Regular City Council Meeting City Council Chambers TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 28, 2017 - 5:00 PM Below is an agenda of all items scheduled to b e considered. Unless otherwise stated, items may b e taken out of the order presented on the agenda at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. Additionally, the Mayor and Council may comb ine two or more agenda items for consideration, and may remove an item from the agenda or delay discussion relating to an item on the agenda at any time. Pub lic comment is limited to three minutes per person.
Ceremonial Matters - INVOCATION - Pastor Craig Janson - River Valley Bible Church - PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Public Comments During the Public Comment portion of the agenda, comments are to be limited to matters not appearing on the agenda. Public Comment will be provided on each agenda under each specific item of business. Any public comment shall be addressed to the Mayor, moderator, or chair of the public body and shall be direct so as to form a view point of an issue. All public comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes, unless specifically extended upon request to the Mayor, moderator, or chair of the public body. Derogatory comments of non-public individuals or another public commenter shall not be permitted. The Mayor, moderator, or chair of the public body may limit the individual's comment period if proper decorum is not observed. Items raised under this portion of the agenda cannot be deliberated or acted upon until the notice provisions of the Nevada Open Meeting Law have been met. If you wish to speak at this time, please step up to the podium, and clearly state your name. 1.
Public Comment Cover Sheet
Consent Agenda 1 1
Items on the Consent Agenda may not require discussion. These items may be a single motion unless removed at the request of the Mayor, City Council, or City Manager. 2.
Consideration for approval of the November 28, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda; the October 24, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting minutes and the November 7, 2017 Technical Review Meeting minutes. - Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Cover Sheet m10-24-17 RCC.doc m11-07-17 TRM.docx
3.
Consideration of approval of: a) Notification of Budget Transfers b) Notification of Budget Amendments c) Notification of Bills Paid d) Purchase Orders - Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Cover Sheet Check Register - City Council Agenda 10.30.17 to 11.12.17.pdf Combined Budget Trsfrs & POs for Council.pdf
Special Items 4.
Presentation by Hinton Burdick CPA's & Advisors, and acceptance of the City of Mesquite FY 2016-2017 annual audited financial report. - Presentation - Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Cover Sheet
Resolutions & Proclamations 5.
Resolution 942 - An Inter-local Agreement for a Community Development Block Grant funds to the City of Mesquite Program Services - Fiscal Year 2
2
2017-2018. - Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Cover Sheet Resolution 942.docx Mesquite CDBG 2017 - 2018 Interlocal.doc
Department Reports 6.
Mayor's Comments Cover Sheet
7.
City Council and Staff Reports and Comments Cover Sheet
Zoning Items 8.
Consideration of the Introduction of Bill Number 529 (single family residential parking requirements) to establish performance standards for driveways and parking spaces in the single family residential zone. - Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Cover Sheet Bill No. 529_ Single Family Parking Requirements.docx Bill 529_Attachment1.docx
Administrative Items 9.
Consideration of Tentative Map Case No. TM-17-003 (Val Vista Estates) to approve a 142-lot single family subdivision on 34.24 acres at 1450-1500 Mesquite Heights Road in the Mesquite Estates Planned Unit Development. - Public Hearing - Discussion and Possible Action Cover Sheet TM-17-003_StaffMemo.doc 3 3
TM-17-003_App&Plans.pdf 10.
Consideration of Tentative Map Case No. TM-17-002 (Falcon Ridge Parkway Commercial) to merge four lots into a one-lot commercial subdivision on 82.5 acres at the southwest corner of Falcon Ridge Parkway and Bertha Howe Avenue, in the Hotel Tourist (HT) and General Commercial (CR-2) Zones. - Public Hearing - Discussion and Possible Action Cover Sheet TM-17-002_StaffMemo.doc TM-17-002_App&Plans.pdf
Public Comments During this final Public Comment portion of the agenda, comments are to be limited to matters only appearing on the agenda. Any public comment shall be addressed to the Mayor, moderator, or chair of the public body and shall be direct so as to form a view point of an issue. All public comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes, unless specifically extended upon request to the Mayor, moderator, or chair of the public body. Derogatory comments of non-public individuals or another public commenter shall not be permitted. The Mayor, moderator, or chair of the public body may limit the individual's comment period if proper decorum is not observed. Items raised under this portion of the agenda cannot be deliberated or acted upon until the notice provisions of the Nevada Open Meeting Law have been met. If you wish to speak at this time, please step up to the podium, and clearly state your name. 11.
Public Comment Cover Sheet
Adjournment 12.
Adjournment Cover Sheet
4 4
Note: Please b e advised that the Standing Rules of the City Council are attached for your information. The Standing Rules govern the conduct of City Council Meetings. These Standing Rules may b e acted upon and utilized b y the Mayor and City Council at any City Council Meeting. To ob tain any or all supporting materials for this Agenda, please contact the Clerk's Office at 702-346-5295. Memb ers of the pub lic who are disab led and require special assistance or accommodation at the meeting are requested to notify the City Clerk’s Office -City Hall in writing at 10 E. Mesquite Blvd., Mesquite, NV, 89027 or b y calling 346-5295 twenty-four hours in advance of the meeting.
THIS NOTICE AND AGENDA HAS BEEN POSTED ON OR BEFORE 9:00 AM ON THE THIRD WORKING DAY BEFORE THE MEETING AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: 1. Mesquite City Hall, 10 E. Mesquite Blvd., Mesquite, Nevada 2. Mesquite Community & Senior Center, 102 W. Old Mill Road, Mesquite, Nevada 3. Mesquite Post Office, 510 W. Mesquite Blvd., Mesquite, Nevada 4. Mesquite Lib rary, 121 W. First North, Mesquite, Nevada The agenda is also availab le on the Internet at http://www.mesquitenv.gov and http://nv.gov In accordance with Federal law and U.S. Department of Agriculture policy, the City of Mesquite is prohibited from discriminating on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice), or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).
RULES OF PROCEDURE 1.
Authority
1.1 NRS 266.240 provides that the Council may determine its own rules of procedure for meetings. The following set of rules shall be in effect upon their adoption by the Council and until such time as they are amended or new rules are adopted in the manner provided by these rules. 2.
General Rules
2.1. Public Meetings: All meetings of the Council shall be open to the public, expect those provided in NRS 241 and 288. The agenda and backup material shall be open to public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office. 2.2 Quorum: A majority of the members of the Council shall constitute a quorum and be necessary for the transaction of business. If a quorum is not present, those in attendance will be named and they shall adjourn to a later time. 2.3
Compelling Attendance: The Council may adjourn from day to day to compel attendance of absent members.
2.4 Minutes: A written account of all proceedings of the Council shall be kept by the City Clerk and shall be entered into the official records of the Council. 2.5 Right to Floor: Any member desiring to speak shall be recognized by the chair, and shall confine his remarks to the item under consideration. 2.6 City Manager: The City M anager or his designee shall attend all meetings of the Council. The City M anager may make recommendations to the Council and shall have the right to take part in all discussions of the Council, but shall have no vote. 2.7. City Attorney: The City Attorney or Deputy City Attorney shall attend all meetings of the Council and shall, upon request, given an opinion, either written or verbal, on questions of the law.
5 5
2.8 City Clerk: The City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk shall attend all meetings of the Council and shall keep the official minutes and perform such other duties as required by the Council. 2.9 Officers and Staff: Department heads of the City, when there is pertinent business from their departments on the Council agenda, shall attend such Council meetings upon request of the City M anager. 2.10 Rules of Order: “Roberts Rules of Order Newly Revised” 10th Edition shall govern the proceedings of the Council in all cases, provided they are not in conflict with these rules.
3.
Types of Meetings
3.1 Regular M eeting: The Council shall meet in the Council Chambers for all regular meetings. Regular Council meetings will be held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month. If the second or fourth Tuesday falls on or near a holiday or falls on any day wherein it is determined a quorum may not be available, the Council may provide for another meeting time. 3.2 Special M eetings: Special meetings may be called by the M ayor or by a majority of the City Council. The call for a special meeting shall be filed with the City Clerk in written form, expect that an announcement of a special meeting during any regular meeting at which all members are present shall be sufficient notice of such special meeting. The call for a special meeting shall specify the day, the hour, and the location of the special meeting and shall list the subject or subjects to be considered. 3.3 Adjourned Meeting: Any meeting of the Council may be adjourned to a later date and time, provided that no adjournment shall be for a longer period than until the next regular meeting. 3.4 Workshop and Study Sessions: The Council may meet in workshops or study sessions to review upcoming projects, receive progress reports on current projects, or receive other similar information from the City M anager, provided that all discussions thereon shall be informal and open to the public. 3.5
Executive Sessions: Closed meetings may be held in accordance with NRS 241 and 288.
4.
Duties of Presiding Officer
4.1 Presiding Officer: The M ayor, if present, shall preside at all meetings of the Council. In the M ayor’s absence, the M ayor Pro Tem shall preside. In the absence of both the M ayor and M ayor Pro Tem, the Council members present shall elect a Presiding Officer. 4.2 Preservation of Order: The Presiding Officer shall preserve order and decorum; prevent attacks of a personal nature or the impugning of members’ motives, and confine members in debate to the question under discussion. 4.3 Points of Order: The Presiding Officer shall determine all points of order, subject to the right of any member to appeal to the Council. If any appeal is taken, the question shall be: “Shall the decision of the Presiding Officer be sustained?”
5.
Order of Business and Agenda
5.1 Agenda: The order of business of each meeting shall be as contained in the agenda in accordance with NRS 241 prepared by the City Clerk and approved by the City M anager. The agenda shall be delivered to members of the Council at least three (3) working days preceding the meeting to which it pertains. 5.2 Special Interest/Presentation Items: Unless otherwise approved by the City M anager, and in order to provide for the effective administration of City Council business, a maximum of four (4) items of special interest or presentation shall be scheduled on one agenda. Special Interest/Presentation items must appear on the agenda and it is not appropriate for presentations to be made during the public comment portion of the meeting.
6 6
6.
Creation of Committees, Boards and Commissions
6.1 Resolution: The Council may by resolution create committees, boards, and commission to assist in the operation of the City government with such duties as the Council may specify, which shall not be inconsistent with law. 6.2 Membership and Selection: M embership and selection of members shall be as provided by the Council if not specified by law. Any committee, board, or commission so created shall cease to exist upon the accomplishment of the special purpose for which it was created, as provided in the initial resolution, or when abolished by a majority vote of the Council. No committee, board or commission shall have powers other than advisory to the Council or to the City M anager, except as otherwise provided by law. 6.3 Removal: The Council may remove any member which they have appointed to any board, committee or commission by a vote of at least a majority of the Council. Such appointed members will be removed automatically if they fail consistently (three or more unexcused absences) to attend meetings.
7.
Voting
7.1
All voting procedures shall be in accordance with Parliamentary Authority.
7.2 Point of Order: Any Council member may raise a Point of Order if s/he perceives a breach of the Council’s procedural rules and insists on the enforcement of the rule by the Presiding Officer. A Point of Order take precedence over any main motion, is not debatable, is not amendable, but may be superseded by a motion to table the item over which the Point of Order was raised, and is ruled on immediately by the Presiding Officer. 7.3 Point of Information: This is a request by a Council member, directed to the Presiding Officer or appropriate individual for information relevant to the pending item. A Point of Information takes precedence over a main motion, is not debatable, is not amendable, is not superseded by other motions, and is ruled on for appropriateness by the Presiding Officer. 7.4
Abstentions: A member may abstain from voting for any reason s/he deems appropriate.
7.5 Failure of Affirmative Motion: The failure of a motion calling for affirmative action is not the equivalent of the passage of a motion calling for the opposite negative action. The failure of such affirmative motion constitutes no action. 7.6 Failure of Negative Motion: The failure of a motion calling for a negative action is not the equivalent of the passage of a motion calling for the opposite affirmative action. The failure of such a negative motion constitutes no action. 7.7 Lack of Passage of a M otion: In some instances (maps in particular, per NRS) lack of passage of a motion may result in the item being “deemed approved.” In other instances no action may result in confusion and complication for the applicant. In all cases the City Council will strive to achieve a decision or action. 8.
Citizens’ Rights
8.1 Addressing the City Council: Any person desiring to address the Council by oral communication shall first secure the permission of the Presiding Officer. 8.2 Time Limit: Each person addressing the Council shall step to the microphone, shall give his/her name and residence address in an audible tone of voice for the record and, unless further time is granted by the Presiding Officer, shall limit the time of his/her comments to three (3) minutes. 8.3 Public Comment Content: The presiding officer or the majority of City Council may prohibit comment if the content of the comments is a topic that is not relevant to, or within the authority of, the public body, or if the content of the comments is willfully disruptive of the meeting by being irrelevant, repetitious, slanderous, offensive, inflammatory, irrational, or amounting to personal attacks or interfering with the rights of other speakers.
7 7
8.4 Disruptive Conduct: Any person who willfully disrupts a meeting to the extent that its orderly conduct is made impractical may be removed from the meeting by order of the Presiding Officer or majority of the City Council. A person willfully disrupts a meeting when s/he (1) uses physical violence, threatens the use of physical violence or provokes the use of physical violence, or (2) continues to use loud, boisterous, unruly, or provocative behavior after being asked to stop, which behavior is determined by the Presiding Officer or a majority of the City Council present to be disruptive to the orderly conduct of the meeting, or (3) fails to comply with any lawful decision or order of the Presiding Officer or of a majority of the City Council relating to the orderly conduct of the meeting. 8.5 Written Communications: a. In General: Interested parties or their authorized representatives may address the Council by written communication in regard to any matter concerning the City’s business or over which the Council has control at any time by direct mail to Council members, email, or by addressing it to the City Clerk and copies will be distributed to the Council members. b. At City Council M eetings: Except as provided in subsection c, written communications will not be read at City Council meetings, but will be attached to the item as part of the record, tallied, and reported by the City Clerk as generally in favor of or against the proposition. c. Exceptions: A written communication to the City Council may be read by City staff at a City Council meeting when (1) the person making the written communication has asked it be read aloud, (2) the person is unavailable to be at the meeting due to emergency or illness, (3) the written communication can be read in an ordinary cadence within three minutes, and (4) the person’s name appears on the written communication and will be read into the record. 9.
S uspension and Amendment of These Rules
9.1 Suspension of these Rules: Any provision of these rules not governed by law may be temporarily suspended by a majority vote of the City Council. 9.2 Amendment of these Rules: These rules may be amended, or new rules adopted, by a majority vote of all members of the City Council, provided that the proposed amendments or new rules have been introduced into the records at a prior City Council meeting.
8 8
City Council Agenda Item 1 Submitted by: Tracy Beck Submitting Department: City Manager Meeting Date: November 28, 2017
Subject: Public Comment Recommendation:
Petitioner: Andy Barton, City Manager Is this a budgeted item? No Fiscal Impact:
Background:
Attachments:
9
City Council Agenda Item 2 Submitted by: Tracy Beck Submitting Department: City Clerk Meeting Date: November 28, 2017
Subject: Consideration for approval of the November 28, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda; the October 24, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting minutes and the November 7, 2017 Technical Review Meeting minutes. - Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Recommendation: Approve the November 28, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting Agenda; the October 24, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting minutes and the November 7, 2017 Technical Review Meeting minutes. Petitioner: Tracy E. Beck, City Clerk Is this a budgeted item? No Fiscal Impact:
Background:
Attachments: m10-24-17 RCC.doc m11-07-17 TRM.docx
10
Mesquite Regular City Council
Meeting Mesquite City Hall 10 E. Mesquite Blvd. Tuesday, October 24, 2017; 5:00 PM Minutes of a scheduled meeting of the City Council held Tuesday, October 25, 2017 at 5:00 PM at City Hall. In attendance were Mayor Allan S. Litman, Council members David Ballweg, Rich Green, George Rapson, W. Geno Withelder and Brian Wurten. Also in attendance were City Manager Andy Barton, City Attorney Robert Sweetin, Development Services Director Richard Secrist, Public Works Director Bill Tanner, City Clerk Tracy E. Beck, other city staff and approximately 82 citizens. Mayor Litman called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM. (NOTE: A recording of this meeting has been made for public viewing and will be retained for one year from this meeting). Below is an agenda of all items scheduled to be considered. Unless otherwise stated, items may be taken out of the order presented on the agenda at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. Additionally, the Mayor and Council may combine two or more agenda items for consideration, and may remove an item from the agenda or delay discussion relating to an item on the agenda at any time. Public comment is limited to three minutes per person.
Ceremonial Matters Invocation – Andre Haynes, Daybreak Christian Fellowship
Public Comments 1)
Public Comments
Minutes: Mayor Litman opened up the meeting to Public Comments. Minutes: Diane Van Dyke: I’m here with the Mesquite Citizens for Clean Indoor Air. During the past several meetings, we’ve talked a lot about the different health impacts of secondhand smoke exposure. To help explain this issue in its totality, we also want to address the economic impacts. Each of the health issues caused or made worse by secondhand smoke has a price tag. Tonight, I want to talk to you about the price tag of heart attacks. Secondhand Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 1
11
smoke contributes to heart attacks in two ways. It makes the arteries narrow and it makes the blood stickier. If an artery closes or gets clogged by a blood clot, we have a heart attack, and heart attacks are both deadly and expensive. When someone has a heart attack, he or she is out of commission for a month or months, may miss work, which is a problem for them and their employer. Lost productivity is lost profit. Likewise, when someone gets very sick, there’s a huge expense in terms of healthcare. We all pay for this in the health services we use in the amount we spend on insurance. In 2010, the cost of cardiovascular disease in the U.S. was about $444 billion. This includes treatment of heart conditions, including heart attack, stroke and high blood pressure. Treatment of these diseases accounts for $1 for every $6 spent on health care in the U.S. Even more alarming, The National Business Group on Health estimated in 2010 that the total average cost of a severe heart attack, including direct and indirect costs, is $1 million. And that’s just one heart attack! The costs involved include ambulance rides, hospital stays and doctor charges, drugs, tests and cardiologist appointments. The largest indirect costs are lost is productivity and income. Obviously, a key way to saving lives and money is to reduce people’s exposure to secondhand smoke. Working and spending time around tobacco smoke is hazardous. We all know this. Many studies show that heart attack rates go down in areas after smoke-free laws are passed. But we also know that we’ll save both lives and health care dollars if we support the clean indoor air in Mesquite, and that will benefit us all. We urge you to act right away. Minutes: Adam Leverenz: I think I can tell from the rolling eyes and the looks of exasperation I perceive from some of you up there that you are tired of hearing me express my belief that when you swear an oath to support, protect and defend The Constitution of the United States and Nevada and bear true faith and allegiance to any ordinance resolution or law, that means you’ve given your word to act again conduct made known to you in violation of those things. This is another oath taken by specific City personnel. This one’s called the Oath of Honor and it’s from the Mesquite Police Department. “I will never betray my badge, my integrity, my character, or public trust. I will always have the courage to hold myself and others accountable for our actions. I will always uphold the Constitution and community I serve.” That not only says the MPD personnel will always uphold the Constitution but says they will always hold themselves accountable for their actions. My Exhibits A and B which I mailed to Mr. Litman, Rapson and Withelder back in August of 2012, and which were provided them again, as well as Misters Green, Barton, Sweetin and Baker in May of 2016, and which were provided Mr. Ballweg and Wursten in January of 2017, show, among other things, clear misconduct and some of the resultant damage done by a group of 6 Mesquite Police Officers, who are some of Mesquite’s most highly paid personnel. I think you all know that 3 minutes isn’t enough to go into some of the ridiculous circumstances involved here. Of the 6 officers indicated as being present when that happened is Troy Tanner sitting against that wall over here and Officer Magadan standing against the wall over here. To date, it would appear that the oath you all took is used as a ruse to feign integrity. Years and years have gone by and no one’s been held accountable for the property damage and violations of law and ethics engaged in by numerous highly paid people who remain in the City’s employ. It shouldn’t be this difficult to find a Mesquite civil servant who thinks enough of their oath to keep their word on it. Anyone wishing to look at these exhibits, they are lettered AO, can send an e-mail to:
[email protected] and see what you turned a blind eye to.
Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 2
12
Minutes: Larry Lemieux: I am the facility operator of the Mesquite Airport. I was speaking to the Mayor a few months ago and he was telling me that the parade, the Veteran's Day parade has been dwindling a bit. So we come up with an idea to make Veteran's Day viable again. So we're going to use the Mesquite Airport and one of the bigger hangers and we're going to have on November 4th a USO Show & Hangar Dance to raise money for our veteran center. We've been overwhelmed by the response from the community both with the service organizations and businesses around town. The donations that may come in and for food, decorations, all kinds of neat things, we're going to have the entertainment, dancing, a DJ, a band, singers, actors, all kinds of cool stuff put on a show. The Elks are going to cook hamburgers, hot dogs with potato salad, beans. We've got all kinds of food for people. We've have food for about 400 people. So, we hope to have the community supported, come on out, its only $5 donation to get in and you get to eat for that and you get a show. So that's all I have to say, just hope that the whole community will come out in support of our veterans and have a good time at the same time. Thank you. Minutes: Mike Benham: Parade of Lights. We have been working hard on it. Tracy has been doing a lot work, and especially Nick. Last year we raised 8000 pounds of food, this year our goal is 10, so we have our work cut out. However, the goal that already been laid between Nick and the PD. Nick said they cheated. I said yes that they cheated fair, so you can go and cheat fair too. So what Nick is doing now to try to win the trophy, he's going to ask everybody to bring a can of food for the thanksgiving dinner and that's awesome. So, 10,000 pounds of food, we really have our work cut out. So, I'm asking everybody in the community when you come and support the parade to bring at least one can of food, we're going to have the Boy Scouts go down both sides with shopping carts and a truck will be behind them. So, that’s our goal this year and we split the food like we did between the Salvation Army and the Virgin Valley Food Bank. The Eureka has generously bought the trophies again this year. We've added one more category and that is for the most participants in a group. So the Eureka are also doing hot chocolate and cookies and that will be served by the Virgin Valley, so I think we're on a good thing that's just my opinion and I just hope we can reach our goal of 10,000 pounds. Thank you. Minutes: Paul Benedict: 12 years ago, members of the Exchange Club of Mesquite founded a tradition and a source of pride in our valley, one thousand flags over Mesquite, an annual weeklong tribute to America's military and veterans. Flag stand on the west field of the Mesquite Recreation Center 24 hours a day. This year two full rows of flags have been dedicated to those affected by the tragedy in Las Vegas on October 1st. There's a separate flag for each of the 58, who lost their lives. A flag for the over 500 wounded and a flag for the first responders, medical professionals and the hundreds of volunteers who helped. We're setting up the field on Sunday, November 5th starting at 9 a.m. We would appreciate any volunteers who want to come on and help us. It's not heavy work but the more of us there are, the quicker we can get it done. We have a Veteran's Day ceremony scheduled for Saturday, November 11 at 6 p.m. at the field and a closing ceremony on Sunday, November 12 at 2 in the afternoon. Mesquite Fire and Rescue is also doing a flag retirement during that closing ceremony. We invite you to sponsor a flag for $35 each. You will be given a ribbon of remembrance to attach your flag in honor of or in memory of an important veteran or military member in your life. There’s room on the dedication flag to add your own words of recognition. Remember one thousand flags over Mesquite honors every veteran and every member of America's military whether living or deceased. After Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 3
13
the closing ceremony you're welcome to either take the flag you sponsored home to display proudly or donate it back to the project to be included in next year's one thousand flags over Mesquite. Either case you keep your dedication ribbon as a reminder of your special veteran. All proceeds go to the Exchange Club of Mesquite Foundation, a 501c3 charitable organization for the benefit of local veterans, charities and community projects. Thank you. Minutes: John Woodmancy: For those in the audience or on television, who don’t know me, I am the Coordinator of the Mesquite Police Department volunteers and I'm here to do my quarterly report for you which is on the back wall. For the third quarter of the year, we started the year with 27 people, we still have 27 people and during the year so far we donated 3754 hours and using a national equivalency figure that equates to $90,600 in value to the city. Our citizen’s volunteer patrol has put in 1906 hours so far. One of our most important programs is a vacation check program where citizens were going to be gone for a week or longer, can fill out a form and we will check their household to make sure everything stays okay. We've done 1615 of those so far through the third quarter. We've done security checks, 199 times at the schools. We've written 16 parking citations for handicapped parking and we've issued 54 written warnings. We've assisted police officer 66 times through the quarter, which includes traffic accidents and we just this week had a fire that we spent several hours assisting them with and various other things to try and free the officers up to do more important work. We've done 19 citizens assist which primarily involves information about the city or directions, that sort of thing. We deployed the radar trailer 68 times and we served 101 subpoenas for the city attorney. I will be back next quarter to report on our results for the end of the year, thank you very much. Minutes: Rob Fuller: I am with Mesa View Regional Hospital and I've two announcements and one reminder tonight. The first announcement is kind of exciting for us at Mesa View. Since this hospital opened 13 years ago, there has been effort to get a Medicare advantage plan, which is important to a lot of seniors in our community in network at our local hospital and our local clinic. So as of today standing here before you, we are now in network with a Medicare advantage plan and I wanted to let you as councilman know as you interact with a large number of our community and it is with the Aetna Medicare advantage. They have a PPO and a HMO plan. The HMO is a zero premium, which is a benefit to a lot of our seniors here and the PPO plans that they have are in network up in St. George, so we're excited about that. I have information I'm going to be sharing with the newspapers about that. I'm just waiting for approval on a press release and I'll be getting that to them as soon as I can. Another announcement is we signed two OB/GYN physicians, obstetrics and gynecology that will be starting right after the first of the year to help support Dr. Ofori in his practice and providing more women services to Mesquite, so we're excited about that. The reminder is this Saturday is the Veterans Health Fair on the 28th up at Sun City. So all the veterans in the community are welcome for some free screenings, Mesquite Fire and the Eureka are also working with us to help put that on from 9 a.m. to 12. So, thank you very much and have a good meeting.
Consent Agenda 2)
Consideration for approval of the October 24, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting agenda; the September 12, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting minutes; the September 20, 2017 Technical Review Meeting minutes; the September 26, 2017
Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 4
14
Regular City Council Meeting minutes and the corrected August 22, 2017 Regular City Council meeting minutes. - Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Minutes: Mayor Litman stated that Item number 9 of the Consent Agenda would be moved to follow Item #11. Minutes: Council member Wursten: I would like to table Item# 19 until the first meeting in January if we can do that.
Council member Wursten moved to Approve Items 2-8 on the Consent Agenda. Council member Rapson seconded the motion. Passed For: 5; Against: 0; Abstain: 0; Absent: 0 3)
Consideration of approval of: a) Notification of Budget Transfers b) Notification of Budget Amendments c) Notification of Bills Paid d) Purchase Orders
- Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action
4)
Consideration of Bid Award for the 2018 Mesquite Street Reconstruction Project – Phase 1.
- Public Comments - Discussion and Possible Action
5)
Consideration of Approval of Bid Award for the Mesquite Airport Perimeter Fencing Project.
- Public Comments - Discussion and Possible Action
6)
Consideration of Approval of a Contract with Forsgren Associates for Construction Management of the Mesquite Airport Wildlife Deterrent Perimeter Fencing Project.
- Public Comments - Discussion and Possible Action Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 5
15
7)
Consideration of Approval for a Front-Ending and Refunding Agreement with Split Decision Holdings, LLC for improvements to be constructed at the intersection of Hafen & Lantana Lane.
- Public Comments - Discussion and Possible Action
8)
Consideration of Adopting the April 2017 Updated City of Mesquite Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program.
- Public Comments - Discussion and Possible Action
Special Items 10)
Presentation of the SOAR awards from the Rotary Club of Mesquite
Minutes: Mayor Litman read this item by its title and deferred to the Rotary Club of Mesquite representative. Minutes: Jake Nalls: First off I would like to recognize the Mesquite Fire and Rescue honors. On March 18, 2017, Mesquite Firefighter/Critical Care Paramedics Norman Nielsen and his partner responded to Mesa View Regional Hospital to transport a 49 year-old male post cardiac arrest patient to Dixie Regional Medical Center in southern Utah. While caring for this patient, Mr. Nielsen did an exceptional job utilizing his critical care skills and knowledge by placing the patient on a breathing ventilator and continuing an intravenous drip. This supplied the patient with the necessary life-saving medication. Mr. Nielsen and his partners successfully and safely transported this patient to definitive care. Mr. Nielsen is one of three critical care paramedics at Mesquite Fire and Rescue. He assisted in the implementation of the critical care program in 2016. This program is a great asset to Mesquite Fire and Rescue and the community. In order to maintain his education, Mr. Nielsen organizes and provides training for the critical care program. Congratulations for being our 2017 SOAR recipient. Captain John Gately has been and continues to be instrumental in the development of Mesquite Fire and Rescue's Critical Care Transport Paramedic Program that was launched last year. Captain Gately is responsible for reviewing and ordering of all medical equipment to support the program. In addition, he has spent a significant amount of time reviewing and editing protocols to reflect current best practices. Captain Gately continues to support the program with his knowledge and expertise as he meets with members of the CCT program for QA and QI purposes in order to ensure a high level of care. Captain Gately has been with Mesquite Fire and Rescue for 13 years with 7 years serving the department as a captain. Thank you, Captain Gately, for continuing to push Mesquite Fire and Rescue to new limits. Before I go to the police departments recognition, I like to say that every year, the Rotary Clubs of Southern Nevada recognize our fine men and women in uniform and we get the opportunity to recognize these fine policemen, paramedics Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 6
16
once a year close to 9/11, as close as we can. This year Mesquite Police Department honored Detective Sergeant John Woods, detectives Gary Erickson, David Alejos, Wyatt Oliver, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department officers, Nate Jones and Chris Kohntopp, CCFD Arson Investigator Linda Poe. This recognition is given for a joint arson investigation during June and July of this year. The suspect actively set a series of fires inside multiple residents, trailers and fields near local schools in Bunkerville and Mesquite as well as businesses and residential neighborhoods. Multiple fire departments responded and battled the fires. BLM fire investigators also responded to assist and review the damage this arsonist has caused on federal property. The arsonist was observed and arrested and charged. He posted bail and was released. The surveillance team again went to work and he was arrested a second time. Once placed on the ground, the lighter he used to start the fire fell from his pocket. Based on the cooperative efforts between the Las Vegas Metro Police Department and Mesquite Police Department together with the CCFD, the BATF and the BLM, the arsonist was apprehended before lives were lost and property and homes were destroyed. These fine men and women of our Mesquite Police Department, we recognized, we gave them a nice trophy and pin to wear and the captain receives a trophy that he keeps and has to return each year, so my thanks to all of them. 11)
Presentation by Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada regarding Smart Communities and the On Board Plan.
- Public Comments - Discussion and Possible Action
Minutes: Mayor Litman read this item by its title and deferred to the Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada representative. Minutes: Raymond Hess: Director of Planning Services with the Regional Transportation Commission. Let me first start by apologizing that Tina Quigley, our general manager cannot be here this evening. She had a conflict and I am a poor substitute for her, so I apologize for that, but that's what you get I guess right. And also I want to take a moment just to thank the Mayor for his leadership on our board in the past and thank current Councilmember Ballweg for his leadership on our board. He keeps us on our toes and he definitely has Mesquite interests in mind at all of our meetings and actually come and met with staff at his direction a couple times already, so thank you for your leadership. So one thing I like to do is just tell you about a couple initiatives we have going on at the Regional Transportation Commission, just getting up to speed on some of things that we're looking at. So, the first thing I want to talk about is smart communities. There's a lot of discussion locally as well as across the country about how we can make our community smarter? How can we use data and analysis to make informed decisions and how we can make government more efficient? And so we're just now starting these conversations, we are convening regional discussions with all of our local jurisdictions, with private industry in the valley and really just trying to figure out what does it mean and how can we apply it here in southern Nevada. So there's a quick video I would like to show you, I will just give you a little bit of context in terms of what that process may look like for us and we will continue to engage City of Mesquite in this process as we move it forward. (Slide presentation and Video) Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 7
17
Minutes: Raymond Hess: So again, I think the video just puts things a little bit in perspective in terms of how we can data analytics and different data collection and analysis to really help us with our decisions and make things more efficient. And again we're having some informal conversations, we're having some sharing across multiple jurisdictions as well as outside of the state just to see what they are doing and what can be adapted here for southern Nevada. The next thing I like to talk to you about is major initiative we have related to transit called On Board, it's On Board Your Future Transit Plan, and this is really important for us because we really want to look at kind of next generation of transit for the RTC. We want to see what does the community desire related to transit and what can we do to deliver those desires. So to just give you a little bit of perspective, the map is not necessarily important. What the map shows is concentrations of population throughout the valley and the real takeaway message here is there is going to continue to be lot of growth in our valley. Currently, the population of Southern Nevada is 2.1 million and in the next ten plus years we expect that to grow to 2.7 million. So, my understanding is the population of Mesquite is around 18000 roughly, 22000, okay. So, it's roughly adding another 30 Mesquite’s roughly population to our valley and so it's just gives you an idea of the magnitude of growth that was expected to experience in the coming years. And so it's something for us to plan for. There is going to be tremendous strain on our transportation networks and we need to figure out how we can move people around effectively. But also speaks to the growth that's going to happen related to visitors. Currently, we have roughly 43 million visitors that come to the valley; we expect that to grow by another 10 million to 53 to 56 million in the next 10 years or so. We have to figure out ways to accommodate all of growth and move people around efficiently. So On Board is going to take a three-legged approach to that process of mobility. We want to look at traditional transit. We want to look at high capacity transit and we want to look at emerging transit technologies. Traditional transit, what I speak to there is our existing bus rail network, how can we make improvements to it to serve mobility into the future? When I talk about high-capacity transit options, I'm talking about next generation transit. So, we're talking about things like light rail, modern streetcar, bus rapid transit, transit that operates typically in a dedicated right away, transit that typically operates more frequently and a little bit faster than traditional transit. And then on emerging transit technologies, we are talking about kind of what is the change that's on the horizon related to transportation and how can we incorporate that into our study? We don't want our study to become obsolete the minute it's done. We want to make sure that it incorporates some of the changes that are on the way and so we're going to be looking at things like ride sharing and technology related to cell phone usage and how we can both enhance transit and how some of those technologies are going to affect demand for transit. So, just to go into each of those just a little bit more deeply, when we talk about the existing traditional transit or fixed route network, we want to understand where we might improve frequencies to better serve the population? Where can we enhance our new coverage areas? Where can we provide faster service to really service the needs of all of our residents? When we speak about high-capacity transit, again this next generation transit, light rail, modern streetcar, bus rapid transit. One of the first things we are going to do is look at our peer communities. We are looking at places like Denver, Phoenix, Salt Lake City, San Diego and Orlando. We want to understand what their best practices are so that we don't have to reinvent the wheel, we can learn from them and take what we learned from them and then incorporate here in southern Nevada. We also want to look at the high-capacity corridors, so which corridors could best be served by high-capacity transit, where is there enough demand to support this type of investment and where might you have the ridership that would be expected. And other thing that's kind of important about the study is we are not looking at transit in a vacuum or working with all the local jurisdictions on our development opportunities. So what are Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 8
18
the adjacent land uses that could support transit? Where could you have extra density that could support transit and there are different types of development patterns such as mixed use that can support a high-capacity transit, such as if you have commercial and retail on the first floor and residential on the second or third floor. You've kind of that constant activity in demand, which is something that we're working with the local jurisdictions to identify places where that might fit. And then on emerging transit technologies, again we're taking a survey across the spectrum to see what's currently out there. We want to know how demand might change, how it's going to affect transit demand both positively and negatively as it relates to technology. So, just a little example that we've incorporated at the RTC recently, all of our buses have Wi-Fi and so that can enhance the transit experience. But then you have things like Lift and Uber that can actually take away from transit ridership and so we want to understand what that is so that the recommendations that come out of the plan are still valid into the future. So, just let to you know what this process will look like, we boiled a complicated scope down into four easy steps. We are currently at the development of alternatives phase. We identified the purpose and the need couple months ago where we really talked about this growth that's expected to come to the valley and our need to address mobility for the valley, development alternatives is currently what we are working on where we are looking at possible corridors and how we can make improvements to those corridors. Next, we're going to move into the evaluation of those corridors and seeing which ones can perform the best and then ultimately in fall of next year, we expect to have the final plan up for recommendation to our board and we'll take it back around the valley as well the desire of the local communities. So, some of the current work that we have going on, community engagement is a big part of what we're trying to do, we are trying to go out to the community and get as much input as possible, it is one of the reasons why I'm here before you today. We really want to hear what the desires are related to transportation, related to transit in particular, so we've been hosting pop up meetings, we have an online survey that you can access at onboardsmb.com that will pop up at the end of the slide as well. And we're doing about five community engagements per week, so we're taking the study and initiative very seriously. We really want to make sure that we reflect the community's desires. So some of the initial feedback we had in terms of which corridors should be identified, this is the valley. You will notice that pretty much every major roadway in the valley was identified, which makes our job interesting and challenging, but what we're going to do is we're going to take this list of corridors and evaluate it across a spectrum of different goals and those are as follows. We want to make transit more compelling. We want to improve regional connectivity. We want to encourage responsible development. We want to make southern Nevada more competitive and we want to develop sustainable solutions. Under each of these goals there are several objectives and another each objective there is several measurable outcomes that we can screen each of those corridors against and so that's some of the work that the consultant is going to help us with in the coming month. So just to let you know what our next steps are, we are pretty proud of this public engagement bus, we rolled this out about a month ago in partnership with NV Transportation, which is one of our transit contractors that actually drives our buses for us. We can take this out to the community events. We can get people to get on the bus. It's completely been gutted. It doesn't look like a bus on the inside. We've TV screens. We've a children's play area in the back of the bus and then it is an opportunity for us to use it as a literal mobile workshop. We can take it out to an event. We can get people on board to fill our surveys or yeah whatever input we're looking we're seeking from the community at the time. So that concludes my presentation, I would be happy to entertain any questions you might have and there is that website I mentioned earlier onboardsnv.com.
Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 9
19
Minutes: Council member Ballweg: Thanks for coming up for this. RTC, Mesquite is part of RTC so it takes care of transportation roads and a lot of different avenues. Not everything RTC is doing applies to us, but we need to be at the table as part of conversation, so we can utilize parts and pieces in Mesquite to enhance our transportation, roadways. There is strength of numbers there. So we can stay compatible with systems in southern Nevada, so we can we utilize the forces, so besides that the RTC is kind of central clearing hub besides smart city. On board, we also have southern Nevada strong, which is another piece of it and we do have representation on track board, which has helped me with that transportation, advisory council. Rachel Dahl from MRB is on that board or on that committee, so she advises them as to what's pertinent to Mesquite and also listen to what the other stakeholders have in that area. So, we're trying to be engaged overall because RTC is our transportation authority for all Clark County, so that they handle that from Laughlin all the way up to Mesquite and everything in between, buses, the mass transit, the roadways, construction. RTC is involved with all the -they call it the reconstruction, the Project Neon. All that is under RTC, so it's a massive organization. Thank you for coming and explaining all that to the people. Minutes: Mayor Litman opened up this item to Public Comment. There were no speakers.
Council member Rapson moved to receive the RTC Presentation. Council member Green seconded the motion. Passed For: 5; Against: 0; Abstain: 0; Absent: 0 (MOVED FROM CONSENT AGENDA) 9)
Consideration of Approval of Agreement with National Purchasing Partners (NPP) to tag onto bid Solicitation No. 1420 for Quantum Fire Pumper RG475.
- Public Comments - Discussion and Possible Action
Minutes: Mayor Litman read this item by its title and deferred to Bill Tanner. Minutes: Mr. Tanner: This is a recommendation to tag on to the bid award as the Mayor explained. I went through this last year where the Council and Mayor had actually approved a purchase of a pumper truck in this year's current budget in the amount of $650,000. What that stipulation was, that we would evaluate the fire trucks, the pumpers and provide to you what I believe is a need whether we replace a truck or not. And so as we go through this, right now the fire department has two ladder trucks. We've got a 2007 and 1999 ladder truck. In these two trucks the life expectancy of those vehicles is 25 to 30 years. Right now we're running up to 15 years on the one, 17 years and 10 years. The other two trucks we have a pumper truck and the second pumper truck, this one is a 2007, this one is 1995. The life expectancy of those two vehicles is a Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 10
20
little bit lower. We're expecting them to be a 20 to 25 year life expectancy. The 2007, ten years old, this is the majority workhorse for the fire department. The 1995 pumper truck is the oldest truck in the fleet, pushing above between 20 to 25 years. That truck has been in a shop quite a bit lately. I have forwarded the work order request to some that have requested it. We have 61 pages of work requests, work orders on that vehicle in the last 10 years. In the last few years, it's been pretty extensive. Right now we've got it down to a fire repair company to evaluate it; we've got an evaluation back looking about anywhere from $7,000 to $10,000 to get it back up and running. By making the recommendation to purchase a new truck to put into service and take that vehicle out of service, we still are going to have to make the repairs for it. The service life of that vehicle is going to have last another year. If we go ahead and approve the purchase of a new pumper truck, we're looking at 9 months to a year before that takes delivery. So with that if approved, we're looking at taking this vehicle here to next life. And these vehicles were all be taken out of service to the fire department, so we're going to eliminate three of them. This one here has been stripped down and will be before Council for auction in the next probably 30 days. This vehicle here would be traded in as shown in the cover sheet information. The Hughes Fire Apparatus Company has offered us $30,000 trade in on this vehicle and roughly around $10,000 for this vehicle. So, we're recommending to approve the purchase of the fire truck and eliminate these three vehicles in the fire department and that's my evaluations based off of the maintenance, the repair, the serviceability in that and then Captain Andrus has a small slide presentation showing you the actual need of the fire department for that pumper truck. He will go through roughly some slides showing you that fire department prospective of that new truck. Minutes: Captain Andrus: (slides). We second the motion from Mr. Tanner that this is time to move forward, replacing our 1995 Freightliner fire engine. Currently, this is our second fire engine. The most important part that this engine does is it carries the water, it carries 1000 gallons of water and, so we are moving forward looking to replace it with similar 2017 Pierce Quantum, it would look essentially similar to our 2007. This would help standardize our compartments and our pump operations in regard to working of pump. Now here are some numbers. As you can see, 227 or 2007 here today has ran 600 calls in the engine and you can look over 206 and 1995 it's only ran 20, which is alarming, but as Mr. Tanner has talked about the 61 pages of work request, it has been out of service to the shops despite their best efforts. And so this is what we're looking at right now, some of the numbers, the engine hours, 206, and compared that to our first out engine that we have. So in talking to similar to the fire departments here in town, Bunkerville and Beaver Dam, this is gallons per minute their total pumpers can pump. Now it's easy to say that well you've got four or five pumpers, we don't have the manpower to take all those to a fire and typically one engine and even a truck makes it to a single house fire. But I can assure you that if we have a Wal-Mart or a casino that, if it does begin to burn, we will need all four engines to put this fire out. One engine specifically will go up to hoping to that fire department connection. We lose using that as a tactical engine just to pump the FDC, the fire department connection in the buildings that we go to. Our neighbors at Beaver Dam have a total right now pumping 5500 gpm with all their pumpers. The question may arise why can't they just come and help us and they do quite frequently, but during the summer months about half of those engine and brush trucks are out on wildland contracts. So I can’t guarantee you that they will come to our rescue and as you can see Bunkerville with their limited resources has come to our aid multiple times. So to keep it simple the reasons for purchase, we do have great water supply here in the City of Mesquite, but we do fight frequent fires on the I-15 corridor. And as we talked about before engine 206 is the largest tanker that we have in our fleet and, so it carries 1000 gallons of water, maintaining current pumping capacity. If we can't maintain 206 and we Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 11
21
do choose not to, we lose those gallons per minute of an output possibly. And then mutual aid in out of service, it's our recommendation to have a second engine for when 207, as good as an engine as it has been, it is 10 years old and so we do send it to mutual aid to Beaver Dam and to Bunkerville occasionally and then when it is out for service we would like to have our first out engine to take its place. And fourth and lastly, it is the enhanced safety of the newer technologies replacing 1995 vehicle with a 2017 vehicle. There are some enhancements that come with that. Are there any questions? That's all I have to say. Is there anything I can help you with, any questions you may have? Minutes: Council member Ballweg: I just wanted to add to your presentation that it was brought to our attention that the older tanker leaks like a sieve to, if you have a lot of landscaping water - so that's another failing of that truck. Minutes: Mr. Tanner: I have one other issue on this. We talked about the vehicle maintenance in our review of this. We talked about their need; now let's talk about the big picture of our budget and right now we kick the can a couple years down the road talking about this. We can kick the can another couple of three years and probably get away with it. The problem with that is once we kick that can, once we make that purchase then we're going to start looking at the ambulances. When we talked about it we got four ambulances, based on the need, the mileage and where we are at the serviceability of them is 8 to 10 years 200,000 miles, we are at that 50 percent cost right now. So, we need to be looking at that expenditure in another probably four to five years. So that's why we're really kind of recommend for this is to make this purchase now and be able to recover and recuperate before we have to purchase the four ambulances in five years, so thank you. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: One quick thing is, one of the things we need to - in talking to the fire department people we have to do some consideration of emergency services support also and maybe some other alternate vehicles that we don't have right now, so they can make sense getting this vehicle now because it is needed and then replacing as needed and the ambulance is maybe adding different type of support vehicles for the damages for the EMS. They are considering that too. So this is kind of a change shifting a little bit from fire suppression to emergency services support that this community really needs so it's a part of a whole looking forward in the next three to five years that this Council has committed to in the long range capital expenditures to bring all of our equipment up to some good standards. Minutes: Mayor Litman opened up this item to Public Comments. Minutes: Adam Leverenz: I was just curious; I imagine it's going to be shocking but what is the cost of this new fire truck roundabout and then is it something the city will finance for awhile or is it a cash purchase? I'm just curious as I said.
Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 12
22
Minutes: Captain Andrus: So the actual cost is $644,000 dollars for this new engine. We are trading in like Mr. Tanner talked about and we are trading in two apparatus straight to Pierce for a credit of approximately $40,000 for that. Minutes: Council member Withelder: This is a budgeted item already. somewhere in our budget.
It's already programmed
Minutes: Mr. Tanner: Yes, it is a budgeted item. It was in the budget this year and it was approved by the Mayor and Council. I think the, the stipulation with that budget was we were going to evaluate this and come back with some concrete ideas and evidence of how we felt about the purchase of this truck and what the actual serviceability of the 1995 was and we've done that evaluation very carefully. Minutes: Mike Benham: As a former fire commissioner, I am glad you guys realize how it's important to have trucks in the station. If you have a fire in the garage, they are not much good, are they? And I'm glad to see the fire department is going with Pierce. Pierce makes some excellent trucks. We bought a ladder truck, rescue truck, and a pumper and we had very little problems with them and the $640,000. That's good deal. We paid a lot more and that was a few years ago. So, I'm glad to see the Council is supporting the fire department. They really it and as citizens we need to know that when we hit that button, if our house is on fire, we got a truck to be there. Thank you.
Council member Rapson moved to Recommend to Approve Agreement for purchase of new Fire Apparatus in accordance to proposal price including all discounts and trade in allowance for Vehicle No. 223 2003 E-one mini pumper & Vehicle No. 206 1995 E-One top mount pumper. Council member Green seconded the motion. Passed For: 5; Against: 0; Abstain: 0; Absent: 0
Resolutions & Proclamations 12)
Proclamation- Vegas Marries Military Day
Minutes: Mayor Litman reads the Proclamation, “Vegas Marries Military” Day WHEREAS, Las Vegas, Nevada and surrounding cities including Boulder City, Henderson, Mesquite, North Las Vegas, plus surrounding towns including Laughlin, are proud to be the home of the VA Southern Nevada Healthcare System and the Nevada Department of Veterans Services; and
Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 13
23
WHEREAS, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs’ 2015 State Summary the number of veterans living in Nevada is 225,000 including 21,000 women and 105,000 veterans age 65 and older; and WHEREAS, Las Vegas, Nevada and surround cities plus surrounding towns are advocates of Armed Forces members including active-duty, guard/reserve, retirees and veterans representing United States branches including the Air Force, Army. Coast Guard, Marines and Navy; and WHEREAS, established in 2017, the Armed Forces Chamber of Commerce, Inc. is Nevada’s only Incorporated and Active Chamber of Commerce that serves Armed Forces members and First Responders; and WHEREAS, the mission of the Armed forces Chamber of Commerce is to Advocate, Empower and Partner with businesses owned by Armed Forces members and First Responders; and WHEREAS, the Armed Forces Chamber of Commerce has developed a program to provide FREE vows and renewals to Armed forces members who are Nevada residents and tourists from around the world; and WHEREAS, the Las Vegas Wedding Chamber of Commerce has partnered with the Armed Forces Chamber of Commerce to develop, market, promote and manage said program; and WHEREAS, the Las Vegas Wedding Chamber of Commerce’s mission is to enhance Las Vegas’ reputation as a premier wedding tourism destination by expanding the Las Vegas brand to mean quality, romance, passion and fun! To work closely with the Clerk’s office to promote quality wedding and special event vendors who provide excellent service and enhance the word-of-mouth reputation of Las Vegas as the leading destination in wedding-related tourism by developing a business resource link for the Clerk’s Wedding Tourism website; and WHEREAS, the County Clerk Lynn Marie Goya has also partnered with the Armed Forces Chamber of Commerce to develop, market, promote and manage said program; and WHEREAS, the “Vegas Marries Military” program provides FREE wedding vows and renewals at banquet halls, and wedding chapels inside casino hotels and stand-alone facilities in Las Vegas, Nevada and surrounding cities; and WHEREAS, members of the Armed Forces Chamber of Commerce and Las Vegas Wedding Chamber of Commerce has combined their efforts to sponsor and support the “Vegas Marries Military” program; and NOW, THEREFORE, in recognition of Armed Forces members who have bravely and unselfishly served Nevada and the United States of America through military service, November 10, 2017, is designated as Minutes: Andre Haynes accepts the Proclamation. (A short Public Service Announcement video is shown) Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 14
24
13)
Proclamation- White Ribbon Against Pornography Week, October 29 through November 5, 2017.
Minutes: Mayor Litman reads the Proclamation, “White Ribbon Against Pornography Week Sunday, October 29, - Sunday, November 5, 2017” WHEREAS, pornography degrades and dehumanizes both female and male participants; and WHEREAS, pornography present you with a distorted and debased image of human sexuality, devoid of love, commitment, and responsibility; and WHEREAS, pornography features anti-social behaviors including adultery, bestiality, incest, child abuse, promiscuity, and the degradation, rape and torture of women; and WHEREAS, pornography leads males and females of all ages into sexual addictions that prevent, harm and tear marriages apart and that contribute to rape and other sexual assaults; and WHEREAS, the explosion of obscenity helps create the demand for prostitutes and for women and children trafficked into sexual slavery; and WHEREAS, so-called “adult” pornography is used by adult predators both to stimulate themselves and to entice, desensitize and instruct their child victims; and WHEREAS, children molest other children in imitation of what they see in pornography; and WHEREAS, according to a survey reported in Cyber-Psychology & Behavior (213), “Overall, 75% of participants (93.2% of boys, 61.1% of girls) had seen online pornography before age 18…and boys were significantly more likely to view online pornography more often…” WHEREAS, according to a survey conducted in 2014 by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, 61% of teens have friend who regularly view Internet pornography; and WHEREAS, the Supreme Court has ruled that the First Amendment does not protect obscenity; and that legitimate governmental interest are furthered by enforcing obscenity laws, including the right of the nation and states to maintain a decent society and the protection of morality, public safety, the community environment, and family life; and WHEREAS, a poll conducted by Harris Interactive in April 2008 found that 75% of adult Americans said that they would support the next president were he to do all in his or constitutional power to ensure that federal obscenity laws are enforced vigorously. NOW THEREFORE, I, and the Mesquite City Council do hereby proclaim October 29 through November 5, 2017, as ~White Ribbon Against Pornography Week~ for the citizens of Mesquite, Nevada to wear or display white ribbons as a sign of their commitment to community standards of decency and their support for enforcement of the laws against obscene materials. Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 15
25
Minutes: Brian Wursten accepts the Proclamation. 14)
Proclamation - Childhood Cancer Awareness Week - October 22-28, 2017.
Minutes: Mayor Litman reads the Proclamation. “Childhood Cancer Awareness Week October 22-28, 2017”. WHEREAS, the American Cancer Fund for Children and Kids Cancer Connection report cancer is the leading cause of death by disease among U.S. children between infancy and age 15. This tragic disease is detected in more than 16,000 of our country’s young people each and every year and; WHEREAS, one in five of our nation’s children loses his or her battle with cancer. Many infants, children and teens will suffer from long-term effects of comprehensive treatment, including secondary cancers; and WHEREAS, founded nearly twenty-five years ago by Steven Firestein, a member of the philanthropic Max Factor cosmetics family, the American Cancer Fund for Children, Inc., and Kids Cancer Connection, Inc. are dedicated to helping these children and their families; and; WHEREAS, the American Cancer Fund for Children and Kids Cancer Connection provide a variety of vital patient psychosocial services to children undergoing cancer treatment at Sunrise Children’s Hospital, Children’s Medical Center in Summerlin Hospital, Children’s Hospital of Nevada at UMC in Las Vegas, as well as participating hospitals throughout the country, thereby enhancing the quality of life for these children and their families; and WHEREAS, the American Cancer Fund for Children and Kids Cancer Connection also sponsor Courageous Kid Recognition Awards, family sailing, pet assisted therapy, handmade get well cards and hospital celebration in honor of a child’s s determination and bravery to fight the battle against childhood cancer. NOW, THEREFORE, the Mesquite City Council does hereby declare the week of October 2228, 2017 as ~Childhood Cancer Awareness Week~ and do urge the citizens of Mesquite to raise awareness for the vital cause.
15)
Proclamation Recognizing Denton Dorn for his contribution to the City of Mesquite through his work for Athletics and Leisure Services and also selected to represent Team Nevada in the 2018 Special Olympics USA Games. The Olympic Games will take place in Seattle, Washington on July 1st through July 6, 2018.
Minutes: Mayor Litman: My next Proclamation is a very exciting one. I met this young man when he was very short and small about 13 years ago and that has changed somewhat. Mayor Litman read this Proclamation, Denton Dorn October 24, 2017 Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 16
26
WHEREAS, for over two years, Denton Dorn has chosen to take time out of his life to help make the City of Mesquite a better place to live and make a significant positive contribution to bettering social, community and school athletics. WHEREAS, this individual has become a vital and positive force in our community and has demonstrated a willingness to pitch in at the Virgin Valley High School by helping manage the Bulldog’s football and basketball teams. He’s a true Bulldog fan who bleeds green. WHEREAS, while working for the Mesquite Recreation Center Denton has demonstrated a positive atmosphere while cleaning, working the slide at the outdoor pool and refereeing the seasonal sports. WHEREAS, Denton Dorn, a bowling athlete, has been selected to represent Team Nevada in the 2018 Special Olympics USA Games. The Olympic Games will take place in Seattle, Washington on July 1st through July 6th, 2018. WHEREAS, the City is proud to have such an amazing young man represent our community. NOW THEREFORE, we, the Mayor and City Council of the City of Mesquite, Nevada proudly proclaim Denton Dorn for his outstanding accomplishments in being selected to participate in the Special Olympic Games and for being a remarkable member of our community. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand to be affixed this Tuesday, October 24, 2017. Presentation to Denton Dorn of the Proclamation. 16)
Resolution No. 941 of the Mesquite City Council “Supplementing Local Education through Marijuana Revenues”.
- Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Minutes: Mayor Litman read this item by its title and deferred to Council member Ballweg. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: Council member Wursten and I have been working diligently on trying to come up with a compromise to all the discussions we've had from - seems like many many from the public, during public comment and other comment sessions in the last several months. The whole time, speaking for myself, I stated repeatedly I was dedicated to help the kids out. It's just a matter of finding the solution best for the city that we can manage this process. Well, to set the stage to we, I don't know if you read the paper, but we receive the first quarter numbers from Deep Roots Harvest on income. It was reported it was up $132,000 received for the first quarter, which is going to be about to be about double, $12,500 of that was the licensing fee, which would not be part of the budgeted amount, but so we're talking about instead of having $240,000 we are going to have maybe as much as $480,000. So, we've got some information here now that gives us an indication that we're going to be able to exceed our Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 17
27
budgets, but still to be fiscally responsible. We wanted to make sure that we covered the original budget at of the $240,000. So in the light of that we hashed out some different ways to do this and again one of my goals was to make this a community, a community process not just necessarily the city so to fund to CEAB operation, the board to help them with programs. So, one of the main elements of this new resolution is to create a city trust. The new charter has the ability to establish a trust. So it should be a charitable trust, one that would be something that would be a community-based item where different entities besides the city can deposit for certain programs. But I thought it was very critical right now that we establish some idea for the CEAB board, so they know how much financing they had, to what kind of program they might be able to present to us because the city councilmen, myself, I want to make sure this money is still used for a very beneficial use for the kids on education. So that's why it's structured the way it is that anything over the first $240,000 up to for the first year $60,000, this is a resolution, so this could can be amended within the budget process. But the first goals are to basically get the CEAB Board an idea of how much funding they're going to have, that they can target a program so, part of the resolution also states that they will come back some time in January, February time to present to the council, a program or programs that they would use this money for, for the benefit of the kids. So we're talking about somewhere in the neighborhood of $60,000, maybe more. At the previous council meeting there was an offer from Deep Roots Harvest for additional funding, which is still in the works, we don't know what the details are, but that money could also be added to this trust fund concept. But I think the most important thing is right now is that we give the CEAB Board a target to what they're going to have, basically a minimum to be able to propose some programs for the kids. And this kind of goes hand in hand, we are in the midst of, we have sued in and it's in process and filed against the Clark County school district to bring what has been statutorily required to fund for our schools, plus there are some other funds that they have denied us that we can do us for English language learners and other things that our students need to be proficient. And I have been asked and stated to us that don’t we give enough already to Clark County school district, we do. I mean the Clark County gets a big percentage of the property taxes, a big cut, but we're going to go down one path of trying to get what we are due through the court system because we're not having much luck talking to them nicely, so we will do it that way, but we can't sacrifice the kids until we resolve that. So we want to get the CEAB Board some idea what they would have. I think that's kind of the key to this whole thing, it gives the CEAB Board a goal to what they're going to have to put on a program to help the academic advancement of the kids, so. I think I covered most of our discussions. Minutes: Council member Wursten: Something else that I think needs to be brought up along with this, is you touched on it briefly is the fact that we Councilman at different times have been meeting with Deep Roots Harvest and they've been wonderful to look towards an idea on how to help fund this and if things comes to fruition like we think they will, we hope they will, that would help replace some of those funds that may be coming from the city in the marijuana taxes and offset that. So we're pretty excited about those meetings as well, but this resolution what they do works within this resolution as well or it can, and I think that's a very positive thing, so it's kind of all encompassing in that regard. Minutes: Council member Rapson: I think there are some pieces to this that I like and there are some that I would prefer not be in here. I mean I can't think of anyone who knows their schools better than the principal. I don't care how involved the parent is, they're not involved in all of the activities the school provides. I think that it would been simpler and wiser to allocate the money Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 18
28
directly to the principal based on some allocation that's rational and qualitative like per pupil per school that ratio, this goes to this school, this goes to this school and the principal decides how to allocate it because one of ladies up here spoke about the need for books, somebody else is talking about funding a football team. I think this is a compromise and I'm fine with that but I would have preferred to see that in this motion, a resolution and I wanted to just clarify that this is not a blank check, I mean the $60,000 that were allocating now if Deep Roots comes back with something and says we can raise another $0,000 it's now$120,000 I mean is that the way it is? It is 120,000 Minutes: Council member Ballweg: That is the intent that we give them a target to what they can - the funds are going to have to set up whatever program they're going to come back to us for, not writing a blank check as you said. We want accountability. Minutes: Council member Rapson: I want to cap it too. Then if that's the case then that's what it does, that's what my fundamental issue was with this original proposal is one half of one percent and not knowing what that amount is and we do have other budgetary issues in the city and in contrary to some of the comments, not every citizen in this town wants to spend every available dollar on extracurricular activities at school. Their kids are gone. They have no dog in the fight. I get comments from a lot of people, so I think this alleviates a couple of concerns that I had and I appreciate the two councilman for working together to come up with something that although I'm not 100 percent happy with them, I can live with it. Minutes: Council member Withelder: This is directed to Mr. Sweetin. Have we had any conversations with the Department of Taxation as to what portion of the collective sales tax or the marijuana tax is going to be distributed to the education system? Minutes: Mr. Sweetin: We haven't. Right now, there is no way to tell that because what essentially will happen is all the money that comes in essentially to the state is going to go to the state's rainy day fund. Minutes: Council member Withelder: I don't think that's totally true. I think that portion of it is not going to rainy day fund.
Minutes: Mr. Sweetin: Statutorily that may be the case. That is how it is written. I don't know anyone at taxation or from any other agency that believes or the schools that thinks that any of the money will actually make it to the school's distributive account. So what is essentially is once you had a surplus in the state's rainy day fund and a certain amount of marijuana tax dollars will be allocated to the to the distributive student account. That account actually is funded in a way that our students aren't going to see that money. I mean it's not going to have any practical effect on students in Clark County at least. It may for a student like Eureka county, or White Pine where
Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 19
29
you’ve got 5000 students and an extra $100 a student makes a difference, but see if they get an extra 100 or an extra $700 a student that's like an extra nickel a student for us. Minutes: Council member Withelder: Coincidently, I'm going to be in Reno on Thursday and as you know I'm the representative of Nevada League of Cities and we have a meeting with the Director of Taxation from the state and that will be one of the topics that we will be discussing. So I might come back with a much clearer picture of what we're talking about now as far as to the distribution point and back to the state to be distributed to education. I had this conversation with her several months ago and she couldn't give me a number because it was too early in the game after recreational went positive, but I still think we don't know what we're talking about here. Minutes: Mr. Sweetin: I guess they respond to that, that’s taxation issue to work out as to the distributive student account, and after the rainy day fund, the state's rainy day fund is taking care of and legislators get to make that determination. So, I mean, I think as to what we're talking about and I defer to the council members who were petitioners on it. I think this is money that would directly affect our schools, whereas the marijuana taxation money, I don't think anybody at this point, there's anyone in the state that believes that's going to have any practical effect on Clark County schools to the extent it does it would affect Clark County school district. It would have no effect on like local communities. So, I think this money would be going directly to stay here and be funded by CEAB whereas marijuana dollars would be some state funding that no one knows how it would work. Minutes: Council member Wursten: It would be nice to believe that the money that comes from the State will get to us, but we can't even get the school district now to fund what they're supposed to and we're suing School District because of that. I'm telling you I don't think - well I'm fairly certain that none of us in this community will see any of that money ever. Minutes: Council Rapson: That is the real point here I think is even a few dollars did get to the Virgin Valley School System, it doesn't go to the same thing. It goes to - it's not to fund extracurricular activities, it is not to bring back the forensics, it's not to fund books, it's not to do the things that this is purposed for. So irrespective of whether we get a little bit or get a lot, it's spent in a different way. This is a discretionary for extracurricular activities, that's not what the pot tax would go to through the school district. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: Also, there is another fund that is supposed to be established. I think Bob - I think its $15,000,000 that is going to be put on this fund that they don't know how they’re going to distribute yet. It may be a C tax type formula or some type of grand petition that they’re going to pass out money to help communities that are impacted by the marijuana. I think that is second in line after the Rainy day fund.
Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 20
30
Minutes: Mr. Sweetin: It is a $5 million dollar account and they don't know how they’re going to distribute it. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: That is second in line after the rainy day and then the third in line is possibly any educational money, so I think and I again I think we need to get started on this. I think it takes the city commitment to give CEAB, here's your goal, here's your target what can you do with these funds so we can actually aim and come back and then there is accountability for us that you know we can then input into not every nuance of it, but to give him some direction and then there's accountability to the council for these funds that are being given. Thank you. Minutes: Council member Green: I don't see anybody from CEAB here although I understand the Mayor Litman. – oh some are here. Good, I want to make sure that CEAB is on board with this to be geared up to be responsible for that. CEAB has representatives from each of the schools and see the principals come to those meetings. Also the last meeting I attended, a couple of meetings to go they were pretty geared up to demands, but I would like to hear from the CEAB that they are willing and ready to manage this. Minutes: Cliff Gravett: CEAB committee member and we have discussed this issue. It's kind of and I am here with Nicholas Montoya as well who is also on the committee, he has badgered me into coming up today. But it's been a matter of some discussion at the last two meetings, it’s kind of a chicken and an egg issue where we are ready and willing to act, but we act somewhat at the pleasure of the city council on this and the myriad issues, so we can’t do anything with the money until we know we're going to get it and we know what we're going to get and what strings will be attached if any. With that having been said we have discussed, though not voted or adopted any rules on a number of different possibilities and have discussed also with the principals who attend the CEAB board meetings, what their needs are, what their wants are, and what input they would like to have in this process. Possibilities that we discussed, trade block granting, block granting was condition, performance granting, performance granting was priority. So we don't know, well I don't want to say we don't know, we have not adopted a specific procedure yet for awarding any monies that we are given the role of making advice to this Council honor or recommending awards for, but we are ready and willing to do that and we would take that issue up with proposals at our very next meeting once we get the go ahead from the City Council. Once we have some indication from the City Council that funds are going to be forthcoming and in that process we would consider conditions to be imposed on the funds if any. Priorities that would be encouraged and again taking input from the principals that attend the board meeting and ensuring both that the money is stewarded wisely and that the school actually gets something they can do something productive with to ensure that the students in the community are actually benefited by this process and it doesn't go to waste either way. That's where I think I'm at I'm not here and if an official capacity for from CEAB but I am here to kind of share where we are at in the process. Thank you. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: That's one way this is structured is to hold somebody accountable to CEAB however they do it, in whatever program they present. So, we are going to - accountable Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 21
31
and if I can express my hope that the first go round would be more of an academic application of these funds versus an extracurricular. I know you could classify academics, but either before school, after school tutoring, I believe it's called ELL now, English Learning Languages, I’m not involved but those kind of activities to help the educational side. So at first that would be my hope to look at that but yeah, the accountability is something that we strongly talked about in our resolution to make sure we didn't want to grant it out and then dump money out. We want to be able to have somebody accountable come back, here's a program next year to come back and say we evaluate what was the success of that program. Does it work? Do we expand that? That's the whole idea. Let's meet local, let's be close. That was part of the goals of reorganization school district to have more local control input. It doesn't really seem to be working or doing but for the degree we can do it, it’s just very important that we help the kids that need the help. Minutes: Council member Green: I have one additional question. I wasn't sure I heard the answer to Councilman Rapson's question. If Deep Roots were to come up with say an equal amount of $60,000, would that be on top of the $60,000 or would that be something that would be taken into account in ascertaining this $60,000? Minutes: Council member Ballweg: No it’s not, we are not. At this time, we can always change - this is a resolution so we can always change our minds so they come - if the CEAB comes with something that we think is an exceptional opportunity then we can change it, but this would be a cap on - pretty much a cap on what they need to start planning to use this year, that's the intent of the resolution. Minutes: Council member Green: But it would always wouldn't come until after we reach to $240,000 mark. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: Right, it doesn't come Minutes: Council member Green: So if you do the practical application and we got $120,000 for the first quarter, if we get another $120,000 for the second quarter, we don't make any distribution to this trust. Third quarter results are known in April. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: It doesn't cannibalize the budget in anyway, we support the budget. Minutes: Council member Green: From a timing standpoint it wouldn’t be until probably April, if there's any funding.
Minutes: Council member Ballweg: Possibly. Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 22
32
Minutes: Mayor Litman opened this item to Public Comment. Minutes: Adam Leverenz: Given the contentious and emotional nature of some of the comments made at recent meetings regarding this matter and then looking at the remainder of the audience tonight, I don't think you're probably going to hear it so I want to say it. I think two gentlemen, Councilman Ballweg and Councilman Wursten are be commended for having such kind of differing opinions several months ago and being able to sit down and work together. I imagine perhaps Mr. Sweetin helped craft some of this. I understand Councilman Rapson has expressed concerns. There is probably no way you could make everybody 100 percent happy on who's going to spend the money and what they're going to spend it on but as Mr. Ballweg mentioned this is a resolution you'll be able to revisit it in the future and I think there should be a whole bunch of students and teachers here tonight saying thank you Minutes: Council member Rapson: We are just like Congress, we work together. Minutes: Council member Wursten: I just want to thank Councilman Ballweg for - he worked hard in helping to get this - moving this forward, so I'll make the motion. I want to move that we approve Resolution 941 supporting local education through marijuana revenues.
Council member Wursten moved to Approve Resolution No. 941 of the Mesquite City Council “Supplementing Local Education through Marijuana Revenues”. Council member Ballweg seconded the motion. Passed For: 5; Against: 0; Abstain: 0; Absent: 0
Department Reports 17)
Mayor's Comments
Minutes: Mayor Litman: On November 4th, at 7:45, there is a preparade program at Veterans Park which is by our old cemetery. Veteran's Day parade on November 4 starts promptly at 10 a.m. on Mesquite Boulevard. By the way Hangar Dance is at the airport 12 to 4 which also supports our veterans in Mesquite. 18)
City Council and Staff Reports and Comments
Minutes: Council member Ballweg: A couple of things I want to announce is that a few weeks ago, we had a very successful manufacturing day in Mesquite. We had I think 90 kids come through or so between Primex and Lotech and tried to give them the advantages of manufacturing and opportunities in careers and things which are very successful. Talking about the chamber of Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 23
33
commerce, the chamber of commerce has really become extremely active in areas - we are part of a coalition of chambers in Las Vegas and also the Southern Utah Chamber of Commerce, another collective group and this next week, the executive board will be a participating in the retreat in Southern Utah on Thursday this week to collaborate and see what the other councils are doing. We are scheduling for early November another “What's up Mesquite”, which is a very promising program for breakfast and to let everybody know. So if anybody reads about that, everyone is welcome to come out and have breakfast at the Elks for a reasonable price and hear what is going on in Mesquite. Thank you.
Administrative Items 19)
Consideration of the Adoption of Bill No. 526 as Ordinance No. 526, amending Title 2 of the Mesquite Municipal Code “Business License Regulations”; Chapter 2 “Taxes”; Creating Article C. “Supplementing Local Education through Marijuana Revenues” and other matters properly related thereto.
- Public Hearing - Discussion and Possible Action
THIS ITEM WAS TABLED UNTIL THE FIRST MEETING IN JANUARY 2018
20)
Consideration of the Adoption of Bill #528 as Ordinance 528, an Ordinance amending: Title 9 of The Mesquite Municipal Code Entitled “Unified Development Ordinance”, by adding Massage Therapy to the lists of Permitted Uses in the PB, CR-1, CR-2, CR-3, and HT Zoning Districts; and other matters properly related thereto.
- Public Hearing - Discussion and Possible Action
Minutes: Mayor Litman read this item by its title and deferred to Mr. Secrist. Minutes: Mr. Secrist: This Bill proposes to allow massage therapy in all five commercial zones in the city. It's a practice has been allowed since 2009 under an interpretation that was made at that time, but it was never added to the code. We are just proposing to codify that and make it explicit and with that I recommend you open the Public Hearing and approve the Bill. Minutes: Mayor Litman opened up this item to Public Hearing. There were no speakers. Mayor Litman closed this item to Public Hearing.
Council member Rapson moved to Adopt Bill #528 as Ordinance No. 528 an Ordinance amending: Title 9 of The Mesquite Municipal Code Entitled “Unified Development Ordinance”, by adding Massage Therapy to the lists of Permitted Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 24
34
Uses in the PB, CR-1, CR-2, CR-3, and HT Zoning Districts; and other matters properly related thereto. Council member Wursten seconded the motion. Passed For: 5; Against: 0; Abstain: 0; Absent: 0 21)
Consideration of the Adoption of Bill 529 as Ordinance 529 (single family residential parking requirements) to clarify in section 9-7f-7A what the minimum parking requirement is, what the maximum number of spaces is, and that all offstreet parking spaces open to view from the street must be paved.
- Public Hearing - Discussion and Possible Action Minutes: Mayor Litman read this item by its title and deferred to Mr. Secrist. Minutes: Mr. Secrist: This Bill proposes to make some changes to the parking requirements in the single family residential zone and essentially by answering some questions that have arisen through some of our code enforcement cases on parking issues. However, having said that, once we introduced the Bill we started getting contacted by people, who thought this maybe went too far and caused some unforeseen consequences. At least on a couple of the issues, I’m convinced that it probably does need a little more research and revision. So with that I'm going to recommend that it be continued and go ahead and open the public hearing to see if there's any additional comment, but I like to have another swing at it come back. We will renotice it when it comes back and go through it again. Minutes: Mayor Litman opened this item to Public Hearing. There were no speakers. Mayor Litman closed the Public Hearing.
Council member Ballweg moved to continue this until a date is brought back by the Department. Council member Rapson seconded the motion. Passed For: 5; Against: 0; Abstain: 0; Absent: 0
22)
Consideration of Introduction of Bill No 530 as Ordinance 530, amending Mesquite Municipal Code, Title 2, Chapter 14 titled Medical Marijuana .
- Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Minutes: Mayor Litman read this item by its title and deferred to Mr. Secrist.
Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 25
35
Minutes: Mr. Secrist: This Bill proposes to make some changes to the medical marijuana regulations to just put that chapter in sync with what we've done with chapter 16 on recreational marijuana. We've updated their definitions to be consistent with legislation by the state to raise the age, people being able to enter the dispensary to 21 and I think the only other change was deleting the $12,500 quarterly fee paid by dispensaries that we're now not allowed to collect because were capped at 3 percent. It's kind of a cleanup, but it makes medical regulations consistent with a new recreational. Minutes: Mayor Litman opens this Item up to Public Comment. Minutes: Ernie Hoffman: I have a question. It comes from something that’s in the paper. How does this affect the fact that Deep Roots is going to be a distribution center to the new store that's going to open in Henderson? How does that affect your tax and your payments? Minutes: Council member Rapson: They are wholesaling all over the state. It’s a gross receipt tax on the wholesales.
Council member Rapson moved to Introduce Bill 530 as Ordinance 530 and to have a Public Hearing at the Regular City Council meeting on Tuesday, November 14, 2017. Council member Withelder seconded the motion. Passed For: 5; Against: 0; Abstain: 0; Absent: 0 23)
Consideration of Tentative Map Case No. TM-17-001 (Conestoga Golf Course) to approve the division of large parcels into individual golf course lots, remainder lots for future development, and common elements in the Anthem Mesquite Planned Unit Development, located generally at the intersection of Falcon Ridge Parkway and Flat Top Mesa Drive.
- Public Hearing - Discussion and Possible Action Minutes: Mayor Litman read this item by its title and deferred to Richard Secrist. Minutes: Mr. Secrist: The applicant in this case Developer, Pulte Del Webb, brought a tentative map to the city. They probably would've brought a map of division of the large parcels put under NRS some of the parcels were too small for that. But basically, this subdivision is not creating any new residential lots. We are not proposing to divide up the golf course holes or do away with the golf course or any other things that people become alarmed about. But what they are doing is creating a map that establishes boundaries between what are the golf parcels, what are common elements and what are remainder parcels for future development. They started this mapping process back in 2006 and never finished until now. So, this map is different than any Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 26
36
other subdivision map that you normally see. Again, we're not creating any new residential lots with this. It’s kind of a cleanup establishing the boundaries between those three types of parcels. In the map you have before you, it is a 9 page map. The first page is just the title page I guess, index and then the legal description and then you have 6 pages of sheets that show golf holes, common elements, remainder lots and the final sheet, which show details of the golf club house and some of the rest stops along the way on the golf course. Unfortunately, when the notices were sent out and Pulte also sent out an email blast to property owners to let them know that what was going on. In retrospect it probably could have been worded better and I think a lot of people got alarmed as a result that. We talked to numerous people who have called and tried to explain what's going on. Some are probably still here tonight. One gentleman I spoke to who is working for the master HOA was concerned for example that he didn't feel they had access to some of the common element properties that the HOA was going to be asked to maintain. He thought that they shouldn't be asked or accepts something they can't get to, which I agreed. But in any case, I suggested they sit down with Pulte and try to work those issues out. I'm not sure we can solve that tonight if there are still those kinds of issues. We will probably hear from some of the residents on that. John Schippert from Pulte is also here, and you can - he'll probably help explain some of this and if you have any questions, you can direct them to him as well. But basically it's kind of a cleanup. They have listed the golf course for sale and I gather that they want to make sure where all the boundaries for all the properties are as they go forward with that. So with that explanation, I was prepared to recommend approval, but I'm not sure what some of the residents - how they might feel. They may have a need to ask for a continuance. Minutes: Mayor Litman opened this Item to Public Hearing. Minutes: George Mitchnik: I live in Sun City, Mesquite for over nine years and like to make a few comments about the little flare I got because it was very vague to me what is going on put the map on the back. I'm thoroughly confused on what's taking place here. I called Mr. Secrist and talked to him. I also came in on this past Friday and looked at the 9 pages of the maps and that even confused me even more. So, I have no idea as a homeowner what's going on there and I do have a very concern that adding more common elements to the HOA is another additional cost and homeowners are paying quite a large fee for the common elements, I believe the new budget shows in excess of $600,000 for common elements and I'm a little concerned that it is going to increase then what's going to happen with the golf course. So, I would hope that the Council would consider putting this on hold until they give a little more information to the residents of Sun City, Mesquite, so we know where we stand when the golf course is going to change hands and what's going to happen. It is totally confusing, I could say it what's going on. I hope you could reconsider not passing this resolution tonight. Thank you. Minutes: Doris Chrystal-Lear: Same as the gentleman I'm just concerned about how it is written here the approval, the division of the large parcels, are those large parcels existing common area? And if it is, they are turning them into individual golf course lots; does that mean homes with the golf course view? If that's true then they are in actuality increasing the number of homes, whereas the gentleman earlier I think stated that was not the intent. So as the other gentleman said I just need a lot more clarification on what it is they are actually doing. Thank you for your time.
Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 27
37
Minutes: Mayor Litman closed Public Hearing. Minutes: Council member Rapson: Mr. Schippert, can you shed some light on this? Minutes: John Schippert: As Richard alluded to; we started this process in 2006. It’s a process of defining where the golf course property is in relationship to the other developable areas. The proposed tentative map is a vehicle for us to define and procreate a legal description for the golf course. There are some limitations in doing a division of large parcels, which wouldn't require coming to Council for a tentative map. It's done through mapping process that wouldn't come to come to Council, but there's limitations of 10 acres, so we have some golf course holes, the technical languages is lots, but it's golf holes that we’re defining and the golf course boundaries that worked in the golf course. The common area, common space and all that is consistent with our land use plan that's in our development agreement. We haven't added or adjusted to that at this time. Correct, Richard? Yeah, so it is consistent with the land use that we have through our development agreement for golf course acreage and common areas and there are some identified common areas as Mr. Mitchnik alluded to that would be future common areas, it’s just being defined on the map. Right now it's five large maps of 300 acres that had common areas adjacent to those and they're just all being defined. We're not turning all 300 or 500 acres over to the HOA at this time as George is concerned. That will happen as development happens with each development in each community that we do. Those part and parcels are turned over as we landscape them and become part of the community. So, I hope that helps with some clarification. There is not going to be any additional lots, we are still having the same amount of developable acres as we were entitled to in the development agreement. It's simply an exercise identifying the legal boundaries and legal description and have it on one map. That's important too. So you can look at one document and say this is the golf course. So I hope that answers your question. Minutes: Council member Rapson: I believe it does. This is just simply defining the boundaries of the golf course for sale. It doesn't create any additional common area. At this was point that it wasn't originally in the in the development agreement. Minutes: Mr. Schippert: There are future areas that will be common areas. Those will be defined, but they are not the turnover process of the HOA and we're not going to burden them with something that doesn't work. Minutes: Council member Rapson: Is it going to create any inaccessible common areas? Minutes: Mr. Schippert: The next process is to establish what we call final map and through the final map process we will identify drainage easements, access easements, utility easements and all of those issues will be defined and worked out through the final map process, which the city is a part of. Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 28
38
Minutes: Council member Rapson: So all so all of the common areas would have access. Minutes: Mr. Schippert: Yes, so there is going to be some that are going to have access. An example would be the perimeter fence around the community. They're going to need to access onto the golf course to be able to paint and service that fence through the HOA, so there is going to be an easement granted to the HOA outside of that boundary that would allow them access for maintenance in those items. So that's going to be taken account for all of these lots and it's a pretty detailed process and like I said it has been ongoing since 2006. Minutes: Council member Rapson: From my personal perspective I think you, did that answer your question young lady out there, I kind of Minutes: Ms. Chrystal-Lear: Yes (too far away to hear). Minutes: Council member Rapson: You can't sell something that doesn't have a defined boundary. So, if you are going to sell a golf course, you need to define the boundary and in doing so it takes what was undefined and makes it something else, which is future common area potentially. No new lots, no new anything and the common area will not be developed or improved, which would cause no further cost to the HOA until the development around those common areas can support it. Is that a fairly accurate summary? Minutes: Mr. Schippert: That is really accurate. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: This is for Richard basically; do we have in our original development plan for this? Is the golf outlined already? Were its borders defined in the development agreement? Minutes: Mr. Secrist: The Golf Course is mapped, and it was part of the master plan, yes. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: So any of these parcel carve outs, or blocking, does that intrude into any of the original map, I mean does it cut down that original boundaries of the golf course? Minutes: Mr. Secrist: No.
Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 29
39
Minutes: Council member Ballweg: Good, it keeps the golf course in the same boundaries. It just defines the areas around the golf course. Is that basically what we're saying? Minutes: Mr. Secrist: Basically, yeah. Minutes: Council member Withelder: John, can you just verify yes or no that the golf course is for sale? I've had several emails from constituents and residents asking me and I couldn't answer because I don’t know. I still don't know. Minutes: Mr. Schippert: We have put the Golf Course on the market and we're examining if there is a market for a golf course at this time. Minutes: David Harvilak: Every time we have meetings up there a lot of times things are so vague, and I just have one comment I want to propose to Mr. Schippert and that's when he talks about future turnover of these common areas. If this golf course sells and there is a certain portion of it that initially was going to be part a golf course and now Pulte is telling the HOA that we're going to end up taking over some of it. In time that’s going to be an extra expense with watering, with landscaping and an upkeep. And I just want to ask him what's his term of future development or future turning over of these common areas. Future is three months, future is also five years and we've been hit with a lot of things and as time goes on if anything accelerates with regards to the sale of the golf course, and it doesn't include land as already deemed part of the golf course, but now it's going to be part of HOA, it’s going to be a significant increase in what we are responsible for. So I just like some clarification on to with regards to what we're talking about when he says future turnover three months, six months, five years, 10 years. Thank you, appreciate it.
Minutes: Mr. Schippert: My answer is yes, 3 years, 6 years, 12 years as we develop each community. We don't know today exactly where those common areas and parcels are going to be in the design. I don’t if we can put the map back up there, so I think this might help define - if you could go to one of the sheets that has the golf boundaries, may not be really super visible. Yeah, so as you could see right now there's a large parcel up there. With those familiar with the golf course it’s going to be hole 18, 1 driving range 2,3,4,5. We’re simply splitting out the golf and identifying where the golf is in that large parcel there as a future common buildable lot and those type of things. We don't know exactly what those components are going to be today because those lines are not complete for those communities. However, as we develop each community, we turn over common area and that's all been part of the parcel in the process of the development as we build, and we develop, and we've developed a community it establishes common areas and those common areas once they are landscaped are turned over to the HOA. So, yes, there is going to be some, actually we just did a recent block and turning over in the process of turning over some common area right now. It's an ongoing thing and it happens as we develop each community. So, I hope that that Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 30
40
Minutes: Council member Rapson: Perhaps this will clarify, I don't know. If there was no intention of selling the golf course and no need to define its boundaries in the legal sense. With this change would anything change with respect to the number of future lots in common areas associated with those lots? Minutes: Mr. Schippert: No. Minutes: Council member Rapson: This doesn't change anything? Minutes: Mr. Schippert: It is just establishing where the golf course Minutes: Council member Rapson: I think that is what they are looking for is, is everything going to be the same and it would be if this wasn't happening or does this create additional burden for that taxpayer or the homeowners and it appears that this is not going to change the economics or the community in any sense. It's simply defining the boundaries of the golf course. Minutes: Mr. Schippert: There are minor adjustments that are going to be made that is in the benefit of the HOA and the Homeowners Association through this process and it was always been contemplated and consider those areas to be part of the association and not golf. Minutes: Council member Rapson: This doesn't deviate materially from the original plans? Minutes: Mr. Schippert: It helps to establish those boundaries. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: One thing I want to kind of express if I state this wrong. Richard that they have to come back, so each one of these parcels when they do their development map, they have to come in before the Council for that to be approved. And then at those times, the roads, all those details have to be presented. So those would have to go to another approval process with the public hearing, so that the citizens - all the residents up there will have then the particulars of what is going to happen and can then specifically note complications or problems with what's being presented then. Minutes: Mr. Secrist: Each new subdivision will go through a tentative map process like we're doing here tonight. There will be notices sent out to the surrounding property owners and a public hearing published notice in the paper. The final maps after the tentative they don't come to Council and those will be acted on administratively and ultimately recorded, but the tentative role will show what's going to be residential, how many lots, what areas are proposed for common area and so forth and there will be public hearing on those. Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 31
41
Minutes: Mr. Schippert: We have two currently submitted. Minutes: Ms. Chrystal-Lear: Once again it just seems a little influx, I mean I've purchased a home. I know the size of my lot, the square footage. I think Del Webb has been here about 13 years. I’m new to the neighborhood. I'm sure when they submitted it, everyone has been talking about the original map, and it must have been the original map, the size of a golf course, the size of the lots. So, I don't understand why it's now kind of shifting and moving into a different size and shape and a gentleman in the audience says what happens to all this common area or rearranging of the size of the lots, if the golf course doesn't sell. Minutes: Mr. Schippert: I am not sure I quite - can you clarify what the lots Minutes: Ms. Chrystal-Lear: My concern is when the development was originally built you had a size of the golf course 80 acres Minutes: Mr. Schippert: Can we put the map back up here? Yes, so that is the map of Sun City. Minutes: Ms. Chrystal-Lear: So my concern is, is that now you want to change it because you don't Minutes: Mr. Schippert: We are not changing anything, we are just mapping it. Minutes: Ms. Chrystal-Lear: But didn't you do that when you originally built the place? Minutes: Mr. Schippert: It's been part of, so this right now; this boundary right now is currently one map. So now we're defining this boundary of the golf course here and this will be future development, this is future development, and this are will be primarily golf because it is golf hole 18, golf hole 1, the club house and then there is future development here. None of the future development is changing. Minutes: Ms. Chrystal-Lear: When this was originally submitted, didn't you know how long the green is going to be? It's going be a par 5, a par 3 of 200 acres?
Minutes: Mr. Schippert: This is not changing any of the aspects of the golf course. It is just defining legally what the description of the boundary is. So, we've done that here. So there is a boundary Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 32
42
when we built this community we went through the same process when we built this community adjacent to the golf course, we've done the same process, but when we did the model homes up here we did the same process as well as this community, this community and this community that we're here today. So now we're defining where all of the remaining golf holes are is all this is doing. We're not creating any more development, we have 2000 acres. We are not increasing the 2000 acres or decreasing it. We are just defining the golf course. Minutes: Ms. Chrystal-Lear: Okay, but what my main question, I guess I'm not presenting myself effectively is when you originally submitted the plans, it seems like you came along and built it and then got the back of a napkin and said well we now want to kind of, I mean, I just understand that you can build a whole development and say we will kind of come back and finish it halfway down the road, I guess that is the best way to present it. Minutes; Mr. Schippert: I don't know how to answer that. Minutes: Mayor Litman: I think this probably best answered in a in a discussion with this the clients themselves up there rather than this being a City Council issue. Minutes: Mr. Schippert: This is mapping and not having to do with the sale of the golf course. We’re just defining the golf course; we would like for the Council to obviously have consideration for this tonight and not move it forward. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: I am on the HOA Board with Canyon Crest, and adjusting these property lines is not uncommon. We are still doing it around the golf courses and things like to define lines at the beginning were best laid plans, but things change, and definitions need to be changed and I think that's what I see. I mean since I am very sensitive to this issue that something is going to change, but I think this is just adding detail to what the original intent was. I looked at this and I just don't see where it's really materially changing anything other than defining exactly where the golf course is at now on this plan.
Minutes: Peter Sheets: I would like to know if the golf course was on the original plan, why couldn’t that then provide us with an overlay map, what you guys approved what the golf course is now. Two, he mentioned that communities aren't developed yet, but yet he seems to know what's going to be common area. I know, I'm missing something in that translation. Three, he talks about handing over the common areas to the HOA, who we have no say in what's planted, the amount that’s going to be planted, so we are then saddled with the long-term maintenance and care. New subdivisions still have bushes planted, when they mature it will be one because the other ones died out.
Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 33
43
Minutes: George Mitchnik: I like to take everybody back a few years back to when the golf course was first developed. I happened to be one of the golfers that was there for the pre-grand opening of the golf course. Quincy Edwards, who I got to, know quite well over a period of time of living there. I asked him the question when the golf course was opened; I said what role does Pulte play with the golf course? And he says absolutely none. It's a different entity and we really stipulated that Pulte has no control. They are not even involved with the golf course. So I would just like to mention this to the City Council that this what was originally told to me as a homeowner and again this is some of the confusion that I'm having with looking at these maps and who says that the new owner who is going to buy this, I don't want this portion involved in the golf course and I don't want this parcel involved and I don't want this parcel involved. We have no idea what the new owner of this golf course wants at this time until these deals settle. So, again I am still very concerned about this item. Thanks. Minutes: Council member Rapson: I think this is very clear to me and I am sorry I can't see the issues you guys have. I don't get, this is simply putting a defined boundary, and you can't sell your house unless you have a defined boundary. You can't sell the golf course until once it’s defined. There's no reason to define where the golf course starts and ends in a development that hasn't got anything in it yet. So, this has happened progressively as developments were done on the golf course. Is that not correct Mr. Schippert? So this is not a first time, this happens all the time. It happened all the way up along the golf course. It's just simply defining, when I sell, when you sell your house, there is a legal description of that property. This is a legal description of that property. It's real simple. With respect to the HOAs, that was in the master plan in design standard handbook, was it not that there was going to be x amount of HOA or common areas, common elements within each - This has been done. This isn't changing that. There is going to be common area up there in those undeveloped areas as it was originally in the design standard handbook. Minutes: Council member Rapson: You have to come up to the mike, it has to be recorded. Minutes Mr. Sheets: You indicated that there has to be a legal description. Is there currently a legal description of that golf course? I'm assuming it's being taxed. So, it's a private parcel of land, the golf course. Minutes: Council member Rapson: If Pulte owns it, it is being taxed. Minutes: Mr. Sheets: There has to be a legal description somewhere and if that’s changing, I would like to why. Minutes: Victor Campbell, Bulloch Brothers Engineering: The current legal description of hole 18, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 is this complete parcel right here. That is what is taxed. It's got the golf course on it; it's got a golf maintenance facility on it. It's got the clubhouse on it, so when these were, if you look Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 34
44
at these, the PUD map originally approved, we had these lots right here. Now Nevada state law says if they want to sell a golf course, you have to map it. You cannot do anything but create that legal description by a map. So, what we did, is we went out there, we tied in the grass, we tied in features around the golf course, used some of the design stuff that they've done on these parcels and that's how we determine the boundary of the golf course. Until this map was recorded, there is not an actual legal description on the golf course. Minutes: Council member Rapson: So if I may clarify or embellish on what you said. So those that have been already mapped on the south end of that there have been developments around them with common elements, those have been mapped they pay tax on that portion of the golf course because there is no - everybody else's own something. This is just the undeveloped area up on top. It does not have a defined map of the golf course because they're paying tax on the entire parcels up there. Does that answer your question? Minutes: Dave Harvilak: My question is I am going to throw out some numbers here. Say the entire golf course is 10,000 acres, now I know it’s not, but just to say it's 10,000 acres and they want to sell the golf course, but by time they change things around, this 10,000 acres becomes 8,000 acres, which means Pulte is strapping us with 2,000 acres of HOA property now that we're going to have to pay for. So, my question is, is there a record of exactly how much land is encompassed in the golf course and if so I'd like to know that and also I would like to know when its sells if that same amount is sold versus cutting out some extra land for HOA to be strapped paying for? Thank you. Minutes: Mayor Litman: Remember, the golf course is from what I've been told is not even actually for sale, you are shopping it. Yeah, so that's kind of an unknown. Okay. Council what do you want to do with this? Minutes: Council member Ballweg: If we postpone this and allow you to have another meeting of the community would that hinder the sale? It's clear to me, but it' seems like you still have some residents that don't understand. I don't want to hinder your sale since you don’t have anything Minutes: Mr. Schippert: It could potentially. I don't know the impacts of that. I would have to get back with you on that. Minutes: Council member Withelder: Does Pulte Inc, or whatever your structure is, are they the owners of the golf course? Minutes: Mr. Schippert: It is a PN2 Inc owned golf course.
Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 35
45
Minutes: Council member Withelder: So it is a Pulte – Minutes: Mr. Schippert: It is a developer owned golf course. Minutes: Council member Withelder: So Troon is a management corporation that runs the gold course? Minutes: Mr. Schippert: Troon is the management company that we selected to be our are partner and manage it.
Council member Rapson moved to approve Tentative Map Case No. TM-17-001, subject to staff recommendations Council member Ballweg seconded the motion. Passed For: 5; Against: 0; Abstain: 0; Absent: 0
24)
Consideration of Approval of a Restaurant with Bar liquor license for VJ's at 551 W. Mesquite Blvd.
- Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Minutes: Mayor Litman read this item by its title and deferred to Richard Secrist. Minutes: Mr. Secrist. It is just an application for restaurant with bar license for John Corporation doing business as BJ's. Mr. John is not required to undergo a background check because he is already a license holder in the city. Recommend it be approved. Minutes: Mayor Litman opened up this item to Public Comment. There were no speakers.
Council member Rapson moved to Approve the Restaurant with Bar license for MV John Corporation dbat VJ's, 551 W. Mesquite Blvd. Council member Green seconded the motion. Passed For: 5; Against: 0; Abstain: 0; Absent: 0
Public Comments 25)
Public Comments
Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 36
46
Minutes: Mayor Litman opened up the meeting to final Public Comment. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: Anybody still watching on TV or the Sun City people who left, if during the process you feel when the maps are put out or whatever, please come back to the Council and voice your individual concerns, but as myself I just could not see a problem with going ahead with that map. So, but please keep the Council informed, bring any concerns you have to the building services and we will definitely be responsive to the concerns that you don't think they’re handling it properly.
Adjournment 26)
Adjournment
Minutes: Mayor Litman adjourned the meeting at 7:14 PM
________________________________ Allan S. Litman, Mayor
__________________________ Tracy E. Beck, City Clerk
Mesquite Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Tuesday, October 24, 2017 Page 37
47
Mesquite Technical Review Meeting Mesquite City Hall 10 E. Mesquite Blvd. Tuesday, November 7, 2017; 1:30 PM Minutes of a scheduled meeting of the City Council held Tuesday, November 7, 2017at 1:30 PM at City Hall. In attendance were Mayor Pro-Tem W. Geno Withelder, Council members David Ballweg, Rich Green, George Rapson and Brian Wursten. Also in attendance were City Manager Andy Barton, City Attorney Robert Sweetin, Assistant to the City Manager Aaron Baker, Development Services Director Richard Secrist, Police Chief Troy Tanner, City Clerk Tracy E. Beck, other city staff and four citizens. Mayor Pro-tem Withelder called the meeting to order and excused the absence of Mayor Allan S. Litman. (Note: This meeting was recorded and will be available in the City Clerk’s Office for one year). Below is an agenda of all items scheduled to be considered. Unless otherwise stated, items may be taken out of the order presented on the agenda at the discretion of the Mayor and Council. Additionally, the Mayor and Council may combine two or more agenda items for consideration, and may remove an item from the agenda or delay discussion relating to an item on the agenda at any time. Public comment is limited to three minutes per person.
Public Comments 1)
Public Comment
Minutes: Mayor Pro-tem Withelder opened up the meeting to Public Comments. There were no speakers.
Consent Agenda 2)
Consideration for approval of the Tuesday, November 14, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting agenda,; the October 17, 2017 Technical Review Meeting Minutes.
- Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Minutes: Mayor Pro-tem Withelder read this item by its title and asked if there were any questions or comments.
Mesquite Technical Review Meeting Minutes Tuesday, November 7, 2017; 1:30 PM Page 1
48
Minutes: Ms. Beck: I need to add an additional proclamation to the agenda. It is the General Aviation Appreciation Month, which is this month. I received this on Friday and I would like to add that on. Chief Tanner needs to add a Memorandum of Understanding and I'm sure he can give you an explanation as to that. Minutes: Chief Tanner: It is the IRS Task Force, we have been trying to get on that task force for almost a year and they called me today and gave us permission to be on there. It generates a lot of revenue for the forfeiture account. We have bought several vehicles this year through that account. The narcotics guys, the cars they have right now were funded through that forfeiture account. So we utilize that money we did shades on PD for the hot summers on both sides; detective vehicles; the bought computers with it, we bought hundreds of thousands of dollars of stuff the last four years and depleted that account. We pulled our guy from PIDA three years ago, in 2014, and pulled our guy off of the IRS task force so we are looking to put a guy back on the IRS task force which is higher revenue for the forfeiture side. She sent me the MOU today and we will get this done as soon as possible.
Council member Ballweg moved to add the two addition items to the Tuesday, November 14, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting agenda. Council member Wursten seconded the motion. Passed: 4; Against: 0; Abstain: 0; Absent: 0 3)
Consideration of approval of: a) Notification of Budget Transfers b) Notification of Budget Amendments c) Notification of Bills Paid d) Purchase Orders e) September 2017 Financial Statement
- Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Minutes: Mayor Pro-tem Withelder read this item by its title and asked if there were any questions or comments. There were no speakers. 4)
Consideration of Development Application Cycle Dates and Deadlines for 2017/2018.
- Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action
Mesquite Technical Review Meeting Minutes Tuesday, November 7, 2017; 1:30 PM Page 2
49
Minutes: Mayor Pro-tem Withelder read this item by its title and asked if there were any questions or comments. Minutes: Mr. Secrist: This is just our annual calendar application deadlines to get on the Council agenda for Development.
Special Item 5)
Recognition for Volunteer Honoree, Don Woodmancy.
Minutes: Mayor Pro-tem Withelder read this item by its title and asked if there were any questions or comments. Minutes: Mr. Barton: Don Woodmancy is retiring after giving us 12 years of excellent volunteer work. This is just a means of honoring his service. Minutes: Chief Tanner: Just a quick comment on that. I talked to him today. There is no official retirement date on that. We are trying to have him stay on as he possibly will. We just want to recognize him of course and the Mayor contacted me and Andy and he missed out a couple of times on the Distinguished Citizen. So, he hasn't given us a date yet, we 've been begging to stay on as long as he will. He handles all the events in the city and we appreciate that.
6)
Presentation from Southwest Gas regarding their upcoming SB151 Filing with the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada and other matters properly related thereto.
- Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Minutes: Mayor Pro-tem Withelder read this item by its title and asked are they having a representative here that night? Minutes: Mr. Baker: Yes they will. When I posted this agenda item it was “upcoming”. They filed this morning, so that has changed and I can include that filing in the packet. Minutes: Council member Green: The small document that it is. Minutes: Mr. Baker: It’s about 500 pages. Mesquite Technical Review Meeting Minutes Tuesday, November 7, 2017; 1:30 PM Page 3
50
Resolutions & Proclamations 7)
Proclamation - Small Business Saturday 2017
Minutes: Mayor Pro-tem Withelder read this item by its title and asked if there were any questions or comments. There were no speakers.
Department Reports 8)
Mayor's Reports
Minutes: Mayor Pro-tem Withelder read this item and was not sure if Mayor Litman will have anything. 9)
City Council and Staff Reports and Comments
Minutes: Mayor Pro-tem Withelder read this item and asked if anyone will have any items. Minutes: Council member Rapson: Not at the moment, but potentially.
Administrative Items 10)
Consideration of Approval of a Retail/Recreational Marijuana Dispensary, Recreational Cultivation and Recreational Production facility licenses.
- Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Minutes: Mayor Pro-tem Withelder read this item by its title and asked if there were any questions or comments. Minutes: Mr. Secrist: Deep Roots has been operating under a conditional business license and now this is the approval of their regular business license. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: We normally don't approve businesses licenses so is this part of the procedure for handling the conditional business licenses to rescind them, is this also rescinding the conditional?
Mesquite Technical Review Meeting Minutes Tuesday, November 7, 2017; 1:30 PM Page 4
51
Minutes Mr. Secrist: Yes, I guess so. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: Normally, we don't see business licenses. Minutes: Council member Rapson: I think at some point, if it was conditional, you would have to end the conditional. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: That is what I was saying this would be more ending the conditional not approving the new license. Maybe we need to do that in the conditional business licenses. I don't know if there is anything stipulating in there now to rescind it or not when we did the Ordinance. Minutes: Council member Rapson: Or just the simple language in the approval of the business license that this supersedes the previous. 11)
Consideration of Adoption of Bill No 530 as Ordinance 530, amending Mesquite Municipal Code, Title 2, Chapter 14 titled Medical Marijuana.
- Public Hearing - Discussion and Possible Action
Minutes: Mayor Pro-tem Withelder read this item by its title and stated that is a Public Hearing Item. Minutes: Mr. Secrist: That is correct. 12)
Consideration of Conditional Use Permit Case No. CUP-17-005, (Virgin River Event Tent), to allow the placement of a temporary event tent in an existing parking lot behind the Virgin River Casino at 100 East Pioneer Boulevard in the Hotel Tourist (HT) Zone.
- Public Hearing - Discussion and Possible Action Minutes: Mayor Pro-tem Withelder read this item by its title and deferred to Richard Secrist. Minutes: Mr. Secrist: Yes, it is basically a 10,000 square foot event facility, located directly behind the kitchen area of the Virgin River between the bowling alley and the old movie theaters. Mesquite Technical Review Meeting Minutes Tuesday, November 7, 2017; 1:30 PM Page 5
52
Minutes: Council member Ballweg: Are they going to have an entrance from inside the casino into it or is it outside? Minutes: Mr. Secrist: It's all outside but there will be an exit/entrance from the back side. Minutes: Council member Rapson: They do have a double door entry on the west side there. Minutes: Council member Ballweg: It is kind of nested it. Minutes: Council member Rapson: And the walk around to the arcade too.
Public Comments Minutes: Mayor Pro-tem Withelder opened up the meeting to final Public Comment. There were no speakers.
Adjournment 14)
Adjournment
Minutes: Mayor Pro-tem Withelder adjourned the meeting at 1:39 PM.
_______________________________
__________________________
W. Geno Withelder, Mayor Pro-tem
Tracy E. Beck, City Clerk
Mesquite Technical Review Meeting Minutes Tuesday, November 7, 2017; 1:30 PM Page 6
53
City Council Agenda Item 3 Submitted by: Dodie Melendez Submitting Department: Finance Meeting Date: November 28, 2017
Subject: Consideration of approval of: a) Notification of Budget Transfers b) Notification of Budget Amendments c) Notification of Bills Paid d) Purchase Orders
- Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action
Recommendation: Approval of Budget Transfers, Budget Amendments, Bills Paid, and Purchase Orders. Petitioner: David Empey – Financial Director/City Treasurer Is this a budgeted item? No Fiscal Impact: See Attached Background: See Attached
Attachments: Check Register - City Council Agenda 10.30.17 to 11.12.17.pdf Combined Budget Trsfrs & POs for Council.pdf
54
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017
1
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
Report Criteria: Report type: GL detail GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
10/17
10/30/2017
167544
Payee
12062 BINGHAM & SNOW LLP
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
092216
1
10-51-310
Total 167544: 10/17
10/30/2017
10/30/2017
167852
9642 IAEM
102416
1
10-56-230
10/30/2017
168865
8748 VIRGIN VALLEY VETERINARY H 232191
1
10-70-310
11/08/2017
171173
8810 CHIEF SUPPLY CORP
251905
1
10-54-610
10/30/2017
171248
4000 Nevada Secretary of State
100917
1
10-50-210
10/30/2017
56.59-
.00
.00
171255
14640 SUNRISE ENGINEERING, INC.
80215
1
10-76-610
.00
62.49-
10158 LAS VEGAS METRO POLICE DE
2017-001
1
10-54-700
Total 171284:
.00
62.49- V 62.49-
35.00-
35.00- V 35.00-
205.52-
.00 171284
56.59- V 56.59-
.00
Total 171255: 10/17
.00
335.00- V 335.00-
.00
Total 171248: 10/17
335.00-
.00
Total 171173: 11/17
.00
250.00- V 250.00-
.00
Total 168865: 10/17
250.00-
.00
Total 167852: 10/17
.00
205.52- V 205.52-
513.70
.00
513.70 513.70
11/17
11/01/2017
171285
8034 WALMART STORES, INC.
OCT 2017
1
10-41-620
.00
31.28
31.28
11/17
11/01/2017
171285
8034 WALMART STORES, INC.
OCT 2017
2
10-81-610
.00
19.76
19.76
11/17
11/01/2017
171285
8034 WALMART STORES, INC.
OCT 2017
3
10-81-610
.00
67.52
67.52
11/17
11/01/2017
171285
8034 WALMART STORES, INC.
OCT 2017
4
10-81-610
.00
98.57
98.57
11/17
11/01/2017
171285
8034 WALMART STORES, INC.
OCT 2017
5
10-54-240
.00
14.30
14.30
11/17
11/01/2017
171285
8034 WALMART STORES, INC.
OCT 2017
6
10-54-240
.00
17.84
17.84
11/17
11/01/2017
171285
8034 WALMART STORES, INC.
OCT 2017
7
10-54-240
.00
121.46
121.46
11/17
11/01/2017
171285
8034 WALMART STORES, INC.
OCT 2017
8
10-54-240
.00
12.96
12.96
55 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171285: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171286
13280 1000 BULBS.COM
W00664488
1
10-63-610
Total 171286: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00
383.69 117.64
.00 171287
13745 ACTION TARGET INC.
105379-1
1
10-54-250
Total 171287:
.00
117.64 117.64
3,700.00
.00
3,700.00 3,700.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171288
3655 AIRGAS USA LLC
9068185664
1
10-57-615
.00
135.50
11/17
11/06/2017
171288
3655 AIRGAS USA LLC
9068666637
1
10-57-615
.00
95.15
95.15
11/17
11/06/2017
171288
3655 AIRGAS USA LLC
9948266592
1
10-57-615
.00
255.82
255.82
11/17
11/06/2017
171288
3655 AIRGAS USA LLC
9948266593
1
10-57-615
.00
211.05
211.05
Total 171288: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171289
13419 ALMA RIVERA
102317
1
17-34-405
Total 171289:
.00
135.50
697.52 50.00
.00
50.00 50.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171290
8756 ALSCO
LSTG767000
1
10-66-610
.00
36.82
36.82
11/17
11/06/2017
171290
8756 ALSCO
LSTG767957
1
16-71-480
.00
97.94
97.94
11/17
11/06/2017
171290
8756 ALSCO
LSTG767966
1
10-66-610
.00
53.46
53.46
11/17
11/06/2017
171290
8756 ALSCO
LSTG768120
1
16-71-480
.00
11.22
11.22
11/17
11/06/2017
171290
8756 ALSCO
LSTG768899
1
10-66-610
.00
36.82
36.82
Total 171290: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171291
1050 AMERICAN SHOOTERS SUPPL
293632
1
10-54-610
Total 171291:
2
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
.00
236.26 83.90
.00
83.90 83.90
11/17
11/06/2017
171292
14353 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTOR
S098297167
1
10-66-245
.00
511.36
511.36
11/17
11/06/2017
171292
14353 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTOR
S098426429
1
10-66-245
.00
483.52
483.52
11/17
11/06/2017
171292
14353 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTOR
S098426430
1
10-66-245
.00
64.18
64.18
11/17
11/06/2017
171292
14353 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTOR
S098515393
1
10-66-245
.00
468.60
468.60
11/17
11/06/2017
171292
14353 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTOR
S098515399
1
10-66-245
.00
279.12
279.12
56 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
11/17
11/06/2017
171292
Payee
14353 AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTOR
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
S098598541
1
10-66-245
Total 171292: 11/17
11/06/2017
9764 AMY GALE
101717
1
10-48-620
Total 171293: 11/17
11/06/2017
11/06/2017
171294
11509 ANIMAL CARE EQUIP & SVC
56755
1
10-70-610
11/06/2017
.00
.00
171295
15600 ANN M MURPHY
OCT 2017
1
17-80-310
.00
30.00
15599 ANNA KATHERINA BULLOCH
OCT 2017
1
17-80-310
Total 171296:
.00
30.00 30.00
196.65
196.65 196.65
464.00
.00 171296
350.32 2,157.10
.00
Total 171295: 11/17
350.32
.00
Total 171294: 11/17
.00 .00
171293
464.00 464.00
1,086.00
.00
1,086.00 1,086.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171297
11104 ASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT
AMG 1120
1
83-82-010
.00
3,722.73
3,722.73
11/17
11/06/2017
171297
11104 ASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT
AMG1146
1
83-81-010
.00
1,625.91
1,625.91
Total 171297: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171298
10454 AUTO AIR & MORE INC.
219926
1
10-66-250
Total 171298: 11/17
11/06/2017
10955 AZ WASTEWATER IND. INC.
36506
1
52-40-620
Total 171299: 11/17
11/06/2017
11/06/2017
279.00
.00
171300
15433 BATTLE BORN GRAPHIX
3274
1
10-70-610
.00
3,265.00
13237 BDP INDUSTRIES INC.
9346
1
52-40-610
.00
3,265.00 3,265.00
685.00
.00 171301
279.00 279.00
.00
Total 171300: 11/17
.00
5,348.64
.00 171299
3
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
685.00 685.00
1,471.23
1,471.23
57 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171301:
.00
1,471.23
11/17
11/06/2017
171302
14265 BEST DEAL SPRINGS, INC.
3007077
1
10-66-250
.00
8.00
8.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171302
14265 BEST DEAL SPRINGS, INC.
3007251
1
10-66-480
.00
371.98
371.98
Total 171302: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171303
12190 BETTY KING
OCT 2107
1
17-80-310
Total 171303: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00
379.98 896.25
.00 171304
15892 CAROL DIETTER
102617
1
16-71-230
Total 171304:
.00
896.25 896.25
40.00
.00
40.00 40.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171305
4755 CASELLE INC.
83798
1
52-40-310
.00
35.00
35.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171305
4755 CASELLE INC.
83798
2
10-46-310
.00
210.00
210.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171305
4755 CASELLE INC.
83798
3
10-54-310
.00
50.00
50.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171305
4755 CASELLE INC.
83798
4
10-57-310
.00
50.00
50.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171305
4755 CASELLE INC.
83798
5
10-46-310
.00
402.08
402.08
11/17
11/06/2017
171305
4755 CASELLE INC.
83798
6
83-81-610
.00
244.12
244.12
11/17
11/06/2017
171305
4755 CASELLE INC.
83798
7
83-82-610
.00
244.12
244.12
11/17
11/06/2017
171305
4755 CASELLE INC.
83798
8
52-40-310
.00
545.68
545.68
Total 171305:
.00
1,781.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171306
14765 CCS PRESENTATION SYSTEMS
15863
1
10-47-260
.00
4,839.00
4,839.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171306
14765 CCS PRESENTATION SYSTEMS
15864
1
10-47-260
.00
1,059.00
1,059.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171306
14765 CCS PRESENTATION SYSTEMS
15865
1
10-47-260
.00
650.00
650.00
Total 171306: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171307
8810 CHIEF SUPPLY CORP
268552
1
10-54-610
Total 171307: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00
6,548.00 296.46
.00 171308
14345 CITY OF MESQUITE - ISDD
102317
1
90-26109
4
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
.00
296.46 296.46
4,000.00
4,000.00
58 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171308:
.00
4,000.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171309
1608 CLARK CO. DEPT. OF FINANCE
OCT 17
1
10-23240
.00
9,272.50
9,272.50
11/17
11/06/2017
171309
1608 CLARK CO. DEPT. OF FINANCE
SEPTEMBE
1
10-23130
.00
16,993.07
16,993.07
Total 171309:
.00
26,265.57
11/17
11/06/2017
171310
8634 CLARK CO. TREASURER
SEPTEMBE
1
10-23140
.00
16,993.07
16,993.07
11/17
11/06/2017
171310
8634 CLARK CO. TREASURER
SEPTEMBE
1
10-23140
.00
10,620.67
10,620.67
Total 171310: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171311
8793 CLASSY CLOSETS
61978-1
1
15-60-740
Total 171311: 11/17
11/06/2017
1634 CONNIE MORTENSEN
2017-02
1
10-66-610
Total 171312: 11/17
11/06/2017
11/06/2017
171313
15886 DANIEL RHODES
102317
1
17-34-405
11/06/2017
171314
15891 DELRAY'S AUTO BODY LLC
17706
1
10-63-610
11/06/2017
171315
11883 DESERT RADIOLOGISTS
82317
1
10-57-320
11/06/2017
.00
.00
.00
171316
10588 DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS PLUS
155681
1
10-49-250
.00
50.00
12119 DOROTHEA K. MELENDEZ
103017
1
10-46-230
.00
50.00 50.00
400.00
400.00 400.00
42.01
42.01 42.01
632.45
.00 171317
105.00 105.00
.00
Total 171316: 11/17
105.00
.00
Total 171315: 11/17
.00
982.64 982.64
.00
Total 171314: 11/17
982.64
.00
Total 171313: 11/17
.00
27,613.74
.00 171312
5
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
632.45 632.45
39.00
39.00
59 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171317:
.00
39.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171318
1965 DREXEL MEACHAM
101717
1
15-60-330
.00
335.14
335.14
11/17
11/06/2017
171318
1965 DREXEL MEACHAM
102417
1
10-51-240
.00
49.00
49.00
Total 171318: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171319
11887 EMERGENCY VEHICLE SYSTE
855
1
10-54-250
Total 171319: 11/17
11/06/2017
14939 FABIAN LEE
102317
1
17-34-405
Total 171320: 11/17
11/06/2017
11/06/2017
349.00
.00
171321
15887 FALCON RIDGE PARKWAY, LLC
103117
1
10-32-500
.00
50.00
15888 FERNO WASHINGTON, INC
816521
1
10-57-250
Total 171322:
.00
50.00 50.00
600.00
.00 171322
349.00 349.00
.00
Total 171321: 11/17
.00
384.14
.00 171320
600.00 600.00
417.88
.00
417.88 417.88
11/17
11/06/2017
171323
8643 FINAL DETAILS
41193
1
10-81-620
.00
16.00
16.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171323
8643 FINAL DETAILS
41206
1
10-57-610
.00
1,386.00
1,386.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171323
8643 FINAL DETAILS
41207
1
10-57-610
.00
715.00
715.00
Total 171323: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171324
13960 FINANCIAL CONCEPTS
103117
1
17-34-405
Total 171324: 11/17
11/06/2017
14274 FRESHAIRE/AIREMASTER
77627
1
10-81-610
Total 171325: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00
2,117.00 25.00
.00 171325
.00
10499 FRITO LAY INC.
85964461
1
90-26113
.00
25.00 25.00
70.00
.00 171326
6
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
70.00 70.00
348.32
348.32
60 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171326: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171327
15505 GINA R SANDOVAL
OCT 2017
1
17-80-310
Total 171327: 11/17
11/06/2017
12100 GOLF FORE KIDS
102517
1
10-81-480
Total 171328: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00
348.32 54.00
.00 171328
.00
10783 GOT BUGS?
21320
1
10-63-310
Total 171329:
.00
54.00 54.00
150.00
.00 171329
150.00 150.00
400.00
.00
400.00 400.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171330
2245 GRAINGER, INC.
9577206460
1
10-66-250
.00
21.85
11/17
11/06/2017
171330
2245 GRAINGER, INC.
9578432826
1
10-63-610
.00
8.80
8.80
11/17
11/06/2017
171330
2245 GRAINGER, INC.
9582994712
1
10-66-250
.00
56.24
56.24
Total 171330: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171331
15885 GUADALUPE TRUJILLO
102317
1
17-34-405
Total 171331:
.00
21.85
86.89 50.00
.00
50.00 50.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171332
2452 HIGH DESERT SUPPLY
IN00174282
1
10-66-250
.00
46.71
46.71
11/17
11/06/2017
171332
2452 HIGH DESERT SUPPLY
IN00174418
1
10-66-250
.00
520.58
520.58
11/17
11/06/2017
171332
2452 HIGH DESERT SUPPLY
IN00174546
1
10-66-250
.00
177.88
177.88
11/17
11/06/2017
171332
2452 HIGH DESERT SUPPLY
IN00174547
1
52-40-610
.00
54.32
54.32
Total 171332: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171333
2500 HUGHES OIL
15924
1
52-40-250
Total 171333: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00
799.49 514.08
.00 171334
2657 INTERSTATE BATTERY SO. UT
490084748
1
10-66-250
7
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
.00
514.08 514.08
549.70
549.70
61 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171334: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171335
2654 INTERSTATE FIRE PROTECTIO
172010-3
1
10-66-250
Total 171335: 11/17
11/06/2017
8009 INTERWEST REBUILDERS, INC.
51286
1
10-66-250
Total 171336: 11/17
11/06/2017
11/06/2017
171337
14040 IRON MOUNTAIN CLEANERS
235794
1
10-54-620
11/06/2017
.00
.00
171338
15880 IRWIN MADSON
907
1
15-23200
.00
725.00
14908 ITERIS INC
1027857
1
10-65-610
Total 171339:
.00
725.00 725.00
33.84
33.84 33.84
200.00
.00 171339
180.00 180.00
.00
Total 171338: 11/17
180.00
.00
Total 171337: 11/17
.00
549.70
.00 171336
200.00 200.00
200.00
.00
200.00 200.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171340
15504 ITSAVVY LLC
00985827
1
10-47-260
.00
678.98
678.98
11/17
11/06/2017
171340
15504 ITSAVVY LLC
00986983
1
10-47-260
.00
122.96
122.96
11/17
11/06/2017
171340
15504 ITSAVVY LLC
00988501
1
10-47-240
.00
79.74
79.74
11/17
11/06/2017
171340
15504 ITSAVVY LLC
00988623
1
10-47-240
.00
107.48
107.48
Total 171340:
.00
989.16
11/17
11/06/2017
171341
13293 JAMES E. GUESMAN
101717
1
10-51-310
.00
250.00
250.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171341
13293 JAMES E. GUESMAN
102317
1
10-51-310
.00
200.00
200.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171341
13293 JAMES E. GUESMAN
102317A
1
10-51-310
.00
350.00
350.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171341
13293 JAMES E. GUESMAN
102417
1
10-51-310
.00
325.00
325.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171341
13293 JAMES E. GUESMAN
103117
1
10-51-310
.00
200.00
200.00
Total 171341: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171342
14171 JESSICA BUCKLIN
OCT 2017
1
17-80-310
8
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
.00
1,325.00 1,151.10
1,151.10
62 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171342:
.00
1,151.10
11/17
11/06/2017
171343
13999 JO ANNE F SMITH
OCT 2017
1
17-80-310
.00
128.00
128.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171343
13999 JO ANNE F SMITH
OCTOBER 2
1
16-71-620
.00
238.00
238.00
Total 171343:
.00
366.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171344
14347 KIM OTERO
102317
1
10-54-230
.00
206.57
206.57
11/17
11/06/2017
171344
14347 KIM OTERO
102317
2
10-54-240
.00
17.86
17.86
11/17
11/06/2017
171344
14347 KIM OTERO
110117
1
10-54-230
.00
80.00
80.00
Total 171344:
.00
304.43
11/17
11/06/2017
171345
10984 KOKOPELLI LANDSCAPING
97573
1
10-76-610
.00
1,540.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171345
10984 KOKOPELLI LANDSCAPING
97699
1
10-76-610
.00
268.00
268.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171345
10984 KOKOPELLI LANDSCAPING
97846
1
10-76-610
.00
1,030.00
1,030.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171345
10984 KOKOPELLI LANDSCAPING
97927
1
10-76-610
.00
1,730.40
1,730.40
11/17
11/06/2017
171345
10984 KOKOPELLI LANDSCAPING
98034
1
10-76-310
.00
1,100.00
1,100.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171345
10984 KOKOPELLI LANDSCAPING
98044
1
10-76-310
.00
1,995.00
1,995.00
Total 171345: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171346
11958 KRISSY THORNTON
102617
1
16-71-620
Total 171346: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00
8349 L & M WELDING L.C.
141791
1
52-40-610
Total 171347:
.00
1,540.00
7,663.40 64.30
.00 171347
64.30 64.30
75.00
.00
75.00 75.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171348
3050 L V REVIEW-JOURNAL
0000945981
1
10-44-220
.00
111.36
111.36
11/17
11/06/2017
171348
3050 L V REVIEW-JOURNAL
0000945983
1
10-44-220
.00
69.12
69.12
Total 171348:
9
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
.00
180.48
11/17
11/06/2017
171349
15053 LAMPPOST ELECTRIC LLC
17-008
1
10-47-240
.00
160.00
160.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171349
15053 LAMPPOST ELECTRIC LLC
CITY 17-007
1
10-81-650
.00
1,533.00
1,533.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171349
15053 LAMPPOST ELECTRIC LLC
CITY 17-009
1
10-81-650
.00
650.00
650.00
63 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
11/17
11/06/2017
171349
Payee
15053 LAMPPOST ELECTRIC LLC
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
CITY 17-009
1
10-81-310
Total 171349:
.00
1,690.00
.00
1,690.00 4,033.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171350
9979 LARRY LEMIEUX
110517
1
12-87-310
.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171350
9979 LARRY LEMIEUX
110517
2
12-87-610
.00
28.00-
28.00-
11/17
11/06/2017
171350
9979 LARRY LEMIEUX
110517
3
12-87-695
.00
222.64-
222.64-
11/17
11/06/2017
171350
9979 LARRY LEMIEUX
110517WC
1
12-87-610
.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171350
9979 LARRY LEMIEUX
110617
1
12-87-310
.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171350
9979 LARRY LEMIEUX
110617
2
12-87-695
.00
305.21-
305.21-
11/17
11/06/2017
171350
9979 LARRY LEMIEUX
110617WC
1
12-87-610
.00
50.92-
50.92-
Total 171350:
1,000.90
50.924,671.60
.00
1,000.90
50.924,671.60
5,014.81
11/17
11/06/2017
171351
3000 LAS VEGAS CONVENTION AUT
SEPTEMBE
1
10-23115
.00
8,496.53
8,496.53
11/17
11/06/2017
171351
3000 LAS VEGAS CONVENTION AUT
SEPTEMBE
1
10-23100
.00
67,972.27
67,972.27
Total 171351: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171352
3030 LAS VEGAS METRO POLICE DE
910
1
15-21340
Total 171352:
.00
76,468.80 336.00
.00
336.00 336.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171353
14034 LAW ENFORCEMENT COORDIN
101217
1
10-54-210
.00
150.00
150.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171353
14034 LAW ENFORCEMENT COORDIN
101217
2
10-54-210
.00
75.00
75.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171353
14034 LAW ENFORCEMENT COORDIN
101217
3
10-54-210
.00
75.00
75.00
Total 171353: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171354
15563 LIFE LINE EMERGENCY VEHICL 007266
1
10-66-250
Total 171354: 11/17
11/06/2017
14207 LUNAS CONSTRUCTION CLEA
T-31482
1
10-66-245
Total 171355: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00
300.00 476.04
.00 171355
.00
12972 MANDY MUIR
OCT 17
1
17-80-310
.00
476.04 476.04
80.00
.00 171356
10
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
80.00 80.00
186.00
186.00
64 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171356: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171357
14407 MAQUADE CHESLEY
103117
1
10-54-230
Total 171357: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00
186.00 1,353.68
.00 171358
13504 MASTER CRAFTSMEN
216
1
10-66-250
Total 171358:
.00
1,353.68 1,353.68
525.00
.00
525.00 525.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171359
3276 MASTERTECH SECURITY SERV 289615
1
12-87-610
.00
35.71
35.71
11/17
11/06/2017
171359
3276 MASTERTECH SECURITY SERV 290000
1
10-81-310
.00
21.95
21.95
11/17
11/06/2017
171359
3276 MASTERTECH SECURITY SERV 290000
2
10-55-610
.00
21.95
21.95
11/17
11/06/2017
171359
3276 MASTERTECH SECURITY SERV 290000
3
10-57-310
.00
38.90
38.90
11/17
11/06/2017
171359
3276 MASTERTECH SECURITY SERV 290000
4
10-63-310
.00
37.90
37.90
11/17
11/06/2017
171359
3276 MASTERTECH SECURITY SERV 290000
5
10-66-610
.00
16.95
16.95
11/17
11/06/2017
171359
3276 MASTERTECH SECURITY SERV 290000
6
10-65-610
.00
21.95
21.95
11/17
11/06/2017
171359
3276 MASTERTECH SECURITY SERV 290000
7
10-70-610
.00
18.95
18.95
11/17
11/06/2017
171359
3276 MASTERTECH SECURITY SERV 290000
8
10-76-310
.00
18.95
18.95
11/17
11/06/2017
171359
3276 MASTERTECH SECURITY SERV 290000
9
10-81-310
.00
59.85
59.85
11/17
11/06/2017
171359
3276 MASTERTECH SECURITY SERV 290000
10
10-82-620
.00
21.95
21.95
11/17
11/06/2017
171359
3276 MASTERTECH SECURITY SERV 290000
11
16-71-290
.00
38.90
38.90
11/17
11/06/2017
171359
3276 MASTERTECH SECURITY SERV 290000
12
52-40-310
.00
16.95
16.95
11/17
11/06/2017
171359
3276 MASTERTECH SECURITY SERV 290000
13
10-38-701
.00
21.95
21.95
Total 171359: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171360
696 MAXINE SHAW
OCT 2017
1
17-80-310
Total 171360: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00
392.81 320.00
.00 171361
3313 MCCANDLESS INTERNATIONAL
X100623106:
1
52-40-250
Total 171361:
11
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
.00
320.00 320.00
167.00
.00
167.00 167.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171362
11236 MEADOW GOLD DAIRIES
59610501
1
16-71-480
.00
242.30
242.30
11/17
11/06/2017
171362
11236 MEADOW GOLD DAIRIES
59610575
1
16-71-480
.00
181.24
181.24
65 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171362: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171363
9415 MESQUITE DENTAL
DU0025
1
10-55-620
Total 171363:
.00
423.54 1,021.00
.00
1,021.00 1,021.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171364
11650 MESQUITE FORD
387012
1
10-66-250
.00
53.41
53.41
11/17
11/06/2017
171364
11650 MESQUITE FORD
387031
1
10-66-250
.00
85.50
85.50
11/17
11/06/2017
171364
11650 MESQUITE FORD
387092
1
10-66-250
.00
16.56
16.56
11/17
11/06/2017
171364
11650 MESQUITE FORD
387094 CR
1
10-66-250
.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171364
11650 MESQUITE FORD
387174
1
10-66-250
.00
Total 171364: 11/17
11/06/2017
14391 MESQUITE REGIONAL BUSINE
2017-32
1
43-40-310
Total 171365: 11/17
11/06/2017
11/06/2017
171366
15893 Mesquite Reserve LLC & Legacy
110217
1
90-26100
11/06/2017
171367
15890 MIREYA PEREZ
110117
1
17-34-405
11/06/2017
15,833.33
.00
.00
171368
13651 MIRIAM C FLORES
103117
1
10-51-310
.00
68,110.30
14526 MOAPA VALLEY TELEPHONE
102617
1
10-47-310
Total 171369:
.00
68,110.30 68,110.30
50.00
50.00 50.00
500.00
.00 171369
15,833.33 15,833.33
.00
Total 171368: 11/17
.00
8.28126.97 274.16
.00
Total 171367: 11/17
126.97
.00
Total 171366: 11/17
8.28-
.00 171365
12
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
500.00 500.00
199.78
.00
199.78 199.78
11/17
11/06/2017
171370
3580 MORCON INDUSTRIAL SPECIA
0017998-IN
1
10-57-610
.00
12.93
11/17
11/06/2017
171370
3580 MORCON INDUSTRIAL SPECIA
0018142-IN
1
10-63-610
.00
63.78
12.93 63.78
11/17
11/06/2017
171370
3580 MORCON INDUSTRIAL SPECIA
0018143-IN
1
10-63-610
.00
167.08
167.08
11/17
11/06/2017
171370
3580 MORCON INDUSTRIAL SPECIA
0018144-IN
1
10-63-610
.00
3,213.76
3,213.76
66 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
11/17
11/06/2017
171370
3580 MORCON INDUSTRIAL SPECIA
0018166-IN
1
10-66-610
.00
65.53
65.53
11/17
11/06/2017
171370
3580 MORCON INDUSTRIAL SPECIA
0018190-IN
1
10-63-610
.00
178.54
178.54
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171370: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171371
15879 MOTO ZOO POWERSPORTS
46214
1
10-66-250
Total 171371:
.00
3,701.62 1,005.56
.00
1,005.56 1,005.56
11/17
11/06/2017
171372
3653 MOUNT OLYMPUS WATERS, IN
10219318 10
1
10-54-240
.00
66.50
11/17
11/06/2017
171372
3653 MOUNT OLYMPUS WATERS, IN
10219327 10
1
12-87-610
.00
25.95
25.95
11/17
11/06/2017
171372
3653 MOUNT OLYMPUS WATERS, IN
10219327 10
2
10-49-240
.00
113.82
113.82
11/17
11/06/2017
171372
3653 MOUNT OLYMPUS WATERS, IN
10219327 10
3
10-41-610
.00
60.20
60.20
11/17
11/06/2017
171372
3653 MOUNT OLYMPUS WATERS, IN
4898481102
1
10-51-610
.00
21.70
21.70
Total 171372:
.00
66.50
288.17
11/17
11/06/2017
171373
14058 MTM CLEANING SERVICE
289
1
10-63-310
.00
1,080.00
1,080.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171373
14058 MTM CLEANING SERVICE
290
1
10-63-310
.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
Total 171373:
.00
2,280.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171374
13039 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY
73512426
1
10-66-250
.00
53.57
53.57
11/17
11/06/2017
171374
13039 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY
73512824
1
10-66-250
.00
228.44
228.44
11/17
11/06/2017
171374
13039 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY
73512875 C
1
10-66-250
.00
Total 171374: 11/17
11/06/2017
10891 NICHOLE BURNSIDE
OCT 2017
1
17-80-310
Total 171375: 11/17
11/06/2017
11/06/2017
.00
171376
14685 PASTPERFECT SOFTWARE, IN
2017PPO-35
1
10-82-620
.00
384.00
14477 POLARIS WORLD
311617
1
10-66-250
.00
384.00 384.00
360.00
.00 171377
11.73270.28
.00
Total 171376: 11/17
11.73-
.00 171375
13
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
360.00 360.00
146.26
146.26
67 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171377:
.00
146.26
11/17
11/06/2017
171378
10243 PRECISION AGGREGATE PRO
43756
1
10-76-610
.00
421.57
421.57
11/17
11/06/2017
171378
10243 PRECISION AGGREGATE PRO
43757
1
10-76-610
.00
686.21
686.21
Total 171378: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171379
15304 PREMIER PROPERTY MGMT O
102317
1
10-32-100
Total 171379: 11/17
11/06/2017
15189 PUMP MANAGEMENT COMPAN
306
1
52-40-620
Total 171380: 11/17
11/06/2017
11/06/2017
45.84
.00
171381
4458 RAINBOW SIGN & BANNER
102124
1
10-66-250
.00
2,039.17
15878 RANDAL SNOW
906
1
15-23200
Total 171382:
.00
2,039.17 2,039.17
104.46
.00 171382
45.84 45.84
.00
Total 171381: 11/17
.00
1,107.78
.00 171380
14
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
104.46 104.46
460.00
.00
460.00 460.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
1
12-87-290
.00
118.04
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
2
52-40-290
.00
82.79
118.04 82.79
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
3
10-49-290
.00
1,048.94
1,048.94
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
4
10-47-310
.00
1,209.54
1,209.54
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
5
10-47-310
.00
444.16
444.16
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
6
10-76-284
.00
56.12
56.12
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
7
10-81-284
.00
83.37
83.37
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
8
90-26113
.00
56.12
56.12
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
9
10-50-240
.00
157.50
157.50
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
10
10-54-284
.00
56.12
56.12
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
11
10-51-290
.00
30.82
30.82
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
12
10-82-290
.00
29.78
29.78
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
13
10-57-290
.00
125.81
125.81
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
14
10-60-290
.00
147.86
147.86
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
OCTOBER 1
15
10-76-290
.00
882.85
882.85
68 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
11/17
11/06/2017
171383
Payee
4500 RELIANCE CONNECTS
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
OCTOBER 1
16
10-54-290
Total 171383: 11/17
11/06/2017
8598 RMT EQUIPMENT
P00258
1
10-76-610
Total 171384: 11/17
11/06/2017
11/06/2017
171385
10148 RUTH KOLHOSS
100517
1
10-51-310
11/06/2017
171386
13715 SALT LAKE WHOLESALE SPOR
41371
1
10-54-260
11/06/2017
281.70
.00
.00
171387
12951 SATCOM GLOBAL LTD.
AS10170152
1
10-57-290
.00
100.00
4750 SCHOLZEN PRODUCTS CO., IN
6239204-00
1
10-65-610
Total 171388:
.00
100.00 100.00
313.20
313.20 313.20
13.30
.00 171388
281.70 281.70
.00
Total 171387: 11/17
.00
965.61 5,495.43
.00
Total 171386: 11/17
965.61
.00
Total 171385: 11/17
.00 .00
171384
13.30 13.30
131.67
.00
131.67 131.67
11/17
11/06/2017
171389
8117 SCOTT TAYLOR
101517
1
14-54-230
.00
48.00
48.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171389
8117 SCOTT TAYLOR
103117
1
10-54-230
.00
18.85
18.85
11/17
11/06/2017
171389
8117 SCOTT TAYLOR
111517
1
10-54-230
.00
61.00
61.00
Total 171389: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171390
9467 SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES
PPDINV0008
1
90-26113
Total 171390:
.00
127.85 435.60
.00
435.60 435.60
11/17
11/06/2017
171391
15836 SEVIER VALLEY OIL CO. INC.
135486S
1
10-66-255
.00
8,050.98
8,050.98
11/17
11/06/2017
171391
15836 SEVIER VALLEY OIL CO. INC.
135502S
1
10-66-255
.00
11,627.30
11,627.30
Total 171391:
15
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
.00
19,678.28
69 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
11/17
11/06/2017
171392
Payee
15488 SHANIA GALINDO
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
102817
1
10-54-310
Total 171392: 11/17
11/06/2017
12196 SHERWIN- WILLIAMS STORE 85 2948-3
1
10-65-610
Total 171393: 11/17
11/06/2017
11/06/2017
100.00
.00
171394
12788 SILVER STATE TRUCK & TRAIL
VP410322
1
10-66-250
.00
29.99
13011 SILVERSTATE ANALYTICAL LA
LV213974
1
52-40-310
Total 171395:
.00
29.99 29.99
8.01
.00 171395
100.00 100.00
.00
Total 171394: 11/17
.00 .00
171393
8.01 8.01
453.00
.00
453.00 453.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171396
14502 SIMPLIFILE
NVT7G8-103
1
10-44-310
.00
126.00
126.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171396
14502 SIMPLIFILE
NVT7G8-103
2
10-38-900
.00
42.00
42.00
Total 171396: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171397
11761 SPENCER LEWIS
110117
1
10-57-610
Total 171397: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00
168.00 250.99
.00 171398
15852 SPLIT DECISION HOLDINGS, LL
60019
1
11-65-740
Total 171398:
.00
250.99 250.99
16,120.73
.00
16,120.73 16,120.73
11/17
11/06/2017
171399
10591 SPRINKLER SUPPLY-ST. GEOR
M92083
1
10-76-610
.00
580.07
580.07
11/17
11/06/2017
171399
10591 SPRINKLER SUPPLY-ST. GEOR
M93214
1
10-76-610
.00
1,882.77
1,882.77
Total 171399:
16
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
.00
2,462.84
11/17
11/06/2017
171400
8989 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
3348962837
1
10-81-240
.00
19.82
11/17
11/06/2017
171400
8989 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
3353208893
1
10-81-240
.00
.03
19.82 .03
11/17
11/06/2017
171400
8989 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
3356399564
1
10-60-610
.00
3.40
3.40
11/17
11/06/2017
171400
8989 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
3356825606
1
10-76-610
.00
80.84
80.84
11/17
11/06/2017
171400
8989 STAPLES ADVANTAGE
8046970300
1
10-43-240
.00
28.56
28.56
70 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171400:
.00
132.65
11/17
11/06/2017
171401
1800 STATE OF NEVADA
SEPT 17
1
10-23120
.00
6,372.40
6,372.40
11/17
11/06/2017
171401
1800 STATE OF NEVADA
SEPT 2017
1
10-23145
.00
50,979.50
50,979.50
Total 171401:
.00
57,351.90
11/17
11/06/2017
171402
4000 STATE OF NEVADA
OCTOBER
1
15-21350
.00
60.00
60.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171402
4000 STATE OF NEVADA
OCTOBER
1
15-21320
.00
8,072.00
8,072.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171402
4000 STATE OF NEVADA
OCTOBER
1
15-21330
.00
575.00
575.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171402
4000 STATE OF NEVADA
OCTOBER
1
15-21360
.00
868.00
868.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171402
4000 STATE OF NEVADA
OCTOBER 1
1
15-23200
.00
375.00
375.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171402
4000 STATE OF NEVADA
OCTOBER 1
1
15-21370
.00
600.00
600.00
Total 171402: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171403
8579 STEPHEN WADE AUTO CENTE
5360741
1
10-66-480
Total 171403: 11/17
11/06/2017
14500 STOTZ EQUIPMENT
P18902
1
10-66-250
Total 171404: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00
10,550.00 44.30
.00 171404
.00
1079 SUN BADGE COMPANY
377288
1
10-54-610
Total 171405:
.00
44.30 44.30
144.99
.00 171405
144.99 144.99
244.00
.00
244.00 244.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171406
5224 SUNRISE ENVIRONMENTAL
80215
1
10-76-610
.00
205.52
205.52
11/17
11/06/2017
171406
5224 SUNRISE ENVIRONMENTAL
80330
1
10-70-610
.00
364.45
364.45
Total 171406:
17
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
.00
569.97
11/17
11/06/2017
171407
15170 SYNCB/AMAZON
CEPRGVLGJ
1
10-54-610
.00
92.33
11/17
11/06/2017
171407
15170 SYNCB/AMAZON
CFHKMJRLX
1
10-54-610
.00
24.38
92.33 24.38
11/17
11/06/2017
171407
15170 SYNCB/AMAZON
CUEZGWZQ
1
10-54-250
.00
606.00
606.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171407
15170 SYNCB/AMAZON
CVZSDSIRP
1
10-47-240
.00
27.99
27.99
11/17
11/06/2017
171407
15170 SYNCB/AMAZON
CZCUZOFO
1
10-57-610
.00
521.93
521.93
71 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
11/17
11/06/2017
171407
15170 SYNCB/AMAZON
KTGGXDQY
1
10-54-240
.00
73.39
73.39
11/17
11/06/2017
171407
15170 SYNCB/AMAZON
UHFBLMOB
1
10-54-610
.00
167.85
167.85
11/17
11/06/2017
171407
15170 SYNCB/AMAZON
ZGCSLZVKV
1
10-47-240
.00
25.99
25.99
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171407: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171408
13211 SYSCO LAS VEGAS, INC
117324123
1
16-71-480
Total 171408: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00
1,539.86 1,272.67
.00 171409
15882 TAMMY LAMPH
908
1
15-23200
Total 171409:
.00
1,272.67 1,272.67
880.00
.00
880.00 880.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171410
9127 TEAMSTERS SEC. FUND #14
DEC 17
1
10-22500
.00
83,300.00
83,300.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171410
9127 TEAMSTERS SEC. FUND #14
DEC 2017
1
10-22500
.00
66,640.00
66,640.00
Total 171410: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171411
14215 TERRIE ELAINE MCARTHUR
OCT 2017
1
17-80-310
Total 171411: 11/17
11/06/2017
15393 TESTNOTICE
0001234
1
15-40-420
Total 171412: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00
149,940.00 480.00
.00 171412
.00
5290 THATCHER COMPANY
5032749
1
52-40-480
Total 171413:
.00
480.00 480.00
45.00
.00 171413
18
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
45.00 45.00
2,872.03
.00
2,872.03 2,872.03
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
007556
1
10-66-250
.00
502.55
502.55
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
007624
1
10-66-250
.00
13.94
13.94
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
007672
1
10-63-610
.00
44.97
44.97
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
007761
1
10-66-250
.00
219.86
219.86
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
008020
1
10-66-250
.00
1.98
1.98
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
008046
1
10-66-250
.00
161.02
161.02
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
008138
1
10-66-250
.00
31.96
31.96
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
008162
1
10-66-250
.00
12.33
12.33
72 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
008198
1
10-66-250
.00
33.83
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
008274
1
10-66-250
.00
24.33
24.33
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
008437
1
10-66-250
.00
328.54
328.54
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
008540
1
10-66-480
.00
29.04
29.04
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
008840
1
10-66-480
.00
71.04
71.04
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
008902
1
10-66-250
.00
19.37
19.37
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
008915 CR
1
10-66-250
.00
53.76-
53.76-
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
008936
1
10-66-250
.00
6.29
6.29
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
008937
1
10-66-250
.00
40.54
40.54
11/17
11/06/2017
171414
15287 TINK'S SUPERIOR AUTO PART
008938
1
10-66-250
.00
11.85
11.85
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171414: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171415
13704 TONY TERRY, LTD
102317
1
10-51-310
Total 171415: 11/17
11/06/2017
15889 TRAVELERS
000528090
1
10-50-310
Total 171416: 11/17
11/06/2017
11/06/2017
260.00
.00
171417
5581 TROY TANNER
111517
1
10-54-230
.00
2,912.00
10812 TWIN VALLEY EMERG PHYSICI
100117
1
10-55-620
Total 171418:
.00
2,912.00 2,912.00
61.00
.00 171418
260.00 260.00
.00
Total 171417: 11/17
.00
33.83
1,499.68
.00 171416
61.00 61.00
1,888.00
.00
1,888.00 1,888.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171419
8770 U.S. FOODSERVICE - L.V. DIV.
5108989
1
10-55-620
.00
547.34
547.34
11/17
11/06/2017
171419
8770 U.S. FOODSERVICE - L.V. DIV.
5138841
1
16-71-480
.00
1,405.32
1,405.32
11/17
11/06/2017
171419
8770 U.S. FOODSERVICE - L.V. DIV.
5243176
1
10-55-620
.00
695.03
695.03
11/17
11/06/2017
171419
8770 U.S. FOODSERVICE - L.V. DIV.
5272225
1
16-71-480
.00
1,674.88
1,674.88
11/17
11/06/2017
171419
8770 U.S. FOODSERVICE - L.V. DIV.
5272226
1
16-71-480
.00
223.14
223.14
11/17
11/06/2017
171419
8770 U.S. FOODSERVICE - L.V. DIV.
5403966
1
16-71-480
.00
1,362.81
1,362.81
Total 171419: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171420
5661 UNIFORM CENTER II
84069-1
1
10-57-610
19
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
.00
5,908.52 48.97
48.97
73 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171420: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171421
5616 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
00009E1629
1
10-49-240
Total 171421:
.00
48.97 103.20
.00
103.20 103.20
11/17
11/06/2017
171422
15506 VEGAS ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO
4094-639379
1
11-65-700
.00
26,699.64
26,699.64
11/17
11/06/2017
171422
15506 VEGAS ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO
4094-639572
1
10-65-610
.00
293.40
293.40
Total 171422:
.00
26,993.04
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
1
10-57-290
.00
427.45
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
2
10-54-310
.00
34.16
34.16
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
3
10-70-290
.00
155.94
155.94
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
4
10-50-290
.00
165.94
165.94
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
5
10-43-290
.00
61.98
61.98
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
6
10-41-290
.00
207.92
207.92
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
7
10-51-310
.00
29.27
29.27
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
8
15-40-340
.00
61.98
61.98
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
9
10-61-290
.00
155.94
155.94
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
10
10-57-290
.00
978.35
978.35
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
11
10-57-290
.00
263.43
263.43
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
12
10-48-290
.00
51.98
51.98
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
13
10-47-290
.00
233.76
233.76
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
14
10-76-290
.00
123.96
123.96
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
15
10-54-290
.00
2,959.17
2,959.17
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
16
10-54-310
.00
1,183.49
1,183.49
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
17
52-40-290
.00
81.28
81.28
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
18
10-63-290
.00
113.96
113.96
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
19
10-65-290
.00
103.96
103.96
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
20
10-81-290
.00
110.38
110.38
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
21
52-40-290
.00
155.94
155.94
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
22
16-71-290
.00
155.94
155.94
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
23
10-57-290
.00
245.29-
245.29-
11/17
11/06/2017
171423
9528 VERIZON WIRELESS
9794604527
24
10-50-290
.00
100.00-
100.00-
Total 171423:
20
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
.00
427.45
7,470.89
74 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
11/17
11/06/2017
171424
Payee
14455 VERNA CARNESECCA
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
103017
1
10-54-310
Total 171424:
.00
100.00
.00
100.00 100.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171425
5900 VIRGIN VALLEY DISPOSAL
10025296
1
52-40-310
.00
3,043.53
3,043.53
11/17
11/06/2017
171425
5900 VIRGIN VALLEY DISPOSAL
10025297
1
10-73-310
.00
3,817.00
3,817.00
Total 171425:
.00
6,860.53
11/17
11/06/2017
171426
8748 VIRGIN VALLEY VETERINARY H 242842
1
10-70-310
.00
110.90
110.90
11/17
11/06/2017
171426
8748 VIRGIN VALLEY VETERINARY H 243286
1
10-70-310
.00
110.90
110.90
Total 171426:
.00
221.80
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
AUGUST 17
1
52-21400
.00
46,620.72
46,620.72
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
OCT 17
1
10-49-282
.00
1,334.50
1,334.50
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
OCT 17
2
10-55-282
.00
850.00
850.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
OCT 17
3
10-54-282
.00
1,871.00
1,871.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
OCT 17
4
10-57-282
.00
665.00
665.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
OCT 17
5
10-65-282
.00
120.00
120.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
OCT 17
6
10-66-282
.00
173.00
173.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
OCT 17
7
10-76-282
.00
37,244.00
37,244.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
OCT 17
8
10-81-282
.00
3,295.00
3,295.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
OCT 17
9
10-82-282
.00
53.00
53.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
OCT 17
10
12-87-282
.00
307.00
307.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
OCT 17
11
16-71-282
.00
363.00
363.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
OCT 17
12
10-65-282
.00
152.50
152.50
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
OCT 17
13
10-38-701
.00
263.00
263.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171427
5901 VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRI
OCT 17
14
52-40-620
.00
807.50
807.50
Total 171427: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171428
9788 WATERTECH, INC
W062504
1
52-40-480
Total 171428:
21
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
.00
94,119.22 3,582.00
.00
3,582.00 3,582.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217
1
10-47-240
.00
52.76
52.76
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217
2
10-47-240
.00
38.00
38.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217
3
10-47-310
.00
49.95
49.95
75 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217
4
10-43-240
.00
7.00
7.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217
5
10-54-240
.00
76.00
76.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217
6
10-47-310
.00
720.00
720.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217
7
10-57-240
.00
17.00
17.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217
8
10-60-610
.00
17.00
17.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217
9
10-50-240
.00
17.00
17.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217
10
10-81-620
.00
17.00
17.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217
11
10-47-240
.00
39.00
39.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
1
13-40-450
.00
465.96
465.96
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
2
10-66-250
.00
52.07
52.07
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
3
10-63-250
.00
182.00
182.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
4
52-40-610
.00
50.47
50.47
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
5
10-66-250
.00
62.50
62.50
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
6
10-63-610
.00
33.99
33.99
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
7
10-63-610
.00
23.19
23.19
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
8
10-63-610
.00
14.44
14.44
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
9
10-63-610
.00
79.79
79.79
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
10
10-63-610
.00
79.99
79.99
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
11
10-63-610
.00
79.79-
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
12
10-63-610
.00
236.52
236.52
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
13
10-63-610
.00
431.94
431.94
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
14
10-63-610
.00
70.01
70.01
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
15
10-63-610
.00
377.30
377.30
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
16
10-63-610
.00
14.48
14.48
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
17
10-65-610
.00
150.00
150.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
18
10-63-610
.00
31.54
31.54
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
19
10-65-610
.00
24.99
24.99
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
20
10-63-610
.00
149.30
149.30
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
21
10-63-610
.00
9.29
9.29
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
22
10-63-610
.00
22.99
22.99
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
23
10-63-610
.00
6.75
6.75
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
24
10-63-610
.00
54.99
54.99
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217 BT
25
10-63-610
.00
7.45
7.45
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ABA
1
10-41-230
.00
70.00-
70.00-
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ABA
1
10-43-610
.00
553.99
553.99
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ABA
2
10-41-230
.00
295.00
295.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ABA
3
10-41-610
.00
62.98
62.98
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ABA
4
10-43-610
.00
304.33
304.33
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ABA
5
25-85-210
.00
236.50
236.50
Payee
22
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
79.79-
76 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ABA
6
10-41-230
.00
58.46
58.46
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-AL
1
10-41-230
.00
154.90
154.90
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ATT
1
10-50-210
.00
39.56
39.56
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ATT
2
10-50-230
.00
23.30
23.30
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ATT
3
10-50-230
.00
19.05
19.05
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ATT
4
10-50-240
.00
19.47
19.47
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ATT
5
10-50-230
.00
13.62
13.62
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ATT
6
10-50-210
.00
7.00
7.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ATT
7
10-50-230
.00
59.61
59.61
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ATT
8
10-50-230
.00
74.80
74.80
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ATT
9
10-50-230
.00
14.00
14.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ATT
10
10-50-230
.00
5.85
5.85
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ATT
11
10-50-230
.00
31.77
31.77
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ATT
12
10-50-210
.00
85.00
85.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ATT
13
10-50-230
.00
20.45
20.45
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ATT
14
10-50-230
.00
83.29
83.29
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217BT
1
10-54-230
.00
113.37
113.37
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-MC
1
10-54-230
.00
161.80
161.80
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-MC
2
10-54-230
.00
192.80
192.80
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-MC
3
10-54-610
.00
14.71
14.71
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-MC
4
10-54-610
.00
87.13
87.13
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217RR
1
10-57-230
.00
24.00
24.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217RR
2
10-57-610
.00
2.75
2.75
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217RR
3
10-57-290
.00
47.84
47.84
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217RR
4
10-57-250
.00
283.80
283.80
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217RR
5
10-57-230
.00
40.00
40.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217RR
6
10-57-230
.00
12.00
12.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217RSE
1
10-61-210
.00
120.00
120.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217RT
1
15-40-390
.00
63.37
63.37
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ST
1
10-54-230
.00
32.90
32.90
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ST
2
10-54-230
.00
486.40
486.40
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ST
3
10-54-230
.00
25.00
25.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ST
4
10-54-240
.00
173.42
173.42
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-ST
5
10-54-610
.00
127.47
127.47
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
1
10-54-240
.00
39.43
39.43
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
2
10-54-610
.00
188.19
188.19
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
3
10-54-230
.00
968.88
968.88
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
4
10-54-230
.00
603.96
603.96
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
5
10-54-610
.00
1,366.90
1,366.90
Payee
23
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
77 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
6
10-54-230
.00
692.24
692.24
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
7
10-54-610
.00
10.47
10.47
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
8
10-54-610
.00
62.73
62.73
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
9
10-56-230
.00
675.60
675.60
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
10
10-54-230
.00
425.00
425.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
11
10-54-230
.00
520.00
520.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
12
10-54-230
.00
822.05
822.05
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
13
10-54-230
.00
254.70
254.70
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
14
10-54-610
.00
65.47
65.47
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
15
10-54-240
.00
92.08
92.08
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
16
10-54-310
.00
33.80
33.80
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
17
10-54-610
.00
206.16
206.16
11/17
11/06/2017
171429
10077 WELLS FARGO
101217-TT
18
10-54-230
.00
512.20
512.20
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171429:
.00
15,244.42
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
1
17-80-610
.00
269.95
269.95
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
2
17-80-610
.00
62.13
62.13
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
3
17-80-610
.00
46.95
46.95
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
4
10-81-230
.00
57.00
57.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
5
10-81-230
.00
9.85
9.85
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
6
17-80-610
.00
875.97
875.97
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
7
10-81-610
.00
1,328.28
1,328.28
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
8
17-80-485
.00
150.00
150.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
9
17-80-485
.00
112.58
112.58
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
10
10-81-230
.00
82.00
82.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
11
10-81-230
.00
9.85
9.85
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
12
10-81-230
.00
10.00
10.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
13
10-81-610
.00
545.41
545.41
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
14
10-81-230
.00
50.00
50.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
15
10-81-230
.00
39.70
39.70
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
16
10-81-230
.00
100.00
100.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
17
17-80-485
.00
23.00
23.00
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
18
10-81-610
.00
499.99
499.99
11/17
11/06/2017
171430
9878 WELLS FARGO BANK
5960894
19
10-81-230
.00
9.85
9.85
Total 171430: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171431
12062 BINGHAM & SNOW LLP
092216
1
10-51-310
24
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
.00
4,282.51 250.00
250.00
78 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda
Page:
Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017 GL
Check
Check
Vendor
Period
Issue Date
Number
Number
Payee
Invoice
Invoice
Invoice
Discount
Invoice
Check
Number
Sequence
GL Account
Taken
Amount
Amount
Total 171431: 11/17
11/06/2017
.00 171432
3000 LAS VEGAS CONVENTION AUT
OCT 17
1
10-23100
Total 171432: 11/17
11/07/2017
9560 EUREKA CASINO, HOTEL
110617
1
10-81-480
Total 171433: 11/17
11/07/2017
11/07/2017
5,907.50
.00
171434
15895 VALLEY COLLECTION SERVICE
3309
1
15-70-340
.00
500.00
15504 ITSAVVY LLC
00983244
1
10-49-250
.00
500.00 500.00
854.65
.00 171435
5,907.50 5,907.50
.00
Total 171434: 11/17
.00
250.00
.00 171433
25
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
854.65 854.65
569.10
569.10
Total 171435:
.00
569.10
Grand Totals:
.00
750,449.42
79 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE
Check Register - for City Council Agenda Check Issue Dates: 10/30/2017 - 11/12/2017
Page:
26
Nov 14, 2017 08:33AM
Dated: ______________________________________________________ Mayor: ______________________________________________________ City Council: ______________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________ City Recorder: ______________________________________________________
Report Criteria: Report type: GL detail
80 M = Manual Check, V = Void Check
CITY OF MESQUITE PURCHASE ORDERS REQUIRING COUNCIL APPROVAL DATE OF COUNCIL MEETING: November 28, 2017
A. P.O's for Not Previously Budget-Approved Items...amounts exceed $5,000
For Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Current Vendor
Description
Requested By:
Department
Remaining
G/L
Account
Po's to be
Original
Budget
Budget
Account #
Description
Approved
Budget
Balance
(Over)Under
B. P.O's for Budgeted Items6amounts exceed $25,000
For Fiscal Year 2017-2018 Mechanical Products Nevada Inc. Mechanical Products Nevada Inc.
Carrier Water Cooled Dual Compressor Screw Chiller for Mesquite Campus
B Tanner
Public Works
13-40-625
Fund 13 - Cap Proj Maint/Repairs
$
62,989
$
305,000
$
182,511
$
119,522
Evapco Cooling Tower/ABB Variable Frequency Drives
B Tanner
Public Works
13-40-625
Fund 13 - Cap Proj Maint/Repairs
$
54,221
$
305,000
$
119,522
$
65,301
81
CITY OF MESQUITE NOTIFICATION OF BUDGET TRANSFERS DATE OF COUNCIL MEETING: November 28, 2017
TRANSFERS FROM: Fund
Account #
Account Description
TRANSFERS TO: Incr.
Fund
Account #
Account Description
NRS 354.5980005 Budget appropriations may be transferred between functions, funds or contingency accounts in the following manner, if such a transfer does not increase the total appropriation for any fiscal year and is not in conflict with other statutory provisions: (a) The person designated to administer the budget for local government may transfer appropriations within any function. (b) The person designated to administer the budget may transfer appropriations between functions or programs within a fund, if: (1) The governing body is advised of the action at the next regular meeting and (2) The action is recorded in the official minutes of the meeting (c) Upon recommendation of the person designated to administer the budget, the governing body may authorize the transfer of appropriations between funds or from the contingency account, if: (1) The governing body announces the transfer of appropriations of a regularly scheduled meeting and sets forth the each amount to be transferred and the accounts, functions, programs and funds affected; (2) The governing body sets forth its reasons for the transfer; and (3) The action is recorded in the official minutes of the meeting.
Incr.
82
CITY OF MESQUITE NOTIFICATION OF BUDGET AMENDMENTS AND BUDGET AUGMENTS DATE OF COUNCIL MEETING: November 28, 2017
BUDGET AMENDMENTS FY2017-2018
Revenues Increase
Amended Amounts
Expenditures Increase
Amended Amounts
Fund
Account #
Account Description
Incr.
Budget
Fund
Account #
Account Description
Incr.
Budget
Fund
Account #
Account Description
Incr.
Budget
Fund
Account #
Account Description
Incr.
Budget
Fund
Account #
Account Description
Incr.
Budget
Fund
Account #
Account Description
Incr.
Budget
Fund
Account #
Account Description
Incr.
Budget
Fund
Account #
Account Description
Incr.
Budget
BUDGET AUGMENTS FY2017-2018
Revenues Increase Fund
Account #
Account Description
Amended Amounts Incr.
Budget
Expenditures Increase Fund
Account #
Account Description
Amended Amounts Incr.
Budget
83
City Council Agenda Item 4 Submitted by: Dodie Melendez Submitting Department: Finance Meeting Date: November 28, 2017
Subject: Presentation by Hinton Burdick CPA's & Advisors, and acceptance of the City of Mesquite FY 2016-2017 annual audited financial report. - Presentation - Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action
Recommendation: Receive and file the annual audit report for the City of Mesquite for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.
Petitioner: David R Empey - Finance Director/City Treasurer Is this a budgeted item? No Fiscal Impact: Not Applicable Background: In accordance with Nevada Revised Statutes 354.624, the City of Mesquite is required to provide for an annual audit of its financial statements. Accordingly, the City has engaged the public accounting firm Hinton Burdick CPA's & Advisors to audit the financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2017
Attachments: 84
City Council Agenda Item 5 Submitted by: Nicholas Montoya Submitting Department: Athletics and Leisure Services Meeting Date: November 28, 2017
Subject: Resolution 942 - An Inter-local Agreement for a Community Development Block Grant funds to the City of Mesquite Program Services - Fiscal Year 2017-2018. - Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action Recommendation: Approval of Resolution 942 - An Inter-local Agreement for a Community Development Block Grant funds to the City of Mesquite Program Services - Fiscal Year 2017-2018. Petitioner: Nicholas Montoya, Director Is this a budgeted item? Yes Fiscal Impact: We will be receiving money from Clark County/Federal Grant money for parks improvements. Background: Clark County added in their new Sub-recipient Guidelines for Federal Funding in Exhibit E – it’s mostly guidelines that our organization is already following, we are adding to the criteria of the guidelines for the new Sub-recipient Guidelines for Federal Funding as Exhibit E. Specifically, these guidelines are designed to support sub-recipient compliance with Title 2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.318 to 32) with two focus areas: 1. Non-Federal entity procedures for the procurement of supplies and other expendable property, equipment, real property and other services; and Record keeping requirements. 2. Change Order/Contract modification procedures.
Attachments: Resolution 942.docx Mesquite CDBG 2017 - 2018 Interlocal.doc
85
RESOLUTION 942 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT TO GRANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS TO CITY OF MESQUITE FOR PROGRAM SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 WHEREAS, Clark County, Nevada (the "County") has entered into a grant Agreement with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") for participation in the Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") program, CFDA# 14.218, under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, P. L. 93383 as amended; and WHEREAS, the County is responsible for the administration, implementation, planning, and evaluation within its respective jurisdiction of the CDBG Program (B17UC320001) and for the HUD Consolidated Plan (the "Plan"); and WHEREAS, HUD has provided "Direct Service Program Income Eligibility Criteria HUD Section 8 Guidelines", as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth, for reference in determining the applicability of this grant under the relevant HUD regulations, requirements, and guidelines; and WHEREAS, the CITY OF MESQUITE, DUNS# 194534764, ("Sub-recipient"), a municipal corporation of the State of Nevada and located within the boundaries of the County of Clark, proposes to provide public service and capital development assistance to the residents of Mesquite as allocated in Exhibit “B”, “Expenditures for Advancement of Monies” (“the “Program”); and WHEREAS, Sub recipient is a member of the Clark County CDBG Urban County Consortium for Fiscal Years 2015-2017, as approved in a separate Inter-local agreement on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, under the approved HUD Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2017/2018, Subrecipient agrees to fund those Fiscal Year 2017/2018 capital projects as listed in the Plan and under this Inter-local Agreement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NRS 277.180, any one or more public agencies may contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity, or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the contract is authorized by law to perform; and WHEREAS, the Program has been certified by the County as having met the primary objective of the Plan. Approved this 28th Day of November 2017. CITY OF MESQUITE:
ATTEST:
_______________________________________ Allan S. Litman, Mayor
_____________________________ Tracy E. Beck, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________________ Robert Sweetin, City Attorney
86
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT TO GRANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS TO CITY OF MESQUITE FOR PROGRAM SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018
WHEREAS, Clark County, Nevada (the "County") has entered into a grant Agreement with the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") for participation in the Community Development Block Grant ("CDBG") program, CFDA# 14.218, under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, P. L. 93-383 as amended; and WHEREAS, the County is responsible for the administration, implementation, planning, and evaluation within its respective jurisdiction of the CDBG Program (B17UC320001) and for the HUD Consolidated Plan (the "Plan"); and WHEREAS, HUD has provided "Direct Service Program Income Eligibility Criteria HUD Section 8 Guidelines", as set forth in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth, for reference in determining the applicability of this grant under the relevant HUD regulations, requirements, and guidelines; and WHEREAS, the CITY OF MESQUITE, DUNS# 194534764, ("Subrecipient"), a municipal corporation of the State of Nevada and located within the boundaries of the County of Clark, proposes to provide public service and capital development assistance to the residents of Mesquite as allocated in Exhibit “B”, “Expenditures for Advancement of Monies” (“the “Program”); and WHEREAS, Subrecipient is a member of the Clark County CDBG Urban County Consortium for Fiscal Years 2015-2017, as approved in a separate Interlocal agreement on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, under the approved HUD Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan for Fiscal Year 2017/2018, Subrecipient agrees to fund those Fiscal Year 2017/2018 capital projects as listed in the Plan and under this Interlocal Agreement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to NRS 277.180, any one or more public agencies may contract with any one or more other public agencies to perform any governmental service, activity, or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the contract is authorized by law to perform; and WHEREAS, the Program has been certified by the County as having met the primary objective of the Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the parties agree as follows:
87 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 1 of 45
I.
Scope of Services
A. The County will provide TWO HUNDRED FIVE THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED FORTY-FOUR AND NO/100TH DOLLARS ($205,244) in Fiscal Year 2017/2018 CDBG Funds (the “Funds”) awarded on 09/12/2017, to assist the Subrecipient with the cost of the Program, as set forth in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein as if fully set forth, and for the uses described in the Scope of Work set forth in Exhibit "D". The Subrecipient will review its activities in advance with Community Resources Management Unit ("CRM"), and will conform its activities to any practices necessary to assure continuing eligibility for CDBG funding. B. Subrecipient shall expend the Funds to complete the work that is described in Exhibit “D”, and any of its sub-subrecipients may enter into contracts with a construction manager, an insurer of Builder’s Risk/Liability, and an architect when necessary in order to cause such work in accordance with plans and specifications that have been approved by each of the Parties, or the Sub-Subrecipient may elect to reimburse the Subrecipient for the costs of the Project, in accordance with the terms of Exhibit “D”. In the event that the Subrecipient enters into a contract to complete the work described in Exhibit “D,” the Subrecipent shall comply with the “CRM Subrecipient Guidelines for Federal Funding” as set forth in the “Procurement Policies and Procedures” in Exhibit "E", attached hereto that align with 2 CFR 200 (Uniform Guidance) regulations regarding competition for grantrelated activities. In the event federal funds are used for payment of all or part of this Interlocal Agreement, Subrecipient certifies, by signing this Interlocal Agreement, that neither it or its Sub-Subrecipients nor any of its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any federal department or agency. This certification is made pursuant to the regulations implementing Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, 28 CFR 67.510, as published at Part VII of the May 26, 1988, Federal Register, and any relevant program-specific regulations. This provision shall be required of every subcontractor receiving any payment in whole or in part from federal funds. C. Subrecipient will provide program services as set forth in Exhibit “D”. Subrecipient will provide CRM with client usage records on an annual basis. A cumulative report of the data is to be submitted within 90 days of the close of the program year. Subrecipient will provide the client usage report using the Clark County Grantee Performance Report Direct Benefit Activities Form monthly as shown in Exhibit “C”. These records will contain, but are not limited to, the following data regarding the program target population: 1. 2. 3.
Number of persons assisted (for all non-housing activities); Number of households assisted (for all housing activities); Racial breakdown of persons (non-housing) or households (housing) served including American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian, Black/African American, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, White, American 88
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 2 of 45
4. 5. 6. 7. 8. II.
Indian/Alaska Native and White, Asian and White, Black/African American and White, American Indian/Alaska Native and Black/African American, Other Multi-Racial, (Exhibit “C”); Ethnicity breakdown indicating either Hispanic or non-Hispanic, by race, (Exhibit “C”); Number and percentage of Low and Moderate Income clients, as defined by HUD Section 8 Income guidelines (Exhibit “A”); Number of female heads-of-household served; Number of persons with disabilities; Household size and type for housing activities.
County General Conditions
A. The County shall have no relationship whatsoever with the services provided, except the provision of financial support and the receipt of such reports as are provided for in this Interlocal Agreement. The County is responsible to ensure that all HUD statutes, regulations, and policies and procedures are adhered to. B. The Subrecipient shall obtain any and all federal, state, and local permits and licenses required to execute the Program. The Subrecipient may not assign or delegate any of its rights, interests or duties under this Interlocal Agreement without the written consent of the County. Any such assignment or delegation made without the required consent shall be void, and may, at the option of the County, result in the forfeiture of all obligations of the County herein. C. The Subrecipient must keep and maintain in effect at all times any and all licenses, permits, notices, and certifications which may be required by any City or County ordinance or state or federal statute. D. The County will require the Subrecipient to be bound by all City and County ordinances and state and federal statutes as required. E. The Subrecipient will not lease any portion of any facility, which falls under the jurisdiction of this Interlocal Agreement, without prior written approval from the County. Any lessee, sublessee, or assignee must meet CDBG program requirements and serve eligible low to moderate income residents. If any facility financed by this Interlocal Agreement, or any portion thereof, is subleased without the prior written approval of the County, or through foreclosure or other circumstances the Subrecipient loses legal possession of the property, the Subrecipient will, upon the request of the County, repay to the County, the affected amount of the Funds that the Subrecipient received from the County hereunder. The County may require reasonable assurances of security for such repayments. F. (1) If Subrecipient uses a vehicle in providing its services, Subrecipient shall carry or provide Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance covering bodily injury and property damage, with minimum coverages as follows: 89 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 3 of 45
Bodily Injuries:
$500,000 each person; $500,000 each occurrence;
Property Damage: $500,000 each person; $500,000 each occurrence; and (2) Subrecipient shall carry or provide Comprehensive Fire and Hazard insurance covering the full replacement costs of their Projects. G. The Subrecipient shall allow duly authorized representatives of the County, independent auditors contracted by the County, HUD, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any combination thereof, to conduct such occasional reviews, audits, and on-site monitoring of the facility as the reviewing agency deems to be appropriate in order to determine: (1) (2)
Whether the objectives of the Program are being achieved; Whether the Program is being conducted in an efficient and effective
manner; (3) Whether management control systems and internal procedures have been established to meet the objectives of the Program; (4) Whether the financial operations of the Program are being conducted properly; (5) Whether the periodic reports to the County contain accurate and reliable information; and (6) Whether all of the activities of the Program are conducted in compliance with the provisions of Federal laws and regulations and this Interlocal Agreement. Visits by the County, independent auditors contracted by the County, representatives of HUD, or the Comptroller General of the United States, shall be announced to the Subrecipient in advance of those visits, and shall occur during normal operating hours. Such persons may request, and, if such a request is made, shall be granted, access to all of the books, documents, papers, and records of the Subrecipient which relate to the Program. H. The Subrecipient will protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County from and against any and all liability, damages, demands, claims, suits, liens, and judgments of whatever nature including, but not limited to, claims for contribution or indemnification for injuries to or death of any person or persons, caused by, in connection with, or arising out of any activities undertaken pursuant to this Interlocal Agreement. The Subrecipient's obligation to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless as set forth in this paragraph shall include any and all reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the County in the defense or handling of said suits, demands, judgments, liens, and claims and all reasonable attorneys' fees and investigation expenses incurred by the County in enforcing or obtaining compliance with the provisions of this Interlocal Agreement. I.
The Subrecipient will not use any funds or resources which are supplied by 90
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 4 of 45
the County in litigation against any person, natural or otherwise, or in its own defense in any such litigation and will notify the County of any legal action which is filed by or against it. J. No officer, agent, consultant, or employee of the Subrecipient may seek or accept any gifts, service, favor, employment, engagement, emolument, or economic opportunity which would tend improperly to influence a reasonable person in that position to depart from the faithful and impartial discharge of the duties of that position. K. No officer, agent, consultant, or employee of the Subrecipient may use his or her position to secure or grant any unwarranted privilege, preference, exemption, or advantage for himself or herself, any member of his or her household, any business entity in which he or she has a financial interest or any other person. L. No officer, agent, consultant, or employee of the Subrecipient may participate as an agent of the Subrecipient in the negotiation or execution of any contract between the Subrecipient and any private business in which he or she has a financial interest. M. No officer, agent, consultant, or employee of the Subrecipient may suppress any report or other document because it might tend to affect unfavorably his or her private financial interests. N. The Subrecipient may not assign or delegate any of its rights, interests or duties under this Interlocal Agreement without written approval from the County. Any assignee must meet CDBG program requirements and serve eligible low to moderate income clients. Any such assignment or delegation made with the required consent shall be void, and may, at the option of the County, result in the forfeiture of all financial support provided herein. O. The Subrecipient shall have the opportunity to amend plans up to $500,000 total of its City share of County CDBG funds for the five year HUD Consolidated Plan Action Plan and amounts greater than $500,000 shall require a program amendment to each relevant year of the HUD Consolidated Plan Action Plan. P. Environmental reviews for capital projects shall be prepared by the County with the assistance and cooperation of the Subrecipient. Q. Davis-Bacon federal wage requirements shall be the responsibility of the Subrecipient and be subject to technical approval by CRM staff prior to payment of program invoices. R. The Subrecipient shall comply with the “CRM Subrecipient Guidelines for Federal Funding” as set forth in the “Procurement Policies and Procedures” in Exhibit "E", attached hereto that align with 2 CFR 200 (Uniform Guidance) regulations regarding procurement of goods and services for grant-related activities. S. The Subrecipient shall abide by CDBG program caps (i.e. 10 percent construction contingency; 20 percent administration; and 15 percent public services) 91 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 5 of 45
unless authorized in writing by the Manager, CRM, to exceed the caps against the entity’s yearly grant allocation. T. Subrecipient acknowledges these funds are not to be used for research and development activities. U. The Awarding Official for this grant is Michael Pawlak, Director of Clark County Social Service. The Clark County CDBG Program contact person is Jasmine Carr, Clark County Social Service, Community Resources Management, 1600 Pinto Lane 2nd Floor, Las Vegas, NV 89106, [email protected], or 702-455-5027. III.
Federal General Conditions A.
The Subrecipient shall comply with the following laws and directives: 1.
The Hatch Act as set forth in Title 5, Chapter 15, of the United States
Code. 2. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and the related authorities listed in HUD's implementing regulations issued at 24 CFR, Parts 50 and 58. 3.
Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, Pub.L. 90-284.
4.
Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974.
5. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-2000d-4), and implementing regulations issued at 24 CFR, Part 1. 6. The Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-20), any amendments thereto, and implementing regulations issued at 24 CFR, Part 100. 7. Section 109, Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-383. 8. Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, 12 U.S.C. 1701u, and any amendments thereto. 9. Executive Order 11063, any amendments thereto, and implementing regulations issued at 24 CFR, Part 107. 10. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101-07), and implementing regulations issued at 24 CFR, Part 146. 11. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794) and implementing regulations issued at 24 CFR, Part 8. 12.
Executive Order 11246, and the regulations which are issued under 92
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 6 of 45
the Order at 41 CFR, Chapter 60. 13.
The Federal Labor Standards Act.
14.
The Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended.
15. National Flood Insurance Program and the regulations thereunder (44 CFR, Parts 59 through 79), and Sections 102 and 202 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4012 (a) and 4106 (a). 16. Sections 302 and 401(b) of the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. 4821-4846), and implementing regulations issued at 24 CFR, Part 35, and, in addition, appropriate action must be taken to protect facility occupants from the hazards associated with lead-based paint abatement procedures.
17. The Davis-Bacon Act, as amended, which requires that all laborers and mechanics who are employed to perform construction work, or any contractor or construction work which is financed, in whole or in part, with assistance which is received under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 shall be paid wages at rates which are not less than those that prevail in the locality for similar construction and shall receive overtime compensation in accordance with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act. The contractor and its subcontractors shall also comply with all applicable Federal laws and regulations which pertain to labor standards, including the minimum wage law. 18. 24 CFR, Part 92, of the Cranston-Gonzales National Affordable Housing Act of 1990. 19.
24 CFR, Part 24, Subpart F of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988.
20. Section 319 of Pub. L. 101-121, of the Department of the Interior Appropriations Act, which prohibits the Subrecipient from using appropriated Federal funds for lobbying the Executive or Legislative Branches of the Federal Government in connection with a specific contract, grant, or loan, and requires that no Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the Subrecipient, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 21. Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, which requires that the Subrecipient shall: a.
not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of religion and not limit employment 93
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 7 of 45
b.
c.
or give preference in employment to persons on the basis of religion; not discriminate against any person applying for such public services on the basis of religion and not limit such services or give preference to persons on the basis of religion; and provide no religious instruction or counseling, conduct no religious worship or services, engage in no religious proselytizing, and exert no other religious influence in the provision of such public services.
B. The Subrecipient shall carry out its activities in compliance with all Federal laws and regulations described in 2 CFR Part 200 entitled “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards”. Subrecipient shall comply with the requirements and standards of 2 CFR Part 200 entitled “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards” and shall comply with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, entitled "Audit Requirements" as applicable and shall forward a copy of most recent audit within 30 days of completion. C. The Subrecipient shall carry out its activities in compliance with all Federal laws and regulations described in 24 CFR Part 570.600 - 614, which are applicable to Federal Fiscal Years 2015-2019 CDBG grants, except that the Subrecipient will not assume the County's environmental responsibilities described at 24 CFR 570.604 nor the County's responsibility for initiating the review process under the provisions of 24 CFR Part 58. D. No officer, agent, consultant, employee, or elected or appointed official of the County, or the Subrecipient, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, in any contract or subcontract, or agreement with respect thereto, or the proceeds thereof, either for himself or herself or for those with whom he or she has family or business ties during his or her tenure, or for one year thereafter, for any of the work to be performed pursuant to the Program. E. None of the personnel employed in the administration of the Program shall be in any way or to any extent engaged in the conduct of political activities prohibited by Chapter 15 Title 5, U.S. Code, as applicable. F. None of the Funds to be paid under this Interlocal Agreement shall be used for any partisan political activity, or to support or defeat legislation pending before Congress. G. Program income, as defined in 24 CFR 570.500 and 2 CFR 200.80, shall be returned to the County unless the County authorizes in writing that all or a specific portion thereof of such program income will be retained by the Subrecipient. Provisions under Subpart 504 shall include: 94 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 8 of 45
1. Recording program income. The receipt and expenditure of program income as defined in 24 CFR 570.500 (a) shall be recorded as part of the financial transactions of the grant program. 2.
Disposition of program income received by program participants.
3.
Disposition of program income received by Subrecipient.
4.
Disposition of certain program income received by the County.
H. The Subrecipient shall comply with applicable Grant Administration requirements, as described in 24 CFR 570.500-513. I. The Subrecipient shall maintain records in accordance with 24 CFR 570.502 (b) and 2 CFR 200.333-337. J. The Subrecipient shall follow criteria to determine whether a CDBG-assisted activity complies with one or more of the national objectives as required under 24 CFR 570.200, 570.506, and 570.208, “Criteria for National Objectives”. K. The standards described in this section apply to real property within the recipient's control which was acquired or improved in whole or in part using CDBG funds in excess of $25,000. These standards shall apply from the date CDBG funds are first spent for the property until five years after closeout of an entitlement recipient's participation in the entitlement CDBG program or, with respect to other recipients, until five years after the closeout of the grant from which the assistance to the property was provided. A recipient may not change the use or planned use of any such property (including the beneficiaries of such use) from that for which the acquisition or improvement was made unless the recipient provides affected citizens with reasonable notice of, and opportunity to comment on, any proposed change, and either: (1) The new use of such property qualifies as meeting one of the national objectives in §570.208 (formerly §570.901) and is not a building for the general conduct of government; or (2) The requirements in paragraph (b) of this section are met. If the recipient determines, after consultation with affected citizens, that it is appropriate to change the use of the property to a use which does not qualify under the section above, it may retain or dispose of the property for the changed use if the recipient's CDBG program is reimbursed in the amount of the current fair market value of the property, less any portion of the value attributable to expenditures of non-CDBG funds for acquisition of, and improvements to, the property. If the change of use occurs after closeout, the provisions governing income from the disposition of the real property in §570.504(b)(4) or (5), as applicable, shall apply to the use of funds reimbursed. Following the reimbursement of the CDBG program the property no longer will be subject to any CDBG requirements. IV.
Financial Management 95
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 9 of 45
A. This Interlocal Agreement is subject to other requirements of 2 CFR Part 200 entitled “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards” and 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E, entitled "Cost Principles", as they relate to the use of the CDBG Funds by Subrecipient, and is subject to the current federal regulations as may be amended. B. Subrecipient shall comply with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F, entitled “Audit Requirements" to meet the audit requirements of this Uniform Administrative Requirement, as applicable, and shall forward a copy of the most recent audit within 30 days of completion. C. The Subrecipient shall comply with the “CRM Subrecipent Guidelines for Federal Funding” as set forth in the “Change Order Policies and Procedures” in Exhibit “E”, attached hereto that align with the 2 CFR 200 (Uniform Guidance) regulations regarding contract modifications and change orders. D. All Subrecipient's costs of the Program shall be recorded by budget line items and be supported by canceled checks, payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts, vouchers, orders, and other accounting documents evidencing in proper detail the nature and propriety of all costs. At any time during normal business hours, the Subrecipient's financial transactions with respect to the Program may be audited by the County, independent auditors contracted by the County, HUD, the Comptroller General of the United States, the General Accounting Office, or any combination thereof. The representatives of the auditing agency or agencies shall have access to all books, documents, accounts, records, reports, files, papers, things, property, program participants, and other persons pertaining to such financial transactions and necessary to facilitate the audit. E. Copies, excerpts, or transcripts of all of the books, documents, papers, and records, including canceled checks, payrolls, time records, invoices, contracts, vouchers, orders and accounting documents concerning matters that are reasonably related to the Program will be provided upon request by the County. F. Monies will be advanced by the County to Subrecipient. Invoices of expenditures must be submitted to County and funds will be accounted for in a ledger separate from all other revenue sources, per 2 CFR 200.305. Timeliness of payments to Mesquite as Subrecipient shall be in accordance with 2 CFR 200.305, 2 CFR 200.300-309, and 31 CFR 205, whereby methods and procedures for payment shall minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and disbursement by the subgrantee, in accordance with the cited regulations. Disbursement of funds should occur within 3-5 working days, per recommendation of U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. G. Expenditures will be reviewed for consistency with the approved budget and scope of services as well as 2 CFR Part 200 entitled “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards”. Approved invoices will be paid in a timely manner. 96 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 10 of 45
H. Advancement of funds is contingent upon receipt by the County of its Federal Fiscal Year 2017/2018 CDBG grant funds, in the amounts shown at Exhibit "B". The County shall bear no liability to fund or provide payment to or on behalf of the Subrecipient’s expenditures under the jurisdiction of this Interlocal Agreement in the event no CDBG funds are received during Federal Fiscal Year 2017/2018 and shall only be liable for payment to the extent CDBG funds are received. I. This Interlocal Agreement will commence upon its approval and signature by all parties and it shall be completed by June 30, 2017 for all public service projects only. Capital projects shall be completed by June 30, 2019, or by the written approval of an extension by the Manager of Community Resources Management. J. In the event that the County finds that the total amount of its CDBG funds allocated for the Program are not expended in the time and manner prescribed in this Interlocal Agreement, the County reserves the right to extract that portion for other projects and programs under its CDBG Program, after providing at least forty-five days written notice to Subrecipient. K. Upon the expiration or revocation of this Interlocal Agreement, the Subrecipient shall transfer to County any Funds on hand at the time of expiration or revocation and any accounts receivable attributable to the use of the Funds. V.
Notices
A. All notices or other communication which shall or may be given pursuant to this Interlocal Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered by personal service, or by mail addressed to the other party at the address indicated herein or as the same may be changed from time to time. Such notice shall be deemed given on the day on which personally served; or, if by mail, on the third day after being posted or the date of the actual receipt, whichever is earlier. All notices and other written communications under this Agreement shall be addressed to the individuals in the capacities indicated below, unless otherwise modified by subsequent written notice.
Grantee Address: Kristin R. Cooper, Manager Clark County Social Service Community Resources Management 1600 Pinto Lane Las Vegas, NV 89106 Subrecipient Address: Nick Montoya Director of Athletics & Leisure Services 102 Old Mill Road Mesquite, 89027 97 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 11 of 45
VI.
Expiration, Modification, or Revocation of Interlocal Agreement
A. The parties hereto are required to amend or otherwise revise this Interlocal Agreement should such modification be required by HUD or any applicable Federal statutes or regulations. B. The County shall not be obligated to pay any monies for the Program in the event that any of the CDBG funds provided for in Exhibit "B" are terminated or withheld from the County or otherwise not forthcoming and in such event the County may modify or revoke this Interlocal Agreement. Nothing in this Interlocal Agreement shall prohibit the County, at its discretion, from providing a portion of the Funds to or on behalf of the Subrecipient in the event that the County receives only a portion of the Funds expected to be received by the County from HUD in the amounts described at Exhibit "B". C. If Subrecipient fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Resolution, or if Subrecipient violates any of the conditions or limitations of this Resolution, the County may suspend or revoke this Resolution, and the provision of the Funds, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.338-342. D. The County may revoke this Resolution at any time for its convenience, in accordance with 2 CFR 200.339. ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ 98 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 12 of 45
___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this _____ day of _______________, 2017, by the City of Mesquite.
CITY OF MESQUITE By: ___________________________ ALLAN S. LITMAN, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM
ATTEST: By: _____________________________ ROBERT SWEETIN, City Attorney By: ____________________________ TRACY E. BECK, Deputy City Clerk
PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this _____ day of ________________, 2017, by the County of Clark.
COUNTY OF CLARK
By: _____________________________ STEVE SISOLAK, CHAIRMAN ATTEST:
By: _____________________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By: _____________________________ STEVEN B. WOLFSON DISTRICT ATTORNEY 99
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 13 of 45
LYNN GOYA, County Clerk
100 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 14 of 45
EXHIBIT “A” DIRECT SERVICE PROGRAM INCOME ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA HUD SECTION 8 GUIDELINES
INCOME NOT TO EXCEED VERY LOW EXTREMELY INCOME LOW INCOME (50%) (30%)
FAMILY SIZE
LOW INCOME (80%)
1
$35,250 or less
$22,050 or less
$13,200 or less
2
$40,250 or less
$25,200 or less
$16,240 or less
3
$45,300 or less
$28,350 or less
$20,420 or less
4
$50,300 or less
$31,450 or less
$24,600 or less
5
$54,350 or less
$34,000 or less
$28,780 or less
6
$58,350 or less
$36,500 or less
$32,960 or less
7
$62,400 or less
$39,000 or less
$37,140 or less
8
$66,400 or less
$41,550 or less
$41,320 or less
Median Family Income for a family of four in FY 2017 in Clark County is $61,900. A low income household means a household having an income equal to or less than the Section 8 low income limit established by HUD. A very low income household means a household having an income equal to or less than the Section 8 very low income limit established by HUD at 50 percent of median household income. An extremely low income household means a household whose income is 30 percent or less of the Median Family Income adjusted for family size. Provided by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, effective March 14, 2017.
101 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 15 of 45
EXHIBIT "B" EXPENDITURES FOR ADVANCEMENT OF MONIES CITY OF MESQUITE PROJECTED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT ALLOCATIONS BY PROJECT FY 2017/2018 Community Development Block Grant Funds
FY 2017 Capital Mesquite Recreation Park Improvements
$205,244 _______
Total
$205,244
102 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 16 of 45
EXHIBIT “C” Clark County Grantee Performance Report Direct Benefit Activities Report Form July 2017 – June 2018 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant Program Name of Grantee:
________________________________________________________________________
Contact Person:
______________________________________ Phone No.: _______________________
Program Name:
__________________________________ E-mail: ______________________________
Program Description & Location: _______________________________________________________________
To be completed by staff: IDIS Activity Number:
Client Statistics Total # of Persons Assisted: Total # of Low Income (80% of median income) Assisted: Total # of Very Low Income (50% of median income) Assisted: Total # of Extremely Low Income (30% of median income) Assisted: Total # of Female-Headed Households Assisted:
Month ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
Year-To-Date ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
Select and provide the total number of clients served by race in the categories provided below. Your totals in the ten (10) categories must equal your total number of persons assisted and median income breakdown given above. RACE
TOTAL # OF PERSONS (Month)
TOTAL # OF PERSONS (Year-To-Date)
HISPANIC*
1. White 2. Black/African American 3. Asian 4. American Indian/Alaskan Native 5. Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 6. American Indian/Alaskan Native & White 7. Asian & White 8 Black/African American & White 9. American Indian/Alaskan Nat. & Black/African American 10. Other Multi-Racial
* Provide total number of Hispanic clients served by race as determined by client. Total number should be in addition to the race categories and not substitute for race. The Hispanic ethnic total need not balance with any race category.
Check appropriate month(s) for which you are reporting: Jul ___ Aug ___ Sept ___ Oct ___ Nov ___ Dec ___ Jan ___ Feb ___ Mar ___ Apr ___ May ___ Jun ___ Final End of the Year (Cumulative Unduplicated) ____
News and Accomplishments: Please attach news and accomplishments on separate page.
103 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 17 of 45
EXHIBIT “D” SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF MESQUITE
Project allocations and scopes of work are provided in table below. FY 2017/2018 PROJECT
Mesquite Recreation Park Improvements
SCOPE OF WORK BY ACTIVITY
BUDGET ALLOCATION 2017/2018
This activity involves the installation of a rubberized safety product underneath the existing playground equipment at Desert Rose Park to increase playground safety in close proximity to low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, plus the installation of a shade structure to prevent the harmful effects of ultra-violet rays.
$205,244
This activity also involves the installation of a shade structure and rubberized safety product underneath the existing playground equipment at Jensen Park Playground to increase playground safety in close proximity to low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, plus the installation of a shade structure to prevent the harmful effects of ultra-violet rays.
104 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 18 of 45
EXHIBIT “E”
Community Resources Management Clark County, Nevada
Subrecipient Guidelines for Federal Funding Procurement Policies and Procedures Revised October 27, 2017
105 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 19 of 45
Contents Purpose ..............................................................3 Written Procurement Procedures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Written Code of Conduct . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Records of Procurement History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Competition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Debarment and Suspension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Contracting with Small, Minority, Women’s Businesses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Other Procurement Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Methods of Procurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Scope of Work for Bids or Proposals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Cost and Price Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Contract Modifications and Change Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Contract Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Contract Provisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Appendices Appendix A: 2 CFR 200.318-322 Appendix B: Clark County CRM Subrecipient Checklist Appendix C: Change Order Procedures Appendix D: Rules for Construction Projects with Non-Profit Organizations/Agencies Appendix E: OIG Integrity Bulletin for Procurement and Contracting
106 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 20 of 45
Clark County CRM (Community Resources Management), Nevada
Subrecipient Guidelines for Federal Funding Procurement Policies and Procedures 1. Purpose of these procurement guidelines. These guidelines are designed to support subrecipient compliance with Title 2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.318 to 326 (Procurement Standards) with two focus areas: o o
Non-Federal entity procedures for the procurement of supplies and other expendable property, equipment, real property and other services; and Record keeping requirements.
A copy of the code is attached to this guide as Appendix A. These guidelines are meant as general guidance only and do not represent a full interpretation of 2 CFR 200. Subrecipients should become familiar with 2 CFR 200 to support their compliance with all Federal regulations. These guidelines are subject to being updated, as needed, by the staff of Community Resources Management. The Appendices of this guide also include Appendix D-Rules for Construction Projects with NonProfit Organizations/Agencies and Appendix E-OIG Integrity Bulletin for Procurement and Contracting. Appendix D reiterates the rules for construction projects and due diligence by subrecipients who engage contractors and subcontractors in federally funded work. Appendix E is general guidance provided by the Office of Inspector General for Procurement and Contracting and should be taken under advisement by all subrecipients. 2. Written procurement procedures. (2 CFR 200.318) All non-Federal entities, including subrecipients, who receive Federal awards are required to use their own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable state and local laws, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in 2 CFR 200.318 to 326. The 2 CFR 200 guidance herein may be applied by any subrecipient of Clark County administered Federal awards if that subrecipient’s procurement policies do not comply with 2 CFR 200. A checklist for subrecipients is included with these procedures as Appendix B and should be completed and submitted to Clark County by the subrecipient to confirm an understanding that the subrecipient will use procedures that are compliant with 2 CFR 200, as indicated on the list.
3. Written code of conduct. (2 CFR 200.318) The non-Federal entity, including any subrecipients, must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, or agent shall participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a Federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Such a conflict would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in the firm selected for a contract. 107 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 21 of 45
4. Records of procurement history. (2 CFR 200.318) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Additional records required for each procurement type are outlined under the procurement type in Section 9-Methods of Procurement. Please note that all subrecipients are required to keep these records and make them available for review to Clark County or Federal staff upon request. 5. Competition. (2 CFR 200.319) All procurement transactions shall be conducted in a manner to provide, to the maximum extent practical, open and free competition. The non-Federal entity (subrecipient) shall be alert to organizational conflicts of interest as well as noncompetitive practices among contractors that may restrict or eliminate competition or otherwise restrain trade. In order to ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage, contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, invitation for bids and/or requests for proposals must be excluded from competing for such procurements. Awards shall be made to the bidder or offeror whose bid or offer is responsive to the solicitation and is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity. Price, quality and other factors shall be considered. If the low bidder is not selected, justification must be documented. Examples for not selecting the low bidder may be that the bid was incomplete (non-responsive); the contractor had been debarred or did not have the appropriate licensing, bonding and/or insurance; another bidder qualified for a Section 3 bidding preference, etc. Solicitations shall clearly set forth all requirements that the bidder or offeror shall fulfill in order for the bid or offer to be evaluated by the non-Federal entity. Any and all bids or offers may be rejected when it is in the non-Federal entity’s interest to do so. In all procurement, the non-Federal entity shall avoid practices that are restrictive of competition. These include but are not limited to: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f)
Placing unreasonable requirements on firms in order for them to qualify to do business, Requiring unnecessary experience and excessive bonding, Noncompetitive pricing practices between firms or between affiliated companies, Noncompetitive awards to consultants that are on retainer contracts, Organizational conflicts of interest, Specifying only a brand name product instead of allowing an equal product to be offered and describing the performance of other relevant requirements of the procurement, and (g) Any arbitrary action in the procurement process.
6. Debarment and Suspension (Part I in Appendix II of 2 CFR 200) No contract shall be made to parties listed on the SAM.Gov website as having active “exclusions” (Debarment and/or Suspension). Contractors with awards that exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (currently $150,000) shall provide the required certification regarding its exclusion status and that of its principal employees. All construction contractors, both prime and lower tier contractors, no matter the contract amount, are required to be registered on SAM.gov. Subrecipients are required to check and document both the company names, and the names of company principals, through the SAM.Gov website. Principal names can be obtained by finding the company in the Nevada State Contractors Board website.
108 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 22 of 45
7. Contracting with Small and Minority Businesses, Women’s Business Enterprises, and Labor Surplus Area Firms. (2 CFR 200.321) Positive efforts shall be made by the non-Federal entity to utilize small businesses, minority-owned firms, and women's business enterprises, whenever possible. (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
Ensure that small businesses, minority-owned firms, and women's business enterprises are used to the fullest extent practicable. Make information on forthcoming opportunities available and arrange time frames for purchases and contracts to encourage and facilitate participation by small businesses, minority-owned firms, and women's business enterprises. Consider in the contract process whether firms competing for larger contracts intend to subcontract with small businesses, minority-owned firms, and women's business enterprises. Encourage, when practical, contracting with consortiums of small businesses, minority-owned firms and women's business enterprises when a contract is too large for one of these firms to handle individually. Use the services and assistance, as appropriate and practical, of such organizations as the Small Business Administration and the Department of Commerce's Minority Business Development Agency in the solicitation and utilization of small businesses, minority-owned firms and women's business enterprises.
8. Other Procurement Standards (2 CFR 300.318) In general, the subrecipient should adhere to the following procurement standards: (a) The non-Federal entity should avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Consideration should be given to consolidating or breaking out procurements to obtain a more economical purchase. (b) Where appropriate, an analysis is made of lease and purchase alternatives to determine which would be the most economical and practical procurement. (c) The non-Federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources.
9. Methods of Procurement. (2 CFR 200.320) Federal guidance defines five methods of procurement: Micro-Purchases, Small Purchases, Sealed Bids, Competitive Proposals and NonCompetitive Proposals. For each type of procurement, the information in the shaded area indicates records that must be maintained in the subrecipient’s files. (a) Procurement by micro-purchases. Federal guidance defines procurement by micropurchase as the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold, currently at $3,000 (2 CFR 200.67). This amount is periodically adjusted for inflation. To the extent practicable, the non-Federal entity must distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro109 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 23 of 45
purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable. This method of procurement is intended to reduce administrative burdens by enabling non-Federal entities to obtain supplies and services valued at less than $3,000 without soliciting competitive quotes. Procurement records required for micro-purchase procurement 1. Rationale for using micro-purchase procedures (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the "Simplified Acquisition Threshold" in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1908 (2 CFR 200.88) (currently set at $150,000) and where procurement by sealed bid is not required. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations shall be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources to insure that the selection process is competitive. Records of these price or rate quotations should be maintained in the project files. Please note that 2 CFR 200 states that “the sealed bid is the preferred method for procuring construction.” Therefore, the non-Federal entity should carefully evaluate Construction Contracts, even if they are under the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, to determine whether they should be procured by sealed bid. Procurement records required for small purchase procedures: 1. Rationale for using small purchase procedures 2. Written criteria of materials or scope of work used to obtain quotes 3. Clearly dated records of price or rate quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources
(c) Procurement by sealed bids (formal advertising). Bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming to all the material terms and conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. (i) The sealed bid method is the preferred method for procuring construction if the following conditions are present: (A) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (B) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (C) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed-price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (ii)
If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: 110
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 24 of 45
(A)
The invitation for bids will be publicly advertised and bids shall be solicited from an adequate number of known suppliers, providing them sufficient time prior to the date set for opening the bids; 1. Clark County CRM requires the duration of a subrecipient’s advertisements of an invitation to bid in local media publications to be a minimum of 1 week, and a minimum of 2 weeks from advertisement to bid opening; 2. Examples of local print advertising venues include the Las Vegas Review Journal, El Mundo, El Tiempo, etc.; 3. Plans/specifications are to be made available in local plans rooms (Construction Notebook, Dodge Data & Analytics, Sierra Contractors Source, Construction Market Data, etc.); 4. The advertisement shall state when/where the bid documents will be made available and procedures for obtaining them.
(B)
The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, shall define the items or services in sufficient detail for the bidders to properly and fully respond; All bids will be sealed, dated stamped and publicly opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids; A firm fixed-price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs shall be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound, documented reason.
(C) (D)
(E)
(iii) Advertisements/Solicitations for bid must state that the project is federally funded and therefore subject to Davis-Bacon prevailing wages, Section 3, Affirmative Action/Equal Employment Opportunity and other federal regulations. Procurement records required for sealed bids: 1. Rationale for using sealed bids 2. An independent cost and price analysis (estimate) 3. Written bid solicitations/advertisements 4. Submitted bids 5. Justification for lack of competition when competitive bids are not obtained for procurements 6. Basis for contractor selection (award cost or price) 7. Contractor selection (award letter) 8. Contract 111 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 25 of 45
(d) Procurement by competitive proposals. The technique of competitive proposals is normally conducted with more than one source submitting an offer, resulting in the award of either a fixed-price or cost-reimbursement type contract. It is generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids, micro or small purchase procedures. There are two types of competitive proposals; requests for proposals (RFP’s), or Requests for Qualifications (RFQ’s). If this procurement method is used, the following requirements apply: (i)
(ii)
Requests for proposals (RFP’s), or Requests for Qualifications (RFQ’s), will be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Any response to publicized requests for proposals shall be honored to the maximum extent practical; Proposals will be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources;
(iii)
Awards will be made to the responsible firm whose proposal is most advantageous to the non-Federal entity with price, qualifications and other factors considered (see Section 8 (c) for other factors); and
(v)
RFQ is the type of competitive proposal used to procure Architectural or Engineering (A/E) services for project design. The most qualified competitor is selected based on an evaluation of qualifications. Price is not used as a selection factor. This approach may be used only to purchase architectural and engineering services. Competitors' qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified competitor is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. A scoring matrix should be developed and made part of the RFQ solicitation to score, evaluate and document the submittals. The RFQ cannot be used to procure services other than Architectural or Engineering from a firm, even if that firm is a potential source to perform other services.
Procurement records required for competitive proposals: 1. Rationale for using competitive proposal 2. An independent cost and price analysis (estimate) if more than Simplified Acquisition Threshold or if for construction 3. Written bid solicitations for proposal/advertisements 4. Submitted proposals 5. Justification for lack of competition if insufficient number of proposals are obtained for procurements 6. Basis for proposal selection (award cost or price)/factors considered/scoring matrix 7. Contractor selection (award letter) 8. Contract
112 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 26 of 45
(e) Procurement by noncompetitive proposals. This is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source. (i) Procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be used only when the award of a contract is infeasible under micro-purchase or small purchase procedures, sealed bids or competitive proposals AND one of the following circumstances applies: (A) (B) (C) (D) (ii)
The item is available only from a single source; The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from competitive solicitation; The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes the use of noncompetitive proposals in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.
Cost analysis, i.e., verifying the proposed cost data, the projections of the data, and the evaluation of the specific elements of costs and profits, is required in order to support reasonableness of costs.
Procurement records required for noncompetitive proposals 1. Rationale for using noncompetitive proposal procurement-justification for lack of competition 2. An independent cost and price analysis (estimate) to support reasonableness of cost 3. Scope of work 4. Contract 10. Scope of Work for Bids and Proposals. (2 CFR 200.318) Subrecipients should develop sufficiently detailed scopes of work for bids and proposals so as to avoid unnecessary change orders by contractors. Solicitations for goods and services will provide for all of the following: (a)
A clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product or service to be procured. The description should be comprehensive and with sufficient detail that the contractor will not need to submit change orders for items that should have been in the initial scope of work. In competitive procurements, such a description shall not contain features which unduly restrict competition. (b) Requirements which must be fulfilled, and all other factors to be used in evaluating proposals, are to be submitted in response to solicitations. (c) A description, whenever practicable, of technical requirements in terms of functions to be performed or performance required, including the range of acceptable characteristics or minimum acceptable standards. 113 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 27 of 45
(d)
When relevant, the specific features of "brand name or equal" descriptions that are to be included in responses submitted to solicitation. (e) The acceptance, to the extent practicable and economically feasible, of products and services dimensioned in the metric system of measurement. (f) Preference, to the extent practicable and economically feasible, for products and services that conserve natural resources, protect the environment and are energy efficient. 11. Cost and price analysis. (2 CFR 200.323) Some form of cost or price analysis shall be made and documented in the procurement files in connection with every procurement action, based on guidance for the method of procurement used, as outlined in Section 9-Methods of Procurement. For capital projects that will be procured through a competitive, sealed bid process, it is encouraged that the A/E (lead consultant for the project design) engages the services of a professional, third party cost estimator early in the project design to provide periodic updates through final design to help ensure the project remains within budget parameters. The recipient of federal funds for a capital project must have a cost estimate for the completed project design. The type of procuring instruments used (e.g., fixed price contracts, cost reimbursable contracts, purchase orders, and incentive contracts) shall be determined by the non-Federal entity but shall be appropriate for the particular procurement and for promoting the best interest of the program or project involved. The "cost-plus-a-percentage-of- cost" or "percentage of construction cost" methods of contracting shall not be used. See Section 9-Methods of Procurement for more information on the type of cost analysis required for each method. Records that show evidence of the appropriate cost analysis should be kept in the procurement files. 12. Contract modifications/change orders. (2 CFR 200.324) All contract modifications or change orders by subrecipients must be documented clearly in the files with cost analysis records or third party cost estimates, as applicable, and are subject to review by Clark County and/or Federal staff. Please also note that subrecipients should develop initial scopes of work with sufficient detail as to include all aspects of the project requirements and reduce the use of unnecessary change orders. Details regarding Change Order Procedures are included as Appendix C. 13. Contract administration. A system for contract administration shall be maintained to ensure contractor conformance with the terms, conditions and specifications of the contract and to ensure adequate and timely follow up of all purchases. The non-Federal entity shall evaluate contractor performance and document, as appropriate, whether contractors have met the terms, conditions and specifications of the contract. Subrecipients will make contract administration files available to Clark County CRM staff for monitoring, as needed. 14. Contract provisions. (2 CFR 200.325 and 2 CFR 200.326-Appendix II) The non-Federal entity shall include, in addition to provisions to define a sound and complete agreement, the following provisions in all contracts. The following provisions shall also be applied to subcontracts. 114 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 28 of 45
(a) Contracts in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, currently set at $150,000, shall contain contractual provisions or conditions that allow for administrative, contractual, or legal remedies in instances in which a contractor violates or breaches the contract terms, and provide for such remedial actions as may be appropriate. (b) All contracts in excess of $10,000 shall contain suitable provisions for termination by the non-Federal entity, including the manner by which termination shall be effected and the basis for settlement. In addition, such contracts shall describe conditions under which the contract may be terminated for default as well as conditions where the contract may be terminated because of circumstances beyond the control of the contractor. (c)
Professional Services Contracts should include: (i) Specific contract period dates; (ii) Project milestones; (iii) Specification of materials and other services; (iv) (v) (vi)
Provisions for compensation; All required federal contract language. If paid from CDBG funds: a. Required to use the RFP/RFQ method of solicitation; b. Three-year period, maximum; c. Subrecipient’s contracts should be reviewed and approved by the subrecipient’s legal counsel.
(d) For contracts dealing with construction or facility improvements, the non-Federal entity shall comply with all requirements imposed by its funding sources (and the government regulations applicable to those funding sources) with regard to construction bid guarantees, performance bonds, and payment bonds. Following are HUD’s minimum bonding requirements: (i) (ii) (iii)
(vii)
Bid guarantee-5% of bid price; Performance bond-100% of contract price; Payment bond-100% of contract price;
Bonds from companies holding certificates of authority pursuant to 31 CFR part 223.
(e) All negotiated contracts awarded by the subrecipient shall include a provision to the effect that Clark County and/or HUD shall have access to any books, documents, papers and records of the contractor which are directly pertinent to a specific program for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts and transcriptions. (f) All contracts, including small purchases, awarded by the subrecipient and their contractors where the source of the funds, directly or indirectly, is the federal government, shall contain the procurement provisions from 2 CFR 200.326-Appendix II, as applicable. This document is included in Appendix A of these guidelines. 115 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 29 of 45
Appendices
Appendix A: 2 CFR 200.318-322 and Appendix II-Contract Provisions Appendix B: Clark County CRM Subrecipient Checklist Appendix C: Change Order Procedures Appendix D: Rules for Construction Projects with Non-Profit Organizations/Agencies Appendix E: OIG Integrity Bulletin for Procurement and Contracting
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 30 of 45
116
Appendix A Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 2 - Grants and Agreements Volume: 1 Date: 2014-01-01 Original Date: 2014-01-01 Title: Section 200.318 - General procurement standards. Context: Title 2 - Grants and Agreements. Subtitle A - Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements. CHAPTER II - OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GUIDANCE. - Reserved. PART 200 - UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS. Subpart D Post Federal Award Requirements. - Procurement Standards. § 200.318 General procurement standards. (a) The non-Federal entity must use its own documented procurement procedures which reflect applicable State and local laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable Federal law and the standards identified in this section. (b) Non-Federal entities must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. (c)(1) The non-Federal entity must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the performance of its employees engaged in the selection, award and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, or agent must participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by a Federal award if he or she has a real or apparent conflict of interest. Such a conflict of interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from a firm considered for a contract. The officers, employees, and agents of the non-Federal entity must neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors or parties to subcontracts. However, non-Federal entities may set standards for situations in which the financial interest is not substantial or the gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value. The standards of conduct must provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents of the non-Federal entity. (2) If the non-Federal entity has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a state, local government, or Indian tribe, the non-Federal entity must also maintain written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the non-Federal entity is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization. (d) The non-Federal entity's procedures must avoid acquisition of unnecessary or duplicative items. Consideration should be given to consolidating or breaking out procurements to obtain a more economical purchase. Where appropriate, an analysis will be made of lease versus purchase alternatives, and any other appropriate analysis to determine the most economical approach. (e) To foster greater economy and efficiency, and in accordance with efforts to promote cost-effective use of shared services across the Federal government, the non-Federal entity is encouraged to enter into state and local intergovernmental agreements or inter-entity agreements where appropriate for procurement or use of common or shared goods and services.
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 31 of 45
117
(f) The non-Federal entity is encouraged to use Federal excess and surplus property in lieu of purchasing new equipment and property whenever such use is feasible and reduces project costs. (g) The non-Federal entity is encouraged to use value engineering clauses in contracts for construction projects of sufficient size to offer reasonable opportunities for cost reductions. Value engineering is a systematic and creative analysis of each contract item or task to ensure that its essential function is provided at the overall lower cost. (h) The non-Federal entity must award contracts only to responsible contractors possessing the ability to perform successfully under the terms and conditions of a proposed procurement. Consideration will be given to such matters as contractor integrity, compliance with public policy, record of past performance, and financial and technical resources. (i) The non-Federal entity must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. / Title 2 - Grants and Agreements / / 2014-01-01 (j)(1) The non-Federal entity may use time and material type contracts only after a determination that no other contract is suitable and if the contract includes a ceiling price that the contractor exceeds at its own risk. Time and material type contract means a contract whose cost to a non-Federal entity is the sum of: (i) The actual cost of materials; and profit.
(ii) Direct labor hours charged at fixed hourly rates that reflect wages, general and administrative expenses, and
(2) Since this formula generates an open-ended contract price, a time-and-materials contract provides no positive profit incentive to the contractor for cost control or labor efficiency. Therefore, each contract must set a ceiling price that the contractor exceeds at its own risk. Further, the non-Federal entity awarding such a contract must assert a high degree of oversight in order to obtain reasonable assurance that the contractor is using efficient methods and effective cost controls. (k) The non-Federal entity alone must be responsible, in accordance with good administrative practice and sound business judgment, for the settlement of all contractual and administrative issues arising out of procurements. These issues include, but are not limited to, source evaluation, protests, disputes, and claims. These standards do not relieve the non-Federal entity of any contractual responsibilities under its contracts. The Federal awarding agency will not substitute its judgment for that of the non-Federal entity unless the matter is primarily a Federal concern. Violations of law will be referred to the local, state, or Federal authority having proper jurisdiction. §200.319 Competition. (a) All procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section. In order to ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage, contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, or invitations for bids or requests for proposals must be excluded from competing for such procurements. Some of the situations considered to be restrictive of competition include but are not limited to: (1) Placing unreasonable requirements on firms in order for them to qualify to do business; (2) Requiring unnecessary experience and excessive bonding; (3) Noncompetitive pricing practices between firms or between affiliated companies; (4) Noncompetitive contracts to consultants that are on retainer contracts;
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 32 of 45
118
(5) Organizational conflicts of interest; (6) Specifying only a “brand name” product instead of allowing “an equal” product to be offered and describing the performance or other relevant requirements of the procurement; and (7) Any arbitrary action in the procurement process. (b) The non-Federal entity must conduct procurements in a manner that prohibits the use of statutorily or administratively imposed state, local, or tribal geographical preferences in the evaluation of bids or proposals, except in those cases where applicable Federal statutes expressly mandate or encourage geographic preference. Nothing in this section preempts state licensing laws. When contracting for architectural and engineering (A/E) services, geographic location may be a selection criterion provided its application leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the project, to compete for the contract. (c) The non-Federal entity must have written procedures for procurement transactions. These procedures must ensure that all solicitations: (1) Incorporate a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured. Such description must not, in competitive procurements, contain features which unduly restrict competition. The description may include a statement of the qualitative nature of the material, product or service to be procured and, when necessary, must set forth those minimum essential characteristics and standards to which it must conform if it is to satisfy its intended use. Detailed product specifications should be avoided if at all possible. When it is impractical or uneconomical to make a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements, a “brand name or equivalent” description may be used as a means to define the performance or other salient requirements of procurement. The specific features of the named brand which must be met by offers must be clearly stated; and (2) Identify all requirements which the offerors must fulfill and all other factors to be used in evaluating bids or proposals. (d) The non-Federal entity must ensure that all prequalified lists of persons, firms, or products which are used in acquiring goods and services are current and include enough qualified sources to ensure maximum open and free competition. Also, the non-Federal entity must not preclude potential bidders from qualifying during the solicitation period. [78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 75885, Dec. 19, 2014] §200.320 Methods of procurement to be followed. The non-Federal entity must use one of the following methods of procurement. (a) Procurement by micro-purchases. Procurement by micro-purchase is the acquisition of supplies or services, the aggregate dollar amount of which does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold (§200.67 Micro-purchase). To the extent practicable, the non-Federal entity must distribute micro-purchases equitably among qualified suppliers. Micro-purchases may be awarded without soliciting competitive quotations if the non-Federal entity considers the price to be reasonable. (b) Procurement by small purchase procedures. Small purchase procedures are those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing services, supplies, or other property that do not cost more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. If small purchase procedures are used, price or rate quotations must be obtained from an adequate number of qualified sources. (c) Procurement by sealed bids (formal advertising). Bids are publicly solicited and a firm fixed price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to the responsible bidder whose bid, conforming with all the material terms and
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 33 of 45
119
conditions of the invitation for bids, is the lowest in price. The sealed bid method is the preferred method for procuring construction, if the conditions in paragraph (c)(1) of this section apply. (1) In order for sealed bidding to be feasible, the following conditions should be present: (i) A complete, adequate, and realistic specification or purchase description is available; (ii) Two or more responsible bidders are willing and able to compete effectively for the business; and (iii) The procurement lends itself to a firm fixed price contract and the selection of the successful bidder can be made principally on the basis of price. (2) If sealed bids are used, the following requirements apply: (i) Bids must be solicited from an adequate number of known suppliers, providing them sufficient response time prior to the date set for opening the bids, for local, and tribal governments, the invitation for bids must be publicly advertised; (ii) The invitation for bids, which will include any specifications and pertinent attachments, must define the items or services in order for the bidder to properly respond; (iii) All bids will be opened at the time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids, and for local and tribal governments, the bids must be opened publicly; (iv) A firm fixed price contract award will be made in writing to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. Where specified in bidding documents, factors such as discounts, transportation cost, and life cycle costs must be considered in determining which bid is lowest. Payment discounts will only be used to determine the low bid when prior experience indicates that such discounts are usually taken advantage of; and (v) Any or all bids may be rejected if there is a sound documented reason. (d) Procurement by competitive proposals. The technique of competitive proposals is normally conducted with more than one source submitting an offer, and either a fixed price or cost-reimbursement type contract is awarded. It is generally used when conditions are not appropriate for the use of sealed bids. If this method is used, the following requirements apply: (1) Requests for proposals must be publicized and identify all evaluation factors and their relative importance. Any response to publicized requests for proposals must be considered to the maximum extent practical; (2) Proposals must be solicited from an adequate number of qualified sources; (3) The non-Federal entity must have a written method for conducting technical evaluations of the proposals received and for selecting recipients; (4) Contracts must be awarded to the responsible firm whose proposal is most advantageous to the program, with price and other factors considered; and (5) The non-Federal entity may use competitive proposal procedures for qualifications-based procurement of architectural/engineering (A/E) professional services whereby competitors' qualifications are evaluated and the most qualified competitor is selected, subject to negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. The method, where price is not used as a selection factor, can only be used in procurement of A/E professional services. It cannot be used to purchase other types of services though A/E firms are a potential source to perform the proposed effort. (e) [Reserved]
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 34 of 45
120
(f) Procurement by noncompetitive proposals. Procurement by noncompetitive proposals is procurement through solicitation of a proposal from only one source and may be used only when one or more of the following circumstances apply: (1) The item is available only from a single source; (2) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from competitive solicitation; (3) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes noncompetitive proposals in response to a written request from the non-Federal entity; or (4) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate. [78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 75885, Dec. 19, 2014; 80 FR 54409, Sept. 10, 2015] §200.321 Contracting with small and minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms. (a) The non-Federal entity must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible. (b) Affirmative steps must include: (1) Placing qualified small and minority businesses and women's business enterprises on solicitation lists; (2) Assuring that small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises are solicited whenever they are potential sources; (3) Dividing total requirements, when economically feasible, into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises; (4) Establishing delivery schedules, where the requirement permits, which encourage participation by small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises; (5) Using the services and assistance, as appropriate, of such organizations as the Small Business Administration and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce; and (6) Requiring the prime contractor, if subcontracts are to be let, to take the affirmative steps listed in paragraphs (1) through (5) of this section. §200.322 Procurement of recovered materials. A non-Federal entity that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines. [78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 75885, Dec. 19, 2014]
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 35 of 45
121
§200.323 Contract cost and price. (a) The non-Federal entity must perform a cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold including contract modifications. The method and degree of analysis is dependent on the facts surrounding the particular procurement situation, but as a starting point, the non-Federal entity must make independent estimates before receiving bids or proposals. (b) The non-Federal entity must negotiate profit as a separate element of the price for each contract in which there is no price competition and in all cases where cost analysis is performed. To establish a fair and reasonable profit, consideration must be given to the complexity of the work to be performed, the risk borne by the contractor, the contractor's investment, the amount of subcontracting, the quality of its record of past performance, and industry profit rates in the surrounding geographical area for similar work. (c) Costs or prices based on estimated costs for contracts under the Federal award are allowable only to the extent that costs incurred or cost estimates included in negotiated prices would be allowable for the non-Federal entity under Subpart E—Cost Principles of this part. The non-Federal entity may reference its own cost principles that comply with the Federal cost principles. used.
(d) The cost plus a percentage of cost and percentage of construction cost methods of contracting must not be
§200.324 Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity review. (a) The non-Federal entity must make available, upon request of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity, technical specifications on proposed procurements where the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity believes such review is needed to ensure that the item or service specified is the one being proposed for acquisition. This review generally will take place prior to the time the specification is incorporated into a solicitation document. However, if the non-Federal entity desires to have the review accomplished after a solicitation has been developed, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may still review the specifications, with such review usually limited to the technical aspects of the proposed purchase. (b) The non-Federal entity must make available upon request, for the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity pre-procurement review, procurement documents, such as requests for proposals or invitations for bids, or independent cost estimates, when: (1) The non-Federal entity's procurement procedures or operation fails to comply with the procurement standards in this part; (2) The procurement is expected to exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and is to be awarded without competition or only one bid or offer is received in response to a solicitation; (3) The procurement, which is expected to exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, specifies a “brand name” product; (4) The proposed contract is more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and is to be awarded to other than the apparent low bidder under a sealed bid procurement; or (5) A proposed contract modification changes the scope of a contract or increases the contract amount by more than the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. (c) The non-Federal entity is exempt from the pre-procurement review in paragraph (b) of this section if the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity determines that its procurement systems comply with the standards of this part. (1) The non-Federal entity may request that its procurement system be reviewed by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity to determine whether its system meets these standards in order for its system to be
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 36 of 45
122
certified. Generally, these reviews must occur where there is continuous high-dollar funding, and third party contracts are awarded on a regular basis; (2) The non-Federal entity may self-certify its procurement system. Such self-certification must not limit the Federal awarding agency's right to survey the system. Under a self-certification procedure, the Federal awarding agency may rely on written assurances from the non-Federal entity that it is complying with these standards. The nonFederal entity must cite specific policies, procedures, regulations, or standards as being in compliance with these requirements and have its system available for review. §200.325 Bonding requirements. For construction or facility improvement contracts or subcontracts exceeding the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity may accept the bonding policy and requirements of the non-Federal entity provided that the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity has made a determination that the Federal interest is adequately protected. If such a determination has not been made, the minimum requirements must be as follows: (a) A bid guarantee from each bidder equivalent to five percent of the bid price. The “bid guarantee” must consist of a firm commitment such as a bid bond, certified check, or other negotiable instrument accompanying a bid as assurance that the bidder will, upon acceptance of the bid, execute such contractual documents as may be required within the time specified. (b) A performance bond on the part of the contractor for 100 percent of the contract price. A “performance bond” is one executed in connection with a contract to secure fulfillment of all the contractor's obligations under such contract. (c) A payment bond on the part of the contractor for 100 percent of the contract price. A “payment bond” is one executed in connection with a contract to assure payment as required by law of all persons supplying labor and material in the execution of the work provided for in the contract. §200.326 Contract provisions. The non-Federal entity's contracts must contain the applicable provisions described in Appendix II to Part 200— Contract Provisions for non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards.
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 37 of 45
123
Code of Federal Regulations Title 2 - Grants and Agreements Volume: 1 Date: 2014-01-01 Original Date: 2014-01-01 Title: Appendix II to Part 200 - Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards Context: Title 2 - Grants and Agreements. Subtitle A - Office of Management and Budget Guidance for Grants and Agreements. CHAPTER II - OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET GUIDANCE. - Reserved. PART 200 - UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS. Pt. 200, App. II Appendix II to Part 200—Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards
In addition to other provisions required by the Federal agency or non-Federal entity, all contracts made by the nonFederal entity under the Federal award must contain provisions covering the following, as applicable. (A) Contracts for more than the simplified acquisition threshold currently set at $150,000, which is the inflation adjusted amount determined by the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) as authorized by 41 U.S.C. 1908, must address administrative, contractual, or legal remedies in instances where contractors violate or breach contract terms, and provide for such sanctions and penalties as appropriate. (B) All contracts in excess of $10,000 must address termination for cause and for convenience by the nonFederal entity including the manner by which it will be effected and the basis for settlement. (C) Equal Employment Opportunity. Except as otherwise provided under 41 CFR Part 60, all contracts that meet the definition of “federally assisted construction contract” in 41 CFR Part 60-1.3 must include the equal opportunity clause provided under 41 CFR 60-1.4(b), in accordance with Executive Order 11246, “Equal Employment Opportunity” (30 FR 12319, 12935, 3 CFR Part, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339), as amended by Executive Order 11375, “Amending Executive Order 11246 Relating to Equal Employment Opportunity,” and implementing regulations at 41 CFR part 60, “Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor.” (D) Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 3141-3148). When required by Federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by non-Federal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-Federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-Federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The nonFederal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the Federal awarding agency. (E) Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3701-3708). Where applicable, all contracts awarded by the non-Federal entity in excess of $100,000 that involve the employment of mechanics or laborers must include a provision for compliance with 40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5). Under 40 U.S.C. 3702 of the Act, each contractor must be required to compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard work week of 40 hours. Work in excess of the standard work week is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than one and a half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in the work week. The requirements of 40 U.S.C. 3704 are
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 38 of 45
124
applicable to construction work and provide that no laborer or mechanic must be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous. These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence. (F) Rights to Inventions Made Under a Contract or Agreement. If the Federal award meets the definition of “funding agreement” under 37 CFR § 401.2 (a) and the recipient or subrecipient wishes to enter into a contract with a small business firm or nonprofit organization regarding the substitution of parties, assignment or performance of experimental, developmental, or research work under that “funding agreement,” the recipient or subrecipient must comply with the requirements of 37 CFR Part 401, “Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,” and any implementing regulations issued by the awarding agency. (G) Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387), as amended—Contracts and subgrants of amounts in excess of $150,000 must contain a provision that requires the nonFederal award to agree to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251-1387). Violations must be reported to the Federal awarding agency and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (H) Mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency which are contained in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6201). (I) Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689)—A contract award (see 2 CFR 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the governmentwide Excluded Parties List System in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 CFR 180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 CFR Part 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 CFR Part 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” The Excluded Parties List System in SAM contains the names of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. (J) Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352)—Contractors that apply or bid for an award of $100,000 or more must file the required certification. Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Each tier must also disclose any lobbying with non-Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the non-Federal award. (K) See § 200.322 Procurement of recovered materials.
CDBG Interlocal Agreement.City of Mesquite.FY 2017-18
Page 39 of 45
125
Appendix B Clark County Community Resources Management Federal Grant Subrecipient Procurement Policies and Procedures Checklist As a subrecipient of Federal grant funds, my agency agrees to comply with policies that align with 2 CFR 200 (Uniform Guidance) regulations regarding procurement of goods and services for grant-related activities. By signing below, I acknowledge that I have received from Community Resources Management the Subrecipient Guidelines for Federal Procurement Policies and Procedures. I also acknowledge that my agency: Shall document and maintain procurement procedures and a conflict of interest policy, and shall adhere to a code of conduct that avoids real or apparent conflicts of interest. (2 CFR 200.318) Shall conduct procurement transactions in a manner that provides open and free competition. (2 CFR 200.319) Shall follow Uniform Guidance for procurement by micro-purchases, currently at less than $3,000, unless existing procurement procedures specify a lesser amount as the threshold for micro-purchases, at which time shall use the lesser amount. (2 CFR 200.320) __ Please check here if your agency’s procurement procedures indicate a lesser threshold amount. Your agency’s threshold amount for micro-purchase procedures is: . Shall follow Uniform Guidance and obtain price quotations from an adequate number of qualified sources for small purchase procedures (less than $150,000) unless existing procurement procedures specify a lesser amount as the threshold for small purchases, at which time shall use the lesser amount. (2 CFR 200.320) __ Please check here if your agency’s procurement procedures indicate a lesser threshold amount. Your agency’s threshold amount for small purchase procedures is: . Shall follow Uniform Guidance and solicit formal bids for transactions above the $150,000 threshold (or for a lesser amount if existing procurement procedures indicate a lesser amount as the threshold for formal bids.) (2 CFR 200.320) __ Please check here if your agency’s procurement procedures indicate a lesser threshold amount. Your agency’s threshold amount for formal bids is: . Shall advertise publicly for formal bids in local media publications for a minimum of one (1) week and allow a minimum of two (2) weeks between advertisement to bid opening. Shall ensure that all prequalified lists of persons, firms or products are current and include qualified sources to ensure maximum open and free competition. Shall not preclude potential bidders from qualifying during the solicitation period. (2 CFR 200.319) Shall develop scopes of work with a clear and accurate description of the technical requirements for the material, product, or service to be procured but shall avoid features which unduly restrict competition. (2 CFR 200.319)
126 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.CityofMesquite.FY2017-2018
Page 40 of 45
Shall avoid the unnecessary use of change orders by developing the initial scope of work in sufficient detail as to identify all the requirements an offerer must fulfill in order to allow bidders to properly respond to the request for bids. (2 CFR 200.319) Shall ensure bids are delivered in a sealed envelope and date stamped prior to the bid opening deadline and are publicly opened at a time and place prescribed in the invitation for bids. (2 CFR 200.320) Shall employ the technique of competitive proposals when appropriate, such as for Architectural/Engineering services, and shall publicize and identify all evaluation factors in the RFP (Request for Proposal) or RFQ (Request for Qualifications). (2 CFR 200.320) Shall solicit competitive proposals from an adequate number of qualified sources when this technique is employed. (2 CFR 200.320) Shall employ the technique of noncompetitive proposals only when the award of a contract is infeasible under small purchase procedures, sealed bids or competitive proposals. (2 CFR 200.320) Shall make positive efforts to utilize small businesses, minority-owned firms, and women’s business enterprises, whenever possible, and document efforts to do so. (2 CFR 200.321) Shall require all contractors and subcontractors to register on the SAM.gov web site, and shall not make contracts with any parties listed on SAM.gov as having active exclusions, debarment or suspension from Federal funding. (2 CFR 200.213) Shall obtain and clearly document an appropriate cost or price analysis in connection with every procurement action in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. For contract modifications and change orders, shall adhere to change order policies as outlined in the Procurement Policies and Procedures Guidelines, Appendix C. (2 CFR 200.323) Shall, as a starting point for all procurement, make independent estimates before receiving bids and proposals for purchases in excess of the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. (2 CFR 200.323) Shall maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement, including rationale for method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. (2 CFR 200.318)
Shall maintain financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other records pertinent to the Federal award and shall retain them for a minimum of three years from the date of the submission of the final expenditure report. (2 CFR 200.333) Shall add provisions to all contracts, as required by Appendix II to Part 200—Contract Provisions for nonFederal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards, if applicable. (2 CFR 200.326)
127 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.CityofMesquite.FY2017-2018
Page 41 of 45
________________________________________ Authorized signature Date Title: Click here to enter text. Agency: Click here to enter text.
Received by CRM on: Date Received by:
Printed name
Signature
128 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.CityofMesquite.FY2017-2018
Page 42 of 45
Appendix C Change Order Policies and Procedures for Subrecipients of Federal HUD Funding Through Clark County, Nevada The following process for change orders will be used to document adjustments to construction contracts that are funded by federal HUD dollars provided to subrecipients through Clark County’s U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development funding administered through the Community Resources Management unit of Clark County Social Service. These policies and procedures apply to all subrecipients of Clark County CDBG and HOME funding in relation to construction projects. When is a Change Order Required? An official change order will result from changes regarding the original scope of work, price or schedule agreed upon between the subrecipient and parties involved in construction projects. A change order is a written instrument prepared by an architect and signed by the owner, contractor and architect stating their agreement of a change to the scope of work, timeframe or amount. How Frequently Should Change Orders Be Used? Change orders are to be used minimally. The subrecipient will develop complete and well-defined scopes of work for construction projects to limit the need of change orders, thus avoiding overuse of change orders. When a scope of work is developed, the subrecipient will send a copy to CDBG and HOME staff at the Community Resources Management unit. When change orders are required, the subrecipient will clearly document and keep records explaining the need for the change order. How Should Change Orders Undergo A Cost Analysis? The subrecipient will undertake a cost analysis for every change order. Cost analysis is the review and evaluation of each element of cost to determine reasonableness and applicability. Change order requests are required to show a breakdown between materials, labor and overhead/profit. Cost analysis requires, at a minimum, review and sign off by the construction project architect and the project owner to attest to applicability of the change order to the project and the reasonableness of cost of the change order. The change order will also be reviewed by Clark County CRM staff, as explained in the next section. How Will Clark County CRM Staff Review the Change Order? As the lead agency for HUD funding, Clark County must review and sign off on all subrecipient change orders. After the architect has signed off on the change order and prior to implementing the change order, the subrecipient will submit the change order to the Clark County CRM staff for review and sign-off. The subrecipient also will submit a cost analysis documentation and approval letter from the architect. Clark County will provide written sign-off on the change orders in a timely fashion so as to not delay projects. What Records Must Subrecipients Keep? The subrecipient will maintain hard copy or digital records of all change orders, including cost analysis and review and approval by subrecipient staff, and will produce those records for monitoring by County or Federal level staff. Clark County CRM will maintain records of sign-off on change orders.
129 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.CityofMesquite.FY2017-2018
Page 43 of 45
Appendix D This Appendix applies only to construction projects jointly developed with Non-Profit Organizations and Agencies (Does not include projects developed in conjunction with Clark County RPM). For projects that receive Federal funding, certain procedures must be followed to comply with applicable Federal statutes and executive orders. Grantees must also follow applicable State or local laws on procurement, depending on their location. If there are inconsistencies among Federal, State or local laws, the strictest of the requirements applies. Procurement Manual Non-Federal entities, e.g. both Non-Profit organizations (e.g. Catholic Charities, Nevada Hand, etc.) and units of local government (Clark County, North Las Vegas, Mesquite, etc.), are required to have written procurement procedures or a “Procurement Manual” that clearly outlines purchasing and contracting procedures that comply with Federal Regulations. Among other things, the requirements governing the purchasing process are designed to ensure the following:
Free and open competitive process in securing products and services Proper documentation of activities and decisions Comply with special rules for particular kinds of purchases (competitive sealed bids, etc.) Proper bonding and insurance Use of local businesses and contacting preferences with small, minority and/or women-owned businesses to the maximum extent feasible
These non-Federal entities also must maintain oversight to ensure that contractors perform in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications of their contracts or purchase orders. Procurement and Contracting Ground Rules (See Appendix E) The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Inspector General (OIG) published and “Integrity Bulletin” titled “Procurement & Contracting: Five Ground Rules for Grantees and Subrecipients”. Federal Grants made after December 14, 2014 are now covered by a new common rule at 2 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principals and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. The five basics that should be in place, as discussed in greater detail in the bulletin, are: Maintain Separation of Duties Provide Competencies and Training Insist on Good Record Keeping Maximize Competition Uphold Ethics and Bar Conflicts of Interest Agencies and subrecipients should review this OIG bulletin when developing and updating their procurement and contracting procedures. They are also encouraged to review the Clark County CRM Subrecipient Guidelines for Federal Funding Procurement Policies and Procedures and to ensure their Procurement Manual meet the necessary minimum Federal compliance requirements.
130 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.CityofMesquite.FY2017-2018
Page 44 of 45
Appendix F OIG Integrity Bulletin for Procurement & Contracting
131 CDBG Interlocal Agreement.CityofMesquite.FY2017-2018
Page 45 of 45
City Council Agenda Item 6 Submitted by: Tracy Beck Submitting Department: City Manager Meeting Date: November 28, 2017
Subject: Mayor's Comments Recommendation:
Petitioner: Andy Barton, City Manager Is this a budgeted item? No Fiscal Impact:
Background:
Attachments:
132
City Council Agenda Item 7 Submitted by: Tracy Beck Submitting Department: City Manager Meeting Date: November 28, 2017
Subject: City Council and Staff Reports and Comments Recommendation:
Petitioner: Andy Barton, City Manager Is this a budgeted item? No Fiscal Impact:
Background:
Attachments:
133
City Council Agenda Item 8 Submitted by: Richard Secrist Submitting Department: Development Services Meeting Date: November 28, 2017
Subject: Consideration of the Introduction of Bill Number 529 (single family residential parking requirements) to establish performance standards for driveways and parking spaces in the single family residential zone. - Public Comment - Discussion and Possible Action
Recommendation: Introduce Bill Number 529 as Ordinance Number 529 and set the public hearing for December 12, 2017 at 5:00 p.m.
Petitioner: Richard Secrist, Development Services Director Is this a budgeted item? No Fiscal Impact: None Background: Questions have arisen as to whether vehicles can be parked in a side or rear yard without the parking space having to be paved; what paving materials for driveways are acceptable; and whether there are rules for the parking of unregistered or inoperative vehicles. Existing ambiguity in the Unified Development Code has hindered code enforcement efforts. This proposed code amendment seeks to clarify the intent of the code with respect to these questions.
Attachments: Bill No. 529_ Single Family Parking Requirements.docx Bill 529_Attachment1.docx
134
BILL NO. 529 ORDINANCE NO. 529 CONSIDERATION OF THE INTRODUCTION OF BILL NUMBER 529 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS) TO ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING SPACES IN THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE. WHEREAS, it is reasonable and appropriate to amend the Mesquite Municipal Code from time to time; and WHEREAS, the Nevada Legislature has granted to the governing body (City Council) authority to prepare and adopt a Master Plan, and to divide the City into zoning districts and adopt zoning regulations; and WHEREAS, the purpose of parking regulation is to ensure sufficient off-street parking is provided for each land use without providing excessive parking; ensure sufficient accessible parking is provided for people with disabilities; and WHEREAS, recent code enforcement cases have been deemed unenforceable due to ambiguity and loopholes in the code; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary to amend the Single Family Residential Parking Regulations in order to make clear what the minimum performance standards are for driveway access, off-street parking spaces, and unregistered and inoperative vehicles; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary and appropriate to amend Mesquite Municipal Code Title 9. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MESQUITE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: Section 9-7F-7A-C is hereby amended as set forth in Attachment 1 of this bill; and SECTION 2: If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this ordinance shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, clause or provision shall in no way affect remaining provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 3: All ordinances, parts of ordinances or chapters, sections or paragraphs contained in the Mesquite Municipal Code in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 4: This ordinance shall become effective twenty (20) days after its publication once by title in a newspaper qualified pursuant to provisions of Chapter 238 of NRS, as amended from time to time. 1
135
SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published once immediately following its adoption, by title, in a newspaper qualified pursuant to provisions of Chapter 238 of NRS, as amended from time to time. PASSED, ADOPTED, AND APPROVED this 12th day of December, 2017.
By: ________________________ Allen S. Litman, Mayor
ATTEST:
BY:________________________ Tracy Beck, City Clerk
AYE: NAY: ABSTAIN:
PUBLICATION DATE:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Approved as to Form
By:________________________ Robert Sweetin, City Attorney
136 2
137
Revised: 11/2/2017
9-7F-7: PARKING REQUIREMENTS: A. Off-Street Parking Required: sufficient off street parking shall be provided and maintained for all vehicles. Minimum: Every dwelling unit must have a minimum of two (2) off street parking spaces.(Driveways, carports and garages may be used to fulfill this requirement). 1.
In addition to the standard driveway parking spaces provided in conjunction with any single-family residence, additional off-street parking or storage spaces may be provided within any side or rear yard. 2. All areas utilized for the parking of vehicles shall be paved with a hard surface such as concrete, asphalt, brick, crushed rock, or other similarly durable hardened improved surface with a defined edge. 3. Any unregistered or inoperative vehicles shall be parked: a. In a garage b. In a side or rear yard that is screened from view, or c. On an approved driveway, and covered with a car cover All other buildings/uses must comply with the requirements of section 9-8-5 of this title. B. Commercial vehicles over one and one-half (11/2) tons are prohibited from parking anywhere in the single-family zone. C. Parking of vehicles (as defined in section 9-2-2 of this code) in the front yard of a singlefamily residence is prohibited unless on a paved driveway of concrete, brick, asphalt, or similarly durable hardened improved surface with a defined edge. 1. All driveways in the required front yard setback shall be paved with concrete, asphalt, brick , or similarly durable hardened improved surface with a defined edge. (Dirt, gravel, crushed rock or any other similar material that can be tracked into the street are not acceptable substitutes.) However, behind the required front setback crushed rock may be an acceptable substitute leading to parking in the side or rear yards. 2. No more than half of the width of the front yard may be used as a driveway, except on lots located on a curve, cul-de-sac or knuckle lot. 3. For lots developed with a "circle" or "hammerhead" driveway, no more than two-thirds (2/3) of the area of the required front yard may be used as a driveway. 4. Corner and cul-de-sac lots and other odd shaped lots must have driveways that are not significantly wider or out of character in comparison to neighboring and nearby homes. (Ord. 475, 11-26-2013, eff. 12-18-2013)
138
City Council Agenda Item 9 Submitted by: Richard Secrist Submitting Department: Development Services Meeting Date: November 28, 2017
Subject: Consideration of Tentative Map Case No. TM-17-003 (Val Vista Estates) to approve a 142-lot single family subdivision on 34.24 acres at 1450-1500 Mesquite Heights Road in the Mesquite Estates Planned Unit Development. - Public Hearing - Discussion and Possible Action Recommendation: Open the public hearing for comment, and approve Tentative Map Case No. TM-17-003, subject to staff recommendations Petitioner: Richard Secrist, Development Services Director Is this a budgeted item? No Fiscal Impact: None Background: The applicants are proposing a 142-lot single family subdivision on 34.24 acres in the Mesquite Estates Planned Unit Development. The subdivision will be located between Mesquite Heights Road and Windgate Drive, from Stone Haven Subdivision to Hayden Estates Subdivision. This subdivision will be a common interest community with private streets and private open space. It will have access from Mesquite Heights Road and Windgate Drive. Subdivision lots will range in size from approximately 6,846 square feet to 15,229 square feet. The overall gross density will be approximately 4.08 units per acre, with approximately 4.9 % landscaped open space. Attachments: TM-17-003_StaffMemo.doc TM-17-003_App&Plans.pdf
139
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Richard Secrist, Development Services Director
DATE:
October 24, 2017
RE:
Consideration of Tentative Map Case No. TM-17-003 (Val Vista Estates) to approve a 142-lot single family subdivision on 34.24 acres at 1450-1500 Mesquite Heights Road in the Mesquite Estates Planned Unit Development.
Background The applicants are proposing a 142-lot single family subdivision on 34.24 acres in the Mesquite Estates Planned Unit Development. The subdivision will be located between Mesquite Heights Road and Windgate Drive, from Stone Haven Subdivision to Hayden Estates Subdivision. This subdivision will be a common interest community with private streets and private open space. It will have access from Mesquite Heights Road and Windgate Drive. Subdivision lots will range in size from approximately 6,846 square feet to 15,229 square feet. The overall gross density is approximately 4.14 units per acre, with approximately 4.4 % landscaped open space.
Key Facts The Mesquite Estates Development Agreement lapsed several years ago, but the developer / owners have submitted an application to amend the agreement, and extend
140
Case No: TM-17-003 (Val Vista Subdivision) Date: November 10, 2017 Page: 2
out its term. The pending amendment will change the amount of parks and open space that is required for the PUD, and it will provide two ways for each developer to provide that open space. Subdivision is located in the Mesquite Estates (Formerly Wolf Creek) Planned Unit Development. Subdivision is part of a common interest community. Subdivision contains 142 residential lots, and 6 common element lots, not counting the streets. Overall, the subdivision encompasses 34.24 acres.
Tentative Map Approval Criteria Please refer to Appendix “A” for the excerpt from Mesquite Municipal Code (MMC) Section 9-64. Subsection H sets forth guidelines and criteria for City Council decisions on tentative maps. Analysis Lot Standards: Lots in the subdivision range in size from 6,846 square feet to 15,229 square feet, with all lots conforming to the Design Standards Handbook. General public utility easements for the subdivision are not shown, but will be provided. Staff recommends easements of 10 feet along the front, 3 feet along rear property lines and 5 feet along the side property lines. Open Space: Approximately 4.4 percent of the total site is common open space. There is one private parkette in the middle of the subdivision. The rest of the open space borders streets on the perimeter of the development. As noted above, the pending Development Agreement provides that each subdivider / developer has the choice of providing one or more programmable parks (at least 5-acres in size, the design of which has been approved by the City), or they may set aside private open space in the amount of 518 square feet per dwelling, in one or more usable spaces. If programmable parks are provided in the development, the developer may request reimbursement from the Residential Construction Tax Fund. Open space is required to be provided at the rate of 5 acres per 1,000 in population. The original master plan called for 30 acres of parks and open space. But with changes to the number of persons per household in the 2010 Census that number has dropped to approximately 27 acres. Developers of this property have opted to provide the private open space. The existing plan shows 1.51 acres of open space (not counting streets), and 1.68 acres are needed to meet the new requirement. The subdivision will have to be revised slightly to make up the deficient 7,521 square feet of open space. It will necessitate losing one lot. Landscaping plans for this open space will need to be submitted and approved prior to signing of the final map. Landscaping for Val Vista should be included in the improvement plans. Circulation: The Val Vista Subdivision is accessed from Mesquite Heights Road and Windgate Drive, both public streets. Interior circulation to lots is provided by a two connecting loop streets. These are 41-foot rights-of-way with two 18-foot travel lanes, curb and gutter, and 4-foot wide sidewalk on one side of the streets.
141
Case No: TM-17-003 (Val Vista Subdivision) Date: November 10, 2017 Page: 3
Pedestrian circulation is accommodated by 4-foot wide sidewalks along one side of the private streets. These connect to the sidewalk on Oxbow Bend which has 10-foot sidewalks on both sides. Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA): Under MMC 9-9-6(C)(7) If there is a master planned community with an overall TIA, another TIA will not be required for each phase, unless some portion of the original TIA is no longer valid due to changes in the standards or community. Nevertheless, the city may request a category 1 study for each phase if it has reason to think the target levels of service at driveways and intersections may be compromised. (Ord. 489, 127-2015) The subdivision will generate approximately 1,420 vehicle trips per day (10 per household) using the ITE Trip Generation Manual rates. While this is not an age-restricted community, there is a high elderly component to this PUD. It may, therefore, generate less traffic than the standard for a single-family subdivision. Also, with two points of entry / exit, it is not anticipated that either intersection will drop below a Level of Service C. Therefore, no Traffic Impact Analysis will be required. Improvement Plans: Improvement plans are required for the streets, utilities, and grading and drainage. Landscaping plans for common areas are to be to be submitted with the improvement plans. Landscaping plans need to be reviewed and approved, prior to the signing of the final map. Street Names/ Addressing Addressing must comply with the City’s Street Naming and Addressing Policy. Street names and lot addresses will be reviewed and approved with the improvement drawings prior to Final Map approval. Street names should contain a suffix that denotes some type of right-of-way such as: Lane, Way, Trail, Avenue, etc. Previous Staff & Council Action On May 23, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 342, amending the Mesquite Estates Development Agreement by clarifying the intent of certain grading and open space standards in the Exhibit "C" Design Standards. On November 9, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 310, which adopted the Mesquite Estates Development Agreement, Master Plan and Design Standards Handbook. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Tentative Map Case No. TM-17-003, subject to staff recommendations and Standard Conditions: Building Department 1. Meet all applicable Building Codes and Standard Conditions.
142
Case No: TM-17-003 (Val Vista Subdivision) Date: November 10, 2017 Page: 4
Engineering Department 1. Comply with all corrections noted in the City Engineer’s letter dated October 6, 2017. Planning and Environmental Resources 1. Meet all applicable Zoning Codes and Standard Conditions. 2. Provide additional private open space to conform to the standard of 518 square feet per dwelling. 3. Provide public utility easements along property lines (10’ front, 5’ side, 3’ rear) 4. Street names shall contain a suffix such as: Avenue, Trail, Lane, Way etc. Public Works 1. Standard Conditions as applicable. 2. Mesquite Heights Road to be installed consistently with the same design that has been constructed adjacent to Stone Haven. Sanitation 1. Standard Conditions as applicable. Solid Waste 1. All services will be provided by residential 90 gallon container automated system. Fire & Rescue Department 1. No Concerns Police Department 1. No Concerns.
143
Case No: TM-17-003 (Val Vista Subdivision) Date: November 10, 2017 Page: 5
Appendix A – Excerpt from Mesquite Municipal Code Section 9-6-4: TENTATIVE MAPS: H. Guidelines for Planning Commission or City Council Decision: The planning commission or city council shall consider the following criteria in making a recommendation on the tentative map: 1. Environmental and Health Laws: The application conforms with environmental and health laws and regulations concerning water and air pollution, the disposal of solid waste, facilities to supply water, community or public sewage disposal and, where applicable, individual systems for sewage disposal; 2. Water Availability: The applicant has shown the availability of water which meets applicable health standards and is sufficient for the reasonably foreseeable needs of the subdivision; 3. Public Utilities: The site is served, or will be served at the time of development, with all necessary public utilities, including, but not limited to, water, sewer, gas, electric and telephone service; 4. Location: The site is located in an area of the city that is appropriate for current development activity and which will not contribute to the need for inefficient extensions and expansions of public facilities, utilities and services; 5. Public Services: The applicant has shown the availability and accessibility of public services such as schools, police and fire protection, transportation, recreation and parks; 6. Development Pattern: The site represents an overall development pattern that is consistent with the goals and policies of the master plan, the official map, the capital improvements program and any other applicable planning documents adopted by the city; 7. Conformance: The site and application conform to all applicable provisions of these regulations. If these regulations are inconsistent with the master plan, these regulations shall take precedence; however, city staff shall be instructed to make such recommendations as will be necessary to bring these regulations into compliance with the master plan; 8. Effect on Streets: The application considers the effect of the proposed subdivision on existing public streets and the need for new streets or highways to serve the subdivision;
144
Case No: TM-17-003 (Val Vista Subdivision) Date: November 10, 2017 Page: 6
9. Street Design: The tentative map shows the location, spacing and design of proposed streets, curb cuts and intersections, all of which are consistent with good traffic engineering design principles; 10. Access: Each lot in the map of a residential development has adequate and safe access to/from a local street. If lot access is to/from a collector or arterial street, the planning commission, or city council if there is no planning commission, shall expressly find that such access is safe and that no other lot access or subdivision configuration is feasible; 11. Site Layout: The site contains a parcel, lot and land subdivision layout that is consistent with good land planning and site engineering design principles; 12. Development Sensitive to Environment: The site will be laid out and developed in a manner that is sensitive to environmental features and/or characteristics of the tract or parcel, including, but not limited to, topography, slope, soils, geology, hydrology, floodplains, wetlands, vegetation and trees; 13. Dedications and Improvements: The applicant agrees to dedicate and improve land, right of way and easements, as may be determined to be needed to effectuate the purposes of these regulations and the standards and requirements incorporated herein; 14. Other Recommendations and Comments: The recommendations and comments of those entities reviewing the tentative map pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes chapter 278; 15. Submission Requirements Satisfied: All relevant and applicable submission requirements have been satisfied in a timely manner.
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
City Council Agenda Item 10 Submitted by: Richard Secrist Submitting Department: Development Services Meeting Date: November 28, 2017
Subject: Consideration of Tentative Map Case No. TM-17-002 (Falcon Ridge Parkway Commercial) to merge four lots into a one-lot commercial subdivision on 82.5 acres at the southwest corner of Falcon Ridge Parkway and Bertha Howe Avenue, in the Hotel Tourist (HT) and General Commercial (CR-2) Zones. - Public Hearing - Discussion and Possible Action Recommendation: Open the public hearing for comment, and approve Tentative Map Case No. TM-17-002, subject to staff recommendations Petitioner: Richard Secrist, Development Services Director Is this a budgeted item? No Fiscal Impact: None Background: The applicants are proposing to merge four lots into a one-lot commercial subdivision on 60.6 acres. (The map was revised to include only the CR-2 and HT zoned parcels, and delete the MF-4 that was inadvertently included in the original) This commercial subdivision is being proposed on the old Barcelona Properties site. Once all the improvements have been made to the adjoining streets and a final map has been submitted and approved, the applicant will be able to sell off pads / parcels by meets and bounds descriptions for commercial development. While the future tenants for these sites have not been disclosed at this time, they will be commercial uses allowed in the HT and CR-2 zones. Attachments: TM-17-002_StaffMemo.doc TM-17-002_App&Plans.pdf
152
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
Richard Secrist, Development Services Director
DATE:
October 24, 2017
RE:
Consideration of Tentative Map Case No. TM-17-002 (Falcon Ridge Parkway Commercial) to merge four lots into a one-lot commercial subdivision on 82.5 acres at the southwest corner of Falcon Ridge Parkway and Bertha Howe Avenue, in the Hotel Tourist (HT) and General Commercial (CR-2) Zones.
Background The applicants are proposing to merge four lots into a one-lot commercial subdivision on approximately 60.6 acres. The original application and legal description show a total of 82.5 acres. However, they inadvertently included about 22 acres of High Density Residential land. The applicant’s engineer has revised the map and legal description to only include the lands zoned General Commercial (CR-2) and Hotel Tourist (HT). The high density residential zoning is on the west side of their property next to Willis Carrier Canyon, across from Deep Roots Harvest, and it has now been excluded from the map. This commercial subdivision is being proposed on the old Barcelona Properties site. Once all the improvements have been made to the adjoining streets and a final map has been submitted and approved, the applicant will be able to sell off pads / parcels by meets and bounds descriptions for commercial development.
153
Case No: TM-17-002 (Falcon Ridge Comm. Subdivision) Date: November 10, 2017 Page: 2
While the future tenants for these sites have not been disclosed at this time, they will be commercial uses allowed in the HT and CR-2 zones. The Hotel Tourist Zone has a minimum lot size of 2 acres, and there is no minimum lot size in the General Commercial Zone.
Key Facts
Current Zoning: Hotel Tourist (HT) and General Commercial (CR-2) Surrounding Zoning and Uses North – Mesa View Hospital and vacant land; Commercial Hospital Services (CH) East – Gonzo Mesa Business Park; General Commercial (CR-2) West – Vacant; High Density Multi-Family Residential (MF-4) South – Mesquite Ford Auto Mall; General Commercial (CR-2)
Tentative Map Approval Criteria Please refer to Appendix “A” for the excerpt from Mesquite Municipal Code (MMC) Section 9-64. Subsection H sets forth guidelines and criteria for City Council decisions on tentative maps. Analysis Lot Standards: This is a one-lot commercial subdivision on 11.17 acres. The minimum lot size in the HT zone is 2 acres. The owners may parcel of other lots as time goes on, or they may choose to keep ownership of the entire tract and lease out pads for further commercial development. General public utility easements for the subdivision are not shown, but will be required. Other existing utility and access easements are shown. Circulation: Direct vehicular access to the lot is from Pioneer Boulevard, Berth Howe Avenue, and Falcon Ridge Parkway. Provision will have to be made for pedestrian circulation (sidewalk) to and from the site on Bertha Howe Ave, Falcon Ridge Parkway, and Pioneer Blvd. along with street paving and curb and gutter on Pioneer. Open Space: As future pads/parcels are sold off for development, those projects will be required to apply for Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval. As a part of that process, 15% of each site must be developed as landscaped open space. Circulation: The Val Vista Subdivision is accessed from Mesquite Heights Road and Windgate Drive, both public streets. Interior circulation to lots is provided by a two connecting loop streets. These are 41-foot rights-of-way with two 18-foot travel lanes, curb and gutter, and 4-foot wide sidewalk on one side of the streets. Pedestrian circulation is accommodated by 4-foot wide sidewalks along one side of the private streets. These connect to the sidewalk on Oxbow Bend which has 10-foot sidewalks on both sides. Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA): Under MMC 9-9-6(C)(7) If there is a master planned community with an overall TIA, another TIA will not be required for each phase, unless some portion of the original TIA is no longer valid due to changes in the standards or community. The Solstice Master Planned Development did submit an overall TIA. And while the property will
154
Case No: TM-17-002 (Falcon Ridge Comm. Subdivision) Date: November 10, 2017 Page: 3
now, undoubtedly develop much differently, the surrounding arterial and collector streets are designed to accommodate commercial traffic from this site. Therefore, no additional traffic impact study will be required. Improvement Plans: Improvement plans are required for the streets, utilities, and grading and drainage. Landscaping plans for common areas are to be to be submitted with the improvement plans. Landscaping plans need to be reviewed and approved, prior to the signing of the final map. Street Names/ Addressing Addressing must comply with the City’s Street Naming and Addressing Policy. Lot addresses will be reviewed and approved with the improvement drawings prior to Final Map approval. Previous Staff & Council Action On March 11, 2008 the City Council approved (5-0) Tentative Map Case No. TM-08-001 (Solstice Commercial Subdivision) on 42.39 acres, located at the northwest corner of Falcon Ridge Parkway and Pioneer Boulevard and a portion within the Falcon Ridge PUD.
On March 27, 2007 the City Council approved Bill No. 375 adopting that certain Development Agreement between the City of Mesquite and Barcelona Partners LLC (Solstice Resort). On August 22, 2006 the City Council approved Barcelona Partner's petition to designate 23.84 acres of their property as a Gaming Enterprise District. On February 28, 2006, the City Council approved a Zone Change and Master Plan Amendment for an approximate 136 acre portion of the I 77 acre land area to be developed by Barcelona Partners LLC as "Hotel Tourist," "General Commercial," "High Density Multi-Family" and "RV/Motor Home" by Resolution oflntent No. 424. On January 24, 2006, the land purchase offer was accepted by the City Council for an approximate 132 acre portion of the 177 acre site to be developed by Barcelona Partners LLC. This included property A and Band C as described below: Property A is a part of the 1996 Amended Land Act and was acquired through BLM sale in January 2003. Property B was formerly the location of the City of Mesquite Rodeo Grounds. The former rodeo grounds received a zone change from Public Facility (PF) to Commercial-General CR-2 at the October 22, 2002 City Council Meeting. Property C is part of the Falcon Ridge PUD, which was approved by Council on August 27, 1999. Both properties Band Care part of the 1986 Mesquite Land Act. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of Tentative Map Case No. TM-17-003, subject to staff recommendations and Standard Conditions: Building Department 1. Meet all applicable Building Codes and Standard Conditions.
155
Case No: TM-17-002 (Falcon Ridge Comm. Subdivision) Date: November 10, 2017 Page: 4
Engineering Department 1. Comply with all corrections noted in the City Engineer’s letter dated October 6, 2017. Planning and Environmental Resources 1. Meet all applicable Zoning Codes and Standard Conditions. 2. Provide public utility easements along property lines. 3. Lot addresses shall be submitted with the civil improvement plans and approved prior to Final Map approval. Public Works 1. Standard Conditions as applicable. 2. All off-site improvements will be installed on Falcon Ridge Parkway, Pioneer Blvd, and Bertha Howe Avenue for this commercial subdivision. 3. Willis Carrier improvements will be addressed by Off-Site Agreement for existing and the future proposed roadway. Sanitation 1. Standard Conditions as applicable. Solid Waste 1. Trash enclosures will be required on this project, they need to be designed to City of Mesquite Standards and all locations need to be approved by the Public Works Department before approval of construction plans. 2. Locations are recommended for card board recycle bins throughout this commercial subdivision and bin enclosure will also be required for these bins. Fire & Rescue Department 1. No Concerns Police Department 1. No Concerns.
156
Case No: TM-17-002 (Falcon Ridge Comm. Subdivision) Date: November 10, 2017 Page: 5
Appendix A – Excerpt from Mesquite Municipal Code Section 9-6-4: TENTATIVE MAPS: H. Guidelines for Planning Commission or City Council Decision: The planning commission or city council shall consider the following criteria in making a recommendation on the tentative map: 1. Environmental and Health Laws: The application conforms with environmental and health laws and regulations concerning water and air pollution, the disposal of solid waste, facilities to supply water, community or public sewage disposal and, where applicable, individual systems for sewage disposal; 2. Water Availability: The applicant has shown the availability of water which meets applicable health standards and is sufficient for the reasonably foreseeable needs of the subdivision; 3. Public Utilities: The site is served, or will be served at the time of development, with all necessary public utilities, including, but not limited to, water, sewer, gas, electric and telephone service; 4. Location: The site is located in an area of the city that is appropriate for current development activity and which will not contribute to the need for inefficient extensions and expansions of public facilities, utilities and services; 5. Public Services: The applicant has shown the availability and accessibility of public services such as schools, police and fire protection, transportation, recreation and parks; 6. Development Pattern: The site represents an overall development pattern that is consistent with the goals and policies of the master plan, the official map, the capital improvements program and any other applicable planning documents adopted by the city; 7. Conformance: The site and application conform to all applicable provisions of these regulations. If these regulations are inconsistent with the master plan, these regulations shall take precedence; however, city staff shall be instructed to make such recommendations as will be necessary to bring these regulations into compliance with the master plan; 8. Effect on Streets: The application considers the effect of the proposed subdivision on existing public streets and the need for new streets or highways to serve the subdivision;
157
Case No: TM-17-002 (Falcon Ridge Comm. Subdivision) Date: November 10, 2017 Page: 6
9. Street Design: The tentative map shows the location, spacing and design of proposed streets, curb cuts and intersections, all of which are consistent with good traffic engineering design principles; 10. Access: Each lot in the map of a residential development has adequate and safe access to/from a local street. If lot access is to/from a collector or arterial street, the planning commission, or city council if there is no planning commission, shall expressly find that such access is safe and that no other lot access or subdivision configuration is feasible; 11. Site Layout: The site contains a parcel, lot and land subdivision layout that is consistent with good land planning and site engineering design principles; 12. Development Sensitive to Environment: The site will be laid out and developed in a manner that is sensitive to environmental features and/or characteristics of the tract or parcel, including, but not limited to, topography, slope, soils, geology, hydrology, floodplains, wetlands, vegetation and trees; 13. Dedications and Improvements: The applicant agrees to dedicate and improve land, right of way and easements, as may be determined to be needed to effectuate the purposes of these regulations and the standards and requirements incorporated herein; 14. Other Recommendations and Comments: The recommendations and comments of those entities reviewing the tentative map pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes chapter 278; 15. Submission Requirements Satisfied: All relevant and applicable submission requirements have been satisfied in a timely manner.
158
159
160
161
162
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TOGETHER WITH ALL OF PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN BY MAP THEREOF IN FILE 101, PAGE 49 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE CLARK COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, NEVADA.
IRR
TENTATIVE MAP
ALL OF PARCEL 2 AS SHOWN BY MAP THEREOF IN FILE 100, PAGE 25 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE CLARK COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, NEVADA.
FOR 36 16
" EX 42
1647
EX FIRE HYDRANT D
D
1646 1645 1644 1643 1642 1641
D
D
DATE:
00' 05. W 6 " 7 '1 4
3060 E. POST ROAD, #110 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89120 PH: 702.521.3355 FX: 702.891.5397
CONSULTING INC.
1644
SD
SS
SS
SD
SS
SD
°4 N15
00'
RIETZ
16
1648
1643
SS
SD
05. W 6 " 7 '1 4
W
" E 24 EX DG RI IC) N UBL CO (P
54
B 3 TM
X6
L FA
5.74 ACRES
°4
16
0
1655
SD
SD
D= 20°29'24" R= 1745.52' L= 624.23' T=315.49'
163
139.82' N5°18'41"W
SS
SS
SD
169 5 169 4
SS
98
SS
16
SD SD
SS
91
100
S
IRR
NOT A PART PARCEL 2
0
W
16
R Y WE W PK
SE
52
C PV
N15
16
R TE WA VC
53 D= 18°57'47" 16 R= 386.66' L= 127.97' T=64.58'
X9
6" P
81
X2
50
100
1 163
16
56 16
SCALE: 1" = 100'
1 EX
X10
W
16
IRR
X9 82
D= 11°45'46" R= 1040.00' L= 213.51' T=107.13'
EX FIRE HYDRANT
ER EW CS
D
83 16
" PV
D
24 EX
SD
I RR
D
SD
12"
X9
' 120
1641
1 W 5 " 3 4 ' 15 S74°
1642
4
D
D
P " HD EX 60 D ' S 8.53
1650
8 16
S
SD
D
D D
1651
SD
89 16
EX 8" PVC SEWER
S D
S
ORMSD E ST P D ORM SD EX 60" H E ST P D "H EX 60
S
ORM E ST SD
1653
90 16
W
SD
D
X7
X10
1652
TOR M
EX 12" PVC WATER
7
0" H DPE S
EX 60" H DPE ST W SD ORM
6 16
EX 6
S
68 16 69 16 70 16 71 16 72 16 73 16
D
D
64 16 65 16 66 16
D D
S
S
SD ' 0 13.5 4 W EX FIRE " 3 '4 15 S74° HYDRANT
9
W
(PU
D
X8
164
S
52
W
B
W
16
D
D
HA H ERT BLIC)
D
53 16 54 16 55 16 56 16 57 16 0' 8 58 16 59 16 60 16 61 16 62 16 63 16
EX FIRE HYDRANT
D S
SD
S
16
EX
EX FIRE HYDRANT
D
E
AV E W O W
34
IRR
16
96
REV:
D
2' 24.4 SD 3 W D= 87°53'46" " 15'43 ° 4 7 R= 25.00' S L= 38.35' T=24.10'
ER WATW ER C V SEW 2" P C 1 V P X " E EX 8
97
D D
D
SD
W
" 18 M EX TOR S
A TM3
S
S
W
D
D
1699
EX FIRE HYDRANT
33
1648
164 9
1650
1 165
EX 12'X8' DOUBLE RCB
IRR
(A 1 LOT COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION)
M STOR 5 3 16
EXCLUDING THE AREA ZONED MF-4 CONTAINING 60.6 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SD
FALCON RIDGE
SS
TOGETHER WITH ALL PARCELS 22 AND 23 AS SHOWN BY FILE 3, PAGE 14 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE CLARK COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, NEVADA, AND THAT PORTION VACATED BY THAT CERTAIN "ORDER TO VACATE AND ABANDON" RECORDED DECEMBER 20, 2000, IN BOOK 20001220 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 01270, THAT WOULD PASS THROUGH BY OPERATION OF LAW.
16
DESCRIPTION:
THOSE PORTIONS OF THE EAST HALF (21) OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 70 EAST, M.D.M., CITY OF MESQUITE, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
36
R
R
D
SD
23
S
AT
EX
D
C
W
" X8
4
PV
ER
W SE
D
D= 2°46'27" R= 2060.00'
EASEMENT
STREET LIGHT BOX SERVICE POLE
EXST MINOR CONTOUR LINE
GUY WIRE
EXST SCREEN WALL AS INDICATED
TRANSFORMER
EXST EDGE OF PAVEMENT
STREET LIGHT CABINET STREET LIGHT
EXST EDGE OF SIDEWALK TS
SD
EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN HERON ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN HEREON. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES NOT SHOWN IN THEIR PROPER LOCATION.
EXST STORM DRAIN "L" TYPE CURB "A" TYPE CURB EDGE OF SIDEWALK
TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX
ENGINEER / LAND SURVEYOR RIETZ CONSULTING INC. ERIC RIETZ, P.E., P.L.S. 3060 E. POST ROAD, #110 LAS VEGAS, NV 89120 TEL.: (702) 521-3355 [email protected]
VD
ER
BL
E
ON
Exp: 12/31/17
CIVIL
AY W H IG
PI
US
15
SHEET
H
TM1 SHEET
VICINITY MAP
ERIC J. RIETZ No.1635 0
Y
EXST MAJOR CONTOUR LINE
W PK
DISCLAIMER NOTE:
SL
NORTH NOT TO SCALE E
4. 10' MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER LINES AND SEWER LINES TO BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES
ELECTRICAL MANHOLE
VE
DG RI
NORTH 00°47'57" WEST - BEING THE BEARING OF THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE1/4) OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 70 EAST, M.D.M., CITY OF MESQUITE, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, AS SHOWN BY MAP THEREOF IN FILE 101, PAGE 49 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE CLARK COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, NEVADA.
E
WE A
A HO
TH BER
ON
BASIS OF BEARING
1600 1601
CABLE TV BOX
OWNER/DEVELOPER FALCON RIDGE PKWY LLC 2711 E. SAHARA AVE. LAS VEGAS, NV 89104 [email protected]
EER - S GI N TA N E
PROJECT LOCATION LC FA
EXST "A" TYPE CURB
3. POWER SERVICE PROVIDED BY: OVERTON POWER DISTRICT 731 TURTLEBACK RD. MESQUTE, NV 89027 (702) 346-5710
6. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL TO MEET CITY OF MESQUITE STANDARDS.
FIBER BOX
CATV
EXST "L" TYPE CURB
5. CONCRETE ENCASE SEWER LINE TO 10' ON BOTH SIDES OF WATER LINE CROSSING PER C.C. SANITATION DIST. DESIGN STANDARD DWG. NO SD-20.
TELEPHONE MANHOLE
FESSIONAL PRO
CENTER LINE
TELEPHONE BOX
T
WILLIS CARRIER CYN
PROPERTY LINE
STORM MANHOLE
OF NEVADA TE
1. WATER SERVICE PROVIDED BY: VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 500 RIVERSIDE ROAD MESQUITE, NEVADA 89027 (702) 346-5731
D
JOHN DEERE DR
RIGHT-OF-WAY
EXISTING T
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
F
GENERAL NOTES
DATE:
LEGEND
SCALE:
EX 5 BARREL BOX CULVERT
EJR
1638
1637
D
1"=100'
E
CHECKED:
° 51
C PV
NJL
"E
.0
" 14
DRAFTER:
5 0'0
5 31
0'
W
11-09-2017
N1
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET TM2 N
2. SEWER SERVICE PROVIDED BY: MESQUITE CITY SANITATION DEPARTMENT 10 E. MESQUITE BLVD MESQUITE, NEVADA 89027 (702) 346-5295
FALCON RIDGE MESQUITE, NEVADA 002-13-501-006, 002-13-601-001 & 002, 002-13-701-001
7
IR
4
16
1635
1644
1645
1648
1649
1651
1652
TENTATIVE MAP
147.99'
IR
162
D= 90°00'00" R= 25.00' L= 39.27' T=25.00'
SS
1677
162
SS
7
1636
163
1638
1639
0
164
1667
W D
1641
2
9'
R D
164
1643
66
66.8 W 1 " 9 '3 4°25
" IR
'
16 25
S
P:\FALCON RIDGE IN MESQUITE\C3D\TENTATIVE\TENTATIVE MAP.dwg - 11/9/2017 11:57 AM
EX FIRE HYDRANT
12
55
N6°30'28"W
SS
EX
0.
1646
7 164
16
1669
0 167
1672
1673
16 71
1655
1668
1676
7 167 78 16
D= 14°03'39" R= 638.72' L= 156.75' T=78.77'
X2
59
0
7
1654
"W
X5 165
1653
'55
1652
168
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
19
8°
6 162
1678
'
50 413. W " 15'43 S74°
1634
ER AT
S
N3
1694
1679
W
21.9 ACRES (MF-4 ZONING)
EX FIRE HYDRANT
VC
NOT A PART
X3
60.6 ACRES
1635
"P 16
LOT 1
D= 12°14'44" R= 447.02' L= 95.54' T=47.95'
EX
IR
R
SS
16
1
OF
3
SHEETS
163 WILLIS CARRIER CYN
JOHN DEERE DR
168 6
N2°47'50"W 500.00'
1
VICINITY MAP
163
71
LEGEND
SS
16
SS
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
48 16
EXST "L" TYPE CURB EXST "A" TYPE CURB
SS
163
16
35 SS
1639
163 6
S
SS
SS
SS
0
SS
34 16
3060 E. POST ROAD, #110 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89120 PH: 702.521.3355 FX: 702.891.5397
3 163 32 16
EX FIRE HYDRANT
1600 1601
33
165
Y
169 8 1699
W
(PUBLIC)
PK
WILLIS CARRIER CYN
E
DG
4
EASEMENT
16
43 16
1642
45
16
4 164
HI
163
W
W
120'
8 164
46 16
1
649
47
SS
50
16 49
16
6
47 16
45 16 44 16
16 4
EX 10" PVC SEWER
16
S
15
CENTER LINE
W
W
US
S
W W
AY
W GH
PROPERTY LINE
1
" PVC WAT EX 16 W
R
P
4 66
D
D
EE
N IO
16
O PI
S
D
EX FIRE HYDRANT
VD
BL
RIGHT-OF-WAY
N87°12'10"E 88.00'
D
RI
1664 1663
NORTH NOT TO SCALE
ON
D= 38°18'32" R= 800.00' L= 534.89' T=277.88' 65 16
HOW
35
R LIC E B NE(PU
C 3 TM
SS
52
1665
1
C PV " 0
ER
W SE
PROJECT LOCATION
E E AV
)
6
6 16
AT S
DESCRIPTION: DATE: REV:
S
LC
W
16
70 16 669 68 1 6 67 1 16
VD L B
X4
EX
W
CONSULTING INC.
RIETZ
1622
1623
1624 1626
1627
1628
W
FALCON RIDGE MESQUITE, NEVADA 002-13-501-006, 002-13-601-001 & 002, 002-13-701-001
1644 1649
1650
165
1
4 165
165 5
C PV
FA
1670
W
" 16
C PV
EX 5 BARREL BOX CULVERT
EXST MAJOR CONTOUR LINE EXST MINOR CONTOUR LINE
TENTATIVE MAP
1667
R IR
1635
9' 166.8
"W 25'39 N14°
SS
1656
EX
" 10
'
83
EX
1671
165 1 16 50 1649
W
EX FIRE HYDRANT
D
E
1625
1658 165 7
C PV
THA
N87°12'10"E 91.22'
C PV
1629
.56 327
8 N4
2 168
67 16 6 166
" X8
1 162
EX 8" PVC SEWER
" 16
W SE
0' 12
'
70
16
5 6 97 94 169 169 16 6 1
1685
70 16
5 170 04 3 17 170 702 01 1 17
SS W
69 16
S
W
W
ER
EX FIRE HYDRANT
S
1684
87 116688
8
166
EX FIRE HYDRANT
16 16 76 7 16 5 74 16 73 167 2
D
R
WE SE
S
BER
1667
E
AT
SS
4
EX
"E '38 3 °5
C
W
AT
X4
. 61 1 1
SD
SS
4 16
EX 10" C-900 PVC WAT
1637
1638
39
40 16
1641
1642
W
W
0"W 1'4 5°3 N2
50'
D= 2°46'27" R= 2060.00' L= 99.74' T=49.88'
47
59
16
89 16
60 16 1661
1690
52 16
06 17
1687
1645
16
1
53
16
PV
D
8
9 16
10 709 1708 707 1 17 1
SS W
1688
6 166
65 16
164
60.6 ACRES
' .90 139
1692
LOT 1
6 164
1693
0"W 1'4 5°3 N2
4 169
D TM3
X5 1643
1695
SS
W
S
5 31
1° N5
16
1697
W
X9
4" X1
'0 40
D= 20°58'14" R= 475.64' L= 174.09' T=88.03'
21.9 ACRES (MF-4 ZONING)
D
SS
E 5"
6
NOT A PART
4
0' .0
MATCH LINE SEE SHEET TM1
S
9 16
162
D= 90°00'00" R= 25.00' L= 39.27' T=25.00'
23 16
1636
1669
7 163
1638
1639
66 16
0 164
SS
2
1641
164
D
0
167
1672
1673
16 71
D
1655
1668
1676
7 167 78 16
D= 14°03'39" R= 638.72' L= 156.75' T=78.77'
1643
7 168
1654
EXST SCREEN WALL AS INDICATED EXST EDGE OF PAVEMENT
SCALE: 1" = 100'
1637
EXST EDGE OF SIDEWALK
8
EXST STORM DRAIN
SD
100
50
0
100 "L" TYPE CURB
EX FIRE HYDRANT
"A" TYPE CURB
ELECTRICAL MANHOLE STREET LIGHT BOX
X3
SERVICE POLE GUY WIRE
GENERAL NOTES 1. WATER SERVICE PROVIDED BY: VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 500 RIVERSIDE ROAD MESQUITE, NEVADA 89027 (702) 346-5731
X5 X6 X7
TS
TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX
BASIS OF BEARING NORTH 00°47'57" WEST - BEING THE BEARING OF THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE1/4) OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 13 SOUTH, RANGE 70 EAST, M.D.M., CITY OF MESQUITE, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, AS SHOWN BY MAP THEREOF IN FILE 101, PAGE 49 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE CLARK COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, NEVADA.
4. 10' MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER LINES AND SEWER LINES TO BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES
DISCLAIMER NOTE:
6. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL TO MEET CITY OF MESQUITE STANDARDS.
EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN HERON ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE EXACT VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE THAT ALL EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN HEREON. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR UTILITIES NOT SHOWN IN THEIR PROPER LOCATION.
1"=100'
EER - S GI N TA N E
STREET LIGHT
3. POWER SERVICE PROVIDED BY: OVERTON POWER DISTRICT 731 TURTLEBACK RD. MESQUTE, NV 89027 (702) 346-5710
5. CONCRETE ENCASE SEWER LINE TO 10' ON BOTH SIDES OF WATER LINE CROSSING PER C.C. SANITATION DIST. DESIGN STANDARD DWG. NO SD-20.
STREET LIGHT CABINET
FESSIONAL PRO
2. SEWER SERVICE PROVIDED BY: MESQUITE CITY SANITATION DEPARTMENT 10 E. MESQUITE BLVD MESQUITE, NEVADA 89027 (702) 346-5295
TRANSFORMER
X4
SCALE:
E SL
EJR
CABLE TV BOX
CHECKED:
FIBER BOX
CATV
NJL
TELEPHONE MANHOLE
DRAFTER:
T
TELEPHONE BOX
T
F
STORM MANHOLE
ERIC J. RIETZ
OF NEVADA TE
P:\FALCON RIDGE IN MESQUITE\C3D\TENTATIVE\TENTATIVE MAP.dwg - 11/9/2017 11:57 AM
X2
D
DATE:
EXISTING
11-09-2017
EDGE OF SIDEWALK
Exp: 12/31/17
CIVIL No.1635 0
X8
X9
SHEET
TM2
X10
SHEET
2
OF
3
SHEETS
164 BERTHA HOWE AVE (PUBLIC) CL
R/W
PL
40'
40'
PL 60'
R/W
DESCRIPTION:
50' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT
FALCON RIDGE PKWY (PUBLIC) CL 60'
100' PULSIPHER WASH EASEMENT
10' PUBLIC UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT
EXISTING SIDEWALK
17' PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT
EXISTING GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
DATE:
EXISTING ASPHALT
EXISTING ASPHALT
EXISTING ASPHALT
EXISTING GRADE
EXISTING SIDEWALK
B -
(NTS)
PIONEER BLVD (PUBLIC) CL
PL 60'
REV:
EAST PROPERTY LINE (NTS)
3060 E. POST ROAD, #110 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89120 PH: 702.521.3355 FX: 702.891.5397
NORTH PROPERTY LINE
A -
RIETZ
EXISTING CURB
EXISTING CURB
EXISTING CURB
CONSULTING INC.
EXISTING CURB
PL R/W
NOT A PART
LOT 1
60'
EXISTING GRADE 20' EXISTING GRADE
WEST PROPERTY LINE (NTS)
NJL DRAFTER:
DATE:
FESSIONAL PRO
EER - S GI N TA N E
ERIC J. RIETZ
OF NEVADA TE
P:\FALCON RIDGE IN MESQUITE\C3D\TENTATIVE\TENTATIVE MAP.dwg - 11/9/2017 11:57 AM
NA
D -
11-09-2017
(NTS)
SCALE:
SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
EJR
EXISTING CURB
FALCON RIDGE MESQUITE, NEVADA 002-13-501-006, 002-13-601-001 & 002, 002-13-701-001
EXISTING SIDEWALK
EXISTING ASPHALT
C -
EXISTING GRADE
TENTATIVE MAP DETAILS
EXISTING GRADE
CHECKED:
EXISTING ASPHALT
Exp: 12/31/17
CIVIL No.1635 0
SHEET
TM3 SHEET
3
OF
3
SHEETS
City Council Agenda Item 11 Submitted by: Tracy Beck Submitting Department: City Manager Meeting Date: November 28, 2017
Subject: Public Comment Recommendation:
Petitioner: Andy Barton, City Manager Is this a budgeted item? No Fiscal Impact:
Background:
Attachments:
165
City Council Agenda Item 12 Submitted by: Tracy Beck Submitting Department: City Manager Meeting Date: November 28, 2017
Subject: Adjournment Recommendation:
Petitioner: Andy Barton, City Manager Is this a budgeted item? No Fiscal Impact:
Background:
Attachments:
166
