MORELAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Facilities Master Plan January 2016
Moreland School District Assets:15 Anderson Elementary School Baker Elementary School Country Lane Elementary School EDS (Easterbrook Discovery Middle School) Latimer Elementary School MMS ( Moreland Middle School ) Payne Elementary School Amber Leased School Site Coventry Leased School Site Old Easterbrook Leased School Site Phelan Leased School Site Strawberry Park Leased School Site District Office Complex Maintenance & Operations Building & Corporation Yard Moreland Community Center Rooms & Gymnasium •7 District Core Sites
..
5 Leased Sites
3 Administration / MOT & CC
Moreland School District Fun Facts
Enrollment Projections-District wide Fall 2014
2015-16
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
2022-23
2023-24
2024-25
Growth
TransK
109
109
109
112
112
112
112
112
112
112
K
582
584
588
592
592
592
592
592
592
592
1
552
602
607
611
614
614
614
614
614
614
2
589
561
610
615
614
618
618
618
618
618
3
544
610
582
631
626
627
632
632
632
632
4
617
555
619
591
637
630
631
635
635
635
5
515
620
559
624
594
641
633
633
638
638
6
527
499
610
542
610
578
622
615
616
620
7
481
523
497
609
541
608
576
620
614
615
8
469
481
525
498
610
541
609
577
621
615
4,985
5,144
5,306
5,425
5,550
5,561
5,639
5,648
5,692
5,691
707
2,376 1,132 1,477 4,985
2,466 1,175 1,503 5,144
2,496 1,178 1,632 5,306
2,561 1,215 1,649 5,425
2,558 1,231 1,761 5,550
2,563 1,271 1,727 5,561
2,568 1,264 1,807 5,639
2,568 1,268 1,812 5,648
2,568 1,273 1,851 5,692
2,568 1,273 1,850 5,691
192 141 374 707
Total:
TK-3 4-5 6-8 Total:
2016-17
Projections developed December 2014 Maximum enrollment reached in year 2023-24 Growth is 707 students from fall of 2015 to fall of 2023
Enrollment Projections-District wide Fall 2015
2015-16
TransK
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
2022-23
2023-24
2024-25
87
82
82
82
82
82
79
78
77
77
K
553
566
560
563
563
557
552
546
541
535
1
537
585
592
588
589
589
585
579
573
568
2
565
542
590
596
594
591
591
587
582
575
3
522
572
548
600
604
597
595
595
590
584
4
584
521
567
545
596
602
595
593
593
587
5
518
589
523
571
549
599
604
598
596
596
6
520
508
575
508
567
538
588
594
586
590
7
458
503
491
559
492
558
529
579
585
577
8
Growth
444
452
497
483
551
488
553
524
572
581
4,788
4,920
5,025
5,095
5,187
5,201
5,271
5,273
5,295
5,270
507
TK-3 4-5 6-8
2,264 1,102 1,422
2,347 1,110 1,463
2,372 1,090 1,563
2,429 1,116 1,550
2,432 1,145 1,610
2,416 1,201 1,584
2,402 1,199 1,670
2,385 1,191 1,697
2,363 1,189 1,743
2,339 1,183 1,748
99 87 321
Total: Change
4,788
4,920 132
5,025 105
5,095 70
5,187 92
5,201 14
5,271 70
5,273 2
5,295 22
5,270 -25
507 507
Total:
Projection Variance TK-3 (112) 4-5 (30) 6-8 (55)
(119) (65) (40)
(124) (88) (69)
(132) (99) (99)
(126) (86) (151)
(147) (70) (143)
(166) (65) (137)
(183) (77) (115)
(205) (84) (108)
(229) (90) (102)
Total:
(224)
(281)
(330)
(363)
(360)
(368)
(375)
(397)
(421)
(197)
Projections developed October 2015 Maximum enrollment reached in year 2023-24 Growth is 507 students between fall of 2015 and fall of 2023
School Site Capacity Anderson TK K 1 2 3 4 5 Total:
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
2022-23
2023-24
18
17
17
17
17
17
16
16
16
78
93
95
96
96
95
94
93
92
67
73
87
89
89
89
89
88
87
82
66
72
85
87
88
88
88
87
60
80
64
70
83
86
87
87
87
86
59
78
63
68
82
85
86
86
67
86
59
78
63
68
82
85
86
458
474
472
498
503
525
541
543
541
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
2022-23
2023-24
17
17
17
17
17
16
16
16
97
95
95
95
94
93
92
91
108
107
106
105
105
104
103
102
108
109
108
107
106
106
105
104
115
111
111
110
108
106
106
105
112
115
111
112
110
108
107
107
114
109
113
109
111
109
107
106
671
663
661
655
651
642
636
631
Country Lane 2015-16 18 TK 97 K 107 1 113 2 111 3 117 4 96 5 Total: 659
2024-25 Classrooms Capacity 16 1 24 91 4 96 86 4 96 86 4 96 86 4 96 85 3 96 86 3 96 536 23 600
2024-25 Classrooms Capacity 16 1 24 90 4 96 101 4 96 103 4 96 104 4 96 106 3 96 106 3 96 626 23 600
Enrollment figures include SDC students, Classrooms indicated are General Education
District Capacity Classrooms Anderson Baker Country Lane EDS Latimer Payne MMS Total: Projections:
Gen Ed K-5 23 23 23 24 17 23 133
Gen Ed 6-8 Specialty
12 9
4 3
42 63
4 11
SDC 4 4 5 2 2 1 18
OT / RSP / Ext Care / SDC Speech Flexible IS COE SDC Preschool Preschool 2 2 2 2 1 5 3 1 5 3 3 4 3 1 3 2 1 3 2 4 4 3 7 26 15 3 2 6
Total 31 36 36 55 37 35 54 284
Proof 31 36 36 55 37 35 54 284
Students Flexible 600 640 24 640 24 1,074 724 620 24 1,270 5,640 5,295
Enrollment Projections TK-5 Fall 2014 TK K 1 2 3 4 5 Total:
2015-16 109 582 552 589 544 617 515 3,508
2016-17 109 584 602 561 610 555 620 3,641
2017-18 109 588 607 610 582 619 559 3,674
2018-19 112 592 611 615 631 591 624 3,776
2019-20 112 592 614 614 626 637 594 3,789
2020-21 112 592 614 618 627 630 641 3,834
2021-22 112 592 614 618 632 631 633 3,832
2022-23 112 592 614 618 632 635 633 3,836
2023-24 112 592 614 618 632 635 638 3,841
2024-25 112 592 614 618 632 635 638 3,841
TK K 1 2 3 4 5 Total:
2015-16 87 553 537 565 522 584 518 3,366
2016-17 82 566 585 542 572 521 589 3,457
2017-18 82 560 592 590 548 567 523 3,462
2018-19 82 563 588 596 600 545 571 3,545
2019-20 82 563 589 594 604 596 549 3,577
2020-21 82 557 589 591 597 602 599 3,617
2021-22 79 552 585 591 595 595 604 3,601
2022-23 78 546 579 587 595 593 598 3,576
2023-24 77 541 573 582 590 593 596 3,552
2024-25 77 535 568 575 584 587 596 3,522
Fall 2015
Projected maximum enrollment has decreased by 224 students between the two models Current projected enrollment growth maximizes at 251 in 2020-21, decreases to 156 in 2023-24
Facilities TK-5 Fall 2015 TK K 1 2 3 4 5 Total:
TK-5 Capacity Anderson Baker Country Lane EDS Latimer Payne Total:
2015-16 87 553 537 565 522 584 518 3,366
2015-16 600 664 664 670 426 644 3,668
2016-17 82 566 585 542 572 521 589 3,457
2016-17 600 664 664 670 426 644 3,668
2017-18 82 560 592 590 548 567 523 3,462
2017-18 600 664 664 670 426 644 3,668
2018-19 82 563 588 596 600 545 571 3,545
2018-19 600 664 664 670 426 644 3,668
2019-20 82 563 589 594 604 596 549 3,577
2019-20 600 664 664 670 426 644 3,668
2020-21 82 557 589 591 597 602 599 3,617
2020-21 600 664 664 670 426 644 3,668
2021-22 79 552 585 591 595 595 604 3,601
2021-22 600 664 664 670 426 644 3,668
2022-23 78 546 579 587 595 593 598 3,576
2022-23 600 664 664 670 426 644 3,668
2023-24 77 541 573 582 590 593 596 3,552
2023-24 600 664 664 670 426 644 3,668
2024-25 77 535 568 575 584 587 596 3,522
2024-25 600 664 664 670 426 644 3,668
TK-5 Capacity table includes one classroom for enrollment “bubble” at Baker, Country Lane, and Payne
Enrollment Projections 6-8 Fall 2014 6th 7th 8th Total
2015-16 527 481 469 1,477
2016-17 499 523 481 1,503
2017-18 610 497 525 1,632
2018-19 542 609 576 1,727
2019-20 610 541 610 1,761
2020-21 578 608 541 1,727
2021-22 622 576 609 1,807
2022-23 615 620 577 1,812
2023-24 616 614 621 1,851
2024-25 620 615 615 1,850
Fall 2015 6th 7th 8th Total
2015-16 520 458 444 1,422
2016-17 508 503 452 1,463
2017-18 575 491 497 1,563
2018-19 508 559 483 1,550
2019-20 567 492 551 1,610
2020-21 538 558 488 1,584
2021-22 588 529 553 1,670
2022-23 594 579 524 1,697
2023-24 586 585 572 1,743
2024-25 590 577 581 1,748
Projected maximum enrollment has decreased by 103 students Current Projected maximum growth is 326 students in 2024-25
Facilities 6-8 Fall 2015 6th 7th 8th Total
2015-16 520 458 444 1,422
Middle School Capacity EDS Latimer MMS Total:
2016-17 508 503 452 1,463
2017-18 575 491 497 1,563
2018-19 508 559 483 1,550
2019-20 567 492 551 1,610
2020-21 538 558 488 1,584
2021-22 588 529 553 1,670
2022-23 594 579 524 1,697
2023-24 586 585 572 1,743
2024-25 590 577 581 1,748
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 404 404 404 404 404 404 404 404 298 298 298 298 298 298 298 298 861 848 908 882 968 995 1,041 1,046 1,563 1,550 1,610 1,584 1,670 1,697 1,743 1,748
Capacity table assumes capacity enrollment at EDS and Latimer
Moreland Elementary School District
Facilities Update Total Number of assets
- 15
Total Number of Buildings / Structures – 220 Total Building Square Footage- 600K+
Total Acreage- 155 + Acres Total Field Area- 65 + Acres
TERMS FCI- Facility Condition Index A measure of a facility’s relative condition at a particular point in time.
CS- Critical Systems Critical System refers to equipment associated with a system, sub system or piece of equipment that is essential to the effective functioning of an asset. Some examples of critical systems are: Roofs, Foundations, Fenestrations Structural Building Components, HVAC components.
LCCA- LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS Life-cycle cost is a method of determining the entire cost of a structure, product, or component over its expected useful life.
P-F Interval The P-F interval represents the second (middle) phase in a three-phase life cycle model and deterioration model of assets. The time, or cycles from when a “potential Failure” (“P”) is first detected on an asset, or component, until the asset or component has reached “Functional Failure” (F)
P-F Intervals & Deterioration Rates
The three phases are identified as follows: • Phase 1: Pre-P Period (
F) • Pre-Natal; Childhood; Adolescence; Adulthood; Old Age
P-F Interval Example An example of the progression of deterioration from potential failure (“P”) to functional failure (“F”) along the P-F Interval. Deterioration Rates- The pace at which an asset degrades over time under normal operating conditions. From the moment assets are placed in service, they start to deteriorate.
Deterioration Rate The rate of deterioration is presented graphically on a performance curve (survivor curve) where the slope of the curve indicates the rate R= d/t distance over time = rate of speed -solve for R
Establishing the Patterns of the P-F Interval The longer the P-F Interval, the more time the owner has to make a good decision by planning an appropriate course of action and raising the necessary funds for renewal of the asset. Example: Plan now for funding for early P-F interval extenders for EDS two Story Building with consistent and timely PM.
Inverse Square Rule • The rule - Any part that is known to be failing and left in service until the next level of failure will create an expense equal or greater to the square of the cost of the primary failure part. • Example – A compressor pump shows an elevated AMP draw during a PM task and is not replaced and left in service until it fails will ruin the compressor pump. • Contactor= $ 40.00 • New Compressor Pump = $ 1600.00 +
Assessing Our Performance Problems – 1. Most K-12 maintenance groups are reactive, which is the most expensive kind of maintenance. 2. There is not enough man power. 3. Personnel do not have the expertise to perform necessary maintenance. Q : How can we turn our maintenance system around so that our work replaces parts before the equipment fails ? A: Hire a third-party maintenance provider or adopt their methods. Effective Contractor Management
Deferred Maintenance Components
• • • • • • • • • •
Roofing Building Exteriors / Doors & Window Systems Elevators / Conveying Systems HVAC Controls & Distribution Systems Electrical Equipment Plumbing Fixtures & Systems Fire Protection Systems Painting / Exterior & Interior Vertical Elements e.g. Columns, Exterior Wall Framing.. Horizontal Elements e.g. Beams, Girders, Trusses…
Roofing: Preventative Maintenance • • • • • • •
Anderson- $15K PM Work Baker-$10K PM Work Country Lane-$10K PM Work EDS- $35K PM Work Latimer- $25K PM Work MMS- $50K PM Work Payne- $15K PM Work
• • • • •
Amber- $10K PM Work Coventry - $25K PM Work Easterbrook- $50K PM Work Phelan- $40K PM Work Strawberry Park- $15K PM Work
• District Office - $10K PM Work • MO&T - $5K PM Work • Community Center- $10K PM Work PM = removal of all debris, clean gutters and clear down spouts, patch penetrations & ridge lines, replace missing shingles. Cost if Outsourced: 325K
Roofing: Replacement Anderson Baker Country Lane EDS Latimer MMS Payne
2019 2020 2021 2022 2024 2018 2022
District Office MO&T Community Center
2025 2027 2026
Amber Coventry Old Easterbrook Phelan Strawberry Park
Roof Replacement ranges in cost from $400,000 to $750,000
2019 2017 2018 2017 2021
Old Easterbrook
Old Easterbrook
Old Easterbrook
EDS
Play Surfacing (resilient) & Structures • District Wide- $600K • Includes removal of old resilient surfacing and installation of new – Safety Concern – 8-10 Year life cycle
• Additional Structure at Anderson – playstructures and field shared use with DCS
Asphalt and Concrete • Many District Sites are at end of the expected life cycle, needing complete removal and replacement of A/C, sidewalks and interior walkways (Priority 1- Safety ) • 6.6 Million (at current estimated costs) • Over the next five years would require a $1,320,000 annual contribution • Over ten years would require a $660,000 annual contribution
Asphalt and Concrete Anderson Baker Country Lane EDS Latimer MMS Payne
2017 2019 2016 2016 2018 2017 2016
District Office MO&T Community Center
2020 2022 2020
Amber Coventry Old Easterbrook Phelan Strawberry Park
2016 2016 2018 2017 2020
Asphalt Replacement cost is approximately $4.00 per square foot DPS (4.5” paveout) Slurry / Fog Sealing will prolong life span $.35 per square foot (done in proper P-F Phase Interval)
HVAC • • • • •
Over 1500 units District-wide Life Cycle PF Interval 65% year 8+ Replacement cost per unit- $10K Annual Outsource Expenditures- $25K Anderson is its own DDC and needs to be converted away from proprietary controls to drop down programmable thermostats - $125K
HVAC Units Anderson Baker Country Lane EDS Latimer MMS Payne
2018 2021 2020 2021 2023 2022 2020
District Office MO&T Community Center
2024 2024 2023
Amber Coventry Old Easterbrook Phelan Strawberry Park
Staggered replacement schedule and run to fail Replacement cost per unit = $10,000
2019 2018 2018 2017 2025
Painting • • • • • • •
Anderson Baker Country Lane EDS Latimer Payne MMS
2016 2019 2018 2019 2025 2020 2023
• • • • •
Amber Coventry Old Easterbrook Phelan Strawberry Park
2018 2017 2022 2016 2027
• District Office 2019 • MO&T 2019 • Community Center 2019
10-12 year Life Cycle (depending on prep and quality of material) Exterior Painting can range from $250,000 to $650,000
District Wide Re-keying Costs Justification of rekeying the District- The keying for the District has not been maintained and there has not been a comprehensive key control program utilized for many years. 1. To improve the schools security and safety. 2. To ensure that the school staff and Administration is able to keep track of who’s entering and exiting our campuses. 3. To allow “real-time” visibility to who has keyed access and what those keys open. 4. To ensure that the keys are restricted and not easily duplicated, can maintain all key holder records efficiently, and when a key is lost or unaccounted for- be prepared with a simple and cost effective rekeying avenue.
District Wide Re-keying Costs • With automated key control software platforms, administration becomes more efficient, can be decentralized to each school administrator and provide improved safety and security for students and faculty. To result in reduced year-over-year program costs due to theft and vandalism. • Rule of thumb- Rekey about every five years without (KCS). • ESTIMATED DISTRICT WIDE IMPLEMENTATION- 1 YEAR / $250,000.00
Fire Alarm Upgrades • District wide upgrades that fulfill the voice activation code• EVACS- Emergency Voice/ Alarm Communication System required for MNS (mass notification system) Group E for Educational Occupancies through grade 12 of 30 or more ( previously 50 or more) • NFPA 70 / NFPA 72 / NEC/ IBC • $500K- estimate only
Facilities Maintenance Programs: Routine Restricted Maintenance • Established to ensure that state-funded facility projects are kept in good repair. • Activities involved with repairing, restoring or renovating school property including grounds, building, site improvements, building fixtures and service systems. • Four types of maintenance • Breakdown : emergency maintenance • Operating: work necessary for a component to function properly • Preventative: regularly scheduled maintenance based on life cycle projection of various components. • Overhaul: Periodic major repair or replacement of operating parts and components
Facilities Maintenance Programs: Deferred Maintenance • Major repair or replacement of existing school building components which have approached or exceeded their normal life expectancy – School building Components: • • • • • • • • • •
Painting Paving Roofing Plumbing Lighting Heating, ventilation, air conditioning Electrical systems Wall systems Floor systems Asbestos and Lead Abatement & Monitoring
Routine Restricted Maintenance • Requirement: a minimum of 3% of total General Fund expenditures must be for facilities maintenance • During recession “flexibility” allowed as little as 1% – Moreland was at 1.4% in 2013-14 and 2014-15 – Compliance requirement returning in 2015-16
Routine Restricted Maintenance • Current budget act modifies “flexibility” – 3% minimum must be met by full implementation of LCFF (est. 2020-21) • 2015-16 & 2016-17 – Lesser of 3% requirement or the amount deposited in 2014-15 – Moreland is at 2.5% in 2015-16
• 2017-18 to 2019-20 – Greater of 2% of total General Fund expenditures or the rule for 2015-16 & 2016-17
Deferred Maintenance • Revenue Limit funding model: – State provided funding only if the District matched • equivalent to ½ of 1% General Fund expenditures
– Districts were allowed to “split” 3% RRM requirement • 2.5% to remain in General Fund for RRM • .5% transferred to Deferred Maintenance Fund • State match received the following fiscal year
– State Funding Deficits: • Districts could count “excess” toward following fiscal year
Deferred Maintenance • LCFF funding model: – State match provided in 2012-13 (2011-12 deficited entitlement) folded into LCFF entitlement, as unrestricted funds ($138,283) • Can be used for any purpose (including DM) • Moreland using as “unrestricted general fund”
District Wide Lighting & Sustainability • The District is participating in the Prop 39 initiative. • Additional Sustainability Measures to Counter Rebate Terminations Include: • • • •
Egg Timers for HVAC Systems IR Imaging for BTU Loss in Ceilings & Walls Distribution System Leaks Increase R Insulation Properties in Attic Spaces.
Proposition 39: California Clean Energy Jobs Act • Restricted program with specific compliance and reporting components, subject to annual audit – Funds must be spent for allowed purposes, in compliance with plan – Eligible projects: installed after December 2013
• Nov 2013 – Began release of energy audit and planning funds – Moreland applied for and received $130,000
• Jan 2014 – Began accepting expenditure plans
• June 2018 – All funds must be encumbered
• June 2020 – All projects must be complete
• June 2021 – Final project reporting due
Proposition 39 Funding Fiscal Year
Entitlement
Received
2013-14
$191,394
$130,000
2014-15
$178,329
$0
2015-16
$168,554
$0
Total:
$538,277
$130,000
Requires expenditure plan submitted to and approved by California Energy Commission
District must comply with all reporting requirements (project and savings)
Proposition 39 Funding Plans must include: • “Benchmark” energy data to determine the energy use intensity (EUI) of site(s) • All projects must achieve a minimum savings-to-investment ratio (SIR) of 1.05 • Present value of savings (over life of equipment) / Total costs (net of rebates) • Data release form allowing the Energy Commission to access both historical and future utility billing data through 2023 for all accounts • Projects must be prioritized following 11 factors specified in the Prop 39 guidelines (i.e. age of facilities, modernization, EUI, proportion of pupils eligible for Title I) • Description of energy efficiency measures and identified buildings/facilities • Description of existing energy-using equipment • All calculations and assumptions to support technical feasibility & energy savings • Proposed budget detailing all energy efficiency measure costs
Applicable Energy Measures Category
Energy Measure Interior Fixture Retrofit Interior Linear Fluorescent Relamping Interior LED Lighting Lighting LED Exit Signs CFL Lamp Retrofit Exterior Fixture Retrofit Daylighting Controls Lighting Controls Occupancy Controls HVAC and Air Handler Repairs Packaged/Split Unit Replacement Repair Economizer HVAC Replace Economizer Duct Sealing Retrocommissioning HVAC Controls Programmable / Smart Thermostats Insulation Building Envelope Cool Roofs Premium Efficiency Motors Pumps, Motors, Drives Energy Efficient Pumps Domestic Hot Water Water Tank, Pipe Insulation Kitchen High Efficiency Appliances Irrigation Pump Control Irrigation High Efficiency Sprinkler Power Management Plug Loads Vending Machine Misers
The Measure K ballot initiative spoke to maximizing energy efficiency to result in savings to the District. One of the projects under Measure K was the construction of parking structures and the installation of solar arrays on roof tops and these structures at 5 sites and the District Office. The project took place in two phases, the first being the Country Lane, Moreland Middle School and District Office site, all of which were fully operational by November 2012. Phase Two included the Anderson, Baker, EDS and Payne school sites, all of which were operational by July 2013.
Solar Project Time Span
Average Total Rate Anderson
Baker
Killowatts Generated Country Moreland Lane Middle EDS Payne
July-Dec 2012
0.17650
Jan-April 2013
0.18091
May-Sept 2013
0.18442
81,072
60,489 140,581 31,335
65,546
Oct-Dec 2013
0.18521
56,686
49,034
51,647
21,549
45,144
80,553
33,556
Jan-Feb 2014
0.18618
31,841
27,658
29,761
12,326
25,233
47,734
18,935
Mar-April 2014
0.18768
58,609
50,260
53,575
24,614
45,181
86,032
34,325
May-Sept 2014
0.19440
179,438 152,495 154,545 78,143 137,050 256,949 104,363
Oct-Dec 2014
0.20003
48,473
Total:
35,961
DO
90,592
42,605
41,329
19,493
38,994
25,929
26,060
146,906
59,027
243,512 100,012
72,965
29,469
456,119 382,541 597,991 187,460 357,148 960,580 405,747
Approximate Savings Baker
Country Lane
EDS
Payne
Moreland Middle
Time Span
Anderson
DO
Total:
July-Dec 2012
$
-
$
-
$
6,347
$
-
$
-
$
4,576
$ 4,600
$ 15,523
Jan-April 2013
$
-
$
-
$ 16,389
$
-
$
-
May-Sept 2013
$ 14,951
$ 11,155
$ 25,926
$ 5,779
$ 12,088
$ 26,577
$ 10,679
$ 53,645
$ 44,908
$ 18,444
$ 133,251
Oct-Dec 2013
$ 10,499
$ 9,082
$
9,566
$ 3,991
$ 8,361
$ 14,919
$ 6,215
$ 62,633
Jan-Feb 2014
$ 5,928
$ 5,149
$
5,541
$ 2,295
$ 4,698
$
8,887
$ 3,525
$ 36,023
Mar-April 2014
$ 11,000
$ 9,433
May-Sept 2014
$ 34,883
$ 29,645
$ 10,055
$ 4,620
$ 8,480
$ 16,146
$ 6,442
$ 66,176
$ 30,044
$ 15,191
$ 26,643
$ 49,951
$ 20,288
$ 206,645
Oct-Dec 2014
$ 9,696
$ 8,522
$
8,267
$ 3,899
$ 7,800
$ 14,595
$ 5,895
$ 58,674
Total:
$ 86,957
$ 72,986
$ 112,135
$ 35,775
$ 68,070
$ 180,559
$ 76,088
$ 632,570
Solar Incentives The District was able to take advantage of solar incentives which were being offered at the time the projects were being constructed. These incentives come to the District in the form of rebates, and are limited to the first five years of the project. The table below shows the funding received by the District from PG&E through these incentives. Solar Incentives
Anderson
Baker
FY 12-13
Country Lane $
13,608.37
EDS
MMS
Payne
$ 22,051.90
D.O. $
8,863.33
Total: $
44,523.60
FY 13-14
$ 28,557.69
$ 23,843.46
$
46,547.73
$ 25,089.21
$ 27,216.28
$
77,113.80
$ 28,051.33
$ 256,419.50
FY 14-15
$ 32,171.15
$ 30,440.58
$
36,095.51
$ 10,749.12
$ 26,295.51
$
62,232.78
$ 25,081.12
$ 223,065.77
FY 15-16*
$ 18,802.63
$ 13,888.21
$
21,364.99
$
$ 14,646.98
$
33,582.85
$ 14,518.02
$ 121,595.60
4,791.92
FY 16-17
$
-
FY 17-18
$
-
Total:
$ 79,531.47
$ 68,172.25
$ 117,616.60
$ 40,630.25
$ 90,210.67
$ 172,929.43
$ 76,513.80
$ 645,604.47
Summary: Facilities Plan Roof PM Roof Replacement Painting Playsurface Replacement Asphalt PM Asphalt Replacement Re-Keying Fire Alarm / PA System Latimer Classroom Building Lighting Fields Technology Infrastructure HVAC Replacement Shade Structures Total:
2015-16 2016-17 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ 325,000 $ 300,000 $ 300,840 $ 250,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 25,000 $ 225,000 $ 250,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 225,000 $ 225,000 $ 9,000,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000
$
40,000 $
2017-18 $ 90,000 $ 300,000 $ 310,000 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 350,000 $ 50,000 $ 225,000
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
2018-19 90,000 400,000 410,000 25,000 50,000 1,200,000 50,000 250,000
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
2019-20 40,000 450,000 400,000 25,000 45,000 1,200,000 50,000 250,000
$ $
40,000 $ 500,000 $
40,000 $ 500,000 $
40,000 500,000
40,000 $
40,000 $
80,000 $
120,000
$ 5,830,840 $ 5,780,000 $ 1,955,000 $ 3,095,000 $ 3,120,000
Summary: Facilities Plan Roof PM Roof Replacement Painting Playsurface Replacement Asphalt PM Asphalt Replacement Re-Keying Fire Alarm / PA System Latimer Classroom Building Lighting Fields Technology Infrastructure HVAC Replacement Shade Structures Total:
2020-21 $ 25,000 $ 375,000 $ 350,000 $ 25,000 $ 35,000 $ 1,400,000
2021-22 $ 30,000 $ 450,000 $ 375,000 $ 150,000 $ 40,000 $ 600,000
2022-23 $ 35,000 $ 450,000 $ 350,000 $ 150,000 $ 50,000 $ 600,000
2023-24 $ 15,000 $ 750,000 $ 300,000 $ 150,000 $ 50,000 $ 450,000
2024-25 $ 15,000 $ 675,000 $ 300,000 $ 150,000 $ 65,000 $ 400,000
$ 250,000 $
250,000 $
50,000 $
50,000 $
50,000
$ 40,000 $ $ 500,000 $
25,000 $ 500,000 $
25,000 $ 500,000 $
25,000 $ 25,000 500,000 $ 500,000
$ 120,000 $
125,000 $
125,000 $
175,000 $ 200,000
$ 3,120,000 $ 2,545,000 $ 2,335,000 $ 2,465,000 $ 2,380,000
Funding Plan: • Increase Routine Restricted Maintenance to required 3% over 3 years • Transfer portion of LCFF that originated from State Deferred Maintenance match to Building Fund • Future lease revenue increases
Routine Restricted Maintenance: RRM 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
% of Budget 0.025 0.0265 0.0285 0.03
Total GF Budget MYP 50,389,922 51,939,740 52,737,651 53,792,404
RRM 1,254,080 1,340,870 1,461,374 1,566,769
Staffing Costs 591,667 609,417 621,605 634,037
Supplies & LCFF DM Total Services Transfer Maintenance 662,413 1,254,080 731,453 138,000 1,478,870 839,769 138,000 1,599,374 932,732 138,000 1,704,769
Leased Sites • All sites currently leased • Revenue: – For duration of lease, December CPI; however, minimum of 3%, maximum of 6%
• Lease revenues deposited into Building Fund – Continue transfer in of $5.2 million to General Fund to support general operating costs – Balance retained in Building Fund for Deferred Maintenance of all sites
Lease Revenues: Lease Revenues 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
Lease Revenues $ 5,857,776 $ 6,131,692 $ 6,527,658 $ 6,719,139
$ $ $ $
Transfer to GF 5,193,380 5,193,380 5,193,380 5,193,380
Deferred Maintenance $ 664,396 $ 938,312 $ 1,334,278 $ 1,525,759
4 Year Facilities Maintenance Budget: Fiscal Year 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19
Lease Revenues $ 664,396 $ 938,312 $ 1,334,278 $ 1,525,759
RRM LCFF Trf Total $ 1,254,080 $ 1,918,476 $ 1,340,870 $ 138,000 $ 2,417,182 $ 1,461,374 $ 138,000 $ 2,933,652 $ 1,566,769 $ 138,000 $ 3,230,528
Staffing Costs $ 591,667 $ 609,417 $ 621,605 $ 634,037
Supplies & Services $ 1,326,809 $ 1,807,765 $ 2,312,047 $ 2,596,491
Special Reserve for Capital Outlay • Funds generated from sale of school site • Expenditures – Augment bond measures – Lease District occupied portable classrooms – Deferred Maintenance
Special Reserve Fund: 8 Year Recap Sale of Site Fund - Summary Beginning Balance @ 7/1/2008 Projected Ending Balance @ 6/30/16
$ $
25,016,703 14,273,133
Maintenance Bond Project Supplement Easterbrook Modernization Portable Leases
$ $ $ $
1,750,000 4,500,000 5,350,000 1,420,000
Measure K 2010 Bond Measure For Futhur Discussion:
Measure K Construction Program Funding Sources: Bond Program Summary Revenues Bond BAN Premium State Modernization Match Developer Fees Interest
Through 6/30/15
Budgeted 15-16
$ 47,000,000.00 $ 328,490.75 $ 5,292,247.60 $ $ 141,738.80 $ Total: $ 52,762,477.15 $
875,000.00 35,200.00 910,200.00 $ 53,672,677.15
Measure K Construction Program Project Costs: Projects Solar Site Safety & Security Modernization MMS Painting Anderson Field Latimer Field Lunch Table Replacement Technology Infrastructure Upgrade Baker Modular Restroom EDS Portable Replacement EDS New Classroom Building EDS Blacktop Restoration Latimer New Classroom Building HVAC Upgrade Coventry Fire Alarm Community Center MU Rooms Community Center MU Room AV System Mowers Classroom Furniture (Latimer & EDS)
Through 6/30/15
Budgeted 15-16
$ 9,248,362.37 $ 1,492,453.59 $ 14,897,983.66 $ $ 195,328.61 $ 1,229,683.51 $ 862,172.93 $ 272,404.48 $ 2,597,370.87 $ 437,418.09 $ 723,910.72 $ 4,540,430.63 $ $ $ 252,584.57 $ $ 90,571.07 $ 5.85 $ 38,544.01 $ 10,494.25 $ 28,074.28 $ 98,287.20 $
1,645,411
1,248,091 485,000 9,027,679
148,649
Measure K Recap General Expenses Issuance Fees Consulting Fees Staff Salaries and Benefits (Distributed to projects @ year-end) Legal Fees Design Costs - Project Planning Project Accounting Software Total Expended or Budgeted
Through 6/30/15
$ $
Budgeted 15-16
419,856.37 $ 38,285.00 $ $ $ 12,834.20 $ $ 19,011.66 $ $ 57,950.00 $ 37,564,017.92 $
93,269 16,815 124,072 237 1,330 12,790,553 $ 50,354,570.92 Expended/Budgeted $ 3,318,106.23 Remaining balance
Measure K: Final Frontier • District Construction Committee – Composition • • • • •
Representative from each site (Principal / Vice Principal) Two Board Members Community Member Certificated representative Classified representative
• Final Prioritization – Given parameters of approximately $3 million dollars – Each site submitted a list of desired projects – Compilation of projects submitted • Grouped into similar projects – for economies of scale • Cost estimates developed • Tentative prioritization reviewed in December 2015 meeting – Safety / Liability – Parity – Preservation of Assets
• Priorities revised according to feedback
Construction Committee Project Listing Project Site(s) Play Surfacing @ Play Structures All Elementary Additional Play Structure ** Anderson Outside Lighting Anderson Shade Structures Latimer, MMS, EDS Restripe Playground Country Lane Repair Holes at Field Country Lane Quad Area MMS Resurface Blacktop MMS Landscaping outside Kitchen EDS Turf Field and Amenities EDS Tile Wainscoting Anderson Repaint Buildings Anderson MU Folding Tables Baker MU Partition Baker AV @ MU Room All Possible Traffic Safety Mitigation EDS/Old EB
Moreland Deferred Maintenance Program
Routine Restricted Prop 39 Measure K Maintenance Energy Bond Program Efficiency Funds $ 609,900
X $ 644,900
X X X X X $ 2,229,500
X X X X
MORELAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
