Facilities Committee Meeting SCUSD Maintenance Yard 425 1st Avenue Sacramento, CA 95818
Minutes October 27, 2016 Special Facilities Committee Meeting 1.0 Welcome/Call to Order – 4:38pm. 2.0 Roll Call/Establish Quorum Members Present: Members Hansen and Pritchett Members Absent: Member Arroyo Staff Present: Cathy Allen, Jim Dobson, Elena Hankard, Amna Javed, Nathaniel Browning Quorum established. Public Comment None 3.0 Approval of Agenda Motion by: Member Pritchett
Second by: Member Hansen
That the agenda be approved as presented. 4.0 Approval of Minutes October 10, 2016 – Regular Meeting Motion by: Member Pritchett
Second by: Member Hansen
That the minutes be approved as presented. 5.0 Old Marshall Review Committee Ranking and Next Steps Three proposals for the development of the Old Marshall development were received. The proposal screening committee was comprised of the following participants: Ellen Cochrane, George Raya, Tom Quasebarth, Cathy Allen, Jim Dobson, and Nathaniel Browning. The screening committee unanimously voted to move forward with the Mogavero proposal for the development of the Old Marshall site. SCUSD Board Member Ellen Cochrane described the screening process to the Facilities Committee. The review committee used a grading grid and conducted a round table discussion. The review committee realized early on that their unanimous 1st pick was the Mogavero/Bardis proposal.
Page 1
The recommendation will be taken to Closed Session on November 3, 2016. Tom Quasbarth shared that the process was a success. George Raya was pleased with their decision. He liked that Mogavero/Bardis had good experience in the development field and also that they were proposing senior housing which is what the neighborhood association was leaning towards being that it would be less intrusive to the neighborhood. Options for next steps: If the Facilities Committee is in agreement with the review committee’s recommendation, then we would take it to the full Board in Closed Session on November 3rd. Then if the full Board is in agreement with the Facilities Committee, direction can be given to the Superintendent to begin negotiations with Mogavero/Bardis. The 150 day due diligence process will begin. Due diligence is a chance for all parties to do their homework. If at the end of the 150 days the developer decides that they do not want to continue, there are two options the Board could take. 1. Go with the number 2 choice, Immanuel Housing 2. New RFP Member Pritchett: Will the building be torn down? Answer: The main building will stay and they will be adding two more buildings. The annex will be torn down. Member Pritchett: After the 99 years are up, what will happen then? Answer: There will be language in the lease that states the agreement will roll over. There can also be language in the lease to review and update terms at any given time to reflect among other things, escalation factors. Fair market value today of 16th and N is approximately $1.7m if we were to just sell it. SCUSD will in no way be the property manager of this development. This agreement will be completely different from the ones we have with Fruit Ridge and Maple lessors. Julie Murphy: SCUSD has done a wonderful job moving this process along and hopes the community will still be kept involved. Question: How does the Mogavero/Bardis proposal comply with the Education Code? Answer: Ed Code is a prescriptive direction on how to either surplus property and sell it. Ellen Cochrane would like to see the Mogavero/Bardis parties model the community outreach of Stonebridge. She would like to see early involvement from Mogavero/Bardis and community meetings. Member Hansen would like the following: A statement to the press, an email blast and a summary of the project prepared by Mogavero/Bardis. 6.0 Future Business •
Next Meeting – Regular Meeting: November 28, 2016 12:00 to 1:30pm. 425 1st Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95818
Adjourn 5:36pm. Motion by: Member Pritchett
Second by: Member Hansen
Page 2
Page 3