasota County, Florida
9
#3 Sausalito, California
11
#4 Tallahassee, Florida
12
13
What Is a Dog Park and How Does It Benefit the Community? With cities becoming more and more crowded and leash laws becoming more restrictive, many concerned dog owners are looking to the creation of dog parks as a solution to their need for a place to spend quality time with their pets. But just what is a “dog park,” and what benefits can one bring to your city or town? A dog park is a public park, typically fenced, where people and their dogs can play together. Similarly, a dog run is a smaller fenced area, created for the same use, that is often located within an existing park. As the names imply, these places offer dogs off-leash play areas where their owners can enjoy a park-like setting and the chance to socialize with other canines and their owners. Dog parks, which are sometimes managed by park users in conjunction with city or town officials, are being established all over the country and offer a wealth of benefits to dogs, dog owners and the community as a whole.
Dog parks offer canines and their owners a safe place to socialize.
14
1
More than just “room to roam,” the creation of a dog park . . . Allows dogs to exercise and socialize safely. Puppies and adult dogs need room to run, and enclosed play areas permit them to do so while preventing them from endangering themselves and others (for example, by running into the path of an oncoming vehicle). In addition, dogs who are accustomed to playing with animals and people other than their owners are more likely to be wellsocialized and react well toward strangers.
Promotes responsible dog ownership. Dog parks prevent off-leash animals from infringing on the rights of other community residents and park users such as joggers, small children, and those who may be fearful of dogs. Parks also make it easier for a city to enforce its leash laws, as resident dog owners with
Enclosed play areas for exercise make dogs better-adjusted neighbors.
2
Establishing a Dog Park
15
park access have no reason to allow their canine companions off-leash when outside of the park.
Provides an outlet for dog owners to socialize. Dog parks are a great place for owners to meet other people with common interests. The love people share for their dogs reaches beyond economic and social barriers and helps foster a sense of community. Park users also benefit from the opportunity to ask questions of other owners and find solutions to problems they might be having with their pet.
Makes for a better community by promoting public health and safety. Well-exercised dogs are better neighbors who are less likely to create a nuisance, bark excessively, and destroy property. Their presence in the park, along with their owners, also may help deter crime.
16
3
How to Build a Dog Park in Your Community By now you’ve recognized the need for a dog park in your area, and you’re eager to see one established. But how do you get started? The following are some strategies for a successful campaign:
The First Steps . . . Start with a core group of committed dog park activists. Talk with a half dozen other individuals who are concerned about the lack of off-leash spaces. These may be people you already know, or you may want to put a notice in the local paper. This group may form a park association and will be responsible for meeting with public officials, making presentations, maintaining the park and defusing any problems that arise.
Hold a public meeting. Once the core group is in place, a larger community meeting will help you get the word out to supporters and solicit input and suggestions. Contact other dog owners, dog-related clubs, veterinarians, and humane society and animal control officials to gather interest and support. Do so by posting, mailing, or distributing notices in areas such as neighborhood bulletin boards, pet supply stores, animals hospitals, and shelters. Encourage people to write letters of support to public officials and the media, and to make presentations to community groups whose backing would be valuable.
Educate your fellow dog owners on the need to be responsible. The owner who neglects to pick up after his dog or who allows an aggressive or unsocialized dog to run loose can do a lot of damage to your cause and undermine your chances of success.
Write a clear mission statement that details the need and purpose of the park, stressing the benefits to dog owners, their canine companions, and the greater community. The Redwood City [California] Responsible Dog Owners’ statement says it all: “To establish a fenced-in, offleash dog park where well-behaved canine citizens can exercise in a clean, safe environment without endangering or annoying people, property or wildlife. To 17
4
Establishing a Dog Park
Dog owners who neglect to pick up after their dogs can damage your cause. 18
5
develop a beautiful, well-maintained space open to all dog lovers and friends who are willing to uphold the park’s rules and restrictions. To view this park as a community project, in partnership with the City of Redwood City, designed to satisfy the needs of dog-owners and non–dog owners alike.”
Choose a site. The ideal area will be a safe, accessible location that takes into account the needs of park users as well as the effect the park will have on neighbors and the environment. Please refer to “Dog Park Design” on page 15 for additional recommendations.
Create a budget. Determine how much it will cost to construct and maintain the park – costs for grass, fences, garbage removal, lawn maintenance, drinking water, field drainage, lighting, benches, and a pooper-scooper station. Some cities are willing and able to finance a dog park; others would rather share the cost with a group committed to maintaining the park and ensuring that park rules are followed. Keep in mind that, if it is within your budget to do so,
SUCCESS STORY #1 Monmouth County, New Jersey In the summer of 1999, a newly organized group of Monmouth County dog owners petitioned the county park system and several local municipalities to establish an off-leash dog park. The Bay Shore Companion Dog Club and New Jersey D. O. G. (Dog Owners Group) helped recruit members and collect signatures from owners of the nearly 40,000 licensed dogs living in the county. After collecting 12,000 signatures, the group presented its proposal to the county park system’s Board of Recreation Commissioners and municipal park system officials. Officials agreed that a dog park would offer many benefits to residents. They talked to other counties with successful parks about liability issues, rules, and regulations, before voting to approve funding for the estab-
lishment of an off-leash area in Monmouth County. The Thompson Park Dog Run opened on October 30, 1999, to enormous popularity. Now that the park has opened, area dog owners will concentrate on forming a core group to help keep up the site and prevent potential problems. Just because dogs are allowed to run free does not mean that owners will not be responsible for their animals’ actions. There are rules to be followed, guidelines to be maintained. “Public education for dog owners will be critical to the park’s success,” notes one of the organizers. The park itself provides a terrific venue for teaching people to be responsible dog owners. Members of the local dog community have already held a “Park Do’s and Don’ts” seminar and plan to host future programs there.
19
6
Establishing a Dog Park
sharing expenses with the city can be a great public relations tool. It shows officials that you are committed to the project, will help foster good community relations and may increase your chance for the park’s approval. Depending on your situation, you will have to determine how you will generate revenue for your budget. One possibility to consider is user fees – requiring all park users to pay an annual or daily fee. Permits could be obtained from the city or town or through the park association. Fund-raisers such as a dog wash or concession sale at a local dog show can also help to generate money to cover expenses and maintenance costs. Finally, consider soliciting town and city sources. By convincing elected officials that there is wide support for a dog park among taxpayers and voters, you may help encourage funding for the park.
Solicit the input and seek the approval of significant organizations in your community. Meet with the proposed park’s neighbors before talking to city hall. As soon as someone brings up a concern, address it and try to come up with a solution. With a little good will and cooperation, neighborhood differences can usually be resolved.
20
7
OK, you’ve gathered your resources. Where do you go from here? Create a proposal. Your well-prepared presentation will include your mission statement and goals, and should address issues such as location, funding, maintenance and enforcement. Committee members will be expected to establish and enforce reasonable health and safety rules for the park, and these should be included in the proposal as well. Suggestions for these guidelines can be found in the “Rules and Regulations” section of this brochure. A good proposal will also do the following:
Demonstrate need. Do this by gathering statistics on the dogs and the people in your community. • How many dogs would use a dog park? • What are the demographics of the people in your city? • Who currently uses city parks – and who doesn’t? Downplay the “dog factor” and emphasize people issues. Dogs don’t pay taxes or vote.
21
8
Establishing a Dog Park
Demonstrate support. In many communities, organizers found that a simply worded request, circulated on a petition, helped convince city officials that there was indeed both a need and widespread public support for a responsibly run dog park. • Place petition gatherers at supermarkets, pet-supply stores and other hightraffic areas.
SUCCESS STORY #2 Sarasota County, Florida Sarasota County is the proud home to two successful “paw parks,” thanks in part to some active AKC®-affiliated dog club members. One long-time club member chaired the Animal Welfare Advisory Committee that approved the opening of the 17th Street Paw Park last year. The chairman and his rescued Greyhound participated in a ribbon-cutting ceremony that attracted the attention of enthusiastic dog owners, media and city officials alike. The overwhelming success of the 17th Street Paw Park led to the creation of a second
off-leash area at Woodmere Park in Venice, Florida. In support of the move, the Greater Venice Florida Dog Club donated a decorative sign to mark the new paw park’s location. In the last year, county officials from across the nation have contacted the Sarasota County Parks and Recreation Department regarding their success in developing and maintaining paw parks. Based on the positive response community residents have had to the parks, both off-leash areas will continue to serve as models for dog groups in the future.
22
9
•
•
•
•
Enlist the support of local veterinarians, groomers, dog walkers, and others who have a real interest in seeing a community filled with healthy, wellsocialized dogs. Involve them in gathering petitions, writing letters to the editor of local papers and generally spreading the word. Organize local residents to contact their community representatives, parks department officials, and media in the form of letters, e-mails, and phone calls, asking for their support. Consider sending press releases to local media, explaining how the community will benefit from a dog park and providing information about the success of existing parks in other areas. You’ll need to get the neighbors’ approval, too. Explain your proposal to them, as well as the ways that a dog park will benefit them, and ask them to sign a separate petition stating that they are willing to have the park in their neighborhood.
Get to know local officials – your city council members and the director of your department of parks and recreation. Attend meetings, join them at fund-raisers. Find out what they need from you to move the dog park forward. To help you get started, the AKC’s Government Relations Department can provide you with brochures offering tips on working with government officials.
23
10 Establishing a Dog Park
When you’re ready, request a hearing with city government to discuss your proposal. Have two or three carefully selected, knowledgeable and articulate members of your group present your plan, clearly expressing its many benefits to the community and calmly addressing any concerns. Be prepared to deal with a range of concerns, including the risk of dog fights, dog bites, noise level, parking and traffic needs, liability issues, and maintenance. Explain why some of these are nonissues – the park’s dogs, for example, will be well-socialized and therefore less likely to fight, bite, and cause accidents in the community. Have a plan to address legitimate issues, like traffic and noise.
Be patient and flexible. Dealing with city government is rarely a quick process, but don’t give up! Follow through with continued letters and e-mails, and be willing to work toward compromise.
SUCCESS STORY #3 Sausalito, California In early 1991, the City of Sausalito passed a law requiring dogs to be leashed at all times within the city limits. After receiving a citation and fine for walking her dog Remington without a leash, one owner led a citizen group that worked with the city council, the parks and recreation department and the Marin Humane Society to establish a dedicated enclosed area where the dogs of Sausalito could be off leash. During that summer volunteers raised funds to fence a 1.3 acre area in the Martin Luther King School area, located on the north side of Sausalito, to be used as a dedicated dog park. In November 1991, the “Remington Dog Park” was officially opened with a gala ribbon cutting attended by city council members, local citizens, and their dog companions. Although the city provides utilities, including water, electricity, and garbage removal, the park has been maintained by its users since the opening. Regularly scheduled work parties cut the grass as
well as maintain and improve the grounds. Improvements to the park in excess of $36,000 to date have been made through donations solely from park users. In addition to original fencing the park now has lighting, a storage shed, a riding lawnmower, picnic tables, benches, a dog drinking-water area, and a “scooper” cleaning station. The park is the home of champion show dogs as well as mixed breeds. Dog owners have adopted over 30 “rescue” dogs. Many owners now have two dogs as a result of this program. Having received the highest rating of “4 Paws” in The California Dog Lover’s Companion, the Sausalito Dog Park is now used by over 300 dogs per day. From sunup to sundown, dogs of all ages, sizes, and types can be seen romping in the park, chasing a never ending supply of tennis balls, simply lying at their masters’ feet under a picnic table or on top of the picnic table demanding face-to-face attention. (See also www.dogpark-sausalito.com.)
24
11
SUCCESS STORY #4 Tallahassee, Florida Members of the Ochlockonee River Kennel Club are always looking for ways to give back to their community, so when the opportunity came to help with the establishment of a dog park in Tallahassee, they jumped at the chance. The group had long realized how important it was for dog owners to have a place where they could socialize with others and let their dogs run or play Frisbee. At the same time, their community was facing problems at a nearby city park where owners were permitting their dogs to illegally roam off-leash. The solution seemed simple -build a dog park! A public committee was formed, and an ORKC board member volunteered to serve on behalf of the dog community. While the city of Tallahassee was
12
Establishing a Dog Park
receptive to the idea, it was clear that little could be done without funds for fencing, pooper-scoopers, and the like. ORKC, which donates to various organizations every year, soon agreed to give the city the $4,000 that would be needed to fence the two-acre park. Other clubs and fanciers followed suit, donating money for watering holes, cleanup facilities, shade trees, and benches. The city even donated old fire hydrants to add to the fun. The park has been extremely popular since its opening in the summer of 1999, and city officials, who originally agreed to open the park on a trial basis only, are now enthusiastic about developing more. Members of the ORKC are pleased to have had a helping hand in the park’s establishment and see it as a great opportunity to increase awareness of responsible dog ownership.
25
Congratulations – they approved it! Now what? Your efforts have been successful, and development of the dog park is moving forward. Now is the time to thank everyone who helped bring the park to fruition, including volunteers, government officials, and community residents. As a result of everyone’s hard work, many dog owners will soon have a new opportunity to enjoy their canine companions! Be sure to share this good news with the AKC’s Government Relations Department so we can pass it on to others. The key to future and continued success of the dog park will lie in responsible park-association members and park users who strictly enforce the rules. For the most part, this will mean getting people to clean up after their dogs, quiet excessive barking and curtail any aggressive behavior. Occasionally larger issues may arise, and it will be up to you to help settle disputes in a responsive, flexible manner. Maintenance will be another important consideration. In some areas, park associations work in conjunction with local kennel clubs and parks department officials to organize volunteer “park cleanup” days. Kennel clubs and other dog organizations may also be willing to donate funds for future supplies of scoopers, trash bags, and cans. The development of a successful dog park requires a great deal of planning and effort. But your involvement and dedication will hopefully lead to the ultimate reward – the joy of creating and maintaining a special place where dogs and their families can run, romp and socialize.
26
13
27
14
Establishing a Dog Park
Dog Park Design: The Ideal Dog Park Should Include . . . • One acre or more of land surrounded by a four- to six-foot high chain-link fence. Preferably, the fence should be equipped with a double-gated entry to keep dogs from escaping and to facilitate wheelchair access. • Cleaning supplies, including covered garbage cans, waste bags, and pooperscooper stations. • Shade and water for both dogs and owners, along with benches and tables. • A safe, accessible location with adequate drainage and a grassy area that is mowed routinely. • If space allows, it is preferable to provide separate areas for small and large dogs. This will enable large dog owners to allow their pets to run more freely, while protecting smaller dogs who may not be suited to the enthusiastic play of larger breeds. • Signs that specify park hours and rules. • Parking close to the site.
A double-gated entry prevents dogs from escaping.
28
15
Rules and Regulations Members of a dog park committee should establish and enforce reasonable health and safety rules for the park, such as the following: • Owners are legally responsible for their dogs and any injuries caused by them. • Puppies and dogs must be properly licensed, inoculated, and healthy. • Animals should wear a collar and ID tags at all times. • Owners must clean up after their dogs. • Dogs showing aggression toward people or other animals will be removed from the park. Animals who exhibit a history of aggressive behavior will not be permitted to enter. • Puppies using the park must be at least four months old. • Owners should not leave their dogs unattended or allowed out of sight. If young children are permitted in the dog park, they too should be under constant supervision. • Dogs in heat will not be allowed inside the park. • Owners must carry a leash at all times. Dogs should be leashed before entering and prior to leaving the park. • Violators will be subject to removal from the park and suspension of park privileges.
29
16
Establishing a Dog Park
30
AKC® Web Site: www.akc.org For more information, contact the Government Relations Department Phone: 919-816-3720 Fax: 919-816-4275 E-Mail:
[email protected] 31 Photos of Remington Dog Park, Sausalito, CA, by Vicky Cook GLEG01 (10/08)
DOG PARKS CAN YOU RISK IT? Real Questions from Real Members We’re considering adding a dog park in our City. What do we need to know? We have considered dog parks from a risk management perspective and have outlined some general thoughts and options for consideration below. Some of the aspects of a dog park include risk management considerations and/or rules covering safety, noise, sanitation, location, maintenance, surfacing, and dog park clubs. Rules and signs must be clear, unambiguous, and posted in highly visible and conspicuous locations such as the dog park entrance.
The basic components of a dog park include: sixfoot fencing, double-gated latched entry, and signs displaying the rules.
Some examples of dog park rules and risk management considerations that can reduce the risk of injury, noise complaints, and sanitation problems include: Safety The safety of humans and other dogs is a primary concern. There should be a separate partitioned area for small, timid, and elderly dogs. A potable water source will need to be provided at the park. Sample safety rules Dogs must wear a collar with identification and current dog license and rabies tags. Dogs must be legally licensed and vaccinated against distemper, rabies, and parvovirus and regularly examined for parasites and treated as necessary.
http://riskcontrol.brsrisk.com
800.541.4591
Aggressive dogs are not allowed at any time. An aggressive dog is defined as a dog posing a threat to humans or other dogs. All dogs must be under the owner’s/handler’s control. All dog owners/handlers must have a leash in hand at all times. Dogs must be on a leash when entering and exiting the dog park. Dog owners/handlers must keep their dogs in their view at all times. Dogs shall not be left unattended. Only dogs four months and older are allowed. No female dogs in heat are allowed. Owners/handlers may only bring the number of dogs into the dog park that they can adequately control without endangering other dog park users; up to a maximum of two dogs per owner/handler are allowed per visit. Children under the age of 16 must be accompanied by an adult when inside the dog park. No toddlers, small children, or children under the age of 12 are allowed in the dog park. No dog food or food meant for human consumption is allowed in the dog park. No dog toys or rawhide are allowed in the dog park. Smoking is not allowed in the dog park. Dog owners/handlers must immediately fill in any holes their dogs dig. Chasing or running with the dogs is not allowed.
32
DOG PARKS CAN YOU RISK IT? PAGE 2
Petting other people’s dogs without the owner’s permission is not allowed. Users are legally responsible for their dogs and any injuries and/or damages caused by their dogs. Users are responsible for the health of their dogs and keeping their dogs properly hydrated. If dog park users do not abide by these rules, please contact local animal control at (INSERT PHONE NUMBER). Violation of the City Code results in fines and no further use of the dog park. Any bite of a person or other dog must be immediately reported to local animal control, and the parties involved must wait for an animal control officer to respond except in the case where immediate medical care is necessary.
Noise Sample noise rules The hours of operation of the dog park are from 9:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m. Dogs must not be allowed to bark excessively or to the annoyance of the neighborhood. No excessive shouting by owners/handlers. Sanitation Provide adequate disposal bags and refuse cans. Sample sanitation rules Owners/handlers must have visible pet waste disposal materials at all times. Owners/handlers must pick up their dog’s waste and properly dispose of it in one of the provided trash receptacles.
Location Do not establish a dog park immediately adjacent to residential property lines. There should be a minimum distance of 200 feet between a dog park and any businesses or residences and a minimum distance of 100 feet to any bodies of water. Keep the area of heaviest use away from residential property lines. Locate the off-leash area close to the parking lot to discourage owners/handlers from letting their dogs off the leash between the dog park and the parking lot. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements must be taken into consideration. Maintenance There should be a budget for maintenance of the dog park, such as the frequency of the collection and removal of debris, restocking plastic waste disposal bags, repairing signs, filling holes, repairing fences, irrigation, and maintenance of the surfacing. Surfacing Some of the dog park surfaces to consider include turf, bark or wood chips, decomposed granite, sand, heavily compacted base rock, and combinations of the above. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements must be taken into consideration Dog Park Clubs An active dog park club is important to the success of a dog park. The organization can help educate users and provide self-policing and peer pressure. .
33
City of Manassas
Manassas City Council Economic/Community Development & Land Use Committee 9027 Center Street Manassas, VA 20110
Meeting Date:
February 23, 2017
Time Estimate:
20 Minutes
Agenda Title:
Tax Abatement for Rehabilitated Real Estate Program – Residential
Recommendation:
Information Only
Motion:
N/A
Date Last Considered by City Council: Summary and/or Comments:
N/A
Board – Committee – or Commission Reviewed: Fiscal Impact:
N/A
Staff Contact:
Elizabeth S. Via-Gossman, Community Development Director
[email protected] (703) 257-8224
The City Manager has directed the Department of Community Development to review the residential program and recommend changes that will make it a more attractive program. In addition, the department has been directed to more heavily market the program in cooperation with the Commissioner of the Revenue.
N/A
34
MEMORANDUM CITY OF MANASSAS Department of Community Development Phone: 703-257-8223 Fax: 703-257-5117
DATE:
February 17, 2017
TO:
The Hon. Ian Lovejoy, Chairman, Land Use Committee The Hon. Sheryl Bass, Councilmember The Hon. Mark Wolfe, Councilmember The Hon. Marc Aveni, Vice Mayor (Alternate)
THRU:
W. Patrick Pate, City Manager
FROM:
Elizabeth S. Via-Gossman, AICP, Director, Community Development
COPIES:
The Hon. Harry J. Parrish, Mayor The Hon. Ken Elston, Councilmember The Hon. Pamela Sebesky, Councilmember The Hon. Douglas Waldron, Commissioner of the Revenue
SUBJECT:
City of Manassas Tax Abatement for Rehabilitated Real Estate Program
The City of Manassas offers certain tax abatements for property that is substantially repaired, rehabilitated, or replaced. The program was adopted to encourage renovation and revitalization of underutilized, aging and deteriorating structures located in the City. The program is applicable to both residential and commercial properties. The City Manager has directed the Department of Community Development to review the residential program and recommend changes that will make it a more attractive program. In addition, the department has been directed to more heavily market the program in cooperation with the Commissioner of the Revenue. Attached is an overview of other local programs throughout the Commonwealth. The focus of the agenda item discussion will be on the method of setting the base value, the timing of the application and the duration of the incentive. Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any questions at (703) 257-8224 or
[email protected]
35
Residential Rehab Tax Abatement Program - 2017 Update
Jurisdiction
Virginia Permitted
Manassas
Age of Structure; no less than # years
Base Value Set
Max Assessed Value
15
Local gov't determination
25
Set by CoR inspection prior to work commencing None
Min/Max Time Limit Min Market to Increase to Value Complete Application Size of Increase Work Timing Structure Required
Local gov't Local gov't determination determination
Local gov't determination
Local gov't Local gov't determination determination
maximum 30% 25% increased 3 years
Exemption Period Exemption Fee
No more than 15 years
At the time a building permit is applied for and before any work begins 10 years
Notes
Equal to incremental amount of exemption or 50% of Not to exceed rehabilitatation $125
Years 1-5 100%
$50
6-10 reduce 20% each year
maximum 30% 25% increase 3 years
At the time a building permit is applied for and before any work begins 14 years
maximum 20% 100% increase
At the time a building permit is applied for and before any work begins 7 years
40
Set by CoR inspection prior to work commencing None
maximum 15% 20% increase 2 years
At the time a building permit is applied for and before any work begins 7 years
15
Not needed abatement is based on rehab costs; must produce paid bill receipts None
10% None
No later than 18 months after work completed 10 years
Lynchburg
50
Set by CoR inspection prior to work commencing
40% None
2 years
At the time a building permit is applied for and before any work begins 15 years
Hampton
25
40% 15% increase
1 year
Chesapeake
15
Prince William County
15
Assessed Value when application submitted None
Years 1-5 100% 6-14 reduce 20% each year
Henrico County
Fredericksburg
Newport News
40
Set by CoR inspection prior to work commencing Max $250,000
Based on prior assessment; inspection at application.
10%
6 years No later than 6 10 year period months after work completed.
Years 1-7 100%
Years 1-2 100% 3-7 % decrease
Years 1-5 50% of rehab costs 6-10 decrease by 20%
$50
$50 Historic District or Landmark Only
Henrico County has a replacement program incentive for teardowns as $25 well as the rehab incentive
If work has been started, the base value will include any work and $125 reflect market value Years 1-3 100% 4-6 50% The greater of either the increase in assessed value or 50% rehab cost
$50 Limited use to designated revitalization district; excludes landmarks and those receiving an abatement under a separate Derelict Structures Program
Notes: All localities require current on taxes, compliance with all laws, issuance of building/zoning permits
36
Sec. 110-88. - Partial property tax exemption for certain rehabilitated, renovated or replacement "residential real estate" or "multifamily residential real estate" structures. (a) This section authorizes a partial exemption for improved real property from the general real estate tax by providing tax credits for residential real estate or multifamily real estate that is rehabilitated, renovated or replaced for residential use in accordance with Code of Virginia, § 58.1-3220, as amended, and the provisions of this article. For purposes of this section, "residential real estate" and "multifamily residential real estate" shall be deemed to be substantially rehabilitated, renovated or replaced when a structure, which is no less than 25 years old, has been so improved or replaced that the fair market assessed value of the improved or replacement structure, as determined by the commissioner, is increased by no less than 25 percent. In addition to all other qualification criteria set forth in this article, "residential real estate" and "multifamily residential real estate" that is substantially rehabilitated, renovated or replaced for residential use may not exceed the total square footage of the original, unimproved structure by more than 30 percent and be eligible the tax credit authorized by this article. If the "multifamily residential real estate" contains more than one residential structure, then each improved or replacement structure shall not exceed the total square footage of each corresponding original, unimproved structure by more than 30 percent. No improvements made to unimproved real property shall be eligible for partial property tax exemption pursuant to this section. No property shall be eligible for a partial property tax exemption pursuant to this section unless all appropriate building permits have been acquired for the substantial rehabilitation, renovation or replacement of the structure on the property. No property shall be eligible for a partial property tax exemption pursuant to this section if that property is substantially rehabilitated by the demolition and replacement of any structure that (i) is a registered Virginia landmark, or (ii) is determined by the department of historic resources to contribute to the significance of a registered historic district. (b) The owner of any "residential real estate" or "multifamily residential real estate" who seeks to obtain the partial property tax exemption authorized by this section shall apply for such an exemption to the commissioner at the same time that the owner applies for a building permit to rehabilitate, renovate or replace the structure. Upon receipt of an application for partial property tax exemption, the commissioner shall determine a base fair market value assessment (hereinafter "base value") for the structure prior to commencement of rehabilitation, renovation or replacement. That base value shall serve as the basis for determining whether the rehabilitation, renovation or replacement increases the fair market value of the structure by at least 25 percent. The application to qualify for tax exemption shall be effective until December 31 of the third calendar year following the year in which the application is submitted. If by such expiration date, the rehabilitation, renovation or replacement has not progressed to such a point that the assessed fair market value of the improvement to the property is at least the minimum required percent greater than
Comment [e1]: Change base value to assessed value when application is submitted; allow application up to 6 months after work is completed
Page 1
37
the base value of such structure and if the applicant desires to proceed with the application, then a new application for partial tax exemption shall be filed with the commissioner, and thereafter the commissioner shall establish a new base value. All initial and subsequent applications for the partial exemption authorized by this section shall be accompanied by payment of a nonrefundable fee of $50.00 for processing the application. During the period between the receipt of the application and the time when the commissioner may ascertain that the fair market value of the structure has increased in value by at least the minimum percent specified in subsection (a) of this section, the owner of the property shall be subject to real property taxation upon the full fair market value of the property. At any time prior to November 1 of any calendar year in which rehabilitation, renovation or replacement of a structure is complete, an owner may submit a written request to the commissioner to inspect the structure to determine if it then qualifies for a partial real property tax exemption. After the commissioner has determined that the assessed fair market value of a substantially rehabilitated, renovated or replaced structure exceeds the base value by the percentage specified by subsection (a) of this section, the tax exemption shall become effective beginning on July 1 of the next tax year. (c) Subject to the provisions of subsection (d) of this section and to sections 110-91 and 110-92, the owner of any residential or multifamily residential structure qualifying for partial exemption from the real estate tax because of substantial rehabilitation, renovation or replacement shall be issued a credit for the general real property tax otherwise due on the fair market value of that property in the amount that is equal to the value of the real property tax levy calculated on the difference in value between the base value and the initial fair market value of the substantially rehabilitated, renovated or replaced structure. That credit shall be applied for each year of a five-year period following completion of the substantial rehabilitation, renovation or replacement. In each year of the four-year period following the initial five-year period, the owner of a qualifying property shall be issued a credit for the real estate tax otherwise due on the fair market value of that property in an amount equal to the value of the real property levy calculated on the difference in value between the base value and the initial fair market value of the substantially rehabilitated, renovated or replaced structure, less 20 percent for each year following the expiration of the initial five-year period of exemption. Credits against the real estate tax for any residential or multifamily real estate qualifying pursuant to this section shall run with the land, and, except as otherwise provided by subsection (d) of this section and by sections 110-91 and 110-92, the owner of such property during each of the nine years of the exemption period shall be entitled to receive a credit in the amount specified by this subsection.
Comment [e2]: Change term from 10 years to 7 years with years 1-2 100% exemption and reducing by 20% years 3 – 7.
(d) In the event that the fair market value of a qualifying residential or multifamily residential structure increases after the first year of such substantial rehabilitation, renovation or replacement, the credit specified by subsection (c) of this section shall not be increased. In the event that the fair market value of a qualifying property decreases after the first year of substantial rehabilitation, renovation or replacement, the credit specified in subsection (c) of this section shall be limited to Page 2
38
the extent that the credit shall not reduce the real property tax on a qualifying property below an amount equal to the amount of the real property tax computed on the base value. If any tax credit computed in accordance with subsection (c) of this section is reduced in accordance with this subsection, that credit reduction shall not be applied to any other property or to real property taxes assessed in any other tax year. If the fair market value of any qualifying property decreases below the base value, then that qualifying property shall be assessed at the fair market value, and no credit against the general real property tax shall be allowed. If no tax credit can be granted because the fair market value of a qualifying property is below the base value, that unused credit shall not be applied to any other property or to real property taxes assessed in any other tax year. (e) The credits against the real estate tax specified in subsection (c) of this section shall not affect any special district taxes or levies that may be imposed within the city. All ad valorem special district taxes or levies shall be computed on the full fair market value of all qualifying property. (f) In determining the base value of any structure, and in determining whether any structure has been substantially rehabilitated, renovated or replaced to the extent that the fair market value of the improved or replaced structure exceeds the base value by the percent specified in this section, the commissioner shall employ usual and customary methods of assessing real property and improvements thereon. (g) This section shall be applicable to assessments of qualifying "residential real estate" and "multifamily real estate" made on and after January 1, 2008. (Ord. No. O-2003-11, § 1, 12-16-2002; Ord. No. O-2008-31, § 1, 6-23-2008; Ord. No. O-201208, § 1, 2-27-2012)
Page 3
39
City of Manassas
Manassas City Council Economic/Community Development & Land Use Committee 9027 Center Street Manassas, VA 20110
Meeting Date:
February 23, 2017
Time Estimate:
5 Minutes
Agenda Title:
Land Use Committee Updates
Recommendation:
Information Only
Motion:
N/A
Date Last Considered by City Council:
N/A
Summary and/or Comments:
Please see the attached reports: 1) The ongoing status report of Land Use Committee projects, inquires, and other items. 2) The land use development application cases that have been submitted and are in the process of review.
Board – Committee – or Commission Reviewed: Fiscal Impact:
N/A
Staff Contact:
Elizabeth S. Via-Gossman, Community Development Director
[email protected] (703) 257-8224
N/A
40
City Council Land Use Committee (LUC) – Project Status FY17 February 23, 2017 Page 1 of 3
Issue/Project/ Priority
Date Initiated/ Key Dates
Date Due to City Council
Staff Assigned
Description
Status
Public Safety Facility Space Needs Update
July 1, 2016 (FY16)
TBD
Via-Gossman
Updated report being drafted
Grant Avenue Streetscape
July 1, 2016 (FY16) July 1, 2016 (Budget)
June 30, 2017
Arcieri
December, 2016
Via-Gossman
Space Needs Study for future PSF on Grant Ave. to be updated based on set location and relocation of Fire and Rescue Admin. Concept design for road diet and enhanced landscaping on Grant Avenue from Lee to Wellington High level space needs study, site lay out and cost estimates
Date Initiated/ Key Dates MEDIUM PRIORITY
Date Due
Staff Assigned
Description
Status
Mathis Avenue Sector Plan
November, 2016
June, 2017
Smith, Arcieri, Davis
Draft Study due April 2017
Tax Abatement for Rehabilitated Residential Properties
January 1, 2017
Development of streetscape standards for Mathis Ave and Rt. 28 Amend current program to make more attractive and increase marketing
HIGH PRIORITY
Library/Museum Concept Plan
Issue/Project/ Priority
Via-Gossman
TIA initiated
Final Draft provided to City Council January 2017
LUC discussion 2/23/17
P:\CITY COUNCIL\LAND USE COMMITTEE\WORKPLAN\City Council Land Use Committee - Project Status FY17.docx
41
City Council Land Use Committee (LUC) – Project Status FY17 February 23, 2017 Page 2 of 3
Issue/Project/ Priority
Date Initiated/ Key Dates
Date Due
Staff Assigned
Description
Status
July 1, 2015
TBD
Via-Gossman
This project was unfunded in the FY16 and FY17 budget. It is proposed to identify neighborhoods and tools for conservation, rehabilitation, and redevelopment.
Secured grant in FY17 from VA. Dept. of Housing & Community Development
July 1, 2016 (FY)
June 2017
Davis, Zenich
A new park master plan
Initiated
LOW PRIORITY Housing and Neighborhoods Conservation, Rehab, and Redevelopment Study Stonewall Park Master Plan
P:\CITY COUNCIL\LAND USE COMMITTEE\WORKPLAN\City Council Land Use Committee - Project Status FY17.docx
42
City Council Land Use Committee (LUC) – Project Status FY17 February 23, 2017 Page 3 of 3
COMPLETED FY16 Issue/ Project/ Priority Parking Ordinance Update (Phase 2 ZO) Airport Zoning/Overlay District Update (Phase 2 ZO) Historic Overlay District, B-3, B-3.5 Update (Phase 2 ZO)
Staff Assigned Arcieri Davis
Description/Disposition Update parking standards in non-residential districts. New ordinance effective July 1, 2016. Update zoning ordinance with recommendations from Airport Commission. New ordinance effective July 1, 2016.
Whitworth
Update the Historic Overlay District and underlying zoning districts with recommendations from ARB, business community, etc. New ordinance effective July 1, 2016.
Issue/ Project/ Priority Spot Blight Abatement Pilot Project Gateway Development Agreement and Rezoning
Staff Assigned Via
Description/Disposition Pilot the use of the City’s condemnation powers to abate spot blight.
Small, Via
New development agreement with Buchanan Partners
Parks, Recreation and Cultural Needs Assessment Final Z.O. Technical and Admin. Updates (Phase 3) Sign Ordinance Update
Via, WilsonSogunro Arcieri
Comprehensive needs assessment and level of service study
Arcieri
Based on 2015 Supreme Court decision
Food Trucks Ordinance
Arcieri
Dean Park Master Plan
Davis, Zenich
Requested by M. Hoover (The Bone) to allow food trucks in the City to park for not more than 4 hours instead of continuously moving. Update master plan for Dean Park and analysis of E.G. Smith relocation
COMPLETED FY17
Remaining zoning ordinance update
P:\CITY COUNCIL\LAND USE COMMITTEE\WORKPLAN\City Council Land Use Committee - Project Status FY17.docx
43
City Council Land Use Committee (LUC) – Pending Land Use Cases February 23, 2017 Planning Commission:
Case Name REZ #16-04; Tillett Square
SUP #17-01; Holtzman Oil
Date Submitted 6/20/16
Staff Assigned Davis
10/19/16
Davis
Address/ Description
Status
9522 Fairview Ave. and 8812 Wesley Ave.; Application accepted: 6/24/16 Rezone ±5.8 acres from R-1 and R-5, with ARB Worksession: 12/13/16 proffers and HOD to B-3.5, with proffers and PC hearing: TBD HOD. The project would allow 70 single-family attached homes (townhomes) and six singlefamily detached homes, including the preservation of two historic buildings as singlefamily detached homes. 9530 Prince William St.; SUP for a Storage Yard Application accepted: 10/19/16 (Hazardous Materials) for the distribution and bulk PC hearing: 3/1/17 storage of propane as part of a propane and ice distribution operation.
SUP #17-02; Metz Middle School Telecommunication Tower
1/13/16
Davis
9950 Wellington Road: SUP for placement of a 106-ft tall wireless communication tower collocated on replacement athletic field light.
Application accepted: 1/18/16 PC hearing: TBD
Board of Zoning Appeals:
None
44 Page 1 of 1
