CITY OF THE COLONY CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA TUESDAY, JUNE 6, 2017 6:30 PM TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS Notice is hereby given of a REGULAR SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of The Colony, Texas to be held at 6:30 PM on TUESDAY, JUNE 6, 2017 at CITY HALL, 6800 MAIN ST. THE COLONY, TX, at which time the following items will be addressed: 1 1.1
ROUTINE ANNOUNCEMENTS, RECOGNITIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS Call to Order
1.2
Invocation
1.3
Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag
1.4
Salute to the Texas Flag
1.5
Items of Community Interest
1.6
Presentation from the Library Director regarding current and upcoming programs, events, and service improvements (Library, Sveinsson)
2 WORK SESSION The Work Session is for the purpose of exchanging information regarding public business or policy. No action is taken on Work Session items. Citizen input will not be heard during this portion of the agenda. 2.1 SI17-0001, Sign Ordinance Revision – Appeals Process Receive a presentation from staff, discuss, and provide direction on amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 6, Article XI entitled “Signs” introducing an “Appeals Process” (Development Services, Sen) Proposed Ordinance 2.2
Presentation by Simple Recycling regarding recycling textiles (Facility Maintenance, Gilman)
2.3
Council to provide direction to staff regarding future agenda items (Council) 1
CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR SESSION of the CITY COUNCIL Agenda Meeting Date: 06/06/2017 Page - 2 3 CITIZEN INPUT This portion of the meeting is to allow up to five (5) minutes per speaker with a maximum of thirty (30) minutes for items not posted on the current agenda. The council may not discuss these items, but may respond with factual data or policy information, or place the item on a future agenda. Those wishing to speak shall submit a Request Form to the City Secretary. 4 CONSENT AGENDA The Consent Agenda contains items which are routine in nature and will be acted upon in one motion. Items may be removed from this agenda for separate discussion by a Council member. 4.1 Consider approving City Council Regular Session minutes for May 16, 2017 (City Secretary, Stewart) May 16, 2017 DRAFT Minutes.docx 4.2
Consider approving Council expenditures for the month of April 2017 (Council) Council Expenditures April 2017.pdf
4.3
Consider approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with JPMorgan Chase Bank for the City's bank depository services (Finance, Cranford) Final Depository Contract - 05_31_17.doc Exhibit A.pdf Res 2017- XXX depository chase.doc
4.4
Consider approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Fourth Amendment to the Ground and Tower Lease Agreement with Verizon Wireless (Engineering, Hartline) Verizon Contract Amendment.pdf Res 2017-XXX Verizon Wireless Amendment.doc
5 5.1
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS SP17-0002 Grandscape Lifestyle Center Area 1A Development Plan: Discuss and consider approving an ordinance to allow a Development Plan for Grandscape Lifestyle Center Area 1A that includes a parking garage, surface parking and overall utility, landscape and drainage plans for the first phase of an area generally bound by Grandscape Boulevard and Destination Drive next to the Nebraska Furniture Mart development within Planned Development 25 (PD 25) aka the Grandscape Planned Development Zoning District (Development Services, Sen) Staff Report Overall Location Map Area 1A Location Map Grandscape Lifestyle Center Phasing Plan Grandscape Lifestyle Center General Development Plan Area 1A Site Plan and Landscape Plan Area 1A Taffic Impact Analysis (TIA) 2
CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR SESSION of the CITY COUNCIL Agenda Meeting Date: 06/06/2017 Page - 3 Proposed Ordinance May 23, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeing Minutes 5.2
SP17-0004 Westport Lakeview Villas Townhomes Development Plan: Discuss and consider approving an ordinance to allow a Development Plan for Westport Lakeview Villas Townhomes at 4851 Westport Drive property described as Colony No 33 Lot Tract 1 (Southwest Corner) and A0173A BBB & CRR, Tract 34, 1.586 Acres, Old DCAD Tract # 13 within Planned Development-Townhouse Dwelling (PD-TH) Zoning District (Development Services, Sen) Staff Report Location Map Development Plan Landscape Plan Elevations Ordinance 2017-2247 Proposed Ordinance. May 23, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
5.3
Conduct a public hearing, discuss, and consider an ordinance adopting the Standards of Care Policy for Day Camp Programs (PARD, Downing) Standards of Care and Ordinance.pdf
5.4
Discuss and consider approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to purchase a 2017 Dodge Light Duty Rescue Unit from Fouts Brothers Manufacturing pricing in the amount of $142,694.00 (Fire, Thompson) Example Photos.pptx Fouts Pricing Sheet.pdf Res 2017-XXX Purchase of Dodge Fire Rescue Unit.docx
6 6.1
EXECUTIVE SESSION A. Council shall convene into a closed executive session pursuant to Section 551.072 of the Texas Government Code to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property. B. Council shall convene into a closed executive session pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code to seek legal advice from the city attorney regarding pending or contemplated litigation – Appeal of Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., PUC Docket No. 45175 and City of The Colony, Texas v. Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. matter, Cause No. 16-06424-16. C. Council shall convene into a closed executive session pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code to seek legal advice from the city attorney regarding pending or contemplated litigation – Atlantic Colony Venture I, LLC and Atlantic Colony Venture II, LLC v. City of The Colony, Texas, et al., Cause No. 16-02219-442. 3
CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR SESSION of the CITY COUNCIL Agenda Meeting Date: 06/06/2017 Page - 4
6.2
A. Any action as a result of executive session regarding the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property. B. Any action as a result of executive session regarding pending or contemplated litigation – Appeal of Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., PUC Docket No. 45175 and City of The Colony, Texas v. Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. matter, Cause No. 16-06424-16.
C. Any action as a result of executive session regarding the pending or contemplated litigation - Atlantic Venture, LLC and Atlantic Colony Venture II, LLC v. City of The Colony, Texas, et al.
PURSUANT TO THE TEXAS OPEN MEETING ACT, GOVERNMENT CODE CHAPTER 551 ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE ITEMS MAY BE CONSIDERED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY PURSUANT TO TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 551.071 ARISING OUT OF THE ATTORNEY’S ETHICAL DUTY TO ADVISE THE CITY CONCERNING LEGAL ISSUES ARISING FROM AN AGENDA ITEM. ANY DECISION HELD ON SUCH MATTER WILL BE TAKEN OR CONDUCTED IN OPEN SESSION FOLLOWING THE CONCLUSION OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION. ADJOURNMENT PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES WHO PLAN TO ATTEND THIS MEETING WHO MAY NEED AUXILIARY AIDS SUCH AS INTERPRETERS FOR PERSONS WHO ARE DEAF OR HEARING IMPAIRED, READERS OR, LARGE PRINT ARE REQUESTED TO CONTACT THE CITY SECRETARY’S OFFICE, AT 972-624-3105 AT LEAST TWO (2) WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING SO THAT APPROPRIATE ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE MADE. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that above notice of meeting was posted outside the front door of City Hall by 5:00 p.m. on the 15th day of December, 2016.
____________________________________ 4
CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR SESSION of the CITY COUNCIL Agenda Meeting Date: 06/06/2017 Page - 5 Tina Stewart, TRMC, City Secretary
5
CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 522 Submitted by: Dianne Johnson Submitting Department: City Secretary Meeting Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT Presentation from the Library Director regarding current and upcoming programs, events, and service improvements (Library, Sveinsson) Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS
6
CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 534 Submitted by: Surupa Sen Submitting Department: Development Services Meeting Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT SI17-0001, Sign Ordinance Revision – Appeals Process Receive a presentation from staff, discuss, and provide direction on amending the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 6, Article XI entitled “Signs” introducing an “Appeals Process” (Development Services, Sen) Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS Proposed Ordinance
7
CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS, AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CHAPTER 6, ARTICLE XI, ENTITLED “SIGNS,” BY REPEALING IN ITS ENTIRETY CHAPTER 6, ARTICLE XI, SECTION 6-256, ENTITLED “APPEALS TO SIGN ORDINANCE,” AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW CHAPTER 6, ARTICLE XI, SECTION 6-256; ENTITLED “APPEALS TO SIGN ORDINANCE,” BY PROVIDING THE PROCESS FOR APPEALS OF DECISION OF THE SIGN BOARD OF APPEALS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000) FOR EACH AND EVERY OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, finds and determines that it is necessary to amend Section 6-256 of the Code of Ordinances to address appeals of the Sign Board to City Council. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. That the Code of Ordinances of the City of The Colony, Texas be, and the same is, hereby amended by repealing in its entirety Chapter 6, Article XI, Section 6-256, and replacing it with a new Chapter 6, Article XI, Section 6-256, which shall read as follows: “Sec. 6-256. - Appeals to sign ordinance. (a)
Creation of board. There is hereby established a sign board of appeals consisting of five current members of the board of adjustment and alternates. Alternate members may serve as replacement members in the event of absence or disqualification.
(b)
Quorum. A majority of members, three or more members, shall constitute a quorum. In the event of the absence of the chairman and vice-chairman, the three or more members constituting the quorum shall elect for that meeting a member to preside and assume the duties as acting chairman. All motions shall be decided by a simple majority.
(c)
Meetings. All meetings shall be open to the public. The board shall establish the dates, times and places of meetings.
(d)
Records. All proceedings of the sign board of appeals shall be recorded in minutes of 8
meetings and such minutes approved and made a matter of public record. (e)
(f)
Powers and duties. The sign board of appeals shall have the following powers and perform the following duties: (1)
The sign board of appeals may hear and decide appeals which allege error in any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by the chief building official in connection with the refusal to grant a permit, revoke a permit, or a decision involving any substantive or material interpretation of this article.
(2)
A variance shall not be granted to relieve a self-imposed or personal hardship, nor shall it be based solely on economic gain or loss. In order to make a finding of hardship and to grant a variance from this article, the board must determine that: (A)
The requested variance does not violate the intent of the article.
(B)
The requested variance will not adversely affect surrounding properties.
(C)
The requested variance will not adversely affect public safety.
(D)
Special conditions exist which are unique to the applicant or property.
(E)
The requested variance is not self-imposed or granted to relieve personal a personal hardship.
(F)
The requested variance is not based solely on economic gain or loss.
(3)
All action regarding variances by the sign board of appeals may be appealed in accordance with subsection (f).
(4)
The sign board of appeals shall only exercise those duties which are provided in this article.
Appeal from sign board of appeals to city council. Any person aggrieved by the decision of the sign board of appeals may appeal the boards’ decision to city council. Such appeals shall be made in writing within ten (10) calendar days from the date of the board’s decision and shall be submitted to the city manager, or his designee. The director of planning or four (4) voting members of city council may likewise appeal the boards’ decision following the same appeal process. The city council’s decision is final. ”
SECTION 3. If any section, article paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance, or application thereto any persons or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. 9
SECTION 4. That all provisions of the Ordinances of the City of The Colony, Texas, in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance be, and the same are hereby amended, repealed, and all other provisions of the Ordinances of the City not in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. Any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction in the municipal court of the City of The Colony, Texas, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Every day a violation occurs shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its date of passage in accordance with law. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS, THIS day of , 2017.
Joe McCourry, Mayor ATTEST:
Tina Stewart, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jeff Moore, City Attorney
10
CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 403 Submitted by: Dianne Johnson Submitting Department: Facilities Maintenance Meeting Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT Presentation by Simple Recycling regarding recycling textiles (Facility Maintenance, Gilman) Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS
11
CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 523 Submitted by: Dianne Johnson Submitting Department: City Secretary Meeting Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT Council to provide direction to staff regarding future agenda items (Council) Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS
12
CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 527 Submitted by: Dianne Johnson Submitting Department: City Secretary Meeting Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT Consider approving City Council Regular Session minutes for May 16, 2017 (City Secretary, Stewart) Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS May 16, 2017 DRAFT Minutes.docx
13
MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL REGULAR SESSION HELD ON MAY 16, 2017 The Regular Session of the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, was called to order at 6:30 p.m. on the 16th day of May, 2017, at City Hall, 6800 Main Street, The Colony, Texas, with the following roll call:
Joe McCourry, Mayor Kirk Mikulec, Councilmember Richard Boyer, Councilmember Brian Wade, Councilmember David Terre, Councilmember Perry Schrag, Mayor Pro-Tem Joel Marks, Councilmember
Present Present Present Present Present Present Present
And with 7 council members present a quorum was established and the following items were addressed: 1.0 ROUTINE ANNOUNCEMENTS, RECOGNITIONS and PROCLAMATIONS 1.1 Call to Order Mayor McCourry called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. 1.2 Invocation Horizon's Church Youth and Worship Pastor Lauren Netherland provided the invocation. 1.3 Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag The Pledge of Allegiance to the United States Flag was recited. 1.4 Salute to the Texas Flag Salute to the Texas Flag was recited. 1.5
Recognize members of The Colony High School Girls and Boys Wrestling Teams for their accomplishments at the State Tournament Mayor McCourry recognized young men and women athletes for achieving great goals within the wrestling teams at The Colony High School. These young athletes have shown excellent work ethic by achieving top recognition in winning either at the District, Regional or State Championship level. Mayor acknowledged The Colony High School Principal Tim Baxter and Coach Chuck Brown for receiving the Wrestling Coach of the Year award for 2017. 1.6 Recognize the new Municipal Court Administrator Director of Government Relations Brant Shallenburger recognized Constance White as the new Municipal Court Administrator. 1
These items are strictly public service announcements. Expressions of thanks, congratulations or condolences; information regarding holiday schedules; honorary recognition of city officials, employees or other citizens; reminders about upcoming events sponsored by the City or other entity that are scheduled to be attended by a city official or city employee. No action will be taken and no direction will be given regarding these items.
14
City Council –Meeting Minutes May 16, 2017
1.7 Proclamation recognizing Water Safety Month Mayor McCourry recognized the month of May 2017 as "National Water Safety Month". The proclamation was accepted by Aquatics Manager Elise Knox. Mrs. Knox presented awareness on drowning and ways to prevent the silent killer. 1.8 The Colony Bike Friendly Community Announcement Park Development Manager Eve Morgan announced The Colony's Bicycle Committee received an honorable mention as "Bike Friendly Community" from the League of American Bicyclists. 1.9
Items of Community Interest
1.9.1
Receive presentation from Parks and Recreation regarding upcoming events and activities Recreation Manager David Swain presented the upcoming events for the Parks and Recreation Department. Mayor McCurry announced his visit to Stewart Creek Elementary School for their virtual zoo ribbon cutting ceremony held on May 15, 2017. 2.0 WORK SESSION 2.1 Council to provide direction to staff regarding future agenda items None 3.0 CITIZEN INPUT 1. Suzanne Fuentez, 4909 Hackney Lane, The Colony, and Pam Allen, 4928 Hackney Lane, The Colony, spoke concerning drug activity in their community and on sidewalk improvements. 2. Bill Kula, 6413 Ladbrook Court, Plano, with the Kingsridge Homeowners Association, spoke concerning noise issues within the development in the Grandscape area. 4.0 CONSENT AGENDA Motion to approve- Schrag; second by Wade, motion carried with all ayes. 4.1
Consider approving City Council Regular Session minutes for May 2, 2017 and City Council Special Session minutes for May 6, 2017.
4.2
Consider approving an ordinance authorizing a Negotiated Settlement Agreement between the Atmos Cities Steering Committee and Atmos Energy Corporation regarding the company's 2017 RRM filing.
ORDINANCE NO. 2017-2254 4.3
Consider approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Rescinding and Releasing Declarative of Protective Covenants filed on an 15
City Council –Meeting Minutes May 16, 2017
approximately 18.723 acre tract or tracts of land in the Samuel Hayes Survey, Abstract 648. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-046 5.0 5.1
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS SUP17-0001 Pappy's Pet Lodge Specific Use Permit (SUP): Conduct a public hearing, discuss and consider an ordinance approving a request for Specific Use Permit (SUP) to allow Pappy's Pet Lodge at 4000 Paige Road to operate with the designated "outdoor play area" with stipulations concerning surface treatment and storm water pollution prevention, revoking SUP Ordinance # 2016-2221. Director of Development Services Surupa Sen reviewed the proposed request for Specific Use Permit to allow Pappy's Pet Lodge. She advised Council of the background and prior action, revised policy and procedures and the proposed awning location for this site. Ms. Sen stated with the proposed changes, the Development Review Committee feels confident that the outdoor play area can be utilized for the desired function (play/walk the pets) without contaminating the storm water drainage system and recommends approval of the proposed SUP. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval on May 9, 2017. Council provided discussion on this item. The public hearing was opened and closed at 7:22 p.m. with there being no speakers. Motion to approve- Terre; second by Schrag, motion carried with all ayes with Mayor McCourry and Councilman Wade voting no. ORDINANCE NO. 2017-2255 5.2
Z17-0001 Brentwood Court Townhomes Phase II - Zoning Change from Shopping Center (SC) to Townhouse Dwelling (TH) Zoning District: Conduct a public hearing, discuss and consider an ordinance approving a request for Zoning Change from Shopping Center (SC) to Townhouse Dwelling (TH) Zoning District allowing Town Homes Development at 5600 North Colony Boulevard being 1.4384 acres of land described as portion of Colony Park Baptist Church, Volume 1407, Page 435, DRDCT and all of Colony Park Baptist Church, Volume 1407, Page 431, DRDCT. Director of Development Services Surupa Sen reviewed the proposed request to allow zoning change of property located at 5600 North Colony Boulevard. She stated nineteen townhouse lots will be developed on a 1.44 acre of land. If approved the townhome development will have a total of 43 for-sale townhomes with an estimated average of $280,000 sale price. Ms. Sen advised Council of the developments screening plan and details, development standards and elevations. The Development Review Committee recommends approval and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the request for zoning change from shopping center to townhouse dwelling zoning district.
16
City Council –Meeting Minutes May 16, 2017
Council provided discussion on this item. The public hearing was opened at 7:31 p.m. and closed at 7:32 p.m. with there being no speakers. Fernando Quintana Arbitrator with Executive Realty Group shared with Council the initiative taken by his company in communicating with neighbors in the community regarding the new development. Motion to approve- Mikulec; second by Wade, motion carried with all ayes. ORDINANCE NO. 2017-2256 5.3
Receive presentation, discuss and consider approval of updates to the City's Mosquito Management and Response Plan and expanded treatment zones if needed. Director of Parks and Recreation Pam Nelson briefed Council on the implementation of the mosquito management plan and changes to the response plan. Ms. Nelson introduced Patrick Prather with Municipal Mosquito who provided a presentation to Council on the difference of Emerging Mosquito Borne Diseases and Vector Control. Ms. Nelson gave an overview on this item providing a number of annual positive pool test results and current West Nile Virus plan of action. She noted there is an information page on the city’s website and an email address that can be used to send the city information on potential mosquito breeding sites. She reminded everyone of preventative measures people can take to reduce the chances of exposure. Motion to approve- Wade; second by Mikulec, motion carried with all ayes. 5.4
Discuss and consider approving an ordinance amending the budget to fund Bridges Cemetery restoration and Alley Fence replacement in the amount of $32,000 and award the headstone restoration portion of the project to Versar. Park Development Manager Eve Morgan reviewed the proposed budget amendment to fund restoration at Bridges Cemetery. She stated the project would be funded by the Lake Parks fund account of the Community Development Corporation. Motion to approve- Boyer; second by Marks, motion carried with all ayes. ORDINANCE NO. 2017-2257 5.5
Discuss and consider approving an ordinance amending the budget for Stewart Creek Park - Entry Feature in the amount of $60,000 and awarding the design, construction and landscaping portions of the project. Park Development Manager Eve Morgan reviewed the proposed budget amendment for Stewart Creek Park entry feature. She stated the project would be funded through the Lake Parks fund account of the Community Development Corporation. 17
City Council –Meeting Minutes May 16, 2017
Motion to approve- Mikulec; second by Wade, motion carried with all ayes. ORDINANCE 2017-2258 5.6
Discuss and consider approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the increase of Residential Solid Waste and Recycling rates by 2.1 percent and the increase of Commercial Solid Waste rates by 2.1 percent as specified in Appendix A. Assistant City Manager Tim Miller briefed Council on the proposed resolution. He stated the renewal contract stipulates a CIP increase based on the consumer price index. Mr. Miller advised the change will reflect an increase on an average residential bill of thirty to thirtyone cents. Motion to approve- Terre; second by Marks, motion carried with all ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-047 5.7
Discuss and consider approving an ordinance prohibiting the use of NonFranchise Roll-Offs, Front-loaders, or other containerized units for the collection of residential construction and demolition materials. Director of Community Relations and Programming Joe Perez briefed Council on this item. Assistant City Manager Tim Miller stated there was a study performed to compare roll off rates to our neighboring cities with The Colony's rates being the same for each size of roll off due to the distance to the landfill. Motion to approve- Mikulec; second by Wade, motion carried with all ayes. ORDINANCE NO. 2017-2259 Executive Session was convened at 8:26 p.m. 6.0 6.1
EXECUTIVE SESSION A. Council shall convene into a closed executive session pursuant to Section 551.072 of the Texas Government Code to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property. B. Council shall convene into a closed executive session pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code to seek legal advice from the city attorney regarding pending or contemplated litigation – Appeal of Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., PUC Docket No. 45175 and City of The Colony, Texas v. Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. matter, Cause No. 16-06424-16. C. Council shall convene into a closed executive session pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code to seek legal advice from the city attorney regarding pending or contemplated litigation – Atlantic Colony 18
City Council –Meeting Minutes May 16, 2017
Venture I, LLC and Atlantic Colony Venture II, LLC v. City of The Colony, Texas, et al., Cause No. 16-02219-442. 6.2
A. Any action as a result of executive session regarding the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property. No Action B. Any action as a result of executive session regarding pending or contemplated litigation – Appeal of Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., PUC Docket No. 45175 and City of The Colony, Texas v. Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. matter, Cause No. 16-06424-16.
Motion to authorize the City's Attorney to appeal the Public Utility Commission's Order issued May 4, 2017, in PUC Docket Number 45175, including the filing of a motion for rehearing before the PUC. C. Any action as a result of executive session regarding the pending or contemplated litigation - Atlantic Venture, LLC and Atlantic Colony Venture II, LLC v. City of The Colony, Texas, et al. No Action Regular Session was reconvened at 10:12 p.m. ADJOURNMENT With there being no further business to discuss the meeting was adjourned at 10:13 p.m.
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
________________________________ Joe McCourry, Mayor City of The Colony
_______________________________ Tina Stewart, TRMC City Secretary
19
CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 531 Submitted by: Tina Stewart Submitting Department: City Secretary Meeting Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT Consider approving Council expenditures for the month of April 2017 (Council) Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS Council Expenditures April 2017.pdf
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 528 Submitted by: David Cranford Submitting Department: Finance Meeting Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT Consider approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with JPMorgan Chase Bank for the City's bank depository services (Finance, Cranford) Recommendation: City Charter requires the bank depository contract be rebid every five years and the existing contract with JPMorgan Chase expires July 1st, 2017. Bids packets were sent to all banks within the City and two were return. JPMorgan Chase was selected because of the services offered and they had the lowest fees. Contract term is the same as the prior contract, two years with the option of three one year extensions.
ATTACHMENTS Final Depository Contract - 05_31_17.doc Exhibit A.pdf Res 2017- XXX depository chase.doc
37
CONTRACT FOR DEPOSITORY AGREEMENT WITH JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. AND CITY OF THE COLONY STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF DENTON
§ § §
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
THIS CONTRACT FOR DEPOSITORY AGREEMENT (the “Contract”) is made and entered into this ____ day of June, 2017 by and between the CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS, a Texas municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “CITY”), and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., a
national banking association
(hereinafter referred to as “DEPOSITORY”) and evidences the following:
I. PURPOSE DEPOSITORY shall provide depository banking services to the CITY as specified in Section II of this contract. The purpose of the services provided by DEPOSITORY under this Contract are to provide the CITY with a safe and secure depository bank for CITY funds and to provide such other services as set forth in this Contract and attached documents.
II. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES The services, which DEPOSITORY shall provide for the CITY, shall include the following: A.
DEPOSITORY hereby covenants and agrees that it agrees to work closely with
the CITY’S City Manager, (hereinafter called “Manager”) or his chosen agent, and/or other appropriate officials of the CITY, and that it is to perform any and all tasks required of it to fulfill the purposes of this Contract. B.
DEPOSITORY and the CITY covenant and agree that DEPOSITORY shall
perform all of the services and work contained in DEPOSITORY’S account terms and 1
38
service Terms (“Account and Service Terms”), which is attached hereto as Exhibit A; said document being part of this Contract and incorporated in its entirety herein for all purposes. The parties agree that should there be any conflict between the Account Terms and Service Terms and this Contract, the provisions of this Contract, shall govern.
III. PERFORMANCE OF WORK DEPOSITORY, its associate and employees, shall perform all the work called for in this Contract. DEPOSITORY hereby covenants and agrees that all of its associates and employees who work on this project shall be fully qualified to undertake it and competent to do the work described in this Contract.
IV. TERM OF THE CONTRACT This Contract shall commence and be in full force and effect upon the signing of this Contract and observance of the appropriate formalities, or the 1st day of July, 2017. This Contract shall terminate on the 30th day of June, 2019. If mutually acceptable by both the DEPOSITORY and the CITY, the CITY shall have the option to continue the contract three terms for one year each by giving written notice to the DEPOSITORY at least 90 days prior to the end of the term. Pricing may be renegotiated prior to extension under the option. The term may be extended until such time as the successor shall have been duly selected and qualified, such extension not to exceed ninety (90) days. DEPOSITORY shall undertake commercially reasonable efforts necessary to fully and timely accomplish all services required under this Contract in accordance with “ordinary care" standard of care imposed upon banks under the Uniform Commercial Code.
V. COORDINATION DEPOSITORY represents that, prior to submitting its proposal upon this Contract and prior to signing this Contract, DEPOSITORY has become thoroughly acquainted 2
39
with all matters relating to the performance of this Contract. All services under this Contract shall be coordinated under, and performed to the satisfaction of the CITY.
VI. CONTRACT PERSONAL DEPOSITORY and the CITY hereby covenant and agree that this Contract provides for personal services and that these services are not to be assigned or sublet in whole or part without the prior written consent of the CITY. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, DEPOSITORY may assign this Contract without the prior written consent of the CITY to a successor in interest in connection with a merger, reorganization, consolidation or a disposition of a particular business to which this contract relates, and may assign this Contract to an affiliate or subsidiary. In the event of an assignment, CITY shall have the right to terminate this Contract.
VII. CONFLICT OF INTEREST All activities, investigations and other efforts made by DEPOSITORY pursuant to this Contract will be conducted by employees or associates of DEPOSITORY. DEPOSITORY further understands that the Code of Ordinances for the City of The Colony prohibits an officer or employee of the CITY from having any financial interest, either direct or indirect, in any contract with the CITY. Any violation of this paragraph, which occurred, with the actual or constructive knowledge of DEPOSITORY will render this Contract voidable by the CITY. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the CITY acknowledges that DEPOSITORY may very well, within the ordinary course of its business, have loans to, maintain accounts for, or provide other banking services to CITY officials and employees, and in the course of the DEPOSITORY’S business, such activities are not considered to be a conflict of interest under the CITY’s Code of Ordinances to render this Contract voidable by the CITY. Further, the J.P. Morgan Code of Conduct prohibits any employee in general from acting on behalf of the bank in any transaction or business relationship involving such employee, members of his/her
3
40
family, or other persons or organizations with which such employee or his/her family have any significant personal connection or financial interest.
VIII. CHANGE IN WORK The CITY, through the Manager, may request changes in the scope and focus of the activities and studies called for under this Contract. Any such change which, in the opinion of DEPOSITORY and the Manager varies significantly from the scope and focuses of the work set out herein or entail a significant increase in cost or expense to DEPOSITORY, must be mutually agreed upon by DEPOSITORY and the CITY. The parties herein acknowledge that any change in the scope or focus of the work which results in the increase on compensation to DEPOSITORY must first be approved by the Manager or City Council of the CITY as applicable.
IX. CONFIDENTIAL WORK Any reports, information, project evaluations, data or any other documentation given to or prepared or assembled by DEPOSITORY under this Contract may not be made available to any individual or organization by DEPOSITORY without the prior written notice to the CITY. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any such information may be disclosed by DEPOSITORY as required by law or order or requested by any governmental agency or requested by any regulator having jurisdiction over DEPOSITORY or to defend or prosecute a claim brought against or by DEPOSITORY. In the event that DEPOSITORY is requested or required by law or order to disclose any of such information, DEPOSITORY shall attempt to provide the CITY with prompt written notice, unless notice is prohibited by subpoena, order or law, of any such request or requirement so that the CITY may seek a protective order or other appropriate remedy; provided, however, that DEPOSITORY shall not be required to notify the CITY regarding any disclosure of any such information or material to a regulator having jurisdiction over DEPOSITORY or its affiliates in the course of such regulator’s examination or inspection. 4
41
X. RECORDS The CITY may require copies of all papers and documents created by DEPOSITORY as a result of DEPOSITORY’S performance under this Contract. These copies may be requested by the Manager or his designee and will be reproduced by DEPOSITORY no later than ten (10) days from the date of such request. DEPOSITORY covenants and agrees that documents produced as a result of this Contract will be made available to the CITY, to subsequent CITY employees and/or to independent operators employed by the CITY upon request.
Notwithstanding anything to the
contrary herein, DEPOSITORY will allow the CITY’S auditors and independent public accountants, including where state or federal assistance is involved, state and federal auditors identified by the CITY, reasonable access during normal working hours to bank records of the CITY’S as reasonably required in connection with their examination of the books and records specifically pertaining to the CITY’S accounts, use of funds and services provided by DEPOSITORY to the CITY. Any access or examination will be: requested in writing; specifically describe the scope and records required; mutually agreed upon as to time and scope; and subject to DEPOSITORY’S security procedures and record retention policies. DEPOSITORY may impose reasonable restrictions on the number of individuals allowed access, the frequency and length of access, and the scope of the records made available. The CITY shall reimburse DEPOSITORY for the reasonable cost of copying, collating, researching and producing archived information. Any examination will be at the CITY’S expense.
XI. DEPOSITORY’S LIABILITY Approval of CITY shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of DEPOSITORY, its employees, agents or associates for the accuracy and competency of their designs, reports, information, and other documents or services, nor, shall approval be deemed to be the assumption of such responsibility by
5
42
CITY for any defect, error, or admission in the documents prepared by DEPOSITORY, its employees, agents, or associates.
XII. NONDISCRIMINATION As a condition of this Contract, DEPOSITORY covenants and agrees that it will take all necessary actions to insure, in connection with any work under this Contract, that DEPOSITORY, or its associates, sub-contractors, or employees, will not discriminate in the treatment or employment of any individual or groups of individuals on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, age, sex, or physical handicap unrelated to job performance, either directly or indirectly or through contractual or other arrangements. In this regard, DEPOSITORY shall keep, retain and safeguard all records relating to this Contract for work performed hereunder for a minimum period of two (2) years from final contract completion, with full access allowed to authorized representatives of the CITY upon request, for purposes of evaluating compliance with this and other provisions of this Contract, subject to the CITY’S execution of a confidentiality agreement provided by the DEPOSITORY. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, DEPOSITORY is subject to a documentation retention policy which governs the retention period for each particular form of documentation and other information; this policy is largely dictated by law and regulation of the various jurisdictions in which DEPOSITORY does business. The documentation retention policy will often require retention of documentation and information after the termination of DEPOSITORY’S relationship with the relevant customer. The period of retention beyond termination of the relationship with the CITY will be dependent on the type of information and will be governed by the documentation retention policy.
XIII. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR By the execution of this Contract, the CITY and DEPOSITORY do not change the independent contractor status of DEPOSITORY. No term or provision of this Contract or
6
43
any act of DEPOSITORY in the performance of this Contract may be construed as making DEPOSITORY the agent or representative of the CITY.
XIV. INDEMNIFICATION DEPOSITORY agrees to defend, indemnify and hold CITY, its officers, agents, and employees, harmless against any and all claims, lawsuits, judgments, costs and expenses for personal injury (including death), property damage or other harm for which recovery of damages is sought that directly arise out of DEPOSITORY’S negligent acts or omissions or willful misconduct of DEPOSITORY, its officers, agents, or employees, in the performance of this Contract; except to the indemnity provided for in this paragraph shall not apply to any liability resulting from the negligence of CITY, its officers, agents, employees or separate contractors, and in the event of joint and concurrent negligence of both the DEPOSITORY and CITY, responsibility, if any, shall be apportioned comparatively in accordance with the laws of the state of Texas, without however, waiving any defenses of the parties under Texas law. The provisions of this paragraph are solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and are not intended to create or grant any rights, contractual or otherwise, to any other person or entity. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, DEPOSITORY’S liability for indemnification hereunder shall be invoked only to the extent that (i) the claimed damages, losses, and expenses are directly due to the negligence of DEPOSITORY and/or its subcontractors; (ii) DEPOSITORY’S indemnification obligations shall not exceed an amount, in the aggregate, over the term of the contract, an amount that exceeds one time (1) time the average annual revenues received by DEPOSITORY from the CITY under the contract; and (iii) neither party shall be liable to the other for any indirect, incidental, consequential, exemplary, punitive or special damages, including lost profits, regardless of the form of the action or theory of recovery, even if that party has been advised of the possibility of those damages or the same are reasonably foreseeable.
7
44
XV. NO VERBAL AGREEMENT This Contract contains the entire commitments and agreements of the parties to this Contract. Any verbal or written commitment not contained in this Contract or expressly referred to in this Contract and incorporated by reference shall have no force or effect. XVI. VENUE The parties to this Contract agree and covenant that this Contract will be performable in The Colony, Texas, and that if legal action is necessary to enforce this Contract, exclusive venue will lie in Denton County, Texas, except to the extent preempted by Federal law, in which case federal jurisdiction applies.
XVII. APPLICABLE LAWS This Contract is made subject to the existing provisions of the Charter of the City of The Colony, its rules, regulations, procedures and ordinances, present and future, and all applicable laws of the State of Texas and the United States.
XIII. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION The parties to this Contract covenant and agree that in any litigation relating to this Contract, the terms and conditions of this Contract will be interpreted according to the laws of the State of Texas, except to the extent pre-empted by Federal law, in which case Federal law shall govern.
XIX. NOTICES All notices, communications and reports under this Contract must be mailed or delivered to the respective parties at the addresses shown below, unless either party is otherwise notified in writing by the other party: 8
45
EXECUTED this the
day of
___________
2017.
CITY:
DEPOSITORY:
CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
____________________________
_______________________________
Troy Powell, City Manager
Glenn S. Forbes, Authorized Officer
Approved as to form:
ATTEST:
____________________________
________________________________
Jeff Moore, City Attorney
Depository Secretary
ATTEST:
____________________________ Tina Stewart, City Secretary
9
46
Exhibit A [Account Terms and Service Term Attached]
10
47
48
49
50
RESOLUTION NO. 2017- XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS, APPROVING A CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF THE COLONY AND JPMORGAN CHASE BANK FOR DEPOSITORY SERVICES; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER EXECUTE THE CONTRACT AND OTHER APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City’s existing Contract with JPMorgan Chase for depository expires on July 1, 2017; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the City of The Colony’s Home-Rule City Charter, Depository Contracts are to be rebid every five (5) years; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined it to be in the best interest of the City to contract with JPMorgan Chase for depository services as provided in this contract. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the Depository Contract for depository services July 1, 2017 through July 1, 2019, with three one year extensions by and between the City of Colony, Texas, and JPMorgan Chase, for depository services, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”. Section 2. This Resolution shall become effective July 1, 2017, as the law and charter in such cases provides. PASSED and APPROVED this 6th day of June 2017.
_____________________________ Joe McCourry, Mayor ATTEST:
_____________________________ Tina Stewart, City Secretary, APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jeff Moore, City Attorney 51 Page 1
CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 526 Submitted by: Ron Hartline Submitting Department: Engineering Meeting Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT Consider approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Fourth Amendment to the Ground and Tower Lease Agreement with Verizon Wireless (Engineering, Hartline) Recommendation: The city entered into a Ground and Tower Lease Agreement with Verizon Wireless in 1997 for communication facilities to be located on the city Elevated Tank located at 5033 Clover Valley. The contract has been amended three times previously in 2009, 2014 and 2016. The tenant now desires to amend the Lease Agreement to allow them to include a 5'x10' ground lease area so they can install an Emergency Generator. The City Attorney and staff have reviewed the Fourth Contract Amendment and recommend approval of this item. The initial yearly contract rental rate was $11,040.00. With the Fourth Contract Amendment, the new yearly rental rate will be $34,000.00 per year. Suggested Motion: I move to recommend approval of a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute the Fourth Amendment to the Ground and Tower Lease Agreement with Verizon.
ATTACHMENTS Verizon Contract Amendment.pdf Res 2017-XXX Verizon Wireless Amendment.doc
52
53
54
55
56
57
CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. 2017-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE GROUND AND LEASE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF THE COLONY AND VERIZON WIRELESS; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of The Colony, hereby authorizes the Fourth Amendment to the Ground and Lease Agreement by and between the City of The Colony and Verizon Wireless for a communications facility at the Cougar Water Tower located at 5033 Clover Valley, The Colony, Denton County, Texas. Section 2. That this Fourth Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “A-6”, is found to be acceptable and in the best interest of the City and its citizens, and the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Amendment on behalf of the City of The Colony, Texas, with the terms and conditions as stated therein. Section 3. its passage.
That this resolution shall take effect immediately from and after
PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, this 6th day of July, 2017. __________________________ Joe McCourry, Mayor City of The Colony, Texas ATTEST: ________________________________ Tina Stewart, TRMC, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________________ Jeff Moore, City Attorney
58
CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 532 Submitted by: Surupa Sen Submitting Department: Development Services Meeting Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT SP17-0002 Grandscape Lifestyle Center Area 1A Development Plan: Discuss and consider approving an ordinance to allow a Development Plan for Grandscape Lifestyle Center Area 1A that includes a parking garage, surface parking and overall utility, landscape and drainage plans for the first phase of an area generally bound by Grandscape Boulevard and Destination Drive next to the Nebraska Furniture Mart development within Planned Development 25 (PD 25) aka the Grandscape Planned Development Zoning District (Development Services, Sen) Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS Staff Report Overall Location Map Area 1A Location Map Grandscape Lifestyle Center Phasing Plan Grandscape Lifestyle Center General Development Plan Area 1A Site Plan and Landscape Plan Area 1A Taffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Proposed Ordinance May 23, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeing Minutes
59
CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA DATE:
June 6, 2017
DEPARTMENT:
Development Services Department
PLANNER:
Surupa Sen, AICP, Planning Director, 972-624-3164
SUBJECT SP17-0002 Grandscape Lifestyle Center Area 1A Development Plan Discuss and consider approving an ordinance for Development Plan for Grandscape Lifestyle Center Area 1A that includes a parking garage, surface parking and overall utility, landscape and drainage plans for the first phase of an area generally bound by Grandscape Boulevard and Destination Drive next to the Nebraska Furniture Mart development within Planned Development 25 (PD 25) aka the Grandscape Planned Development zoning district. OWNER/ENGINEER Owner/Developer: Engineer/Surveyor:
The Colony LDC Olsson Associates
The Colony, Texas Overland Park, Kansas
EXISTING CONDITION OF PROPERTY The property is currently undeveloped. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Council, Boards, Commissions) May 23, 2017 – The Planning and Zoning Commission voted (5-0) to recommend approval of the Development Plan for Grandscape Lifestyle Center Area 1A that includes a parking garage, surface parking and overall utility, landscape and drainage plans for the first phase of an area generally bound by Grandscape Boulevard and Destination Drive next to the Nebraska Furniture Mart development within Planned Development 25 (PD 25) aka the Grandscape Planned Development zoning district. OPTIONS 1. Approve as submitted. 2. Approve with conditions. 3. Postpone consideration. 4. Table item. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC) REVIEW The Development Review Committee (DRC) finds the Development Plan meets the requirements of the Appendix A, Zoning Ordinance, PD 25 and other applicable ordinances of the Code of Ordinances as outlined in the Staff Report. ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Analysis 2. Location Map 3. Overall Phasing Plan and Development Plan 4. Area 1A Development Plan 5. Area 1A Landscape Plan 60 1
6. Area 1A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) 7. Proposed Ordinance 8. Minutes of May 23, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
61 2
ATTACHMENT 1
Staff Analysis Summary of Request Grandscape is one of the largest and most unique mixed-use real estate developments located in The Colony, Texas, in the heart of Dallas/Fort Worth, the 4th largest metropolitan area in the nation. The sprawling 400+ acre development will feature 3.9 million square feet of retail, entertainment, dining, hospitality, office and attractions. Grandscape is being developed by Nebraska Furniture Mart, a Berkshire Hathaway company and the developments first anchor. The home furnishings giant opened a 1.86 million square foot store in May 2015, offering furniture, flooring, appliances and electronics. The second phase of the Grandscape mixed-use development is being initiated through this Area 1A Development Plan and the Overall Phasing Plan review and approval. The fully buildout Grandscape Lifestyle Center will encompass roughly 90+ acres (over 2 million square feet of mixed-use development) adjacent the Nebraska Furniture Mart. Several first-to-market tenants and retailers will be announcing plans to join the project in the near future. Other infrastructure improvements are also expected to be underway in summer 2017. The Area 1A development plan includes a parking garage, surface parking, landscaping and utility work that is needed to happen before the first tenants can start working on their building layout and design. Future phases will be presented before the Commission and City Council for review and approval as the tenant specifications and other design parameters (site layout, parking distribution, interior connectivity, pedestrian access etc.) gets finalized. Existing Condition of Property The subject property is currently undeveloped. Platting Status The property is platted as part of Lot 3, Block A, Grandscape Addition Phase II. Adjacent Zoning/Land Use North - Planned Development 25 (PD 25) - SH 121 and Grandscape Boardwalk including Lava Cantina South - Planned Development 25 (PD 25) – Truck Yard and Quincy’s across Destination Drive, vacant land East - Planned Development 25 (PD 25) – Vacant land West - Planned Development 25 (PD 25) – Nebraska Furniture Mart Land Use Analysis Parking for associated mixed commercial uses are allowed under PD 25. Infrastructure Improvements The City is not planning any specific public infrastructure improvements for this area. 62 3
Circulation and Parking For area 1A the following parking spaces are being provided: Area 1 A Parking Provided Surface parking
Garage parking
858 spaces
481 spaces
Landscaping and Irrigation Area 1A surface parking has been proposed with heavy landscaping even though this phase does not include any building. Texas Red Oak, Dessert Willow, Crepe Myrtle, Shumard Oak, Laceberk Elm, Allee Elm has been proposed with minimum 3” caliper size. 87,928 sf landscaped area is shown within Area 1A Development Plan. Deciduous and evergreen shrubs have been proposed for parking lot interior islands. Development Review Committee Review The DRC finds that the Area 1A Development Plan meets all applicable requirements of the Grandscape PD Ordinance, and therefore recommends approval.
63 4
12 SH
B lvd cap e s d n G ra
1
pe ca s d an r G
1 12 SH
vd Bl
e ap sc nd ra G d lv B
r rt D a eM tu r i n r Fu ka s bra Ne
D es tinat ion D r
Subject Area
D on i t na st i e D
r
dd Bllvv ee B p p caa dssc annd G Grra
1 11221 SSHH
Des tinat ion D r
DDrr aarrtt M M ee ttuurr rrnnii u u a FF sskka bbrraa e e NN
M Meerr rriw iweeaath theerr
1 11221 SSHH
Petticoat Petticoat
Gr an ds ca pe Bl vd
Subject Area
rr nn DD ttiioo a a nn ssttii DDee
Project No. SP17-0002 - Project Name: Grandscape Lifestyle Center Grandscape Lifestyle Center
Business Park/Industrial
General Retail
Light Commercial
Office District 1
Single Family Dwelling
Agricultural
Duplex Dwelling
Heavy Commercial
Mobile Home
Planned Development
Townhome
Business Park
Fire Station
Industrial
Neighborhood Service
Shopping Center
This map was generated by GIS data provided by The Colony GIS Department. The City of The Colony does not guarantee the correctness or accuracy of any features on this map. These digital products are for llustration purposes only and are not suitable for site-specific decision making.
64
µ
12 SH
B lvd cap e s d n G ra
1
vd Bl
pe ca s d an Area r G
1 12 SH
1A
e ap sc nd ra G
Grandscape Lifestyle Center
D on i t na st i e D
D es tinat ion D r
d lv B
r rt D a eM tu r i n r Fu ka s bra Ne
r
dd Bllvv ee B p p caa dssc annd G Grra
1 11221 SSHH
Area 1A
Des tinat ion D r
DDrr aarrtt M M ee ttuurr rrnnii u u a FF sskka bbrraa e e NN
Petticoat Petticoat
Gr an ds ca pe Bl vd
1 11221 SSHH
M Meerr rriw iweeaath theerr
Grandscape Lifestyle Center
rr nn DD ttiioo a a nn ssttii DDee
Project No. SP17-0002 - Project Name: Grandscape Lifestyle Center - Area 1A Area 1A
Business Park
Fire Station
Industrial
Neighborhood Service
Shopping Center
Grandscape Lifestyle Center
Business Park/Industrial
General Retail
Light Commercial
Office District 1
Single Family Dwelling
Agricultural
Duplex Dwelling
Heavy Commercial
Mobile Home
Planned Development
Townhome
This map was generated by GIS data provided by The Colony GIS Department. The City of The Colony does not guarantee the correctness or accuracy of any features on this map. These digital products are for llustration purposes only and are not suitable for site-specific decision making.
65
µ
66
1 12 . N O WAY Y A LL W O T H I G RN H T E YBU A S T M RA SA
LEGEND
300 N. Field Street Dallas, TX 75202 TEL 214.987.1299 www.merriman-MAA.com
SY R
7301 West 133rd Street, Ste 200 Overland Park, KS 66213-4750 TX Firm No. F-4253 TEL 913.381.1170 www.olssonassociates.com
BO U LE VA R D
SY 15851 Dallas Pkwy, Ste 240 Addison, TX 75001 TX Firm No. F-1236 TEL 972.386.6888 www.hei-eng.com
GR AN DS CA PE
SY
POINT #
DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION NORTHING
EASTING
MON 12
COTC MON
545.45
7078280.183
2472044.168
BM 200
GAI BRASS DISC
608.48
7078251.309
2469474.833
1801 McGee Street, #101 Kansas City, MO 64108 TEL 816.842.8844
SY
SY
SY 3767 Overland Ave, Ste 111 Los Angeles, CA 90034 www.htharchitects.com TEL 310.842.7170
SY SY 8750 N. Central Expy, Ste 700 Dallas, TX 75231 www.thorntontomasetti.com TEL 972.387.8393
SY
KA
FU RN ITU RE M
AR
TD R.
DRIV
RAS
SY
SY
SY
SY
SY
SCHEEL'S NOTES SY
SY
SY SY
NEBRASKA FURNITURE MART SHOWROOM
LIFESTYLE CENTER
SY
LOT 3, BLOCK A GRANDSCAPE ADDITION PHASE II THE COLONY, TX
SY
NOTES
GRANDSCAPE
SY
DES
TINA
TION
NEB
E
SY
REVISIONS
PROJECT NUMBER:
016-1033 ISSUE:
04/12/2017 SHEET NAME:
NEBRASKA FURNITURE MART WAREHOUSE/DISTRIBUTION
OVERALL SITE PLAN GEN. DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHEET:
2
67
68
69
70
MEMO TO:
FROM: RE: DATE: OA PROJECT #:
Overnight Regular Mail Hand Delivery Other: __________
City of The Colony, Texas Attn: Ms. Surupa Sen, AICP & Mr. Raj Pradhananga, PE 6800 Main Street The Colony, TX 75056 Todd Fredericksen, PE, PTOE Jeremy Stretz, PE, PTOE Grandscape Lifestyle Center Traffic Impact Analysis Executive Summary May 12th, 2017 016-1033, 201, 201401
Project Overview This memorandum describes the methodologies of a February 2017 Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) conducted for the proposed Grandscape Lifestyle Center located in the southwest corner of the Grandscape Boulevard and Destination Drive intersection in The Colony, Texas and describes the preliminary findings for recommendations pertaining to Area 1A. The proposed Grandscape Lifestyle Center is bordered by Nebraska Furniture Mart (NFM) to the south and west, Destination Drive to the east, and Grandscape Boulevard to the north of the site. The Sam Rayburn Tollway (SRT), also known as Highway 121, and it’s associated one-way frontage roads border the site to the north and facilitate a large amount of traffic through The Colony. Area 1A is focused on the section south of SRT between the NFM Main Entrance and Drive 3 located just east of South Colony Boulevard along Grandscape Boulevard. The February 2017 TIA evaluated existing, existing plus approved development, existing plus proposed Grandscape Lifestyle Center, and Future 2040 conditions to determine the impact of the site on the surrounding roadway network. The preliminary findings of the traffic impact analysis were reviewed by City of The Colony staff and Halff Associates, Inc. The review comments were summarized and discussed with City staff Tuesday, March 21st, 2017 and subsequent deliverables were identified including a revised traffic impact analysis report that will provide additional information and land use scenarios including a detailed review of the South Colony Boulevard and EB SRT Frontage Road Ramp intersection. The contents of this memorandum were also requested to provide an immediate description of the preliminary traffic impact analysis findings and summarize the report’s conclusions pertaining specifically to the geometric improvements required to accommodate the Grandscape Lifestyle Center development’s anticipated traffic volumes.
71 7301 West 133rd Street, Suite 200 Overland Park, KS 66213-4750
TEL 913.381.1170 FAX 913.381.1174
www.olssonassociates.com
The preliminary February 2017 TIA considered approximately 1.5 million square feet of mixeduse development including restaurant, office, retail, and residential land uses based on a site plan dated January 16th, 2017 expected to generate approximately 38,243 daily, 3,458 PM peak hour, and 5,617 Saturday peak hour trips after considering a 20% internal capture rate. Trips were distributed to the roadway network and added to the existing plus approved volumes to identify appropriate roadway improvement recommendations. Recommendations were based on review of City standards and intersection capacity analysis results. Among items reviewed were warrants for signalization, auxiliary turn-lane accommodations, and weave segment analysis based on Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Guidelines including the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), The Colony Engineering Design Manual, intersection capacity analysis results based on Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodologies, and engineering judgement. Based on the preliminary findings of the February 2017 TIA, the following intersection improvements were recommended for Area 1A to maintain typical levels of service at study intersections: Grandscape Boulevard with Drive 3 Provide signal control at the intersection and reconfigure the northbound approach exiting the site to accommodate three exiting lanes including two left-turn lanes, a shared through lane, and right-turn lane. o If design conditions limit the ability to provide dual left-turn lanes with a shared through/right-turn lane, an alternative configuration of a single left-turn lane, shared through/left-turn lane, and dedicated right-turn lane is recommended. With the alternative configuration, the intersection requires split-phased north/south operations which can be expected to operate similarly to the recommended configuration. o The attached Figure depicts operations with both traditional and split-phase phasing operations, in each case the intersection is anticipated to operate acceptably. Nebraska Furniture Mart Internal Drive Conditions Provide greater throat lengths along Drive 1 within the Nebraska Furniture Mart parking lot on the northeast corner of the building to provide less conflict along this drive. Grandscape Lifestyle Center Study Area Per City requests the final updated TIA will depict anticipated traffic volumes at the intersections of NFM Drive with Bargain Way as well as the SRT Frontage Road interchange with Plano Parkway. The final updated TIA will also provide further recommendations on wayfinding signage to direct development traffic to the appropriate locations within the site along the desired/most direct routes. An event scenario section will be provided to discuss conditions associated with an event traffic scenario, specific focus for this section will be direction on the SRT Frontage Road interchange with South Colony Boulevard, the intersection of South Colony Boulevard and Grandscape Boulevard with NFM Drive, as well as the intersection of EB SRT Frontage Road with Destination Drive. Additional comments regarding traffic control along the three internal roadways and the analysis of right turn lanes at study intersections have also been addressed as follows: Internal Roadway Traffic Control Grandscape Lifestyle Center Grandscape Boulevard & Destination Drive The Colony, Texas
72 2
The Drive 1 intersection with the NFM East Access is recommended to become an allway stop controlled intersection due to the anticipated traffic volumes at the intersection being relatively low and equal on all approaches. At the intersection of Drive 1 with Drive 2 it is recommended to provide a stop sign along Drive 2. Drive 2 is expected to produce significantly fewer trips than Drive 3, while the through volumes along Drive 1 are expected to be greater than vehicles attempting to enter along Drive 2. Stop signs are recommended along Drive 1 at the intersection with Drive 3 to provide a two-way stop condition allowing entering traffic free-flow to avoid queueing back to the parking drives and the signalized intersection with Drive 3 at Grandscape Boulevard. Volumes along Drive 1 are anticipated to be lower in comparison to entering volumes and adequate gaps are expected to develop allowing stopped vehicles to make maneuvers. The attached Figure depicts anticipated traffic volumes and level of service information for the internal roadway conditions described above. The analysis of these conditions will also be included and described within the final TIA.
Auxiliary Right-turn Lane Analysis Individual movement Level of Service (LOS) and queue information was reviewed along Grandscape Boulevard at the Drive 3 intersection and was determined that the current 6lane facility has adequate capacity to operate acceptably without the addition of dedicated right-turn lanes. Grandscape Boulevard is expected to continue to function adequately as a 6-lane facility with full development traffic, the addition of dedicated right-turn lanes was omitted as the outside lanes can be expected to operate as de-facto right-turn lanes. o The attached Figure depicts anticipated traffic volumes and level of service information with the recommended lane configurations as described above which includes operations along Grandscape Boulevard travel lanes operating in an acceptable range between Level of Service A and LOS C depending on the peak time period. Conceptual drawings of the requested intersections for the Area 1A described above included within the development site plan are Attached to illustrate recommended intersection conditions. The final updated TIA will be completed and provided to the City including the above described conditions.
Grandscape Lifestyle Center Grandscape Boulevard & Destination Drive The Colony, Texas
73 3
a Bo wa 1
242 (3 8 197 (7 5) 61) 223 (7
3) (9 7) 75 02 2) (1 2 3 (2 65 134
98)
223 (3 4
3) (57
203
45 (7
2)
594 (872
248
)
10 5 (1(20) 0 59 ( ) 98)
2
East A
4) 24 6( ) 15 4 (89 5
) 04 ) (2 8 (67 2 1 42
Drive
ccess
72) 45 (
203 (398) 22 (37)
) (470
) (99 ) 56 (235 5 14
(398 ) 37 (2 2)
3) 34 3 ( 8) 22 6 (87 0 7
3
187
NFM Main Access
3)
ive Dr
Dr
140 (485) 37 (100)
) (535 306 (70) 40
) 22 (1 ) ) 78 (10 (438 0 77 2
) (7 7 46 0 (0) ) (77 46
Grandscape Lifestyle Center The Colony, TX
M NF
4) ) (5 644 42 7 ( 33) 8 5 (1 79
lk
Existing + Approved + Development Peak Hour Volumes and Level of Service
5 (9) 8) 17 (2
8 (22 20 (4 ) 2 (4) 0)
Drive 1
2( 4 (2 4) 0) 2 (4 )
5 (4 20 (4 2) 0) 2 (4 )
0) 3) 5 (14 (27 16
2) 40 (6 ) (209 0 3 1
PM (SAT)
D
A
(C
25 m<
){
51 ')} }
m
6')
}
8' (
37
<2
(#
m
1'
){
15 ){
(B A
(C A
33 ')} m
7') 33
5' (
'(
<2 m
76
){
){
(A
(C
A
3
A
')} (38 ')} 8 5' <2 ' (21 0')} ){ ive (C {154 ' (22 ) Dr 4 (D {15 ) (D
3')}
3
' (14
Split Phased Grandscape Blvd & Boardwalk Drive 1 Int. Delay: 16.4 (26.5) sec.
D
) {68
ive
A (B
10
D
25' (85')}
Dr
) 19 (0. 4) .12 (0.2 0 : 9 TIO 0.1 RA O: C ATI / V R C V/
A (A) {<
')} (50 } 5' ') <2 (98 1' 11 ){
(D
A (A)
' (m
B (C)
){
B (C) {37' (62')}
24 {1
} 3')
D
D
B
{ B)
3)} ' (7 29
(
A (B)
A (B) {< 25' (25
)}
NFM Main Access
East A
(<25)}
)}
PM (SAT)
B (B)
{<25'
A (A) {<
A (A) {< 25' A (A) {< (<25)} 25' (25 )}
25)}
PM (SAT) {PM (SAT)}
2
{<25' (<
')} 30 )} ' (2 25 {63 5' (< ) 2 (F C B) {< ( B
Drive
25' (25
(25)}
ccess
{<25'
A (A)
A (A {<25' (< ) 25)}
B
A
(D
M
NF
3')}
#30
9' (
A
) (B
30 m1
D
NFM Dr & S Colony Boulevard/ Grandscape Boulevard Int. Delay: 3.7 (6.0) sec.
B (C) {7 (C)
m ){ (C
B (C)
B (C) {51' (258')}
Dr
(
'(
')} 00 } ' (1 0') 66 (5 ) { 5' (D <2 D D) { ( D
} 6') 22 ')} ' (# (53 66 25' ){ (D D) {< ( D
A
(m 5' <2
1
1
9 {6 A)
')} 67
Grandscape Blvd
')}
alk
alk
' (m
Grandscape Blvd & Boardwalk Drive 1 Int. Delay: 13.5 (24.3) sec.
A (A) {31' (60')}
Grandscape Blvd
')}
4 10
dw ar
Bo
dw
ar
Bo
NFM Dr & NFM Main Access Int. Delay: 11.7 (22.3) sec.
B (C) {<25' (49')}
N
Grandscape Blvd
rd
PHASE 1A
74 Drive 1 A (A)
{<25'
(<25)}
m
#
2
THE COLONY, TX
2017
G DATE
N A R REV. NO.
C S D E P A REVISIONS
REVISIONS DESCRIPTION
D V BL
APPENDIX D INTERSECTION CONCEPTS
G E P A C S D N A R D V BL
drawn by: JSM checked by: JLP approved by: --QA/QC by: --project no.: 016.1033 drawing no.:T_PBASE_61033.dwg date: 4/28/17
SHEET OF
75
3
BY
7301 West 133rd Street, Suite 200 Overland Park, KS 66213-4750 TX Firm No. F-423 TEL 913.381.1170 www.olssonassociates.com FAX 913.381.1174
R
3
THE COLONY, TX
2017
DATE
REVISIONS
REVISIONS DESCRIPTION
BY
1 REV. NO.
K AL
APPENDIX D INTERSECTION CONCEPTS
W
D
AR
BO G E P A C S D N A R D V BL
drawn by: JSM checked by: JLP approved by: --QA/QC by: --project no.: 016.1033 drawing no.:T_PBASE_61033.dwg date: 4/28/17
SHEET OF
76
3
7301 West 133rd Street, Suite 200 Overland Park, KS 66213-4750 TX Firm No. F-423 TEL 913.381.1170 www.olssonassociates.com FAX 913.381.1174
R
77 SPLIT PHASED Queues HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 55: 3/Boardwalk Grandscape Blvd 40: Drive NFM West Access 1&&NFM Dr
Lane Movement Group EBT EBL EBR EBT WBL WBT NBL SEL Lane Group Configurations Flow (vph) 88 903 93 716 54 v/c Traffic Ratio Volume (vph) 0.19 285 0.35 51 0.23 19 0.27 261 0.34 78 Control Future Volume Delay (vph) 285 6.2 8.0 51 3.8 19 261 6.9 48.3 78 Queue Ideal Flow Delay (vphpl) 1900 0.0 1900 0.0 1900 0.0 1900 0.0 1900 0.0 Total Delay Lost time (s) 6.2 5.0 8.0 3.8 5.0 6.9 5.0 48.3 5.0 Queue Lane Util. Length Factor 50th (ft) 0.95 12 57 0.97 4 0.95 85 0.97 33 Queue Frt Length 95th (ft) 0.98 25 77 1.00 m9 1.00 93 0.94 66 Internal Flt Protected Link Dist (ft) 1.00 438 0.95 1.00 338 0.97 Turn Satd.Bay FlowLength (prot) (ft) 3343 180 3319 140 3421 3190 Base Flt Permitted Capacity (vph) 1.00 480 2604 0.95 398 2632 1.00 0.97 205 Starvation Satd. FlowCap (perm) Reductn 3343 0 0 3319 0 3421 0 3190 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Storage Reductn 0 0 Adj. FlowCap (vph) 335 600 220 307 920 Reduced v/c Ratio(vph) 0.18 0.350 0.230 0.270 0.26 RTOR Reduction 15 49 Lane Group Summary Flow (vph) 380 0 22 307 103 Intersection TurnVolume Type for 95th percentile queue NA is metered byProt m upstreamNA signal. Prot Protected Phases 4 3 8 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 10.5 1.0 16.5 6.0 Effective Green, g (s) 10.5 1.0 16.5 6.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.32 0.03 0.51 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1080 102 1736 588 v/s Ratio Prot c0.11 0.01 c0.09 c0.03 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.35 0.22 0.18 0.18 Uniform Delay, d1 8.4 15.4 4.3 11.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 1.1 0.0 0.1 Delay (s) 8.6 16.4 4.4 11.3 Level of Service A B A B Approach Delay (s) 8.6 5.2 11.3 Approach LOS A A B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group
7.8 0.31 32.5 24.5% 15
Ex+App+Dev PM 02/20/2017
NBR SET 54 0.16 51 1.0 51 1900 0.0 1.0 0 0 102
NWL 326 0.66 46.9 0.0 46.9 102 133
NWT 92 0.18 0.8 0.0 0.8 0 0 167
490 0 0 0.85 600 0.110 0
597 0 0 0 0.55
649 0 0 0 0.14
HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
Queues Queues 55: Grandscape Blvd Blvd 55: Drive Drive 3/Boardwalk 3/Boardwalk 1 1& & Grandscape
Lane Lane Group Group Lane Lane Group Group Flow Flow (vph) (vph) v/c v/c Ratio Ratio Control Control Delay Delay Queue Queue Delay Delay Total Total Delay Delay Queue Queue Length Length 50th 50th (ft) (ft) Queue Queue Length Length 95th 95th (ft) (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Base Capacity Capacity (vph) (vph) Starvation Starvation Cap Cap Reductn Reductn Spillback Spillback Cap Cap Reductn Reductn Storage Storage Cap Cap Reductn Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio
EBL EBL 88 88 0.19 0.19 7.0 6.2 0.0 0.0 7.0 6.2 11 12 28 25 180 180 457 480 00 00 00 0.19 0.18
EBT EBT 903 903 0.36 0.35 9.3 8.0 0.0 0.0 9.3 8.0 53 57 151 77 438 438 2506 2604 00 00 00 0.36 0.35
WBL WBL 93 93 0.24 0.23 4.4 3.8 0.0 0.0 4.4 3.8 47 m17 m9 140 140 398 398 00 00 00 0.23
Ex+App+Dev PM PM Ex+App+Dev 05/12/2017 02/20/2017
WBT WBT 716 716 0.28 0.27 9.8 6.9 0.0 0.0 9.8 6.9 90 85 124 93 338 338
SEL SEL 54 54 0.34 0.34 48.2 48.3 0.0 0.0 48.2 48.3 33 33 66 66
SET SET 54 54 0.15 0.16 0.9 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 1.0 00 00 102 102
NWL NWL 163 326 0.65 0.66 51.4 46.9 0.0 0.0 51.4 46.9 104 102 154 133
NWT NWT 163 92 0.65 0.18 51.4 0.8 0.0 0.0 51.4 0.8 104 0 154 0 167 167
NWR 92 0.27 4.3 0.0 4.3 0 14
2533 2632 00 00 00 0.28 0.27
342 205 00 00 00 0.16 0.26
489 490 00 00 00 0.11 0.11
341 597 00 00 00 0.48 0.55
341 649 00 00 00 0.48 0.14
425 0 0 0 0.22
Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.
A 15.0 A
Synchro 9 Report Page 22 21
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
Synchro Synchro99Report Report Page Page221
78 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 55: Drive 3/Boardwalk 1 & Grandscape Blvd
Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS
Ex+App+Dev PM 02/20/2017
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
SEL
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
NWR
75 75 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1711 0.35 622 0.85 88 0 88 D.P+P 7 8 58.8 58.8 0.59 5.0 3.0 439 0.01 0.10 0.20 9.0 0.65 0.2 6.0 A
633 633 1900 5.0 0.91 0.97 1.00 4787 1.00 4787 0.85 745 24 879 NA 4
134 134 1900
79 79 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1711 0.27 485 0.85 93 0 93 D.P+P 3 4 58.8 58.8 0.59 5.0 3.0 369 c0.02 0.13 0.25 9.2 0.30 0.3 3.1 A
567 567 1900 5.0 0.91 0.99 1.00 4865 1.00 4865 0.85 667 6 710 NA 8
42 42 1900
46 46 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1711 0.95 1711 0.85 54 0 54 Prot 1
0 0 1900 5.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1531 1.00 1531 0.85 0 51 3 NA 6
46 46 1900
277 277 1900 5.0 0.97 1.00 0.95 3319 0.95 3319 0.85 326 0 326 Prot 5
0 0 1900 5.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1531 1.00 1531 0.85 0 79 13 NA 2
78 78 1900
52.0 52.0 0.52 5.0 3.0 2529 0.15
7.6 7.6 0.08 5.0 3.0 130 0.03
6.4 6.4 0.06 5.0 3.0 97 0.00
14.8 14.8 0.15 5.0 3.0 491 c0.10
13.6 13.6 0.14 5.0 3.0 208 c0.01
0.28 13.5 0.47 0.3 6.5 A 6.1 A
0.42 44.1 1.00 2.1 46.2 D
0.04 43.9 1.00 0.2 44.1 D 45.1 D
0.66 40.3 1.00 3.4 43.6 D
0.06 37.6 1.00 0.1 37.8 D 42.3 D
Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group
0.85 158 0 0
51.9 51.9 0.52 5.0 3.0 2484 c0.18 0.35 14.2 0.54 0.4 8.0 A 7.8 A 15.2 0.38 100.0 49.0% 15
0.85 49 0 0
HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
0.85 54 0 0
0.85 92 0 0
Lane Group Movement Lane Group Flow (vph) Configurations v/c Ratio Traffic Volume (vph) Control Delay Future Volume (vph) Queue Delay Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Delay Lost time (s) Queue Length 50th (ft) Lane Util. Factor Queue Length 95th (ft) Frt Internal Link Dist (ft) Flt Protected Turn Satd.Bay FlowLength (prot) (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Flt Permitted Starvation Cap Reductn Satd. Flow (perm) Spillback Reductn Peak-hourCap factor, PHF Storage Reductn Adj. FlowCap (vph) Reduced v/c Ratio(vph) RTOR Reduction Lane Group Summary Flow (vph) Intersection Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS
EBL 349 0.43 75 19.5 75 0.0 1900 19.5 5.0 48 1.00 90 1.00 149 0.95 1711 2104 0.34 6160 0.850 880 0.170 88 D.P+P 7 8 57.0 57.0 0.57 5.0 3.0 427 0.01 0.10 0.21 9.8 0.61 0.2 6.2 A
Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group
B 20.0 A
Synchro 9 Report Page 23
SPLIT PHASED
Queues HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 67: Dr & Drive 55: Destination Drive 3/Boardwalk 1&7 Grandscape Blvd
EBR EBT 91 0.20 633 6.7 633 0.0 1900 6.7 5.0 0.910 28 0.97 1.00 4787 1004 1.00 47870 0.850 7450 0.09 24 879 NA 4
NBL EBR 85 0.17 134 6.1 134 0.0 1900 6.1 9 25 150 505 0 0.850 1580 0.170 0
49.9 49.9 0.50 5.0 3.0 2388 c0.18 0.37 15.4 0.55 0.4 8.8 A 8.6 A 16.4 0.42 100.0 48.7% 15
NBT WBL 644 0.36 79 6.7 79 0.0 1900 6.7 5.0 43 1.00 75 1.00 573 0.95 1711 2904 0.27 4780 0.850 930 0.220 93 D.P+P 3 4 57.0 57.0 0.57 5.0 3.0 360 c0.02 0.13 0.26 10.0 0.31 0.4 3.5 A
Ex+App+Dev PM 02/20/2017 05/12/2017
SBT WBT 634 0.49 567 13.6 567 0.0 1900 13.6 5.0 80 0.91 124 0.99 324 1.00 4865 2345 1.00 48650 0.850 6670 0.276 710 NA 8
SBR WBR 371 0.46 42 3.8 42 0.0 1900 3.8 0 36
SEL
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
NWR
46 46 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1711 0.95 1711 0.85 54 0 54 Split 6
0 0 1900 5.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1531 1.00 1531 0.85 0 50 4 NA 6
46 46 1900
277 277 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 1625 0.95 1625 0.85 326 0 163 Split 2
0 0 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 1625 0.95 1625 0.85 0 0 163 NA 2
78 78 1900 5.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1531 1.00 1531 0.85 92 78 14 Perm
50.0 50.0 0.50 5.0 3.0 2432 0.15
7.6 7.6 0.08 5.0 3.0 130 c0.03
7.6 7.6 0.08 5.0 3.0 116 0.00
15.4 15.4 0.15 5.0 3.0 250 c0.10
15.4 15.4 0.15 5.0 3.0 250 0.10
0.29 14.6 0.59 0.3 8.9 A 8.3 A
0.42 44.1 1.00 2.1 46.2 D
0.04 42.8 1.00 0.1 42.9 D 44.6 D
0.65 39.8 1.00 6.0 45.8 D
0.65 39.8 1.00 6.0 45.8 D 43.7 D
150 1166 0 0.850 490 0.320 0
HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
0.85 54 0 0
2 15.4 15.4 0.15 5.0 3.0 235 0.01 0.06 36.1 1.00 0.1 36.2 D
B 20.0 A
Synchro 9 Report Page Page24 2
79 SPLIT PHASED Queues HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 55: 3/Boardwalk Grandscape Blvd 40: Drive NFM West Access 1& &NFM Dr
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT SEL Movement EBT EBR NBL Lane Group Flow (vph) 109 1469 156 822 91 Configurations v/c Ratio 0.27 0.67 0.58 0.36 0.52 Traffic Volume (vph) 429 180 67 404 113 Control Delay (vph) 9.1 20.3 30.0 7.2 52.9 Future Volume 429 180 67 404 113 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Delay 9.1 20.3 30.0 7.2 52.9 Lost time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 271 34 62 56 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.97 Queue Length 95th (ft) m33 337 m67 98 Frt 0.96 1.00 m104 1.00 0.93 Internal Link Dist (ft) 438 338 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 Turn 180 140 Satd.Bay FlowLength (prot) (ft) 3270 3319 3421 3159 Base Capacity (vph) 407 2180 269 2306 205 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 Starvation Reductn 0 Satd. Flow Cap (perm) 32700 33190 34210 31590 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.850 Storage Reductn Adj. FlowCap (vph) 5050 2120 790 4750 1330 Reduced v/c Ratio(vph) 0.27 0.670 0.580 0.360 0.44 RTOR Reduction 45 98 Lane Group Summary Flow (vph) 672 0 79 475 159 Intersection Type NAcapacity, queueProt NA Prot #Turn95th percentile volume exceeds may be longer. Protected 4 cycles. 3 8 2 Queue Phases shown is maximum after two Permitted Phases m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Actuated Green, G (s) 15.7 4.0 24.7 9.3 Effective Green, g (s) 15.7 4.0 24.7 9.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.36 0.09 0.56 0.21 Clearance Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1166 301 1920 667 v/s Ratio Prot c0.21 0.02 c0.14 c0.05 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.58 0.26 0.25 0.24 Uniform Delay, d1 11.5 18.6 4.9 14.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.2 Delay (s) 12.2 19.1 5.0 14.6 Level of Service B B A B Approach Delay (s) 12.2 7.0 14.6 Approach LOS B A B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group
10.7 0.44 44.0 43.4% 15
Ex+App+Dev Saturday 02/20/2017
SET NBR 103 0.47 105 19.1 105 0.0 1900 19.1 7 50 102
NWL 515 0.88 57.9 0.0 57.9 165 #226
NWT 156 0.42 11.7 0.0 11.7 7 53 167
385 0 0.850 1240 0.270 0
597 0 0 0 0.86
510 0 0 0 0.31
HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
Queues Queues Queues 55: 55: Drive Drive 3/Boardwalk 3/Boardwalk 11 && Grandscape GrandscapeBlvd Blvd 55: Drive 3/Boardwalk 1 & Grandscape Blvd Lane EBL LaneGroup Group EBL EBT EBT WBL WBL WBT WBT SEL SEL Lane EBL EBT Lane Group 109 156 822 91 LaneGroup GroupFlow Flow(vph) (vph) 109 1469 1469 WBL 156 WBT 822 SEL 91 Lane Group Flow (vph) 109 156 822 91 v/c 0.30 0.77 v/cRatio Ratio 0.27 1469 0.67 0.61 0.58 0.41 0.36 0.49 0.52 v/c RatioDelay 0.33 0.53 Control 11.6 26.8 23.7 11.7 Control Delay 9.1 0.79 20.3 0.69 30.0 0.43 7.2 50.1 52.9 Control Delay 14.0 Queue 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 QueueDelay Delay 0.0 28.1 0.0 31.9 0.0 13.1 0.0 53.6 0.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 11.6 23.7 11.7 TotalDelay Delay 9.1 26.8 20.3 30.0 7.2 50.1 52.9 Total Delay 14.0 28.1 31.9 13.1 53.6 Queue 23 285 25 108 56 QueueLength Length50th 50th(ft) (ft) 20 271 34 62 56 Queue 27 308 37 m130 113 56 Queue Length 95th (ft) m42 #376 95 QueueLength Length50th 95th(ft) (ft) m33 337 m66 m67 m104 98 Queue Length 95th (ft) m51 #376 m#103 m130 100 Internal 438 338 InternalLink LinkDist Dist(ft) (ft) 438 338 Internal Link Dist (ft) 438 338 Turn Length (ft) 180 140 TurnBay Bay Length (ft) 180 140 Turn Bay Length (ft) 180 140 Base Capacity (vph) 358 1908 257 1995 342 Base Capacity (vph) 407 2180 269 2306 205 Base Capacity 33200 186800 22600 190800 19200 Starvation Cap Reductn Starvation Cap(vph) Reductn Starvation CapReductn Reductn 000 000 000 000 Spillback 000 SpillbackCap Cap Reductn Spillback CapReductn Reductn 000 000 000 000 Storage 000 StorageCap Cap Reductn Storage Cap 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.30 0.77 0.61 0.41 0.27 Reduced v/cReductn Ratio 0.27 0.67 0.58 0.36 0.44 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.79 0.69 0.43 0.47 Intersection IntersectionSummary Summary Intersection Summary ## 95th volume 95thpercentile percentile volumeexceeds exceedscapacity, capacity,queue queuemay maybe belonger. longer. # Queue 95th percentile exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. shown maximum after Queue shownisisvolume maximum aftertwo twocycles. cycles. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. mm Volume Volumefor for95th 95thpercentile percentilequeue queueisismetered meteredby byupstream upstreamsignal. signal. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal.
Ex+App+Dev Ex+App+DevSaturday Saturday Ex+App+Dev Saturday 05/12/2017 02/20/2017 05/12/2017
SET SET SET 103 103 103 0.41 0.47 0.43 16.0 19.1 17.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 19.1 17.277 7 48 50 50 102 102 102 385 385 25600 000 000 0 0.27 0.27 0.40
NWL NWL NWL 263 515 263 0.85 0.88 0.72 64.8 57.9 47.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.8 57.9 47.0 169 165 163 #276 #226 220 325 597 471 00 000 000 0 0.81 0.86 0.56
NWT NWT NWT 264 156 264 0.85 0.42 0.73 64.7 11.7 46.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.7 11.7 46.9 1707 163 #276 53 218 167 167 167 326 510 473 00 000 000 0 0.81 0.31 0.56
NWR NWR 144 144 0.35 0.32 8.5 6.7 0.0 0.0 8.5 6.7 0 430 38 421 546 0 00 00 0.340 0.26
B 15.0 A
Synchro 9 Report Page 22 21
Grandscape Grandscape5:00 5:00pm pm01/19/2017 01/19/2017Existing Existing++App App++Dev DevConditions Conditions JMD Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD JMD
Synchro Synchro99Report Report Page 1 Synchro 9Page Report 22 Page 1
80 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 55: Drive 3/Boardwalk 1 & Grandscape Blvd
Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak-hour factor, PHF Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS
Ex+App+Dev Saturday 02/20/2017
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBL
WBT
WBR
SEL
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
NWR
93 93 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1711 0.29 520 0.85 109 0 109 D.P+P 7 8 55.2 55.2 0.55 5.0 3.0 393 0.02 0.13 0.28 10.9 0.78 0.3 8.9 A
1027 1027 1900 5.0 0.91 0.97 1.00 4785 1.00 4785 0.85 1208 29 1440 NA 4
222 222 1900
133 133 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1711 0.10 172 0.85 156 0 156 D.P+P 3 4 55.2 55.2 0.55 5.0 3.0 267 c0.07 0.26 0.58 14.7 1.44 2.6 23.9 C
644 644 1900 5.0 0.91 0.99 1.00 4858 1.00 4858 0.85 758 8 814 NA 8
54 54 1900
77 77 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1711 0.95 1711 0.85 91 0 91 Prot 1
10 10 1900 5.0 1.00 0.87 1.00 1562 1.00 1562 0.85 12 84 19 NA 6
77 77 1900
438 438 1900 5.0 0.97 1.00 0.95 3319 0.95 3319 0.85 515 0 515 Prot 5
10 10 1900 5.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1551 1.00 1551 0.85 12 121 35 NA 2
122 122 1900
46.3 46.3 0.46 5.0 3.0 2249 0.17
8.7 8.7 0.09 5.0 3.0 148 0.05
7.2 7.2 0.07 5.0 3.0 112 0.01
17.6 17.6 0.18 5.0 3.0 584 c0.16
16.1 16.1 0.16 5.0 3.0 249 c0.02
0.36 17.3 0.39 0.4 7.2 A 9.8 A
0.61 44.0 1.00 7.4 51.4 D
0.17 43.6 1.00 0.7 44.3 D 47.6 D
0.88 40.2 1.00 14.6 54.8 D
0.14 36.0 1.00 0.3 36.3 D 50.5 D
Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group
0.85 261 0 0
44.0 44.0 0.44 5.0 3.0 2105 c0.30 0.68 22.4 0.82 1.6 20.1 C 19.3 B 24.3 0.67 100.0 68.0% 15
0.85 64 0 0
HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
0.85 91 0 0
0.85 144 0 0
Lane Group Movement Movement Lane Group Flow (vph) Lane Configurations v/cLane RatioConfigurations Traffic Volume TrafficDelay Volume (vph) (vph) Control Future Volume FutureDelay Volume (vph) (vph) Queue Ideal Flow (vphpl) IdealDelay Flow (vphpl) Total Total Lost time (s) Total Lost time (s) (ft) Queue Length 50th Lane Lane Util. Util. Factor Factor Queue Length 95th (ft) Frt Frt Link Dist (ft) Internal Flt Flt Protected Protected Turn Bay Length (ft) Satd. Flow Satd.Capacity Flow (prot) (prot) Base (vph) Flt Permitted Flt Permitted Starvation Cap Reductn Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow Spillback Cap(perm) Reductn Peak-hour factor, PHF Peak-hour PHF Storage Capfactor, Reductn Adj. (vph) Adj. Flow Flowv/c (vph) Reduced Ratio RTOR RTOR Reduction Reduction (vph) (vph) Lane Flow Intersection Lane Group GroupSummary Flow (vph) (vph) Turn Turn Type Type Protected Protected Phases Phases Permitted Permitted Phases Phases Actuated Actuated Green, Green, G G (s) (s) Effective Effective Green, Green, gg (s) (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Clearance Time Time (s) (s) Vehicle Vehicle Extension Extension (s) (s) Lane Lane Grp Grp Cap Cap (vph) (vph) v/s v/s Ratio Ratio Prot Prot v/s v/s Ratio Ratio Perm Perm v/c v/c Ratio Ratio Uniform Uniform Delay, Delay, d1 d1 Progression Progression Factor Factor Incremental Incremental Delay, Delay, d2 d2 Delay Delay (s) (s) Level of of Service Service Level Approach Delay Delay (s) (s) Approach Approach LOS LOS Approach
EBL EBL EBL 547 0.61 93 24.393 93 0.093 1900 1900 24.3 5.0 5.0 99 1.00 1.00 146 1.00 1.00 149 0.95 0.95 1711 1711 1572 0.27 0.27 0 494 484 0 0.85 0.85 0 109 109 0.35 00 109 109 D.P+P D.P+P 77 8 50.1 47.4 50.1 47.4 0.50 0.47 5.0 3.0 359 332 0.03 0.12 0.13 0.30 0.33 13.6 15.1 0.79 0.81 0.4 0.5 11.2 12.7 B
Intersection Summary Summary Intersection HCM 2000 2000 Control Control Delay Delay HCM HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity Capacity ratio HCM 2000 Volume to Actuated Cycle Cycle Length Length (s) (s) Actuated Intersection Capacity Capacity Utilization Utilization Intersection Analysis Period Period (min) (min) Analysis Critical Lane Lane Group Group cc Critical
C 20.0 C
Synchro 9 Report Page 23
SPLIT PHASED
Queues HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis HCM Signalized 67: Destination DrIntersection & Drive 7 Capacity Analysis 55: Blvd 55: Drive Drive 3/Boardwalk 3/Boardwalk 1 1& & Grandscape Grandscape Blvd EBR EBT EBT 144 0.28 1027 1027 5.7 1027 1027 0.0 1900 1900 5.7 5.0 5.0 0 0.91 0.91 32 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 4785 4785 800 1.00 1.00 0 4785 4785 0 0.85 0.85 0 1208 1208 0.18 30 31 1439 1438 NA NA 44
NBL EBR EBR 141 0.34 222 222 9.5 222 222 0.0 1900 1900 9.5 22 52 150 416 0 0 0.85 0.85 0 261 261 0.34 00 00
39.3 38.3 39.3 38.3 0.39 0.38 5.0 3.0 1880 1832 c0.30 0.77 0.79 26.3 27.2 0.88 2.7 3.1 25.8 27.1 C 26.1 24.8 C 26.5 27.9 0.72 0.73 100.0 63.7% 15
NBT WBL WBL 734 0.39 133 133 8.4 133 133 0.0 1900 1900 8.4 5.0 5.0 68 1.00 1.00 120 1.00 1.00 573 0.95 0.95 1711 1711 2440 0.10 0.10 0 183 188 0 0.85 0.85 0 156 156 0.30 00 156 156 D.P+P D.P+P 33 4 50.1 47.4 50.1 47.4 0.50 0.47 5.0 3.0 256 227 c0.07 c0.06 0.24 0.26 0.61 0.69 17.3 18.8 0.88 0.91 3.2 6.7 18.5 23.8 CB
Ex+App+Dev Saturday Ex+App+DevSaturday Saturday Ex+App+Dev 02/20/2017 05/12/2017 05/12/2017
SBT WBT WBT 764 0.56 644 644 17.4 644 644 0.0 1900 1900 17.4 5.0 5.0 118 0.91 0.91 185 0.99 0.99 324 1.00 1.00 4858 4858 1800 1.00 1.00 0 4858 4858 0 0.85 0.85 0 758 758 0.42 98 814 813 NA NA 88
SBR WBR WBR 618 0.63 54 54 4.8 54 54 0.0 1900 1900 4.8 0 45
SEL SEL
SET SET
SER SER
NWL NWL
NWT NWT
NWR NWR
77 77 77 77 1900 1900 5.0 5.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1711 1711 0.95 0.95 1711 1711 0.85 0.85 91 91 00 91 91 Split Split 66
10 10 10 10 1900 1900 5.0 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.87 0.87 1.00 1.00 1562 1562 1.00 1.00 1562 1562 0.85 0.85 12 12 81 82 22 21 NA NA 66
77 77 77 77 1900 1900
438 438 438 438 1900 1900 5.0 5.0 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1625 1625 0.95 0.95 1625 1625 0.85 0.85 515 515 00 263 263 Split Split 22
10 10 10 10 1900 1900 5.0 5.0 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1633 1633 0.95 0.95 1633 1633 0.85 0.85 12 12 00 264 264 NA NA 22
122 122 122 122 1900 1900 5.0 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00 1531 1531 1.00 1.00 1531 1531 0.85 0.85 144 144 117 112 27 32 Perm Perm
40.9 39.0 40.9 39.0 0.41 0.39 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 1986 1894 0.17 0.17
10.9 10.2 10.9 10.2 0.11 0.10 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 186 174 c0.05 c0.05
10.9 10.2 10.9 10.2 0.11 0.10 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 170 159 0.01 0.01
19.0 22.4 19.0 22.4 0.19 0.22 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 308 364 c0.16 c0.16
19.0 22.4 19.0 22.4 0.19 0.22 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 310 365 0.16 0.16
0.41 0.43 21.0 22.3 0.52 0.54 0.5 0.6 11.3 12.5 BB 14.3 12.4 BB
0.49 0.52 41.9 42.6 1.00 1.00 2.0 2.8 44.0 45.4 DD
0.13 0.13 40.3 40.9 1.00 1.00 0.3 0.4 40.6 41.3 DD 43.2 42.2 DD
0.85 0.72 39.2 35.9 1.00 1.00 19.9 6.9 59.1 42.9 DE
0.85 0.72 39.1 35.9 1.00 1.00 19.6 6.9 58.7 42.9 DE 40.3 53.5 DD
150 1098 0 0 0.85 0.85 0 64 64 0.56 00 00
HCM 2000 2000 Level Level of of Service Service Sum of lost lost time time (s) (s) ICU Level Level of of Service Service
Grandscape5:00 5:00pm pm01/19/2017 01/19/2017Existing Existing+++App App+++Dev Dev Conditions Grandscape Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing App DevConditions Conditions JMD JMD JMD
0.85 0.85 91 91 00 00
22 19.0 22.4 19.0 22.4 0.19 0.22 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 290 342
0.02 0.02 0.09 0.09 33.4 30.8 1.00 1.00 0.1 0.1 33.5 30.9 CC
CC 20.0 20.0 BB
Synchro Synchro Report Synchro999Report Report Page 22 Page Page24
81 Queues 38:HCM NFMSignalized Dr & Colony Blvd Intersection Capacity Analysis Queues 55: Drive 3/Boardwalk 1 & Grandscape Blvd 38: NFM Dr & Colony Blvd Lane Group Lane Group Flow (vph) Movement v/cLane RatioGroup Lane Configurations Lane Group Flow(vph) (vph) Control Delay Traffic Volume v/c Ratio Queue Delay Future Volume (vph) Control Delay Total Delay Ideal Flow (vphpl) Queue Delay TotalLength Lost time Queue 50th(s)(ft) Total Delay LaneLength Util. Factor Queue 95th (ft) Queue Length (ft) Frt Link Dist50th Internal (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Protected TurnFltBay Length (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Satd. Flow (prot) Base Capacity (vph) Turn Bay Length (ft) Flt Permitted Starvation Cap Reductn Base Capacity (vph) Satd. Flow (perm) Spillback CapCap Reductn Starvation Reductn Peak-hour factor, PHF Storage CapCap Reductn Spillback Reductn Adj. Flow (vph) Reduced Ratio Storagev/c Cap Reductn RTOR Reduction (vph) Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Lane Group Flow (vph) Intersection Turn Type Summary Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS
EBT 532 EBL EBT 0.16 1202 0.193 0.35 0.0 93 0.3 0.1 1900 0.0 05.0 0.3 1.00 0 0 1.00 408 0 0.95 408 1711 3421 0.29 0 3384 520 00 0.85 00 109 0.16 0 0 0.36 109 D.P+P 7 8 55.2 55.2 0.55 5.0 3.0 393 0.02 0.13 0.28 10.9 0.78 0.3 8.9 A
Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group
WBT SWR 262 EBT 262 EBR WBL WBT SWR 0.43 0.18 404 939 10.3 0.3 1027 222 133 0.67 0.0 0.0 1027 0.63 222 133 18.8 6.9 10.3 0.3 1900 1900 1900 0.0 0.0 5.0 265.0 0 18.8 6.9 0.91 1.00 68 0 87 36 0.97 1.00 110 143 85 1.00 0.95 110 4785 2121 1711 1248 1.00 0.10 0 0 837 1532 4785 172 00 00 0.85 0.85 0.85 00 00 1208 0.12 261 156 0.21 0 0 29 0 0 0.48 0.61 1440 0 156 NA D.P+P 4 3 4 44.0 55.2 44.0 55.2 0.44 0.55 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 2105 267 c0.30 c0.07 0.26 0.68 0.58 22.4 14.7 0.82 1.44 1.6 2.6 20.1 23.9 C C 19.3 B 24.3 0.67 100.0 68.0% 15
Ex+App+Dev PM 05/12/2017 Ex+App+Dev Saturday Ex+App+Dev Saturday 02/20/2017 05/12/2017
WBT
WBR
SEL
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
NWR
644 644 1900 5.0 0.91 0.99 1.00 4858 1.00 4858 0.85 758 8 814 NA 8
54 54 1900
77 77 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1711 0.95 1711 0.85 91 0 91 Prot 1
10 10 1900 5.0 1.00 0.87 1.00 1562 1.00 1562 0.85 12 84 19 NA 6
77 77 1900
438 438 1900 5.0 0.97 1.00 0.95 3319 0.95 3319 0.85 515 0 515 Prot 5
10 10 1900 5.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1551 1.00 1551 0.85 12 121 35 NA 2
122 122 1900
46.3 46.3 0.46 5.0 3.0 2249 0.17
8.7 8.7 0.09 5.0 3.0 148 0.05
7.2 7.2 0.07 5.0 3.0 112 0.01
17.6 17.6 0.18 5.0 3.0 584 c0.16
16.1 16.1 0.16 5.0 3.0 249 c0.02
0.36 17.3 0.39 0.4 7.2 A 9.8 A
0.61 44.0 1.00 7.4 51.4 D
0.17 43.6 1.00 0.7 44.3 D 47.6 D
0.88 40.2 1.00 14.6 54.8 D
0.14 36.0 1.00 0.3 36.3 D 50.5 D
0.85 64 0 0
HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service
Grandscape5:00 5:00 pm01/19/2017 01/19/2017Existing Existing +App App++Dev DevConditions Conditions Grandscape Grandscape 5:00 pmpm01/19/2017 Existing ++App + Dev Conditions JMD JMD JMD
0.85 91 0 0
0.85 144 0 0
C 20.0 C
Synchro9 9Report Report Synchro Synchro 9 Report Page 123 Page Page 1
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 38: NFM Dr & Colony Blvd Capacity Analysis HCM Signalized Intersection Queues HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 38: Dr & Colony Blvd 7 67:NFM Destination Dr & Drive 55: Drive 3/Boardwalk 1 & Grandscape Blvd Movement EBL Lane Configurations Movement EBL Lane Group EBL Movement EBL Traffic Volume (vph) 0 Lane LaneConfigurations Group Flow (vph) 547 Lane Configurations Future Volume 00 Traffic Volume (vph) (vph) v/c Ratio 0.61 Traffic Volume (vph) 93 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Future Volume (vph) 0 Control Delay 24.3 Future Volume (vph) 93 Total Lost time (s) Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Queue Delay 0.0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Lane Util. Factor Total Lost time (s) Total Delay 24.3 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Frt Lane Util.Length Factor50th (ft) Queue 99 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 FltFrt Protected Queue Length 95th (ft) 146 FrtFlow (prot) 1.00 Satd. FltInternal Protected Link Dist (ft) 149 Flt Protected 0.95 FltSatd. Permitted Flow (prot) (ft) Turn Bay Length Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 Satd. Flow (perm)(vph) Capacity 1572 FltBase Permitted Flt Permitted 0.27 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85494 Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (perm) Spillback Cap Reductn Adj. Flow (vph) 00 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 Storage Cap Reductn RTOR Reduction (vph) 00 Adj. Flow (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) 109 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 Lane Group Flow (vph) 00 RTOR Reduction (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Turn Type Lane Group Flow (vph) 109 Intersection Summary Heavy Vehicles 1% Protected Phases(%) Turn Type D.P+P Turn TypePhases Permitted Protected Phases 7 Protected Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Permitted Phases 8 Permitted Phases Effective Green, g (s) Actuated Green, G (s) 50.1 Actuated Green, Actuated g/C RatioG g(s)(s) Effective Green, 50.1 Effective Green, g (s) Clearance Time Actuated g/C (s) Ratio 0.50 Actuated g/C Time Ratio(s) Vehicle Extension Clearance (s) 5.0 Clearance Time (s) (s) Vehicle Extension 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp 359 v/s Ratio ProtCap (vph) Lane Cap v/s Grp Ratio Prot(vph) 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm 0.12 v/c Ratio v/sv/c Ratio Permd1 Ratio 0.30 Uniform Delay, v/cUniform Ratio Delay, d1 13.6 Progression Factor Uniform Delay, Factor d1 Progression 0.79 Incremental Delay, d2 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 Delay (s) Incremental Delay (s) Delay, d2 11.2 Level of Service Delay (s)of Service Level B Approach Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS(s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay Intersection HCM 2000Summary Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) (s) ratio HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity Actuated Cycle Length Intersection Capacity Utilization Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) cAnalysis Critical Lane Group Period (min) c Critical Lane Group c Critical Lane Group
EBT
WBT
EBT EBR EBT 452 144 452 1022 0.28 1027 1900 1022 5.7 1027 5.0 1900 0.0 1900 0.95 5.0 5.7 1.005.0 0.95 0 0.91 1.00 1.0032 0.97 3421 1.00 1.00 1.00 3455 4785 3421 800 1.00 1.00 0 0.85 3455 4785 0 532 0.85 0.85 00 1202 1208 0.18 532 030 1202 NA 1439 1% 4 6NA NA 4 46 29.2 29.2 39.3 43.9 1.00 39.3 43.9 0.39 1.005.0 34213.0 1880 c0.16 3455 c0.30 0.35 0.16 0.77 0.0 0.35 26.3 1.00 0.0 0.88 0.0 1.002.7 0.0 0.1 25.8 A 0.1 C 0.0 A 24.8 A 0.1 C A
WBT NBL EBR 223 141 223 343 0.34 222 1900 343 9.5 222 5.0 1900 0.0 1900 1.00 5.0 9.5 1.00 1.00 22 1.00 1.00 52 1801 1.00 1.00 1818 150 1801 416 1.00 0.850 1818 2620 0.85 0.85 00 404 261 0.34 262 00 404 NA 0 1%8 NA 8 9.9 9.9 14.6 0.34 14.6 5.0 0.33 3.0 5.0 610 3.0 c0.15 604 c0.22 0.43
7.5 0.67 1.00 12.6 0.5 1.00 8.0 2.8 A 15.4 8.0 B A 15.4 B 3.7 27.9 0.34 6.0 0.73 29.2 0.60 100.0 27.9% 43.9 63.7% 1515 54.3% 15
WBR
SWL
Ex+App+Dev PM SPLIT PHASED 05/12/2017
Ex+App+Dev Ex+App+DevSaturday Saturday Ex+App+Dev Saturday 05/12/2017 02/20/2017 05/12/2017
SWR
WBR NBT SWL SBT SWR SBR WBL WBT WBR 0 0 223 734 764 618 223 00 00 798 0.39 0.56 0.63 133 644 54 1900 1900 1900 0 0 798 8.4 17.4 4.8 133 644 54 5.0 1900 0.0 1900 0.0 1900 0.0 1900 1900 0.88 1900 5.0 8.4 17.4 4.8 5.0 5.0 0.85 68 118 0.88 0 1.00 0.91 1.00 120 185 0.85 45 1.00 0.99 2694 573 324 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 2720 150 1711 4858 2694 2440 1098 0.10 1800 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 0.85 0.85 0.85 2720 183 4858 00 0 2620 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 179 000 00 939 156 758 64 0.30 0.56 830 000 0.42 008 290 0 0 649 Prot0 156 814 1% 1% 1%6 D.P+P NA 3 8 Prot 6 9.3 4 9.3 50.1 40.9 0.32 50.1 40.9 19.3 5.0 0.50 0.41 19.3 3.0 5.0 5.0 0.44 5.0 3.0 3.0 858 3.0 256 1986 0.03 1195 c0.07 0.17 c0.24 0.24 0.10 0.61 0.41 7.0 0.54 17.3 21.0 1.00 9.1 0.88 0.52 0.0 3.2 0.5 1.00 7.0 0.5 18.5 11.3 A 9.6 B B 7.0 A 12.4 A 9.6 B A
SEL
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
NWR
77 77 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1711 0.95 1711 0.85 91 0 91 Split 6
10 10 1900 5.0 1.00 0.87 1.00 1562 1.00 1562 0.85 12 81 22 NA 6
77 77 1900
438 438 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 1625 0.95 1625 0.85 515 0 263 Split 2
10 10 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 1633 0.95 1633 0.85 12 0 264 NA 2
122 122 1900 5.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1531 1.00 1531 0.85 144 117 27 Perm
10.9 10.9 0.11 5.0 3.0 186 c0.05
10.9 10.9 0.11 5.0 3.0 170 0.01
19.0 19.0 0.19 5.0 3.0 308 c0.16
19.0 19.0 0.19 5.0 3.0 310 0.16
0.49 41.9 1.00 2.0 44.0 D
0.13 40.3 1.00 0.3 40.6 D 42.2 D
0.85 39.2 1.00 19.9 59.1 E
0.85 39.1 1.00 19.6 58.7 E 53.5 D
HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level Sum lost of time (s) ICUof Level ofService Service ICU Level of Service
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing Dev Conditions Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 ++App +++Dev Conditions Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing +App App +Dev Dev Conditions Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing Conditions JMD JMD JMD JMD
0.85 91 0 0
2 19.0 19.0 0.19 5.0 3.0 290 0.02 0.09 33.4 1.00 0.1 33.5 C
A C A 10.0 20.0 10.0 BA A
Synchro Synchro 999Report Synchro Report Synchro 9Report Report Page 24 22 2 Page Page
82 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Queues 55: Drive 3/Boardwalk 1 & Grandscape Blvd 38: NFM Dr & Colony Blvd Movement Lane Group Lane Configurations Lane Group Flow(vph) (vph) Traffic Volume v/c RatioVolume (vph) Future Control Delay Ideal Flow (vphpl) Queue Delay Total Lost time (s) Total LaneDelay Util. Factor Queue Length 50th (ft) Frt Queue Length 95th (ft) Flt Protected Internal Link Dist (ft) Satd. Flow (prot) Turn Bay Length (ft) Flt Permitted Base Capacity (vph) Satd. Flow (perm) Starvation Cap Reductn Peak-hour factor, PHF Spillback Cap Reductn Adj. Flow (vph) Storage Cap Reductn RTOR Reduction (vph) Reduced v/c Ratio Lane Group Flow (vph) Intersection Turn Type Summary Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS
EBL EBT 1202 93 0.35 93 0.3 1900 0.0 5.0 0.3 1.00 0 1.00 0 0.95 408 1711 0.29 3384 520 0 0.85 0 109 0 0 0.36 109 D.P+P 7 8 55.2 55.2 0.55 5.0 3.0 393 0.02 0.13 0.28 10.9 0.78 0.3 8.9 A
Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group
EBT WBT 404 1027 0.67 1027 18.8 1900 0.0 5.0 18.8 0.91 87 0.97 143 1.00 110 4785 1.00 837 4785 0 0.85 0 1208 0 29 0.48 1440 NA 4
EBR SWR 939 222 0.63 222 6.9 1900 0.0 6.9 36 85 1532 0 0.85 0 261 0 0 0.61 0
44.0 44.0 0.44 5.0 3.0 2105 c0.30 0.68 22.4 0.82 1.6 20.1 C 19.3 B 24.3 0.67 100.0 68.0% 15
Ex+App+Dev Saturday Ex+App+Dev Saturday 02/20/2017 05/12/2017
WBL
WBT
WBR
SEL
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
NWR
133 133 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1711 0.10 172 0.85 156 0 156 D.P+P 3 4 55.2 55.2 0.55 5.0 3.0 267 c0.07 0.26 0.58 14.7 1.44 2.6 23.9 C
644 644 1900 5.0 0.91 0.99 1.00 4858 1.00 4858 0.85 758 8 814 NA 8
54 54 1900
77 77 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1711 0.95 1711 0.85 91 0 91 Prot 1
10 10 1900 5.0 1.00 0.87 1.00 1562 1.00 1562 0.85 12 84 19 NA 6
77 77 1900
438 438 1900 5.0 0.97 1.00 0.95 3319 0.95 3319 0.85 515 0 515 Prot 5
10 10 1900 5.0 1.00 0.86 1.00 1551 1.00 1551 0.85 12 121 35 NA 2
122 122 1900
46.3 46.3 0.46 5.0 3.0 2249 0.17
8.7 8.7 0.09 5.0 3.0 148 0.05
7.2 7.2 0.07 5.0 3.0 112 0.01
17.6 17.6 0.18 5.0 3.0 584 c0.16
16.1 16.1 0.16 5.0 3.0 249 c0.02
0.36 17.3 0.39 0.4 7.2 A 9.8 A
0.61 44.0 1.00 7.4 51.4 D
0.17 43.6 1.00 0.7 44.3 D 47.6 D
0.88 40.2 1.00 14.6 54.8 D
0.14 36.0 1.00 0.3 36.3 D 50.5 D
0.85 64 0 0
HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service
Grandscape5:00 5:00pm pm01/19/2017 01/19/2017Existing Existing++App App++Dev DevConditions Conditions Grandscape JMD JMD
0.85 91 0 0
0.85 144 0 0
C 20.0 C
Synchro9 9Report Report Synchro Page 123 Page
SPLIT PHASED
HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Queues HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 38: Dr & Colony Blvd 7 67:NFM Destination Dr & Drive 55: Drive 3/Boardwalk 1 & Grandscape Blvd Movement EBL Lane Group EBL Movement EBL Lane LaneConfigurations Group Flow (vph) 547 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 v/c Ratio 0.61 Traffic Volume (vph) 93 Future Volume 0 Control Delay (vph) 24.3 Future Volume (vph) 93 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Queue Delay 0.0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total time (s) TotalLost Delay 24.3 Total Lost time (s) 5.0 Lane Util.Length Factor50th (ft) Queue 99 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt Queue Length 95th (ft) 146 Frt 1.00 FltInternal Protected Link Dist (ft) 149 Flt Protected 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) (ft) Turn Bay Length Satd. Flow (prot) 1711 Capacity (vph) 1572 FltBase Permitted Flt Permitted 0.27 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 Satd. Flow (perm) Satd. Flow (perm) 494 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 Storage Cap Reductn Adj. Flow (vph) 00 Adj. Flow (vph) 109 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 RTOR Reduction (vph) 00 RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 109 Intersection Summary Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% Turn Type D.P+P Turn Type Phases Protected 7 Protected Phases Permitted Phases 8 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 50.1 Actuated Green, G g(s)(s) Effective Green, 50.1 Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 Actuated g/C Time Ratio (s) Clearance 5.0 Clearance Time (s) (s) Vehicle Extension 3.0 Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) 359 Lane v/s Grp RatioCap Prot(vph) 0.03 v/sv/s Ratio Prot Ratio Perm 0.12 v/sv/c Ratio Perm Ratio 0.30 v/cUniform Ratio Delay, d1 13.6 Uniform Delay, Factor d1 Progression 0.79 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 Incremental Delay (s) Delay, d2 11.2 Delay (s)of Service Level B Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach Delay Approach LOS(s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary Intersection HCM 2000Summary Control Delay HCM 2000 Control Delay HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity Actuated Cycle Length (s) ratio Actuated CycleCapacity Length (s) Intersection Utilization Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group c Critical Lane Group
EBT EBR EBT 144 1022 0.28 1027 1022 5.7 1027 1900 0.0 1900 5.0 5.7 5.0 0.950 0.91 1.0032 0.97 1.00 1.00 3455 4785 800 1.00 1.00 0 3455 4785 0 0.85 0.85 0 1202 1208 0.18 030 1202 1439 1% NA NA 4 46
WBT NBL EBR 141 343 0.34 222 343 9.5 222 1900 0.0 1900 5.0 9.5 1.0022 1.0052 1.00 1818 150 416 1.00 18180 0 0.85 0.85 0 404 261 0.34 00 404 0 1% NA 8
39.3 43.9 39.3 14.6 43.9 0.39 14.6 1.005.0 0.33 3.0 5.0 1880 3.0 3455 c0.30 604 0.35 c0.22 0.77 0.35 26.3 0.67 0.0 0.88 12.6 1.002.7 1.00 0.1 25.8 2.8 0.1 C 15.4 A B 24.8 0.1 C 15.4 A B 27.9 6.0 0.73 0.60 100.0 43.9 63.7% 54.3%15 15
WBR NBT SWL SBT SWR SBR WBL WBT WBR 734 764 618 0 0 798 0.39 0.56 0.63 133 644 54 0 0 798 8.4 17.4 4.8 133 644 54 1900 0.0 1900 0.0 1900 0.0 1900 1900 1900 5.0 8.4 17.4 4.8 5.0 5.0 68 118 0.880 1.00 0.91 120 185 0.8545 1.00 0.99 573 324 1.00 0.95 1.00 2720 150 1711 4858 2440 1098 0.10 1800 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 2720 183 4858 0 0 0 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0 00 00 93964 156 758 0.30 0.56 0 0 0.42 0 8 290 0 0 0 649 0 156 814 1% 1% 1% D.P+P NA 3 8 Prot 6 4 50.1 40.9 50.1 40.9 19.3 0.50 0.41 19.3 5.0 5.0 0.44 5.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 256 1986 1195 c0.07 0.17 c0.24 0.24 0.61 0.41 17.3 21.0 0.54 9.1 0.88 0.52 3.2 0.5 1.00 0.5 18.5 11.3 9.6 B B A 12.4 9.6 B A
Ex+App+Dev Ex+App+DevSaturday Saturday Ex+App+Dev Saturday 05/12/2017 02/20/2017 05/12/2017
SEL
SET
SER
NWL
NWT
NWR
77 77 1900 5.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1711 0.95 1711 0.85 91 0 91 Split 6
10 10 1900 5.0 1.00 0.87 1.00 1562 1.00 1562 0.85 12 81 22 NA 6
77 77 1900
438 438 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 1625 0.95 1625 0.85 515 0 263 Split 2
10 10 1900 5.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 1633 0.95 1633 0.85 12 0 264 NA 2
122 122 1900 5.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1531 1.00 1531 0.85 144 117 27 Perm
10.9 10.9 0.11 5.0 3.0 186 c0.05
10.9 10.9 0.11 5.0 3.0 170 0.01
19.0 19.0 0.19 5.0 3.0 308 c0.16
19.0 19.0 0.19 5.0 3.0 310 0.16
0.49 41.9 1.00 2.0 44.0 D
0.13 40.3 1.00 0.3 40.6 D 42.2 D
0.85 39.2 1.00 19.9 59.1 E
0.85 39.1 1.00 19.6 58.7 E 53.5 D
HCM 2000 Level of Service HCM 2000 Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) Sum lost time (s) ICUofLevel of Service ICU Level of Service
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing Conditions Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing ++App ++Dev Conditions Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing +App App +Dev Dev Conditions JMD JMD JMD
0.85 91 0 0
2 19.0 19.0 0.19 5.0 3.0 290 0.02 0.09 33.4 1.00 0.1 33.5 C
C A 20.0 10.0 B A
Synchro Report Synchro Synchro999Report Report Page 22 Page24
HCM 2010 AWSC 79: NFM East Access & Drive 1
Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Number of Lanes Approach Opposing Approach Opposing Lanes Conflicting Approach Left Conflicting Lanes Left Conflicting Approach Right Conflicting Lanes Right HCM Control Delay HCM LOS Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence, Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q
Ex+App+Dev PM 05/12/2017
7.5 A EBU
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBU
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBU
NBL
NBT
NBR
0 0 0.85 2 0 0
5 5 0.85 2 6 0
20 20 0.85 2 24 1
2 2 0.85 2 2 0
0 0 0.85 2 0 0
2 2 0.85 2 2 0
20 20 0.85 2 24 1
8 8 0.85 2 9 1
0 0 0.85 2 0 0
2 2 0.85 2 2 0
4 4 0.85 2 5 1
2 2 0.85 2 2 0
EB WB 2 SB 1 NB 1 7.4 A
WB EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 7.5 A
NB SB 1 EB 1 WB 2 7.1 A
NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 25% 19% 9% 0% 80% 50% 74% 91% 0% 7% 25% 7% 0% 100% 14% Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop 8 27 22 8 74 2 5 2 0 59 4 20 20 0 5 2 2 0 8 10 9 32 26 9 87 2 5 7 7 2 0.01 0.037 0.034 0.011 0.1 4.013 4.221 4.763 4.017 4.133 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 883 841 747 884 863 2.078 2.282 2.519 1.771 2.178 0.01 0.038 0.035 0.01 0.101 7.1 7.4 7.7 6.8 7.6 A A A A A 0 0.1 0.1 0 0.3
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
Synchro 9 Report Page 1
83
HCM 2010 AWSC 79: NFM East Access & Drive 1
Ex+App+Dev PM 05/12/2017
Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Number of Lanes Approach Opposing Approach Opposing Lanes Conflicting Approach Left Conflicting Lanes Left Conflicting Approach Right Conflicting Lanes Right HCM Control Delay HCM LOS
SBU
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 0 0.85 2 0 0
59 59 0.85 2 69 0
5 5 0.85 2 6 1
10 10 0.85 2 12 0
SB NB 1 WB 2 EB 1 7.6 A
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
Synchro 9 Report Page 2
84
HCM 2010 TWSC 25: Grandscape Blvd & Drive 2
Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow
Ex+App+Dev PM 05/12/2017
1.7 NBL
NBR
NET NER
SWL SWT
0 0 0 Stop 0 0 85 2 0
45 45 0 Stop None 0 85 2 53
203 22 203 22 0 0 Free Free - None 0 0 85 85 2 2 239 26
0 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free - None 0 85 85 2 2 0 0
Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2
Minor1 0 0 0
252 6.22 3.318 787 -
-
787 -
Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS
NB 9.9 A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
Major1 0 -
0 -
NE 0
NET NER NBLn1 - 787 - 0.067 9.9 A 0.2
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
Synchro 9 Report Page 1
85
HCM 2010 TWSC 81: Drive 1 & Drive 3
Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow
Ex+App+Dev PM 05/12/2017
0 SEL
SER
NEL
NET
SWT SWR
56 56 0 Free 0 0 0 85 2 66
145 145 0 Free None 0 85 2 171
182 42 182 42 0 0 Stop Stop - None 0 0 0 85 85 2 2 214 49
54 156 54 156 0 0 Stop Stop - None 0 0 85 85 2 2 64 184
Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2
Major1 0 -
Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS
SE
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
-
NELn1 NELn2 -
0 -
Minor1 124 0 124 -
132 132 0 -
Minor2 132 0 132 -
0 -
-
-
-
NE
SW
-
-
SEL SERSWLn1 -
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
Synchro 9 Report Page 1
86
HCM 2010 TWSC 80: Drive 1 & Drive 2
Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow
Ex+App+Dev PM 05/12/2017
1.3 SBL
SBR
NEL
NET
SWT SWR
5 5 0 Stop 0 0 0 85 2 6
17 17 0 Stop None 85 2 20
40 184 40 184 0 0 Free Free - None 100 0 0 85 85 2 2 47 216
164 5 164 5 0 0 Free Free - None 0 0 85 85 2 2 193 6
Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2
Minor2 507 196 311 6.42 5.42 5.42 3.518 525 837 743
196 6.22 3.318 845 -
Major1 199 4.12 2.218 1373 -
507 507 837 718
845 -
1373 -
Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS
SB 10.1 B
NE 1.4
NEL 1373 0.034 7.7 A 0.1
NET SBLn1 SWT SWR - 734 - 0.035 - 10.1 B 0.1 -
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
0 -
Major2 -
0 -
SW 0
Synchro 9 Report Page 1
87
HCM 2010 TWSC 25: Grandscape Blvd & Drive 2
Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow
Ex+App+Dev Saturday 05/12/2017
1.7 NBL
NBR
NET NER
SWL SWT
0 0 0 Stop 0 0 85 2 0
72 72 0 Stop None 0 85 2 85
398 37 398 37 0 0 Free Free - None 0 0 85 85 2 2 468 44
0 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free - None 0 85 85 2 2 0 0
Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2
Minor1 0 0 0
490 6.22 3.318 578 -
-
578 -
Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS
NB 12.3 B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
NET NER NBLn1 - 578 - 0.147 - 12.3 B 0.5
Major1 0 -
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
0 -
NE 0
Synchro 9 Report Page 1
88
HCM 2010 TWSC 81: Drive 1 & Drive 3
Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow
Ex+App+Dev Saturday 05/12/2017
0 SEL
SER
NEL
NET
SWT SWR
99 99 0 Free 0 0 0 85 2 116
235 235 0 Free None 0 85 2 276
289 67 289 67 0 0 Stop Stop - None 0 0 0 85 85 2 2 340 79
89 244 89 244 0 0 Stop Stop - None 0 0 85 85 2 2 105 287
Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2
Major1 0 -
Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS
SE
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
-
NELn1 NELn2 -
0 -
Minor1 196 0 196 -
233 233 0 -
Minor2 233 0 233 -
0 -
-
-
-
NE
SW
-
-
SEL SERSWLn1 -
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
Synchro 9 Report Page 1
89
HCM 2010 TWSC 80: Drive 1 & Drive 2
Intersection Int Delay, s/veh Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr Sign Control RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow
Ex+App+Dev Saturday 05/12/2017
1.4 SBL
SBR
NEL
NET
SWT SWR
9 9 0 Stop 0 0 0 85 2 11
28 28 0 Stop None 85 2 33
62 294 62 294 0 0 Free Free - None 100 0 0 85 85 2 2 73 346
273 10 273 10 0 0 Free Free - None 0 0 85 85 2 2 321 12
Major/Minor Conflicting Flow All Stage 1 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap-1 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2 Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver Mov Cap-2 Maneuver Stage 1 Stage 2
Minor2 819 327 492 6.42 5.42 5.42 3.518 345 731 615
327 6.22 3.318 714 -
Major1 333 4.12 2.218 1226 -
324 324 731 578
714 -
1226 -
Approach HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS
SB 12.1 B
NE 1.4
NEL 1226 0.059 8.1 A 0.2
NET SBLn1 SWT SWR - 552 - 0.079 - 12.1 B 0.3 -
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
0 -
Major2 -
0 -
SW 0
Synchro 9 Report Page 1
90
HCM 2010 AWSC 79: NFM East Access & Drive 1
Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Number of Lanes Approach Opposing Approach Opposing Lanes Conflicting Approach Left Conflicting Lanes Left Conflicting Approach Right Conflicting Lanes Right HCM Control Delay HCM LOS Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence, Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q
Ex+App+Dev Saturday 05/12/2017
8.2 A EBU
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBU
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBU
NBL
NBT
NBR
0 0 0.85 2 0 0
42 42 0.85 2 49 0
20 20 0.85 2 24 1
4 4 0.85 2 5 1
0 0 0.85 2 0 0
4 4 0.85 2 5 0
20 20 0.85 2 24 1
22 22 0.85 2 26 1
0 0 0.85 2 0 0
4 4 0.85 2 5 0
20 20 0.85 2 24 1
4 4 0.85 2 5 0
EB WB 2 SB 1 NB 1 8.6 A
WB EB 2 NB 1 SB 1 7.6 A
NB SB 1 EB 2 WB 2 7.6 A
NBLn1 EBLn1 EBLn2 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 14% 68% 0% 17% 0% 77% 71% 32% 0% 83% 0% 8% 14% 0% 100% 0% 100% 16% Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop 28 62 4 24 22 128 4 42 0 4 0 98 20 20 0 20 0 10 4 0 4 0 22 20 33 73 5 28 26 151 2 7 7 7 7 2 0.04 0.108 0.006 0.04 0.031 0.183 4.376 5.346 4.303 5.118 4.331 4.366 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 820 673 834 701 828 825 2.391 3.062 2.018 2.835 2.047 2.376 0.04 0.108 0.006 0.04 0.031 0.183 7.6 8.7 7 8 7.2 8.4 A A A A A A 0.1 0.4 0 0.1 0.1 0.7
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
Synchro 9 Report Page 1
91
HCM 2010 AWSC 79: NFM East Access & Drive 1
Ex+App+Dev Saturday 05/12/2017
Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Number of Lanes Approach Opposing Approach Opposing Lanes Conflicting Approach Left Conflicting Lanes Left Conflicting Approach Right Conflicting Lanes Right HCM Control Delay HCM LOS
SBU
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 0 0.85 2 0 0
98 98 0.85 2 115 0
10 10 0.85 2 12 1
20 20 0.85 2 24 0
SB NB 1 WB 2 EB 2 8.4 A
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
Synchro 9 Report Page 2
92
HCM 2010 AWSC 79: NFM East Access & Drive 1
Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Number of Lanes Approach Opposing Approach Opposing Lanes Conflicting Approach Left Conflicting Lanes Left Conflicting Approach Right Conflicting Lanes Right HCM Control Delay HCM LOS Lane Vol Left, % Vol Thru, % Vol Right, % Sign Control Traffic Vol by Lane LT Vol Through Vol RT Vol Lane Flow Rate Geometry Grp Degree of Util (X) Departure Headway (Hd) Convergence, Y/N Cap Service Time HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th-tile Q
Ex+App+Dev Saturday 05/12/2017
8.2 A EBU
EBL
EBT
EBR
WBU
WBL
WBT
WBR
NBU
NBL
NBT
NBR
0 0 0.85 2 0 0
42 42 0.85 2 49 0
40 40 0.85 2 47 1
4 4 0.85 2 5 0
0 0 0.85 2 0 0
4 4 0.85 2 5 0
40 40 0.85 2 47 1
22 22 0.85 2 26 1
0 0 0.85 2 0 0
4 4 0.85 2 5 0
20 20 0.85 2 24 1
4 4 0.85 2 5 0
EB WB 2 SB 1 NB 1 8.3 A
WB EB 1 NB 1 SB 1 7.9 A
NB SB 1 EB 1 WB 2 7.7 A
NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 WBLn2 SBLn1 14% 49% 9% 0% 77% 71% 47% 91% 0% 8% 14% 5% 0% 100% 16% Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop 28 86 44 22 128 4 42 4 0 98 20 40 40 0 10 4 4 0 22 20 33 101 52 26 151 2 5 7 7 2 0.041 0.13 0.073 0.031 0.186 4.475 4.625 5.097 4.348 4.458 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 801 777 705 825 807 2.494 2.642 2.814 2.064 2.473 0.041 0.13 0.074 0.032 0.187 7.7 8.3 8.2 7.2 8.5 A A A A A 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.7
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
Synchro 9 Report Page 1
93
HCM 2010 AWSC 79: NFM East Access & Drive 1
Ex+App+Dev Saturday 05/12/2017
Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Movement Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h Future Vol, veh/h Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow Number of Lanes Approach Opposing Approach Opposing Lanes Conflicting Approach Left Conflicting Lanes Left Conflicting Approach Right Conflicting Lanes Right HCM Control Delay HCM LOS
SBU
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 0 0.85 2 0 0
98 98 0.85 2 115 0
10 10 0.85 2 12 1
20 20 0.85 2 24 0
SB NB 1 WB 2 EB 1 8.5 A
Grandscape 5:00 pm 01/19/2017 Existing + App + Dev Conditions JMD
Synchro 9 Report Page 2
94
CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 2017 - ______ GRANDSCAPE LIFESTYLE CENTER AREA 1A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR GRANDSCAPE LIFESTYLE CENTER AREA 1A THAT INCLUDES A PARKING GARAGE, SURFACE PARKING AND OVERALL UTILITY, LANDSCAPE AND DRAINAGE PLANS FOR THE FIRST PHASE OF AN AREA GENERALLY BOUND BY GRANDSCAPE BOULEVARD AND DESTINATION DRIVE NEXT TO THE NEBRASKA FURNITURE MART DEVELOPMENT WITHIN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 25 (PD 25) AKA THE GRANDSCAPE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A REPEALER CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas, and the Code of Ordinances of the City of The Colony, Texas, and the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, is of the opinion and finds that Development Plan Application No. SP17-0002 for Grandscape Lifestyle Center Area 1A that includes a parking garage, surface parking and overall utility, landscape and drainage plans for the first phase of an area generally bound by Grandscape Boulevard and Destination Drive next to the Nebraska Furniture Mart development within Planned Development 25 (PD 25) aka the Grandscape Planned Development zoning district.is approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, does hereby approve the Development Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this Ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this Ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation of this Ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 4. That any provision of any prior ordinance of the City whether codified or uncodified, which are in conflict with any provision of this Ordinance, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict, but all other provisions of the ordinances of the City whether codified or 95 1
uncodified, which are not in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage. DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, this the 6th day of June, 2017.
Joe McCourry, Mayor ATTEST:
Tina Stewart, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jeff Moore, City Attorney
96 2
EXHIBIT “A”
97 3
MINUTES CITY OF THE COLONY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY 23, 2017 After determining that a quorum was present, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of The Colony, Texas convened into Regular Session which was held on Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 6:30 PM in the City Council Chambers located in City Hall, 6800 Main Street, The Colony, Texas, at which time the following items were addressed: Board Members Present: Karen Hames, Chairman, Detrick DeBurr, Vice Chairman, Shawn Rockenbaugh, Janece Pool, and Shannon Hebb. Board Members Absent: Cesar Molina Jr., and Brian Buffington Staff Present: Naim Khan, P.E. Senior Engineer, Surupa Sen, AICP, Planning Director, Brian McNuelty, Engineering Technician, and Ed Voss, City Attorney. 1.0
CALL REGULAR SESSION TO ORDER
Chairman Hames called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. 1.1
CITIZEN INPUT
No citizen came forward for input. 2 2.1 2.2
2.3
2.4
CONSENT AGENDA Consider approval of the minutes of May 9, 2017 Regular Session. PP17-0001, Preliminary Plat for Westport Lakeview Villas Townhomes Consider approval of a preliminary plat for Lots 1-3, Block A, Lots 1-6, Block B, Lots 1-7, Block C, Lots 1-9, Block D, Lots 1-8, Block E, and Lots 1-4, Block X, Westport Lakeview Villas, being a replat of a portion of Tract 1, The Colony No. 33, and an unplatted tract of land containing 2.982 acres out of the 12.50 -acres of land out of the B.B.B. and C.R.R. Survey, Abstract No. 173, 174, an addition to the City of The Colony, Denton County, Texas located at the southwest quadrant of Main Street and S. Colony Blvd., west of Advance Auto Parts and south of Lakeside Montessori school Planned Development - Townhouse (PD-TH) zoning district. PP17-0002, Gateway Centre Preliminary Plat Consider approval of a preliminary plat for Lots 1-6, Block A, Gateway Centre, being a 13.410 acres of land out of the A. Singleton Survey, Abstract No. 1138, an addition to the City of The Colony, Denton County, Texas located at the northwest corner of SH 121 Service Road and Market Street, within Business Park (BP) zoning district. FP17-0001, Final Plat for Westport Lakeview Villas Townhomes Consider approval of a final plat for Lots 1-3, Block A, Lots 1-6, Block B, Lots 1-7, Block C, Lots 1-9, Block D, Lots 1-8, Block E, and Lots 1-4, Block X, Westport Lakeview Villas, being a replat of a portion of Tract 1, The Colony No. 33, and an unplatted tract of land containing 2.982 acres out of the 12.50 -acres of land out of the B.B.B. and C.R.R. Survey, Abstract No. 173, 174, an addition to the City of The Colony, Denton County, Texas located at the southwest quadrant of Main Street and S. Colony Blvd., west of Advance Auto Parts and south of Lakeside Montessori school Planned Development - Townhouse (PD-TH) zoning district. 1
98
City of The Colony May 23, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 Chairman Hames read the Consent Agenda items into the record. Commissioner Hebb moved to approve Item 2.1 – 2.4 as stated, Commissioner Pool seconded the motion. Motion carried (5-0). 3 3.1
WORK SESSION SI17-0002, Zoning Ordinance Amendments Receive a presentation from staff, review and discuss proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments regarding material for donation box, location requirement for accessory structures, exterior building materials under Gateway Overlay, portable on-demand storage containers and other miscellaneous sections within the Zoning Ordinance with inconsistencies or clerical errors.
Chairman Hames read the Work Session item 3.1 into record. Ms. Sen presented the staff report. Commissioner Pool expressed concern regarding limiting the number of days portable ondemand storage containers are allowed in residential zoning from 28 – 14 days. Ms. Sen answered that staff will share this feedback at the Ordinance Review Committee (ORC) meeting on Wednesday, May 24, 2017 and bring back an updated section for Commission review. Chairman Hames asked about how the “tree/plant list” was generated? Were there any arborist on Park Board who have reviewed this list. Ms. Sen responded that staff does not have that information. Staff will bring back an update at the next meeting regarding this item. Commissioner Rockenbaugh asked for clarification regarding removing fire safety requirements for town houses as structures. Ms. Sen stated that the section under question will refer to the currently adopted and amended International Fire Code (IFC). Commissioner Hebb asked if the color of the donation boxes will be required to match the primary structure on the property? Ms. Sen and City Attorney Ed Voss stated the pros and cons of such requirements. Chairman Hames asked for clarification on building exterior material requirements that is being proposed for amendment. Ms. Sen answered that the exterior material requirement in Gateway Overlay District only applies for commercial zoned properties. 4 4.1
DISCUSSION ITEMS SP17-0002 Grandscape Lifestyle Center Area 1A Development Plan Discuss and consider making a recommendation to City Council on a request for Development Plan for Grandscape Lifestyle Center Area 1A that includes a parking garage, surface parking and overall utility, landscape and drainage plans for the first phase of an area generally bound by Grandscape Boulevard and Destination Drive next to the Nebraska Furniture Mart development within Planned Development 25 (PD 25) aka the Grandscape Planned Development zoning district.
99
City of The Colony May 23, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 Chairman Hames read the Discussion item 4.1 into record. Ms. Sen presented the staff report. Chairman Hames asked why the parking lot interior is not landscaped as required per code. Ms. Sen answered that landscape islands within surface parking lots are encouraged to be consolidated towards end caps and mid points to have efficient irrigation and large canopy trees are supported better in a larger square footage than separated islands. Mr. Ron Lazenby representing Grandscape approached Commission. He stated that due to a layer of surface parking is above the basement level garage to support the load of concrete, cars, people and dirt and tree on top of that will require huge support beams, reducing clear height for the garage level. Commissioner Rockenbaugh moved to approve Item 4.1 as stated, Commissioner DeBurr seconded the motion. Motion carried (5-0). 4.2
SP17-0004 Westport Lakeview Villas Townhomes Development Plan Discuss and consider making a recommendation to City Council on a request for Development Plan for Westport Lakeview Vilas Townhomes at 4851 Westport Drive property described as Colony No 33 Lot Tract 1(SW Corner) and A0173A BBB & CRR, Tract 34, 1.586 Acres, Old DCAD Tract # 13 within Planned DevelopmentTownhouse Dwelling (PD-TH) zoning district.
Chairman Hames read the Discussion item 4.2 into record. Ms. Sen presented the staff report. Commissioner Rockenbaugh asked where dumpster location will be within the townhouse development. Ms. Sen responded that during the zoning change process for this property the applicant had discussed with the Facilities Maintenance department regarding waste disposal. The town houses will have individual waste carts provided by the City’s waste management company, similar to the ones used in single family neighborhoods. The waste management company will pick up the trash from the townhouse project during their scheduled run. Commissioner also wanted to confirm that the Fire Marshall has reviewed the plans and is comfortable with the development having only one entry – exit point. Ms. Sen answered affirmative. Commissioner Rockenbaugh asked how many parking spaces are being proposed for the townhomes. Ms. Sen and applicant Mr. Packer explained that each unit will have 2 car attached garage and each unit have been pushed back on the lot to provide an 18’ long driveway in front of the townhouse. Commissioner Pool moved to approve Item 4.2 as stated, Commissioner DeBurr seconded the motion. Motion carried (5-0). 100
City of The Colony May 23, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Hames adjourned the Regular Session of the Planning and Zoning Commission at 7: 29 p.m.
Karen Hames, Chairman
Surupa Sen, AICP, Planning Director
101
CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 533 Submitted by: Surupa Sen Submitting Department: Development Services Meeting Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT SP17-0004 Westport Lakeview Villas Townhomes Development Plan: Discuss and consider approving an ordinance to allow a Development Plan for Westport Lakeview Villas Townhomes at 4851 Westport Drive property described as Colony No 33 Lot Tract 1 (Southwest Corner) and A0173A BBB & CRR, Tract 34, 1.586 Acres, Old DCAD Tract # 13 within Planned Development-Townhouse Dwelling (PD-TH) Zoning District (Development Services, Sen) Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS Staff Report Location Map Development Plan Landscape Plan Elevations Ordinance 2017-2247 Proposed Ordinance. May 23, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes
102
CITY COUNCIL REPORT AGENDA DATE:
June 6, 2017
DEPARTMENT:
Development Services Department
PLANNER:
Surupa Sen, AICP, Senior Planner, 972-624-3164
SUBJECT SP17-0004 Westport Lakeview Villas Townhomes Development Plan Discuss and consider approving an ordinance for Development Plan for Westport Lakeview Villas Townhomes at 4851 Westport Drive property described as Colony No 33 Lot Tract 1(SW Corner) and A0173A BBB & CRR, Tract 34, 1.586 Acres, Old DCAD Tract # 13 within Planned Development-Townhouse Dwelling (PD-TH) zoning district. OWNER/ENGINEER Owner: Applicant/Developer: Engineer/Surveyor:
Armor Safe Technologies Warren Packer, P Custom Homes Gonzalez & Schneeberg
Lewisville, Texas Frisco, Texas Plano, Texas
EXISTING CONDITION OF PROPERTY The property is currently undeveloped. PRIOR ACTION/REVIEW (Council, Boards, Commissions) May 23, 2017 – The Planning and Zoning Commission voted (5-0) to recommend approval of the Development Plan for Westport Lakeview Vilas Townhomes at 4851 Westport Drive property described as Colony No 33 Lot Tract 1(SW Corner) and A0173A BBB & CRR, Tract 34, 1.586 Acres, Old DCAD Tract # 13 within Planned Development-Townhouse Dwelling (PD-TH) zoning district. January 17, 2017 - City Council approved a change of zoning for these two properties from Shopping Center (SC) and General Retail (GR) to Planned Development-Townhouse (PD-TH) zoning district. As required by The Colony Code of Ordinances, the applicant is now seeking approval for the development plan, preliminary and final plats for this project. OPTIONS 1. Approve as submitted. 2. Approve with conditions. 3. Postpone consideration. 4. Table item. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC) REVIEW The Development Review Committee (DRC) recommends approval of the Development Plan ATTACHMENTS 1. Staff Analysis 2. Location Map 103 1
3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Proposed Development Plan Proposed Landscape Plan Elevations Ordinance #2017-2247 Proposed Ordinance Minutes of May 23, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
104 2
ATTACHMENT 1
Staff Analysis Summary of Request P Custom Homes LLC proposes to develop a Luxury Townhouse project on the vacant land located at 4851 Westport overlooking Lake Lewisville. These three story townhome units will have a modern appearance with rooftop decks overlooking the lake. Three bedroom townhomes with an optional fourth bedroom/study/game room or media are proposed on the uphill residences ranging in size from 2850 to 3250 s.f. estimated sale price for the townhomes will vary from the high $300's to the low $400's. Home Owners Association (HOA) will be responsible for maintaining the exteriors and grounds and landscaping as well as the pool and open areas and screening wall. The up hill townhomes will have lake vicw from the living area and roof top entertainment decks. The townhomes facing the lake will have views from the master bed room, living room and open air roof deck. The site will include a community pool and grilling area with views of the lake for the residences. Access will be provided to the City hike and bike trail on the Army Corp property directly behind the townhouses. In compliance with the Fire Code each townhome will be fully sprinkled with 2 hour rated fire walls separating each unit. A masonry screening wall will be built between the townhome property and the properties to the east. The developer is willing to improve the parts of Westport Drive and provide landscaping within right of way of Westport Drive. Development Standards The ordinance approved by City Council on January 17, 2017 that allowed Planned DevelopmentTownhouse zoning on this property included the following development standards. The development Plan, Preliminary and Final Plats for this project does adhere to these development standards.
105 3
Existing Condition of Property The subject property is vacant. Platting Status Planning and Zoning Commission approved final plat of these properties into 33 for – sale townhouse lots at their May 23, 2017 regular meeting. The common area lost will be maintained by Home Owners Association (HOA). Adjacent Zoning/Land Use North - Shopping Center (SC) – Lakeside Montessori School South - General Retail (GR) – Angelina’s Mexican Restaurant EastShopping Center (SC) & General Retail (GR) – Cougar Car Wash, Advance Auto parts West- Agriculture (A) – Vacant land overlooking Lake Lewisville Infrastructure Improvements Developer is planning to repair Westport Drive as that is the primary access road for this development. Estimated Taxable Value The applicant has estimated sales price ranging from high $300,000 to low $400,000 for the townhomes. With 33 new townhomes, the project will generate approximately $13 million in taxes. Circulation and Parking Table 13-100 Off Street Parking Schedule requires 2.0 parking spaces per townhome dwelling unit. Each residence will have a private two car garage on the ground level. 16 additional off street parking for visitors will be provided. Exterior Building Material The townhouses will be built with 100% stone/brick on all facades. Parkland Dedication This development is required to provide parkland dedication or money in lieu of parkland dedication. The applicant has agreed to pay money in lieu of parkland dedication with the Director of Parks & Recreation’s approval. Development Review Committee Review The Development Review Committee recommends approval of the Development Plan.
106 4
Blaynes View
1
Westport Dr
Main St
4
Blaynes View
Subject Area
0
Wallco
Lakeside Montessori
Texas Brothers BBQ Kwik Kar
Blaynes View
Cougar Car Wash
Frank's Mini Mart
Blaynes View
Subject Area
Main St
Dry Clean Supercenter
Main St
Westport Dr
Bubblez Carwash
El Pollo Regio
Advance Auto Parts
Angelina's Mexican Restaurant
QuickTrip (Pumps)
Project No. SP17-0004 - Project Name: Westport Lakeview Villas Site Plan Westport Lakeveiw Villas
Business Park/Industrial
General Retail
Light Commercial
Office District 1
Single Family Dwelling
Agricultural
Duplex Dwelling
Heavy Commercial
Mobile Home
Planned Development
Townhome
Business Park
Fire Station
Industrial
Neighborhood Service
Shopping Center
This map was generated by GIS data provided by The Colony GIS Department. The City of The Colony does not guarantee the correctness or accuracy of any features on this map. These digital products are for llustration purposes only and are not suitable for site-specific decision making.
Quik Trip
107
µ
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. 2017 - ______ WESTPORT LAKEVIEW VILLAS TOWHOMES DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR WESTPORT LAKEVIEW VILLAS TOWNHOMES AT 4851 WESTPORT DRIVE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS COLONY NO 33 LOT TRACT 1(SW CORNER) AND A0173A BBB & CRR, TRACT 34, 1.586 ACRES, OLD DCAD TRACT # 13 WITHIN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-TOWNHOUSE DWELLING (PD-TH) ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A REPEALER CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, in compliance with the laws of the State of Texas, and the Code of Ordinances of the City of The Colony, Texas, and the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, is of the opinion and finds that Development Plan Application No. SP17-0004 for Westport Lakeview Villas Townhomes at 4851 Westport Drive property described as Colony No 33 Lot Tract 1(SW Corner) and A0173A BBB & CRR, Tract 34, 1.586 Acres, Old DCAD Tract # 13 within Planned Development-Townhouse Dwelling (PD-TH) zoning district is approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That the findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. That the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, does hereby approve the Development Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. That it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this Ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of this Ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this Ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation of this Ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 4. That any provision of any prior ordinance of the City whether codified or uncodified, which are in conflict with any provision of this Ordinance, are hereby repealed to the extent of the conflict, but all other provisions of the ordinances of the City whether codified or uncodified, which are not in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. That this Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage. 125 1
DULY PASSED by the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, this the 6th day of June, 2017.
Joe McCourry, Mayor ATTEST:
Tina Stewart, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Jeff Moore, City Attorney
126 2
EXHIBIT “A”
127 3
MINUTES CITY OF THE COLONY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY 23, 2017 After determining that a quorum was present, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of The Colony, Texas convened into Regular Session which was held on Tuesday, May 23, 2017 at 6:30 PM in the City Council Chambers located in City Hall, 6800 Main Street, The Colony, Texas, at which time the following items were addressed: Board Members Present: Karen Hames, Chairman, Detrick DeBurr, Vice Chairman, Shawn Rockenbaugh, Janece Pool, and Shannon Hebb. Board Members Absent: Cesar Molina Jr., and Brian Buffington Staff Present: Naim Khan, P.E. Senior Engineer, Surupa Sen, AICP, Planning Director, Brian McNuelty, Engineering Technician, and Ed Voss, City Attorney. 1.0
CALL REGULAR SESSION TO ORDER
Chairman Hames called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. 1.1
CITIZEN INPUT
No citizen came forward for input. 2 2.1 2.2
2.3
2.4
CONSENT AGENDA Consider approval of the minutes of May 9, 2017 Regular Session. PP17-0001, Preliminary Plat for Westport Lakeview Villas Townhomes Consider approval of a preliminary plat for Lots 1-3, Block A, Lots 1-6, Block B, Lots 1-7, Block C, Lots 1-9, Block D, Lots 1-8, Block E, and Lots 1-4, Block X, Westport Lakeview Villas, being a replat of a portion of Tract 1, The Colony No. 33, and an unplatted tract of land containing 2.982 acres out of the 12.50 -acres of land out of the B.B.B. and C.R.R. Survey, Abstract No. 173, 174, an addition to the City of The Colony, Denton County, Texas located at the southwest quadrant of Main Street and S. Colony Blvd., west of Advance Auto Parts and south of Lakeside Montessori school Planned Development - Townhouse (PD-TH) zoning district. PP17-0002, Gateway Centre Preliminary Plat Consider approval of a preliminary plat for Lots 1-6, Block A, Gateway Centre, being a 13.410 acres of land out of the A. Singleton Survey, Abstract No. 1138, an addition to the City of The Colony, Denton County, Texas located at the northwest corner of SH 121 Service Road and Market Street, within Business Park (BP) zoning district. FP17-0001, Final Plat for Westport Lakeview Villas Townhomes Consider approval of a final plat for Lots 1-3, Block A, Lots 1-6, Block B, Lots 1-7, Block C, Lots 1-9, Block D, Lots 1-8, Block E, and Lots 1-4, Block X, Westport Lakeview Villas, being a replat of a portion of Tract 1, The Colony No. 33, and an unplatted tract of land containing 2.982 acres out of the 12.50 -acres of land out of the B.B.B. and C.R.R. Survey, Abstract No. 173, 174, an addition to the City of The Colony, Denton County, Texas located at the southwest quadrant of Main Street and S. Colony Blvd., west of Advance Auto Parts and south of Lakeside Montessori school Planned Development - Townhouse (PD-TH) zoning district. 1
128
City of The Colony May 23, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 2 of 4 Chairman Hames read the Consent Agenda items into the record. Commissioner Hebb moved to approve Item 2.1 – 2.4 as stated, Commissioner Pool seconded the motion. Motion carried (5-0). 3 3.1
WORK SESSION SI17-0002, Zoning Ordinance Amendments Receive a presentation from staff, review and discuss proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments regarding material for donation box, location requirement for accessory structures, exterior building materials under Gateway Overlay, portable on-demand storage containers and other miscellaneous sections within the Zoning Ordinance with inconsistencies or clerical errors.
Chairman Hames read the Work Session item 3.1 into record. Ms. Sen presented the staff report. Commissioner Pool expressed concern regarding limiting the number of days portable ondemand storage containers are allowed in residential zoning from 28 – 14 days. Ms. Sen answered that staff will share this feedback at the Ordinance Review Committee (ORC) meeting on Wednesday, May 24, 2017 and bring back an updated section for Commission review. Chairman Hames asked about how the “tree/plant list” was generated? Were there any arborist on Park Board who have reviewed this list. Ms. Sen responded that staff does not have that information. Staff will bring back an update at the next meeting regarding this item. Commissioner Rockenbaugh asked for clarification regarding removing fire safety requirements for town houses as structures. Ms. Sen stated that the section under question will refer to the currently adopted and amended International Fire Code (IFC). Commissioner Hebb asked if the color of the donation boxes will be required to match the primary structure on the property? Ms. Sen and City Attorney Ed Voss stated the pros and cons of such requirements. Chairman Hames asked for clarification on building exterior material requirements that is being proposed for amendment. Ms. Sen answered that the exterior material requirement in Gateway Overlay District only applies for commercial zoned properties. 4 4.1
DISCUSSION ITEMS SP17-0002 Grandscape Lifestyle Center Area 1A Development Plan Discuss and consider making a recommendation to City Council on a request for Development Plan for Grandscape Lifestyle Center Area 1A that includes a parking garage, surface parking and overall utility, landscape and drainage plans for the first phase of an area generally bound by Grandscape Boulevard and Destination Drive next to the Nebraska Furniture Mart development within Planned Development 25 (PD 25) aka the Grandscape Planned Development zoning district.
129
City of The Colony May 23, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 Chairman Hames read the Discussion item 4.1 into record. Ms. Sen presented the staff report. Chairman Hames asked why the parking lot interior is not landscaped as required per code. Ms. Sen answered that landscape islands within surface parking lots are encouraged to be consolidated towards end caps and mid points to have efficient irrigation and large canopy trees are supported better in a larger square footage than separated islands. Mr. Ron Lazenby representing Grandscape approached Commission. He stated that due to a layer of surface parking is above the basement level garage to support the load of concrete, cars, people and dirt and tree on top of that will require huge support beams, reducing clear height for the garage level. Commissioner Rockenbaugh moved to approve Item 4.1 as stated, Commissioner DeBurr seconded the motion. Motion carried (5-0). 4.2
SP17-0004 Westport Lakeview Villas Townhomes Development Plan Discuss and consider making a recommendation to City Council on a request for Development Plan for Westport Lakeview Vilas Townhomes at 4851 Westport Drive property described as Colony No 33 Lot Tract 1(SW Corner) and A0173A BBB & CRR, Tract 34, 1.586 Acres, Old DCAD Tract # 13 within Planned DevelopmentTownhouse Dwelling (PD-TH) zoning district.
Chairman Hames read the Discussion item 4.2 into record. Ms. Sen presented the staff report. Commissioner Rockenbaugh asked where dumpster location will be within the townhouse development. Ms. Sen responded that during the zoning change process for this property the applicant had discussed with the Facilities Maintenance department regarding waste disposal. The town houses will have individual waste carts provided by the City’s waste management company, similar to the ones used in single family neighborhoods. The waste management company will pick up the trash from the townhouse project during their scheduled run. Commissioner also wanted to confirm that the Fire Marshall has reviewed the plans and is comfortable with the development having only one entry – exit point. Ms. Sen answered affirmative. Commissioner Rockenbaugh asked how many parking spaces are being proposed for the townhomes. Ms. Sen and applicant Mr. Packer explained that each unit will have 2 car attached garage and each unit have been pushed back on the lot to provide an 18’ long driveway in front of the townhouse. Commissioner Pool moved to approve Item 4.2 as stated, Commissioner DeBurr seconded the motion. Motion carried (5-0). 130
City of The Colony May 23, 2017 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 4 There being no further business to come before the Commission, Chairman Hames adjourned the Regular Session of the Planning and Zoning Commission at 7: 29 p.m.
Karen Hames, Chairman
Surupa Sen, AICP, Planning Director
131
CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 530 Submitted by: David Swain Submitting Department: Parks & Recreation Meeting Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT Conduct a public hearing, discuss, and consider an ordinance adopting the Standards of Care Policy for Day Camp Programs (PARD, Downing) Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS Standards of Care and Ordinance.pdf
132
CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO. ____________ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS, ADOPTING DAY CAMP STANDARDS OF CARE, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT “A”; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING FOR AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 42.041 of the Texas Human Resources Code provides generally that no person may operate a child-care facility or child-placing agency without a license issued by the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services. Moreover, Section 42.041(b)(14) of the Texas Human Resources Code provides this statutory requirement does not apply in pertinent part to an elementary-age (ages 5-13) recreation program operated by a municipality provided the governing body of the municipality annually adopts standards of care by ordinance after a public hearing for such programs, that such standards are provided to the parents of each program participant, and that the ordinances shall include, at a minimum, staffing ratios, minimum staff qualifications, minimum facility, health, and safety standards, and mechanisms for monitoring and enforcing the adopted local standards; and further provided that parents be informed that the program is not licensed by the state and the program may not be advertised as a child-care facility; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, has determined that the following regulation is necessary in order to protect public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of The Colony, Texas. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS: SECTION 1. The findings set forth above are incorporated into the body of this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein. SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby adopts day camp Standards of Care to be conducted by the Parks and Recreation Department, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” SECTION 3. If any section, article paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase or word in this Ordinance, or application thereto any persons or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by a Court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance; and the City Council hereby declares it would have passed such remaining portions of this Ordinance despite such invalidity, which remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective from and after its date of passage in 133
accordance with law. DULY PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas, on this the 6th day of June, 2017. APPROVED:
___________________________________ Joe McCourry, Mayor ATTEST:
________________________________ Tina Stewart, City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_______________________________ Jeff Moore, City Attorney
134
Exhibit “A”
135
City of The Colony Standards of Care for Kidz Kamp Day Camp Programs PURPOSE The following Standards of Care are intended to be minimum standards by which the City of The Colony Parks and Recreation Department will operate the City’s Kidz Kamp day camp programs. These programs operated by the City of The Colony are recreational in nature and are not licensed by the State of Texas nor operated as day care programs. Adoption of these Standards of Care will allow the City to qualify as being exempt from the requirements of the Texas Human Resources Code. General Information/Administration A.
Organization 1.
The governing body for the City of The Colony Kidz Kamp programs is the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas.
2.
Implementation of the Standards of Care for Kidz Kamp is the responsibility of the Community Services Director and Parks and Recreation Department employees.
3.
The Standards of Care for Kidz Kamp will apply to any Kidz Kamp program including Holiday Kamp, Spring Break Kamp, and Summer Kamp.
4.
The Colony Recreation Center will have available for public review a current copy of the Standards of Care.
5.
Parents of participants will be provided access to a current copy of the Standards of Care through the City’s web site.
6.
Criminal background checks will be conducted on prospective Kidz Kamp employees, when applicable, and consistent with state law. If results of that criminal check indicate that an applicant has been convicted of any of the following offenses, he or she will not be considered for employment: a.
A felony or misdemeanor classified as an offense against a person or family;
b.
A felony or misdemeanor classified as public indecency;
c.
A felony or misdemeanor violation of any law intended to control the possession or distribution of any controlled substance;
136
B.
d.
Any offense involving a crime of moral turpitude;
e.
Any offense that is deemed to potentially put the City of The Colony or Kidz Kamp participants at risk.
Definitions 1.
City: City of The Colony.
2.
City Council: City Council of the City of The Colony.
3.
Department: Parks and Recreation Department.
4.
Director: City of The Colony Director of Community Services.
5.
Kidz Kamp: City of The Colony youth camp program held during school holidays.
6.
Parent Handbook: Booklet of Kamp policies, procedures, required forms and organizational and programming materials relevant to the Kidz Kamp program.
7.
Recreation Coordinator: City of The Colony’s full time programmer who has been assigned administrative responsibility for the City of The Colony’s Kidz Kamp program.
8.
Recreation Manager: Recreation Coordinator’s supervisor who will handle administrative responsibility for the City of The Colony’s Kidz Kamp program in the Recreation Coordinator’s absence.
9.
Employee or Counselor: Someone who has been hired to work for the City of The Colony and has been assigned responsibility for managing, administering, or implementing some portion of the City of The Colony’s Kidz Kamp programs.
10.
Program Site: The Colony Recreation Center or LISD schools.
11.
Participant: A youth whose parent(s) have completed all required registration procedures and who has been determined to be eligible for the City of The Colony’s Kidz Kamp.
12.
Parent(s): A parent or guardian who has legal custody and authority to enroll a child in the City of The Colony’s Kidz Kamp.
137
C.
Inspection/Monitoring/Enforcement 1.
2.
D.
The Recreation Coordinator will make visual inspections of the program based on the following schedule: a.
Summer Kidz Kamp will be inspected twice during the summer.
b.
Holiday Kidz Kamp (Thanksgiving and Winter) will be inspected once.
c.
Spring Break Kidz Kamp will be inspected once.
Complaints regarding enforcement of the Standards of Care will be directed to the Coordinator. The Coordinator will be responsible for taking the necessary steps to resolve the problems. Complaints regarding enforcement of the Standards of Care and their resolution will be recorded by the Coordinator. Serious complaints regarding enforcement of the Standards of Care will be addressed by the Recreation Manager and the complaint and resolution will be noted.
Enrollment 1.
Before a child can be enrolled, a parent/guardian must sign registration forms that contain the child’s: a.
Name, address, home telephone number
b.
Parent/Guardian’s name, address and telephone numbers during program hours Emergency contacts including names and phone number during program hours
d.
Names and driver’s license numbers of people to whom the child may be released
e.
A statement of the child’s special problems, needs or medical conditions
f.
Emergency medical authorization
g.
Permission for field trips
h.
Liability Waiver
138
E.
Suspected Abuse Program employees will report suspected child abuse or neglect in accordance with the Texas Family Code. In the case where a City employee is involved in an incident with a child that could be construed as child abuse, the incident must be reported immediately to the Recreation Coordinator and Recreation Manager. The Recreation Manager will immediately notify the Police Department and any other agency as may be appropriate. Texas state law requires the staff of these youth programs to report any suspected abuse or neglect of a child to the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services or a law enforcement agency. Failure to report suspected abuse is punishable by fine up to $1,000 and/or confinement up to 180 days. Confidential reports may be made by calling 1-800-252-5400.
F.
Staffing – Responsibilities and Training 1.
Recreation Coordinator and Recreation Manager a.
Recreation Coordinator and Recreation Manager are full-time, professional employees of the City of The Colony Parks and Recreation Department and will be required to have all the same qualifications as outlined in Section F.2. below.
b.
Recreation Coordinator and Recreation Manager must meet the minimum education/experience requirements for employment with the City of The Colony to plan and implement recreation activities.
c.
Recreation Coordinator and Recreation Manager must be able to pass a background investigation including a test for illegal substances.
d.
Recreation Coordinator and Recreation Manager must have a current certification in First Aid, Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and AED. All certifications must be current during the camp operation.
e.
Recreation Coordinator is responsible for administering the programs’ daily operations in compliance with the adopted Standards of Care.
f.
Recreation Coordinator is responsible for hiring, supervising, and evaluating the Kidz Kamp Director, Kidz Kamp Assistant Directors and Kidz Kamp Counselors.
g.
Recreation Coordinator is responsible for planning, implementing, and evaluating programs. 139
2.
3.
Kidz Kamp Staff a.
Program employees include Kidz Kamp Director, Kidz Kamp Assistant Director, and Kidz Kamp Counselors.
b.
Program employees may be full-time, part-time, or temporary employees of the Parks and Recreation Department.
c.
Program employees shall be age 16 or older. However, each site will have at least one employee age 18 or older on site at all times.
d.
Program employees should consistently exhibit competency, good judgment and self-control when working with participants.
e.
Program employees must relate to participants with courtesy, respect, tolerance and patience.
f.
Program employees must have a current certification in First Aid, Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and AED. All certifications must be current during the camp operation.
g.
Program employees must pass a background investigation when applicable, including testing for illegal substances.
h.
Program employees will be responsible for providing participants with an environment in which they can feel safe, enjoy wholesome recreation activities, and participate in appropriate social opportunities with their peers.
i.
Program employees will be responsible to know and adhere to all City, Departmental, and youth program standards as well as policies and procedures that apply to the youth programs.
j.
Program employees must ensure that participants are only released to a parent or authorized person, designated by the parent or guardian. If a parent wishes their child to sign himself in or out the parent must provide specific, written authorization.
Training and Orientation a.
The department is responsible for providing training and orientation to program employees in working with children and for specific job responsibilities. 140
G.
b.
Program employees will be provided with a staff manual.
c.
Program employees must be familiar with the Standards of Care for Kidz Kamp programs as adopted by the City Council.
d.
Program employees must be familiar with the program policies including discipline, guidance, and release of participants as outlined in the staff manual.
e.
Program employees will be trained in appropriate procedures to handle emergencies.
f.
Program employees will be trained in areas including city departmental program policies, procedures, leading activities, safety issues and organization.
g.
Program employees will be required to sign an acknowledgement that they have received the required training.
Operations 1.
2.
Staff to Participant Ratio a.
The standard ratio of participants to staff is 1:15 based on average daily attendance. In the event a program employee is unable to report to the program site, the coordinator will assign a replacement.
b.
Program employees are responsible for being aware of the participants’ habits, interests, and special needs as identified by the participants’ parent/guardian during the registration process.
Discipline a.
Program employees will implement discipline and guidance in a consistent manner based on the best interest of program participants.
b.
There will be no cruel treatment or harsh punishment.
c.
Program employees may use brief, supervised separation from the group if necessary.
d.
As necessary, program employees will initiate behavior reports to the parents of participants. Parents will be asked to the sign the behavior 141
reports to indicate they have been advised about specific problems or incidents.
3.
e.
A sufficient number and/or severe nature of a discipline report(s) as indicated in the program manual may result in a participant being suspended from the program.
f.
In instances where there is a danger to other participants or staff, offending participants will be removed from the program site as soon as possible.
Programming a.
Program employees will attempt to provide activities for each group according to participants’ age, interests and abilities. The activities will be appropriate to participants’ health, safety and well-being. The activities must be flexible and promote the participants emotional, social and mental growth.
b.
Program employees will attempt to provide indoor and outdoor time periods to include: -
c.
Program employees will be attentive and considerate of the participants’ safety on field trips and during any transportation provided by the program. -
-
-
4.
Alternating active and passive activities; Opportunity for individual, small and large group activities, and Outdoor time each day as weather permits
During trips, program employees must have access to emergency medical forms and emergency contact information for each participant Program employees must have a written list of participants in the group and must check the roll frequently, specifically before departure to and from location Program employees must have first aid supplies and emergency care available on field trips.
Communications a.
Each program site will have access to a telephone for use in contacting Department staff or making emergency calls.
142
b.
The Recreation Coordinator will make available the following telephone numbers to all employees at each site: -
5.
H.
Emergency services The Colony Police Department dispatch Parks and Recreation Department Poison Control Numbers at which parents/guardians may be reached Recreation Coordinator Telephone and address for the program site itself Field trip destinations
Transportation a.
Before a participant can be transported to and from city-sponsored activities, the field trip release statement must be marked by the parent/guardian on the registration form.
b.
First aid supplies will be available in all program vehicles that transport children.
c.
All program vehicles used for transporting participants must have available a portable fire extinguisher and must be accessible to the adult occupants.
d.
Seatbelts must be worn when provided.
Facility Standards 1.
Safety a.
Program employees will inspect the program site daily to detect sanitation and safety concerns that might affect the health and safety of the participants. A weekly inspection report will be completed by the program employees and kept on file by the Coordinator.
b.
Buildings, grounds, and equipment on the program site will be inspected, cleaned, repaired, and maintained to protect the health of the participants.
c.
Program equipment and supplies should be safe for the participants’ use.
143
2.
3.
4.
d.
Program must have first aid supplies readily available at each site, during transportation to an off-site activity, and for the duration of the off-site activity.
e.
Air conditioners, electric fans, and heaters must be mounted out of participants reach or have safeguards that keep participants from being injured.
Fire a.
In case of fire, danger or fire, explosion or other emergency, program employees’ first priority is to evacuate the participants to a designated safe area.
b.
Each program site must have at least one fire extinguisher approved by the fire marshal readily available to all program employees.
c.
All program employees will be trained in proper use of fire extinguishers as well as locations of fire extinguishers through the program site.
Illness or Injury a.
A participant who is considered to be a health or safety concern to other participants or employees will not be admitted to the program.
b.
Illnesses or injuries will be handled in a manner to protect the health of all participants and employees.
c.
Program employees will follow plans to provide emergency care for injured participants with symptoms of an acute illness as specified in the program manual.
d.
Program employees will follow the recommendation of the Texas Department of Health concerning the admission or readmission of any participant after a communicable disease.
Medication a.
Parent/guardian must complete and sign a medication release that provides authorization for program staff to dispense medication with details as to times and dosages. The release will include a hold harmless clause to protect the City.
144
5.
6.
7.
b.
Prescription medications must be in the original containers labeled with the participants’ name, a date, directions and the physician’s name. The prescribing physician must provide written guidelines. Program employees will administer medication only as stated on the label. Program employees will not administer medication after the expiration date.
c.
Non-prescription medications are labeled with the participant’s name and the date the medication was brought to the youth program. Nonprescription medication must be in the original container. The program employees will administer medication only according to the label directions and with written parental permission.
d.
Medications dispensed will be limited to those not requiring special knowledge or skills on the part of the program employees.
e.
Program employees will ensure medications are inaccessible to participants. If necessary, medication will be kept in the refrigerator.
Special Needs a.
Every reasonable accommodation will be made to address special needs participants.
b.
For health and safety reasons, special needs participants must provide a personal attendant for assistance in feeding, changing of clothes, and using the restroom if needed.
Toilet Facilities a.
The program site will have toilets located inside and equipped so participants can use them independently and program employees can monitor as needed.
b.
There must be one flush toilet for every 30 participants. Urinals may be counted in the ratio of toilets to participants, but must not exceed 50% of the total number of toilets.
c.
An appropriate and adequate number of lavatories will be provided.
Sanitation a.
Program sites must have adequate light, ventilation, air conditioning and heat. 145
b.
The program must have an adequate supply of water meeting the standards of the Texas Department of Health for drinking water and ensure that it will be supplied in a safe and sanitary matter.
c.
Employees must see that garbage is removed from buildings daily.
146
CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 529 Submitted by: Shannon Stephens Submitting Department: Fire Meeting Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT Discuss and consider approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to purchase a 2017 Dodge Light Duty Rescue Unit from Fouts Brothers Manufacturing pricing in the amount of $142,694.00 (Fire, Thompson) Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS Example Photos.pptx Fouts Pricing Sheet.pdf Res 2017-XXX Purchase of Dodge Fire Rescue Unit.docx
147
Rescue 13 Example photos of similar apparatus from Fouts Brothers Duty • Respect • Integrity 1
148
Duty • Respect • Integrity 2
149
Duty • Respect • Integrity 3
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS RESOLUTION NO. 2017-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ISSUE A PURCHASE ORDER TO FOUTS BROTHERS MANUFACTURING FOR THE PURCHASE OF A 2017 DODGE LIGHT DUTY RESCUE UNIT, WITH PRICING OF $142,694.00; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE COLONY, TEXAS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas hereby authorizes the City Manager to issue a purchase order in the amount of $142,694.00 to Fouts Brothers Manufacturing for a 2017 Dodge Light Duty Rescue Unit for the Fire Department. Section 2. That the City Manager or his designee authorized to issue said purchase orders. Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of the City of The Colony, Texas this 6th day of June, 2017.
______________________ Joe McCourry, Mayor City of The Colony, Texas ATTEST:
________________________________ Tina Stewart, TRMC, City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________________ Jeff Moore, City Attorney
161
CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 524 Submitted by: Dianne Johnson Submitting Department: City Secretary Meeting Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT A. Council shall convene into a closed executive session pursuant to Section 551.072 of the Texas Government Code to deliberate the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property. B. Council shall convene into a closed executive session pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code to seek legal advice from the city attorney regarding pending or contemplated litigation – Appeal of Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., PUC Docket No. 45175 and City of The Colony, Texas v. Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. matter, Cause No. 16-06424-16. C. Council shall convene into a closed executive session pursuant to Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code to seek legal advice from the city attorney regarding pending or contemplated litigation – Atlantic Colony Venture I, LLC and Atlantic Colony Venture II, LLC v. City of The Colony, Texas, et al., Cause No. 16-02219-442.
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS
162
CITY COUNCIL Agenda Item Report Agenda Item No. 525 Submitted by: Dianne Johnson Submitting Department: City Secretary Meeting Date: June 6, 2017
SUBJECT A. Any action as a result of executive session regarding the purchase, exchange, lease, or value of real property. B. Any action as a result of executive session regarding pending or contemplated litigation – Appeal of Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., PUC Docket No. 45175 and City of The Colony, Texas v. Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. matter, Cause No. 16-06424-16.
C. Any action as a result of executive session regarding the pending or contemplated litigation - Atlantic Venture, LLC and Atlantic Colony Venture II, LLC v. City of The Colony, Texas, et al.
Recommendation:
ATTACHMENTS
163
